Hybrid simulated annealing image reconstruction for transmission tomography

References

• Cho, Z, Jones, JP, and Singh, M, 1993. Foundation of Medical Imaging. New York: Wiley; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Natterer, F, 2001. Mathematical Methods in Image Reconstruction. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Qureshi, SA, and Mirza, SM, 2005. "Inverse radon transform-based image reconstruction modalities". In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Information Technology and Appliations. Quetta. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Qureshi, SA, Mirza, SM, and Arif, M, 2007. Effect of number of projections on inverse Radon transform-based image reconstruction by using filtered back-projection for parallel beam transmission tomography, Sci. Int. 19 (2007), pp. 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Shepp, L, and Yardy, Y, 1982. Maximum likelihood reconstruction for emission tomography, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 1 (1982), pp. 113–122.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luo, D-S, and Yagle, AE, 1991. "A Kalman filtering approach to stochastic tomography". In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Toronto. 1991. pp. 2589–2592.
   Google Scholar
• Segman, J, 1992. "A new algorithm to compute the discrete inverse radon transform". In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. San Francisco, CA. 1992, III–413–416.
   Google Scholar
• Rajan, K, Patnaik, LM, and Ramakrishna, J, 1994. High-speed computation of the EM algorithm for PET image reconstruction, IEEE trans. Nucl. Sci. 41 (1994), pp. 1721–1728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, JA, and Herman, GT, 1994. "Software for evaluating image reconstruction algorithms". In: Proceedings of the IEEE 1994 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference. Vol. Vol. 4. Norfolk. 1994, 1940–1944.
   Google Scholar
• Kao, C-M, Pan, X, Chen, C-T, and Wong, WH, 1995. "Improved Bayesian image reconstruction in Positron emission tomography". In: Proceedings of the IEEE 1995 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference. Vol. Vol. 2. San Francisco, CA. 1995, 1160–1164.
   Google Scholar
• Kinahan, PE, Fessler, JA, and Karp, JS, 1997. Statistical image reconstruction in PET with compensation for missing data, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 44 (1997), pp. 1552–1557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajan, K, Patnaik, LM, and Ramakrishna, J, 1997. "High-speed image reconstruction based on CBP and Fourier inversion methods". In: Proceedings of the High Performance Computing on the Information Superhighway. Seoul. 1997. pp. 401–406.
   Google Scholar
• Lü, W, Wang, Y, and Luo, J, 1997. A new approach to medical image reconstruction, IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 16 (1997), pp. 41–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, LA, 1963. Optimality and non-scalar-valued performance criteria, IEEE Auto Control 8 (1963), pp. 59–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgiou, T, Olver, PJ, and Tannenbaum, A, 2003. Maximal entropy for reconstruction of back projection images, The IMA Vol. Math. Appl. 133 (2003), pp. 57–64.
   Google Scholar
• Mitra, A, and Banerjee, S, 2004. "A regular algorithm for real time Radon & inverse Radon transform". In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Vol. Vol. 5. Montreal. 2004, V–105–108.
   Google Scholar
• Zbijewski, W, Defrise, M, Viergever, MA, and Beekman, FJ, 2007. Statistical reconstruction for X-ray CT systems with non-continuous detectors, Phys. Med. Biol. 52 (2007), pp. 403–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metropolis, N, Rosenbluth, AW, Rosenbluth, MN, Teller, AH, and Teller, E, 1953. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines, J. Chem. Phys. 21 (1953), pp. 1087–1092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffe, WL, Ferrier, GD, and Rogers, J, 1994. Global optimization of statistical functions with simulated annealing, J. Econom. 60 (1994), pp. 65–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trosset, MW, 2001. What is simulated annealing?, Optim. Eng. 2 (2001), pp. 201–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, S, Gelatt, CD, and Vecchi, MP, 1983. Optimization by simulated annealing, Science 220 (1983), pp. 671–680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, DS, Aragon, CR, McGeoch, LA, and Schevon, C, 1989. Optimization using simulated annealing: An experimental evaluation: Part I, Oper. Res. 37 (1989), pp. 865–892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Press, WH, Teukolsky, SA, Vetterling, WT, and Flannery, BP, 2002. Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Han, D, and Chatterjee, A, 2004. "Simulation-in-the-loop analog circuit sizing method using adaptive model-based simulated annealing". In: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Workshop on System-on-Chip for Real-Time Applications. Banff. 2004. pp. 127–130.
   Google Scholar
• Geman, S, and Geman, D, 1984. Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions and the Bayesian restoration of images, IEEE T. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 6 (1984), pp. 721–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Gamal, AA, Hemachandra, LA, Shperling, I, and Wei, VK, 1987. Using simulated annealing to design good codes, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 33 (1987), pp. 116–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pai, GAV, and Sreeram, S, 2002. "Military target identification using simulated annealing". In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Neural Information Processing. Vol. 4. Singapore. 2002. pp. 2064–2068.
   Google Scholar
• Ingber, L, 1993. Simulated annealing: Practice versus theory, Math. Comp. Mode. 18 (1993), pp. 29–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaqub, M, Boellaard, R, Kropholler, MA, and Lammertsma, AA, 2006. Optimization algorithms and weighting factors for analysis of dynamic PET studies, Phys. Med. Biology 51 (2006), pp. 4217–4232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carletti, C, Meoli, P, and Cravero, WR, 2006. A modified simulated annealing algorithm for parameter determination for a hybrid virtual model, Phys. Med. Biol. 51 (2006), pp. 3941–3952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinthorne, NH, Pan, T-S, Chiao, P-C, Rogers, WL, and Stamos, JA, 1993. Preconditioning methods for improved convergence rates in iterative reconstructions, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 12 (1993), pp. 78–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusko, L, and Kuba, A, 2005. Multi-resolution method for binary tomography, Electron. Notes Discrete Math. 20 (2005), pp. 299–311.
   Google Scholar
• Kak, AC, and Slaney, M, 1988. Principles of Computerized Tomographic Imaging. New York: IEEE Press; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• White, DR, and Wambersie, A, 1999. Tissue substitutes in radiation dosimetry and measurement, International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, ICRU Report No. 61 (1999), pp. 1–132.
   Google Scholar
• Shepp, LA, and Logan, BF, 1974. The fourier reconstruction of a head section, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS-21 (1974), pp. 21–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qureshi, SA, Mirza, SM, and Arif, M, 2006. Quality of inverse radon transform-based image reconstruction using various frequency domain filters in parallel beam transmission tomography, Sci. Int. 18 (2006), pp. 181–186.
   Google Scholar
• Huesman, RH, 1977. The effects of a finite number of projection angles and finite lateral sampling of projections on the propagation of statistical errors in transverse section reconstruction, Phys. Med. Biol. 22 (1977), pp. 511–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, Y, 1995. Fractal Image Compression: Theory and Application. New York: Springer Verlag; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, R, Bender, R, and Herman, GT, 1970. Algebraic reconstruction techniques (ART) for three-dimensional electron microscopy and X-ray photography, J. Theor. Biol. 29 (1970), pp. 471–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inters, X, Ntziachrostos, V, Culver, J, Yodh, A, and Chance, B, 2001. Projection access order in algebraic reconstruction technique for diffuse optical tomography, Phys. Med. Biol. 47 (2001), pp. N1–N10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qureshi, SA, Mirza, SM, and Arif, M, 2007. Determination of optimal number of projections and parametric sensitivity analysis of operators for parallel-ray transmission tomography using hybrid continuous genetic algorithm, Int. J. Imag. Syst. Tech. 17 (2007), pp. 10–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girodias, KA, Barrett, HH, and Shoemaker, RL, 1991. Parallel simulated annealing for emission tomography, Phys. Med. Biol. 36 (1991), pp. 921–938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar