Modelling mechanical interfaces experiencing micro-slip/slap

References

• Goodman, RE, Taylor, RL, and Brekke, TL, 1968. A model for the mechanics of jointed rock, J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. 59 (1968), pp. 99–637.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, G, 1985. An isoparametric joint interface element for finite element analysis, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 21 (1985), pp. 585–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai, CS, Zaman, MM, Lightner, JG, and Siriwardane, HJ, 1984. Thin-layer element for interfaces and joints, Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 8 (1984), pp. 19–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, TD, Noruziaan, B, and Razaqpour, AG, 1998. Modeling of construction joints and shear sliding effects on earthquake response of arch dams, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 27 (1998), pp. 1013–1029.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, KG, and Desai, CS, 1992. Analysis and implementation of thin-layer element for interfaces and joints, J. Eng. Mech. 118 (1992), pp. 2442–2462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pande, GN, and Sharma, KG, 1979. On joint/interface elements and associated problems of ill-conditioning, short communications, Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 3 (1979), pp. 293–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Ahmadian, M. Ebrahimi, J.E. Mottershead, and M.I. Friswell, Identification of Bolted-joint Interface Models, International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering (ISMA), Katholieke University, Leuven, Belgium, 2002..
   Google Scholar
• H. Ahmadian, H. Jalali, J.E. Mottershead, and M.I. Friswell, Dynamic Modelling of Spot Welds using Thin-layer Interface Theory, 10th International Congress on Sound and Vibration (ICSV 10), Stockholm, Sweden, 2003..
   Google Scholar
• Ahmadian, H, Mottershead, JE, James, S, Friswell, MI, and Reece, CA, 2006. Modeling and updating of large surface-to-surface joints in the AWE-MACE structure, Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 20 (2006), pp. 868–880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Bograd, A. Schmidt, and L. Gaul, Joint Damping Prediction by Thin-layer Elements, Proceedings of IMAC XXVI: A Conference and Exposition on Structural Dynamics, Orlando, FL, 2008..
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, MH, and Gaul, L, 2007. Segment-to-segment contact elements for modeling joint interfaces in finite element analysis, Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 21 (2007), pp. 724–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalali, H, Ahmadian, H, and Mottershead, JE, 2007. Identification of nonlinear bolted lap-joint parameters by force-state mapping, Int. J. Sol. Struct. 44 (2007), pp. 8087–8105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy, JN, 1984. An Introduction to the Finite Element Method. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahimbegovic, A, Taylor, RL, and Wilson, EL, 1990. A robust quadrilateral membrane finite element with drilling degrees of freedom, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 30 (1990), pp. 445–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, Y, and Beards, CF, 1998. Identification of effective linear joints using coupling and joint identification techniques, ASME J. Vibr. Acoust. 120 (1998), pp. 331–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, WL, 2002. A new method for structural model updating and joint stiffness identification, Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 16 (2002), pp. 155–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadian, H, and Zamani, A, 2009. Identification of nonlinear boundary effects using nonlinear normal modes, Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 23 (2009), pp. 2008–2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartwigsen, CJ, Song, Y, McFarland, DM, Bergman, LA, and Vakakis, AF, 2004. Experimental study of non-linear effects in a typical shear lap joint configuration, J. Sound Vib. 277 (2004), pp. 327–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelb, A, and Vander Velde, WE, 1968. Multiple-input Describing Functions and Nonlinear System Design. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.; 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, RW, 1972. Large deformation isotropic elasticity: On the correlation of theory and experiment for incompressible rubber-like solids, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 326 (1972), pp. 565–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friswell, MI, and Mottershead, JE, 1995. Finite Element Model Updating in Structural Dynamics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• H. Grafe, Model updating of large structural dynamic models using measured response functions, Ph.D. diss., Imperial College of Science Technology and Medicine, 1998..
   Google Scholar
• H.G. Natke, On regularization method within system identification, in Inverse Problems in Engineering Mechanics: IUTAM Symposium, M. Tanaka and H.D. Bui, eds., Springer, Berlin, 1993, pp. 3–20..
   Google Scholar
• Tikhonov, AN, 1995. Numerical Methods for the Solution of Ill-posed Problems. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Tikhonov, AN, and Arsenin, VY, 1977. Solutions of Ill-posed Problems. New York: John Wiley; 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmadian, H, Mottershead, JE, and Friswell, MI, 1998. Regularization method for finite element model updating, Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 12 (1998), pp. 47–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hua, XG, Ni, YQ, and Ko, JM, 2009. Adaptive regularization parameter optimization in output-error-based finite element model updating, Mech. Syst. Sig. Process. 23 (2009), pp. 563–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar