Inversion of top of atmospheric reflectance values by conic multivariate adaptive regression splines

References

• Jankowski P. Integrating geographical information systems and multiple criteria decision-making methods. Int. J. Geog. Inf. Syst. 1995;9:251–273.10.1080/02693799508902036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nogué S, Rull V, Vegas-Vilarrúbia T. Modeling biodiversity loss by global warming on Pantepui, northern South America: projected upward migration and potential habitat loss. Clim. Change. 2009;94:77–85.10.1007/s10584-009-9554-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trotter CM. Remotely-sensed data as an information source for geographical information systems in natural resource management a review. Int. J. Geog. Inf. Syst. 1991;5:225–239.10.1080/02693799108927845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu M, Chen AS, Chen L, Lee C, Lin F, Huang C. A GIS-based decision support system for typhoon emergency response in Taiwan. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 2011;29:7–12.10.1007/s10706-010-9362-0
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelmi OV, Brunskill JC. Geographic information systems in weather, climate, and impacts. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 2003;84:1409–1414.10.1175/BAMS-84-10-1409
   Google Scholar
• Voivontas D, Assimacopoulos D, Mourelatos A, Corominas J. Evaluation of renewable energy potential using a GIS decision support system. Renewable Energy. 1998;13:333–344.10.1016/S0960-1481(98)00006-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng TQ, Zhou Q. Optimal spatial decision making using GIS: a prototype of a real estate geographical information system (REGIS). Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci. 2001;15:307–321.10.1080/136588101300304034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masser I. Managing our urban future: the role of remote sensing and geographic information systems. Habitat Int. 2001;25:503–512.10.1016/S0197-3975(01)00021-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeri O, Peled A. Geographical model for precise agriculture monitoring with real-time remote sensing. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 2009;64:47–54.10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2008.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong JS, García-Moruno L, Hernández-Blanco J. A site planning approach for rural buildings into a landscape using a spatial multi-criteria decision analysis methodology. Land Use Policy. 2013;32:108–118.10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.09.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulloch DL, Myers JR, Hasse JE, Parks PJ, Lathrop RG. Integrating GIS into farmland preservation policy and decision making. Landscape Urban Plan. 2003;63:33–48.10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00181-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coburn, TC, Yarus, JM. Geographic information systems in petroleum exploration and development (AAPG computer applications in geology, no. 4). Tulsa (OK): American Association of Petroleum Geologists; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Knox‐Robinson CM, Wyborn LAI. Towards a holistic exploration strategy: using geographic information systems as a tool to enhance exploration. Aust. J. Earth Sci. 1997;44:453–463.10.1080/08120099708728326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tso B, Mather PM. Classification methods for remotely sensed data. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Proud SR, Rasmussen MO, Fensholt R, Sandholt I, Shisanya C, Mutero W, Mbow C, Anyamba A. Improving the SMAC atmospheric correction code by analysis of Meteosat Second Generation NDVI and surface reflectance data. Remote Sens. Environ. 2010;114:1687–1698.10.1016/j.rse.2010.02.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson GP, Pukall B, Allred CL, Jeong LS, Hoke M, Chetwynd JH, Adler-Golden SM, Berk A, Bernstein LS, Richtsmeier SC, Acharya PK, Matthew MW. FLAASH and MODTRAN4: state-of-the-art atmospheric correction for hyperspectral data. In: 1999 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings. Vol. 4. Piscataway (NJ); 1999. p. 177–181.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein LS, Adler-Golden SM, Sundberg RL, Levine RY, Perkins TC, Ratkowski AJ, Felde G, Hoke ML. A new method for atmospheric correction and aerosol optical property retrieval for VIS-SWIR multi- and hyperspectral imaging sensors: QUAC (QUick atmospheric correction). In: Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2005. IGARSS '05. Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International. Vol. 5. Seoul; 2005 July 25–29. p. 3549–3552.
   Google Scholar
• Tanre D, Deroo C, Duhaut P, Herman M, Morcrette JJ, Perbos J, Deschamps PY. Technical note description of a computer code to simulate the satellite signal in the solar spectrum: the 5S code. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1990;11:659–668.10.1080/01431169008955048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards JA, Jia X. Remote sensing digital image analysis: an introduction. 4th ed. Berlin: Springer; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Gao B-C, Montes MJ, Davis CO, Goetz AFH. Atmospheric correction algorithms for hyperspectral remote sensing data of land and ocean. Remote Sens. Environ. 2009;113:S17–S24.10.1016/j.rse.2007.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermote EF, El Saleous NZ, Justice CO. Atmospheric correction of MODIS data in the visible to middle infrared: first results. Remote Sens. Environ. 2002;83:97–111.10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00089-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman H, Dedeiu G. SMAC: a simplified method for the atmospheric correction of satellite measurements in the solar spectrum. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1994;15:123–143.10.1080/01431169408954055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber G-W, Batmaz İ, Köksal G, Taylan P, Yerlikaya-Özkurt F. CMARS: a new contribution to nonparametric regression with multivariate adaptive regression splines supported by continuous optimization. Inverse Prob. Sci. Eng. 2011;20:371–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman JH. Multivariate adaptive regression splines. Ann. Stat. 1991;19:1–67.10.1214/aos/1176347963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özmen A, Kropat E, Weber G-W. Spline regression models for complex multi-modal regulatory networks. Optim. Method Softw. 2014;29:515–534. doi:10.1080/10556788.2013.821611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deichmann J, Eshghi A, Haughton D, Sayek S, Teebagy N. Application of multiple adaptive regression splines (MARS) in direct response modeling. J. Interact. Marketing. 2002;16:15–27.10.1002/dir.10040
   Google Scholar
• Krzyscin JW, Eerme K, Janouch M. Long-term variations of the UV-B radiation over Central Europe as derived from the reconstructed UV time series. Ann. Geophys. 2004;22:1473–1485.10.5194/angeo-22-1473-2004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leathwick JR, Elith J, Hastie T. Comparative performance of generalized additive models and multivariate adaptive regression splines for statistical modelling of species distributions. Ecol. Modell. 2006;199:188–196.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.05.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermote EF, Kotchenova SY, Ray JP. MODIS surface reflectance user’s guide (version. 1.3). 2011; [cited 2012 Nov 10]. Available from: http://dratmos.geog.umd.edu/products/MOD09_UserGuide_v1_3.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Proud SR, Fensholt R, Rasmussen MO, Sandholt IA. Comparison of the effectiveness of 6S and SMAC in correcting for atmospheric interference in Meteosat Second Generation images. J. Geophys. Res-Atmos, 2010. 115:( D17209)1–14. doi: 10.1029/2009JD013693.
   Google Scholar
• Vermote E, Tanre D, Deuze J, Herman M, Morcette J-J. Second simulation of the satellite signal in the solar spectrum, 6S: an overview. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 1997;35:675–686.10.1109/36.581987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MODIS level 1B product user’s guide. NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center. 2009; [cited 2013 Oct 29]. Available from: http://ccplot.org/pub/resources/Aqua/MODIS%20Level%201B%20Product%20User%20Guide.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Springer; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Taylan P, Weber G-W, Yerlikaya Özkurt FY. A new approach to multivariate adaptive regression splines by using Tikhonov regularization and continuous optimization. Top. 2010;18:377–395.10.1007/s11750-010-0155-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubanks PA, King MD, Platnick S, Pincus R. MODIS atmosphere L3 gridded product algorithm theoretical basis document (Collection 005 Version 1.1). 2008; [cited 2012 Oct 29]. Available from: http://modis-atmos.gsfc.nasa.gov/_docs/L3_ATBD_2008_12_04.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron AC, Windmeijer FAG. An R-squared measure of goodness of fit for some common nonlinear regression models. J. Econom. 1997;77:329–342.10.1016/S0304-4076(96)01818-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MARS®. Salford Systems. Available from: http://www.salfordsystems.com.
   Google Scholar
• MOSEKTM. Available from: http://www.mosek.com.
   Google Scholar
• Özmen A, Weber G-W, Batmaz İ, Kropat E. RCMARS: robustification of CMARS with different scenarios under polyhedral uncertainty set. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2011;16:4780–4787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özmen A, Weber G-W, Çavuşoğlu Z, Defterli Ö. The new robust conic GPLM method with an application to finance: prediction of credit default. J. Global Optim. 2013;56:233–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen PC. Rank-deficient and discrete Ill-posed problems: numerical aspects of linear inversion. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM; 1998.10.1137/1.9780898719697
   Google Scholar