Identification of structural parameters including crack using one dimensional PZT patch model

References

• Ghanem R, Shinozuka M. Structural-system identification I: theory. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE. 1995;121:255–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh C, See L. Identification and uncertainty estimation of structural parameters. J. Eng. Mech. ASCE. 1994;120:1219–1236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborthy S, Mukhopadhyay M. Estimation of in-plane elastic parameter and stiffner geometry of stiffened plates. J. Sound Vib. 2000;231:99–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kianian M, Golafshani AA, Ghodrati E. Damage detection of offshore jacket structures using frequency domain selective measurements. J. Mar. Sci. Appl. 2013;12:193–199.
   Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Wang L. Structural damage detection by changes in natural frequencies. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2010;21:309–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Hu N, Fukunaga H, et al. Structural damage identification using static test data and changes in frequencies. Eng. Struct. 2001;23:610–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Xin K, Qi Q. Study of structural damage detection with multi-objective function genetic algorithms. Proc. Eng. 2011;12:80–86.
   Google Scholar
• Kang JS, Park SK, Shin S, et al. Structural system identification in time domain using measured acceleration. J. Sound Vib. 2005;288:215–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandakumar P, Shankar K. Structural parameter identification using damped transfer matrix and state vectors. Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 2013;13:1250076, 27p.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh CG, Chen Y, Liaw C. A hybrid computational strategy for identification of structural parameters. Comput. Struct. 2003;81:107–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao F, Lu Y. A kalman-filter based time-domain analysis for structural damage diagnosis with noisy signals. J. Sound Vib. 2006;297:916–930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh CG, Hong B, Liaw CY. Substructural and progressive structural identification methods. Eng. Struct. 2003;25:1551–1563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varghese CK, Shankar K. Crack identification using combined power flow and acceleration matching technique. Inverse Prob. Sci. Eng. 2012;20:1239–1257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding Z, Lu Z, Huang M, et al. Improved artificial bee colony algorithm for crack identification in beam using natural frequencies only. Inverse Prob. Sci. Eng. 2016. doi: 10.1080/17415977.2016.1160391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu L, Huang L, Lu ZR. Crack identification of beam structures using homotopy continuation algorithm. Inverse Prob. Sci. Eng. 2016. doi:10.1080/17415977.2016.1141206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H. JL, Lu Z. Simultaneous identification of stiffness and damping based on derivatives of eigen-parameters. Struct. Eng. Mech. 2015;55(4):687–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gounaris GD, Papadopoulos CA, Dimarogonas AD. Crack identification in beams by coupled response measurements. Comput. Struct. 1996;58:299–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krawczuk M, Zak A, Ostachowicz W. Elastic beam finite element with a transverse elasto-plastic crack. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 2000;34:61–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viola E, Federici L, Nobile L. Detection of crack location using cracked beam element method for structural analysis. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 2001;36:23–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viola E, Nobile L, Federici L. Formulation of cracked beam element for structural analysis. J. Eng. Mech. 2002;12:220–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumant PS, Maiti SK. Crack detection in a beam using pzt-sensors. Smart Mater. Struct. 2006;15:695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukunaga H, Hu N, Chang FK. Structural damage identification using piezoelectric sensors. Inter. J. Solids Struct. 2002;39:393–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen MH. A new modeling technique for piezoelectrically actuated beams. Comput. Struct. 1995;57:361–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendary IM. MAE, Riad AM. Finite element model of smart beams with distributed piezoelectric actuators. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 201021:747-758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zemcik S. Modal analysis of beam with piezoelectric sensors a actuators. Appl. Comput. Mech. 2007;1:381–386.
   Google Scholar
• Sadilek P, Zemcik R. Frequency response analysis of hybrid piezoelectric cantilever beam. Eng. Mech. 2010;17:73–82.
   Google Scholar
• Sulbhewar LN, Raveendranath P. A numerically accurate and efficient coupled polynomial field interpolation for euler-bernoulli piezoelectric beam finite element with induced potential effect. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 2014; 26(12):1537–1550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjeddou A. Advances in piezoelectric finite element modeling of adaptive structural elements: a survey. Comput. Struct. 2000;76:347–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapuria S, Hagedotn P. Unified efficient layerwise theory for smart beams with segmented extension/shear mode piezoelectric actuators and sensors. J. Mech. Mater. Struct. 2007;2(7):1267–1298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandesh S, Shankar K. Time domain identification of structural parameters and input time history using a substructural approach. Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 2009;9:243–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShengPing LXS. Dynamic analysis of bernoulli-euler piezoelectric nanobeam with electrostatic force. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 2013;56:1930–1937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzou H, Tseng C. Distributed piezoelectric sensor/actuator design for dynamic measurement/control of distributed parameter systems: a piezoelectric finite element approach. J. Sound Vib. 1990;138:17–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James K, Eberhart R. Particle swarm optimization. Vol. 4, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks. 1995; p. 1942–1948.
   Google Scholar
• Perez R, Behdinan K. Particle swarm approach for structural design optimization. Comput. Struct. 2007;85:1579–1588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandesh S, Shankar K. Application of a hybrid of particle swarm and genetic algorithm for structural damage detection. Inverse Prob. Sci. Eng. 2010;18:997–1021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouser CR, Dunn SA. Comparing genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization for inverse problem. ANZIAM J. 2005;46:89–101.
   Google Scholar
• Yun CB, Bahng EY. Substructural identification using neural networks. Comput. Struct. 2000;77:41–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar