Continuous analogue to iterative optimization for PDE-constrained inverse problems

References

• Isakov V. Inverse problems for partial differential equations. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2006. (Applied Mathematical Sciences; 127).
   Google Scholar
• Tarantola A. Inverse problem theory and methods for model parameter estimation. Philadelphia: SIAM Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Banks H, Kunisch K. Estimation techniques for distributed parameter systems. Boston, Basel, Berlin: Birkhäuser; 1989. (Systems & Control: Foundations & Applications; 1).
   Google Scholar
• Bock H, Carraro T, Jäeger W, et al. Model based parameter estimation: theory and applications. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2013. (Contributions in Mathematical and Computational Sciences; 4).
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho EP, Martínez J, Martínez JM, et al. On optimization strategies for parameter estimation in models governed by partial differential equations. Math Comput Simul. 2015;114:14–24. doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2010.07.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinze M, Pinnau R, Ulbrich M, et al. Optimization with PDE constraints. Netherlands: Springer; 2009. (Mathematical Modelling: Theory and Applications; 23).
   Google Scholar
• Ito K, Kunisch K. Lagrange multiplier approach to variational problems and applications. Philadelphia: SIAM Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics; 2008. (Advances in Design and Control; 15).
   Google Scholar
• Xun X, Cao J, Mallick B, et al. Parameter estimation of partial differential equation models. J Am Stat Assoc. 2013;108:1009–1020. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2013.794730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen BF, Lysaker M, Grøttum P. Computing ischemic regions in the heart with the bidomain model – first steps towards validation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2013 Jun;32(6):1085–1096. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2013.2254123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Airapetyan RG, Ramm AG, Smirnova AB. Continuous methods for solving nonlinear ill-posed problems. Operator Theory Appl. 2000;25:111.
   Google Scholar
• Kaltenbacher B, Neubauer A, Ramm AG. Convergence rates of the continuous regularized Gauss-Newton method. J Inv Ill-Posed Problems. 2002;10:261–280. doi: 10.1515/jiip.2002.10.3.261
   Google Scholar
• Tanabe K. Continuous Newton–Raphson method for solving and underdetermined system of nonlinear equations. Nonlinear Anal Theory Methods Appl. 1979;3(4):495–503. doi: 10.1016/0362-546X(79)90064-6
   Google Scholar
• Tanabe K. A geometric method in nonlinear programming. J Optim Theory Appl. 1980;30(2):181–210. doi: 10.1007/BF00934495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson L, Bartholomew-Biggs M, Ford J. Optimization and nonlinear equations. Journal of computational and applied mathematics. Vol. 124. Amsterdam: The Netherlands; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Tanabe K. Global analysis of continuous analogues of the Levenberg–Marquardt and Newton–Raphson methods for solving nonlinear equations. Ann Inst Statist Math. 1985;37(Part B):189–203. doi: 10.1007/BF02481091
   Google Scholar
• Fiedler A, Raeth S, Theis FJ, et al. Tailored parameter optimization methods for ordinary differential equation models with steady-state constraints. BMC Syst Biol. 2016 Aug;10:80.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenblatt M, Timmer J, Kaschek D. Customized steady-state constraints for parameter estimation in non-linear ordinary differential equation models. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2016;4:41. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2016.00041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidler E. Nonlinear functional analysis and its applications II/B: nonlinear monotone operators. New York, NY: Springer; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Faller D, Klingmüller U, Timmer J. Simulation methods for optimal experimental design in systems biology. Simulation. 2003;79(12):717–725. doi: 10.1177/0037549703040937
   Google Scholar
• Potschka A. Backward step control for global Newton-type methods. SIAM J Numer Anal. 2016;54(1):361–387. doi: 10.1137/140968586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potschka A. Backward step control for Hilbert space problems. 2017; ArXiv:1608.01863 [math.NA].
   Google Scholar
• Engl H, Hanke M, Neubauer A. Regularization of inverse problems. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2000. (Mathematics and Its Applications; 375).
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez D, Vollmann EH, von Andrian UH. Mechanisms and consequences of dendritic cell migration. Immunity. 2008;29(3):325–342. 2017/05/19. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellman I, Steinman RM. Dendritic cells. Cell. 2001;106(3):255–258. 2017/05/19. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00449-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hock S, Hasenauer J, Theis FJ. Modeling of 2D diffusion processes based on microscopy data: parameter estimation and practical identifiability analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14(10):1–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schumann K, Lammermann T, Bruckner M, et al. Immobilized chemokine fields and soluble chemokine gradients cooperatively shape migration patterns of dendritic cells. Immunity. 2010 May;32(5):703–713. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.04.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber M, Hauschild R, Schwarz J, et al. Interstitial dendritic cell guidance by haptotactic chemokine gradients. Science. 2013;339:328–332. doi: 10.1126/science.1228456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hross S Parameter estimation and uncertainty quantification for reaction-diffusion models in image based systems biology [dissertation]. München: Technische Universität München; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Raue A, Schilling M, Bachmann J, et al. Lessons learned from quantitative dynamical modeling in systems biology. PLoS One. 2013 Sep;8(9):e74335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapor P, Weindl D, Ballnus B, et al. Pesto: parameter estimation toolbox. Bioinformatics. 2017 Oct;btx676–btx676. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrd RH, Hribar ME, Nocedal J. An interior point algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming. SIAM J Optim. 1999;9:877–900. doi: 10.1137/S1052623497325107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrd RH, Gilbert JC, Nocedal J. A trust region method based on interior point techniques for nonlinear programming. Math Program. 2000 Nov;89(1):149–185. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/PL00011391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltz RA, Morales JL, Nocedal J, et al. An interior algorithm for nonlinear optimization that combines line search and trust region steps. Math Program. 2006 Jul;107(3):391–408. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10107-004-0560-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpert DH, Macready WG. No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput. 1997 Apr;1(1):67–82. doi: 10.1109/4235.585893
   Google Scholar
• Boyd S, Vandenberghe L. Convex optimisation. UK: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Boiger R, Hasenauer J, Hross S, et al. Integration based profile likelihood calculation for PDE constrained parameter estimation problems. Inverse Prob. 2016 Dec;32(12):125009. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/32/12/125009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar