Reconstruction of impact load on structures with limited measurements using dynamic hybrid adaptive differential search algorithm

References

• Goodier JN, Jahsman WE, Ripperger EA. An experimental surface-wave method for recording force-time curves inelastic impacts. J Appl Mech. 1959;26:3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Jacquelin E, Bennani A, Hamelin P. Force reconstruction: analysis and regularization of a deconvolution problem. J Sound Vibr. 2003;265(1):81–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunawan FE, Homma H, Kanto Y. Two-step B-splines regularization method for solving an ill-posed problem of impact-force reconstruction. J Sound Vibr. 2006;297(1-2):200–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle JF. An experimental method for determining the dynamic contact law. Exp Mech. 1984;24(1):10–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoue H, Harrigan JJ, Reid SR. Review of inverse analysis for indirect measurement of impact force. Appl Mech Rev. 2001;54(6):503–524.
   Google Scholar
• Wu E, Yeh JC, Yen CS. Impact on composite laminated plates: an inverse method. Int J Impact Eng. 1994;15(4):417–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan G. A Bayesian approach for impact load identification of stiffened composite panel. Inverse Probl Sci Eng. 2014;22(6):940–965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollandsworth PE, Busby HR. Impact force identification using the general inverse technique. Int J Impact Eng. 1989;8(4):315–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan G, Sun H, Büyüköztürk O. Impact load identification for composite structures using Bayesian regularization and unscented Kalman filter. Struct Control Health Monit. 2017;24(5):e1910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoue H, Shibuya T, Koizumi T, et al. Measurement of impact force applied to a plate by the deconvolution method. Hihakai Kensa(J NDI). 1988;37(11):874–878.
   Google Scholar
• Inoue H, Watanabe R, Shibuya T, et al. Measurement of impact force by the deconvolution method. Hihakai Kensa(J NDI). 1988;37(4):337–342.
   Google Scholar
• Martin MT, Doyle JF. Impact force identification from wave propagation responses. Int J Impact Eng. 1996;18(1):65–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoue H, Kamibayashi M, Kishimoto K, et al. Numerical Laplace transformation and inversion using fast Fourier transform. JSME Int J Ser 1 Solid Mech Strength Mater. 1992;35(3):319–324.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle JF. A wavelet deconvolution method for impact force identification. Exp Mech. 1997;37(4):403–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zemčík R, Bartošek J, Lašová Z, et al. Reconstruction of impact on composite airfoil segment using piezoelectric sensors. In EWSHM-7th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Khoo SY, Ismail Z, Kong KK, et al. Impact force identification with pseudo-inverse method on a lightweight structure for under-determined, even-determined and over-determined cases. Int J Impact Eng. 2014;63:52–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw JK, Sirkis JS, Friebele EJ, et al. Model of transverse plate impact dynamics for design of impact detection methodologies. AIAA J. 1995;33(7):1327–1334.
   Google Scholar
• Akhavan F, Watkins SE, Chandrashekhara K. Prediction of impact contact forces of composite plates using fiber optic sensors and neural networks. Mech Adv Mater Struct. 2000;7(2):195–205.
   Google Scholar
• Atobe S, Kuno S, Hu N, et al. Identification of impact force on Stiffened composite Panels. Trans Japan Soc Aeronaut Space Sci Space Technol Japan. 2009;7(ists26):Pc_1–Pc_5.
   Google Scholar
• Worden K, Staszewski WJ. Impact location and quantification on a composite panel using neural networks and a genetic algorithm. Strain. 2000;36(2):61–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaul L, Hurlebaus S. Identification of the impact location on a plate using wavelets. Mech Syst Signal Process. 1998;12(6):783–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu N, Fukunaga H, Matsumoto S, et al. An efficient approach for identifying impact force using embedded piezoelectric sensors. Int J Impact Eng. 2007;34(7):1258–1271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy M, Chang FK. Identifying impacts in composite plates with piezoelectric strain sensors, part I: theory. J Intell Mater Syst Struct. 1998;9(11):920–928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seydel R, Chang FK. Impact identification of stiffened composite panels: I. system development. Smart Mater Struct. 2001;10(2):354–369.
   Google Scholar
• Matsumoto S, Fukunaga H, Hu N. Impact force identification of plates using PZT piezoelectric sensors. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Structural Health Monitoring and Intelligent Infrastructure; 2003. p. 837–845.
   Google Scholar
• Chang C, Sun CT. Determining transverse impact force on a composite laminate by signal deconvolution. Exp Mech. 1989;29(4):414–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi K, Chang FK. Identification of impact force and location using distributed sensors. AIAA J. 1996;34(1):136–142.
   Google Scholar
• Wang L, Wang X. Dynamic loads identification in presence of unknown but bounded measurement errors. Inverse Prob Sci Eng. 2015;23(8):1313–1341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosoughi AR, Anjabin N. Dynamic moving load identification of laminated composite beams using a hybrid FE-TMDQ-GAs method. Inverse Probl Sci Eng. 2017;25(11):1639–1652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmari S, Yang M. Impact location and load identification through inverse analysis with bounded uncertain measurements. Smart Mater Struct. 2013;22(8):085024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpert DH, Macready WG. No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput. 1997;1(1):67–82.
   Google Scholar
• Haftka RT. Requirements for papers focusing on new or improved global optimization algorithms. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2016;54:1–1. doi: 10.1007/s00158-016-1491-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Civicioglu P. Transforming geocentric cartesian coordinates to geodetic coordinates by using differential search algorithm. Comput Geosci. 2012;46:229–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Wu C, We G, et al. A novel differential search algorithm and applications for structure design. Appl Math Comput. 2015;268:246–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhl T. The inverse identification problem and its technical application. Archive Appl Mech. 2007;77(5):325–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peelamedu SM, Ciocanel C, Naganathan NG. Impact detection for smart automotive damage mitigation systems. Smart Mater Struct. 2004;13(5):990–997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjorck A, Golub GH. Numerical methods for computing angles between linear subspaces. Math Comput. 1973;27:579–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayalakshmi V, Lakshmi K, Rama Mohan Rao A. Dynamic force reconstruction techniques from incomplete measurements. J Vibr Control. 2018;24(22):5321–5344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam JH, Ong ZC, Ismail Z, et al. Inverse identification of elastic properties of composite materials using hybrid GA-ACO-PSO algorithm. Inverse Probl Sci Eng. 2018;26(10):1432–1463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley CT. Detection and Remediation of Stagnation in the Nelder--Mead algorithm using a sufficient Decrease Condition. SIAM J Optim. 1999;10(1):43–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rama Mohan Rao A, Lakshmi K. Discrete hybrid PSO algorithm for design of laminate composites with multiple objectives. Int J Reinf Plast Compos. 2011;30(20):1703–1727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantu-Paz E. Efficient and accurate parallel genetic algorithms. Boston: Kluwer Academic; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Kammer DC. Sensor set expansion for modal vibration testing. Mech Syst Signal Proces. 2005;19(4):700–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feeny BF, Liang Y. Interpreting proper orthogonal modes of randomly excited vibration systems. J Sound Vibr. 2003;265(5):953–966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rama Mohan Rao A, Appa Rao TVSR, Dattaguru B. Generating optimised partitions for parallel finite element computations employing float-encoded genetic algorithms. Comput Model Eng Sci. 2004;5(3):213–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar