Comparison of TVcDM and DDcTV algorithms in image reconstruction

References

• Pan X, Sidky EY, Vannier M. Why do commercial CT scanners still employ traditional, filtered back-projection for image reconstruction? Inverse Probl. 2009;25:123009. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/25/12/123009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han X, Pearson E, Pelizzari C, et al. Algorithm-enabled exploration of image-quality potential of cone-beam CT in image-guided radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60:4601–4633. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/12/4601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao B, Lu W, Hitchens TK, et al. Accelerated MR parameter Mapping with lLow-rank and sparsity constraints. Magn Reson Med. 2015;74:489–498. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang D, Liu B, Wang J, et al. Accelerating SENSE using compressed sensing. Magn Reson Med: An Official J Int Soc Magn Reson Med. 2009;62:1574–1584. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22161
   Google Scholar
• Liang D, Wang H, Chang Y, et al. Sensitivity encoding reconstruction with nonlocal total variation regularization. Magn Reson Med. 2011;65:1384–1392. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao Z, Zhang Z, Pan X, et al. Optimization-based image reconstruction from sparsely sampled data in electron paramagnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson. 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donoho DL. Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans Inf Theory. 2006;52:1289–1306. doi: 10.1109/TIT.2006.871582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao B, Haldar JP, Christodoulou AG, et al. Image reconstruction from highly undersampled (k, t)-space data with joint partial separability and sparsity constraints. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012;31:1809–1820. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2012.2203921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu H, Wang G. A soft-threshold filtering approach for reconstruction from a limited number of projections. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55:3905. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/13/022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidky EY, Kao C-M, Pan X. Accurate image reconstruction from few-views and limited-angle data in divergent-beam CT. J Xray Sci Technol. 2006;14:119–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidky EY, Pan X. Image reconstruction in circular cone-beam computed tomography by constrained, total-variation minimization. Phys Med Biol. 2008;53:4777. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/17/021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen GH, Tang J, Leng S. Prior image constrained compressed sensing (PICCS): a method to accurately reconstruct dynamic CT images from highly undersampled projection data sets. Med Phys. 2008;35:660–663. doi: 10.1118/1.2836423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bian J, Siewerdsen JH, Han X, et al. Evaluation of sparse-view reconstruction from flat-panel-detector cone-beam CT. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55:6575. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/22/001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bian J, Wang J, Han X, et al. Optimization-based image reconstruction from sparse-view data in offset-detector CBCT. Phys Med Biol. 2012;58:205. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/2/205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Han X, Pearson E, et al. Artifact reduction in short-scan CBCT by use of optimization-based reconstruction. Phys Med Biol. 2016;61:3387. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/9/3387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia D, Langan DA, Solomon SB, et al. Optimization-based image reconstruction with artifact reduction in C-arm CBCT. Phys Med Biol. 2016;61:7300. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/20/7300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Ye J, Chen B, et al. Investigation of optimization-based reconstruction with an image-total-variation constraint in PET. Phys Med Biol. 2016;61:6055. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/16/6055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao Z, Redler G, Epel B, et al. 3D pulse EPR imaging from sparse-view projections via constrained, total variation minimization. J Magn Reson. 2015;258:49–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2015.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidky EY, Chartrand R, Boone JM, et al. Constrained TpV minimization for enhanced exploitation of gradient sparsity: application to CT image reconstruction. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2014;2:1–18. doi: 10.1109/JTEHM.2014.2300862
   Google Scholar
• Yang J, Yu H, Jiang M, et al. High order total variation minimization for interior tomography. Inverse Probl. 2010;26:350131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Ma J, Fan Y, et al. Adaptive-weighted total variation minimization for sparse data toward low-dose x-ray computed tomography image reconstruction. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57:7923–7956. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/23/7923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambolle A, Pock T. An introduction to continuous optimization for imaging. Acta Numer. 2016;25:161–319. doi: 10.1017/S096249291600009X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang H, Zhang X, Tai XC, et al. Domain decomposition methods for nonlocal total variation image Restoration. J Sci Comput. 2014;60:79–100. doi: 10.1007/s10915-013-9786-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigie DS. Joint reconstruction of multi-channel, spectral CT data via constrained total nuclear variation minimization. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60:1741. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/5/1741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esser E. Applications of Lagrangian-based alternating direction methods and connections to Split Bregman. Cam Report. 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Esser E, Zhang X, Chan T. A general framework for a class of first order primal-dual algorithms for TV minimization. UCLA CAM Report. 2009:09–67.
   Google Scholar
• Afonso MV. Fast image recovery using variable splitting and constrained optimization. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2010;19:2345–2356. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2010.2047910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han X, Bian J, Ritman EL, et al. Optimization-based reconstruction of sparse images from few-view projections. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57:5245. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/16/5245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambolle A, Pock T. A first-order primal-dual algorithm for convex problems with applications to imaging. J Math Imaging Vis. 2011;40:120–145. doi: 10.1007/s10851-010-0251-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidky EY, Jørgensen JH, Pan X. Convex optimization problem prototyping for image reconstruction in computed tomography with the Chambolle–pock algorithm. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57:3065. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/10/3065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidky EY, Kraemer DN, Roth EG, et al. Analysis of iterative region-of-interest image reconstruction for x-ray computed tomography. J Med Imag. 2014;1:031007. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.1.3.031007
   Google Scholar
• Qiao Z, Redler G, Gui Z, et al. Three novel accurate pixel-driven projection methods for 2D CT and 3D EPR imaging. J Xray Sci Technol. 2018;26:83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel CR, Oman ME. Iterative methods for total variation denoising. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Qiao Z, Redler G, Epel B, et al. Comparison of parabolic filtration methods for 3D filtered back projection in pulsed EPR imaging. J Magn Reson. 2014;248:42–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jmr.2014.08.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epel B, Gromov I, Stoll S, et al. Spectrometer manager: a versatile control software for pulse EPR spectrometers. Concepts Magn Reson Part B: Magn Reson Eng. 2005;26:36–45. doi: 10.1002/cmr.b.20037
   Google Scholar
• Epel B, Sundramoorthy SV, Mailer C, et al. A versatile high speed 250-MHz pulse imager for biomedical applications. Concepts Magn Reson Part B: Magn Reson Eng. 2008;33:163–176. doi: 10.1002/cmr.b.20119
   Google Scholar
• Qiao Z, Liang D, Tang S, et al. Optimization-based image reconstruction from fast-scanned, noisy projections in EPR imaging. IEEE Access. 2019;7:19590–19601. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2897140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar