Use of asymptotic analysis for solving the inverse problem of source parameters determination of nitrogen oxide emission in the atmosphere

References

• United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2019. Available from https://www.epa.gov/criteria-air-pollutants.
   Google Scholar
• Directive 2008/1/ of the European parliament and of the council of 15 January 2008 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control. 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Directive 2001/80/ec of the European parliament and of the council of 23 October 2001 on the limitation of emissions of certain pollutants into the air from large combustion plants. 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Gost 17.2.3.02-78. Nature protection. Atmosphere. Regulations for establishing permissible emissions of noxious pollutants from industrial enterprises. 1978. Available from: https://www.russiangost.com/p-16584-gost-172302-78.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Convention on long-range transboundary air pollution. Geneva. 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna S. A simple method of calculating dispersion from urban area sources. J Air Pollut Control Assoc. 1971;21:774–777.
   Google Scholar
• Kuenen J, Visschedijk A, Jozwicka M, et al. Tnomacc ii emission inventory; a multi-year (2003-2009) consistent high-resolution european emission inventory for air quality modeling. Atmos Chem Phys. 2014;14:10963–10976.
   Google Scholar
• Elansky N. Air quality and co emissions in the moscow megacity. Urban Climate. 2014;8:42–56.
   Google Scholar
• Jericevic A, Kraljevic L, Grisogono B, et al. Parameterization of vertical diffusion and the atmospheric boundary layer height determination in the EMEP model. Atmos Chem Phys. 2010;10:341–364.
   Google Scholar
• Brusseau M, Pepper I, Gerba C. Environmental and pollution science. 3rd ed. London: Academic Press; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Elanskii N, Grechko G, Plotkin M, et al. The ozone and aerosol fine structure experiment: Observing the fine structure of ozone and aerosol distribution in the atmosphere from the salyut 7 orbiter. iii – experimental results. J Geophysical Res. 1991;96(D10):18661–18670.
   Google Scholar
• Burrowsa J, Webera M, Buchwitza M, et al. The global ozone monitoring experiment (gome): mission concept and first scientific results. J Atmos Sci. 1999;56:151–175.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt P, Hilsenrath E, Leppelmeier GW, et al. Science objectives of the ozone monitoring instrument. IEEE Trans Geoscience and Remote Sensing. 2006;44(5):1199–1208.
   Google Scholar
• Valks P, Pinardi G, Richter A, et al. Operational total and tropospheric NO2 column retrieval for gome-2. Atmos Meas Tech. 2011;4:1491–1514.
   Google Scholar
• Vries J, Voors R, Ording B, et al. TROPOMI on ESAS Sentinel 5p ready for launch and use. Proceedings on SPIE. 2016;9688:86–97.
   Google Scholar
• Geffen J, Eskes H, Boersma K, et al. TROPOMI ATBD of the total and tropospheric NO2 data products. Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Boersma K, Eskes H, Richter A, et al. Improving algorithms and uncertainty estimates for satellite NO2 retrievals: results from the quality assurance for the essential climate variables (qa4ecv) project. Atmos Meas Tech. 2018;11:6651–6678.
   Google Scholar
• Postylyakov O, Borovski A, Makarenkov A. First experiment on retrieval of tropospheric NO2 over polluted areas with 2.4-km spatial resolution basing on satellite spectral measurements. Proceedings on SPIE. 2017;10466:633–640.
   Google Scholar
• Postylyakov O, Borovski A, Elansky N, et al. Comparison of space high-detailed experimental and model data on tropospheric. Proceedings of SPIE. 2019;11208:587–595.
   Google Scholar
• Lukyanenko D, Shishlenin M, Volkov V. Solving of the coefficient inverse problems for a nonlinear singularly perturbed reaction-diffusion-advection equation with the final time data. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul. 2018;54:233–247.
   Google Scholar
• Lukyanenko D, Shishlenin M, Volkov V. Asymptotic analysis of solving an inverse boundary value problem for a nonlinear singularly perturbed time-periodic reaction-diffusion-advection equation. J Inverse and Ill-Posed Problems. 2019;27(5):745–758.
   Google Scholar
• Lukyanenko D, Grigorev V, Volkov V, et al. Solving of the coefficient inverse problem for a nonlinear singularly perturbed two-dimensional reaction-diffusion equation with the location of moving front data. Computers and Math Appl. 2019;77(5):1245–1254.
   Google Scholar
• Davydova M, Nefedov N, Zakharova S. Asymptotically Lyapunov-stable solutions with boundary and internal layers in the stationary reaction-diffusion-advection problems with a small transfer. Lecture Notes Computer Sci. 2019;11386:216–224.
   Google Scholar
• Samarskii A, Vabishchevich P. Computational heat transfer. Chichester: Wiley; 1995. Mathematical Modelling
   Google Scholar
• Lavrentiev M. On integral equations of the first kind. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR. 1959;127(1):31–33.
   Google Scholar
• Tikhonov N. Regularization of incorrectly posed problems. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR. 1963;153(1):49–52.
   Google Scholar
• Vasin V, Ageev A. Ill-posed problems with a priori information. Utrecht: VSP; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Resurs-p. 2019. Available from http://russianspacesystems.ru/bussines/dzz/orbitalnaya-gruppirovka-ka-dzz/resurs-p/.
   Google Scholar
• Hysplit. 2019. Available from https://www.ready.noaa.gov/HYSPLIT.php.
   Google Scholar
• Silam. 2019. Available from http://silam.fmi.fi/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Mitsuru M, Jongkyun L, Ichiro K, et al. Improving emission regulation for coal-fired power plants in asean. 2016. (ERIA Research project report; 2).
   Google Scholar
• Yagola A, Leonov A, Titarenko V. Data errors and an error estimation for ill-posed problems. Inverse Problems in Eng. 2002;10(2):117–129.
   Google Scholar
• Dorofeev K, Titarenko V, Yagola A. Algorithms for constructing a posteriori errors of solutions to ill-posed problems. Comput Math and Math Phys. 2003;43(1):10–23.
   Google Scholar
• Titarenko V, Yagola A. Error estimation for ill-posed problems on piecewise convex functions and sourcewise represented sets. J Inverse and Ill-Posed Prob. 2008;16(6):625–638.
   Google Scholar
• Yagola A, Korolev Y. Error estimation in ill-posed problems in special cases. 48. 2013, p. 155–164. (Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics;
   Google Scholar
• Leonov A. Error estimation in ill-posed problems in special cases. Which of inverse problems can have a priori approximate solution accuracy estimates comparable in order with the data accuracy. Vol. 7, 2014. p. 284–292.
   Google Scholar
• Leonov A. A posteriori accuracy estimations of solutions to ill-posed inverse problems and extra-optimal regularizing algorithms for their solution. Numer Anal Appl. 2012;5(1):68–83.
   Google Scholar
• Tikhonov A, Goncharsky A, Stepanov V, et al. Numerical methods for the solution of ill-posed problems. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Kabanikhin S. Definitions and examples of inverse and ill-posed problems. J Inverse Ill-Posed Prob. 2008;16(4):317–357.
   Google Scholar
• Beilina L, Klibanov M. Definitions and examples of inverse and ill-posed problems. SIAM J Sci Comput. 2008;31(1):478–509.
   Google Scholar
• Klibanov M, Fiddy M, Beilina L, et al. Picosecond scale experimental verification of a globally convergent algorithm for a coefficient inverse problem. Inverse Probl. 2010;26(4):045003.
   Google Scholar
• Klibanov M, Koshev N, Li J, et al. Numerical solution of an ill-posed cauchy problem for a quasilinear parabolic equation using a Carleman weight function. J Inverse Ill-Posed Prob. 2016;24:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Klibanov M, Yagola A. Convergent numerical methods for parabolic equations with reversed time via a new Carleman estimate. Inverse Probl. 2019;26(11):115012.
   Google Scholar