An efficient numerical method to solve inverse fuzzy-uncertain viscoelastic problems of identification

References

• Castello DA, Rochinha FA, Roitman N, Constitutive parameter estimation of a viscoelastic model with internal variables. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2008;22(8):1840–1857.
   Google Scholar
• Jager A, Lackner R, Eberhardsteiner J. Identification of viscoelastic properties by means of nanoindentation taking the real tip geometry into account. Meccanica. 2007;42(3):293–306.
   Google Scholar
• Leo CJ. Identification of a general poro-viscoelastic model of one-dimensional. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Soft Soil Engineering. Vancouver: CRC Press; 2006. p. 397.
   Google Scholar
• Lewandowski R, Chorazyczewski B. Identification of the parameters of the Kelvin-Voigt and the Maxwell fractional models, used to modeling of viscoelastic dampers. Comput Struct. 2010;88(1–2):1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Sarron JC, Blondeau C, Guillaume A, et al. Identification of linear viscoelastic constitutive models. J Biomech. 2000;33(6):685–693.
   Google Scholar
• Smilauer V, Bazant ZP. Identification of viscoelastic c-s-h behavior in mature cement paste by fft-based homogenization method. Cement Concrete Res. 2010;40(2):197–207.
   Google Scholar
• Tian YC, Zhang ZM, Wei PJ. Parametric inversion of viscoelastic media with homotopy method. Chin J Rock Mech Eng. 2006;25:1718–1722.
   Google Scholar
• Venture G, Yamane K, Nakamura Y, et al. Identification of human limb viscoelasticity using robotics methods to support the diagnosis of neuromuscular diseases. Int J Rob Res. 2009;28(10):1322–1333.
   Google Scholar
• Erdogan YS, Bakir PG. Inverse propagation of uncertainties in finite element model updating through use of fuzzy arithmetic. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2013;26(1):357–367.
   Google Scholar
• Moens D, Hanss M. Non-probabilistic finite element analysis for parametric uncertainty treatment in applied mechanics: recent advances. Finite Elem Anal Des. 2011;47(1):4–16.
   Google Scholar
• Moens D, Vandepitte D. Recent advances in non-probabilistic approaches for non-deterministic dynamic finite element analysis. Arch Comput Methods Eng. 2006;13(3):389–464.
   Google Scholar
• Walz NP, Hanss M. Fuzzy arithmetical analysis of multibody systems with uncertainties. Arch Mech Eng. 2013;60(1):109–125.
   Google Scholar
• Wang C, Matthies HG, Qiu Z. Optimization-based inverse analysis for membership function identification in fuzzy steady-state heat transfer problem. Struct Multidiscipl Optim. 2017;57(4):1495–1505.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez WP, Borges FCL, Castello DA, et al. Bayesian inference applied on model calibration of fractional derivative viscoelastic model. In V Steffen Jr, DA Rade, WM Bessa (Eds.), DINAME 2015-Proceedings of the XVII International Symposium on Dynamic Problems of Mechanics. Natal; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang E, Chazot J, Antoni J, et al. Bayesian characterization of Young's modulus of viscoelastic materials in laminated structures. J Sound Vib. 2013;332(16):3654–3666.
   Google Scholar
• Dosso SE, Holland CW. Geoacoustic uncertainties from viscoelastic inversion of seabed reflection data. IEEE J Ocean. Eng. 2006;31(3):657–671.
   Google Scholar
• Oates WS, Hays M, Miles P, et al. Uncertainty quantification and stochastic-based viscoelastic modeling of finite deformation elastomers. In Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD), vol. 8687. San Diego: SPIE; 2013. p. 86871O.
   Google Scholar
• Elishakoff I. Possible limitations of probabilistic methods in engineering. Appl Mech Rev. 2000;53(2):19.
   Google Scholar
• Moens D, Vandepitte D. A survey of non-probabilistic uncertainty treatment in finite element analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2005;194(12–16):1527–1555.
   Google Scholar
• Santoro R, Muscolino G, Elishakoff I. Optimization and anti-optimization solution of combined parameterized and improved interval analyses for structures with uncertainties. Comput Struct. 2015;149:31–42.
   Google Scholar
• Wang C. Evidence-theory-based uncertain parameter identification method for mechanical systems with imprecise information. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2019;351:281–296.
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Cao L, Jiang C, et al. Parallelotope-formed evidence theory model for quantifying uncertainties with correlation. Appl Math Model. 2020;77:32–48.
   Google Scholar
• Cao LX, Liu J, Jiang C, et al. Evidence-based structural uncertainty quantification by dimension reduction decomposition and marginal interval analysis. J Mech Design. 2020;142(5):051701-1–051701-12.
   Google Scholar
• Wang C, Matthies HG. Novel interval theory-based parameter identification method for engineering heat transfer systems with epistemic uncertainty. Int J Numer Methods Eng. 2018;115(6):756–770.
   Google Scholar
• Wang L, Liu Y, Liu Y. An inverse method for distributed dynamic load identification of structures with interval uncertainties. Adv Eng Softw. 2019;131:77–89.
   Google Scholar
• Wang L, Xiong C, Wang X, et al. Sequential optimization and fuzzy reliability analysis for multidisciplinary systems. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2019;60:1079–1095.
   Google Scholar
• Wang L, Xiong C, Yang Y. A novel methodology of reliability-based multidisciplinary design optimization under hybrid interval and fuzzy uncertainties. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2018;337:439–457.
   Google Scholar
• Faes M, Moens D. Recent trends in the modeling and quantification of non-probabilistic uncertainty. Arch Comput Methods Eng. 2019;27:633–671.
   Google Scholar
• Haag T, Gonzalez SC, Hanss M. Model validation and selection based on inverse fuzzy arithmetic. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2012;32:116–134.
   Google Scholar
• Hanss M, Oexl S, Gaul L. Identification of a bolted-joint model with fuzzy parameters loaded normal to the contact interface. Mech Res Commun. 2002;29(2–3):177–187.
   Google Scholar
• Adhikari S, Khodaparast HH. A spectral approach for fuzzy uncertainty propagation in finite element analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2014;243:1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes M, Ray S, Pereira JCF, et al. Quantification of uncertainty propagation due to input parameters for simple heat transfer problems. Int J Therm Sci. 2012;60:94–105.
   Google Scholar
• Sofi A, Muscolino G. Static analysis of Euler–Bernoulli beams with interval Young's modulus. Comput Struct. 2015;156:72–82.
   Google Scholar
• Yang HT, Li YX, Xue YN. Interval uncertainty analysis of elastic bimodular truss structures. Inverse Probl Sci Eng. 2015;23(4):578–589.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy J, Eberhart R. Particle swarm optimization. In proceedings of ICNN'95-International Conference on Neural Networks, vol. 4. Perth: IEEE; 1995. p. 1942–1948.
   Google Scholar
• Mezura-Montes E, Coello C. Constraint-handling in nature-inspired numerical optimization: past, present and future. Swarm Evol Comput. 2011;1(4):173–194.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen H, Erik M. Good parameters for particle swarm optimization. Denmark: Hvass Lab., Copenhagen; 2010. p. 1551–3203. (Tech. Rep. HL1001).
   Google Scholar
• Klimke A, Wohlmuth B. Computing expensive multivariate functions of fuzzy numbers using sparse grids. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2005;154(3):432–453.
   Google Scholar
• Klimke A. Uncertainty modeling using fuzzy arithmetic and sparse grids [dissertation]. Stuttgart: Universität Stuttgart; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Deeks AJ, Wolf JP. A virtual work derivation of the scaled boundary finite-element method for elastostatics. Comput Mech. 2002;28(6):489–504.
   Google Scholar
• He YQ, Yang HT. Solving viscoelastic problems by combining SBFEM and a temporally piecewise adaptive algorithm. Mech Time-Depend Mater. 2017;21(3):481–497.
   Google Scholar
• Yang HT. A new approach of time stepping for solving transfer problems. Commun Numer Methods Eng. 1999;15(5):325–334.
   Google Scholar
• Li SY. Engineering fuzzy mathematics with applications. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology Press; 2004. p. 5–30.
   Google Scholar
• Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL, Zhu JZ. The finite element method: its basis and fundamentals. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Shames IH, Cozzarelli FA. Elastic and inelastic stress analysis. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Wang C, He YQ, Yang HT. A SBFEM and sensitivity analysis based algorithm for solving inverse viscoelastic problems. Eng Anal Bound Elem. 2019;106:588–598.
   Google Scholar
• Klimke A, Wohlmuth B. Algorithm 847: spinterp: piecewise multilinear hierarchical sparse grid interpolation in MATLAB. ACM Trans Math Softw. 2005;31(4):561–579.
   Google Scholar
• Clenshaw CW, Curtis AR. A method for numerical integration on an automatic computer. Numer Math. 1960;2(1):197–205.
   Google Scholar
• Klimke A, Nunes RF, Wohlmuth BI. Fuzzy arithmetic based on dimension-adaptive sparse grids: a case study of a large-scale finite element model under uncertain parameters. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl-Based Syst. 2006;14(5):561–577.
   Google Scholar
• Hanss M. Applied fuzzy arithmetic. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Hanss M. The extended transformation method for the simulation and analysis of fuzzy-parameterized models. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl-Based Syst. 2003;11(6):711–727.
   Google Scholar
• Hanss M. The transformation method for the simulation and analysis of systems with uncertain parameters. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2002;130(3):277–289.
   Google Scholar
• Wu D, Gao W, Wang C, et al. Robust fuzzy structural safety assessment using mathematical programming approach. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2016;293:30–49.
   Google Scholar