Sequential estimation of creatinine removal by a haemodialyser

References

• Levey A, Coresh J. Chronic kidney disease. Lancet. 2012;379:165–180.
   Google Scholar
• Ronco C, Canaud B, Aljama P., editors. Hemodiafiltration (Vol. 158). Basel: Karger Medical and Scientific Publishers; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Drukker W, Parsons FM, Maher JF., editors. Replacement of renal function by dialysis: a textbook of dialysis. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Twardowski ZJ. History of hemodialyzers’ designs. Hemodial Int. 2008;12(2):173–210.
   Google Scholar
• Locatelli F, Buoncristiani U, Canaud B, et al. Haemodialysis with on-line monitoring equipment: tools or toys? Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005;20:22–33.
   Google Scholar
• Abbrecht PH, Prodany NW. A model of the patient-artificial kidney system. Trans On Bio Engin. 1971;18:257–264.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffrin MY, Ding L, Laurent JM. Simultneous convective and diffusive mass transfers in hemodialyzer. J Bio Eng. 1990;112: 112–212.
   Google Scholar
• Legallais C, Catapano G, Harten B, et al. A theoretical model to predict the in vitro performance of hemodiafilters. J Membr Sci. 2000;168:3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Lambie SH, McIntyre CW. Developments in online monitoring of haemodialysis patients: towards global assessment of dialysis adequacy. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2003;12(6):633–638.
   Google Scholar
• Uhlin F, Fridolin I, Magnusson M, et al. Dialysis dose (Kt/V) and clearance variation sensitivity using measurement of ultraviolet-absorbance (on-line), blood urea, dialysate urea and ionic dialysance. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;21(8):2225–2231.
   Google Scholar
• Nigatie Y. Diffusion in tube dialyzer. Biomed Eng Comput Biol. 2017;8:1179597217732006.
   Google Scholar
• Islam MS, Szpunar J. Study of dialyzer membrane (Polyflux 210H) and effects of different parameters on dialysis performance. Open J Nephrol. 2013;3:161–167.
   Google Scholar
• Tam VK. The mathematical basis, clinical application and limitations of ionic dialysance. Hong Kong J Nephrol. 2004;6(1):56–59.
   Google Scholar
• Droog RP, Kingma BR, van Marken Lichtenbelt WD, et al. Mathematical modeling of thermal and circulatory effects during hemodialysis. Artif Organs. 2012;36(9):797–811.
   Google Scholar
• Lee JC, Lee K, Kim HC. Mathematical analysis for internal filtration of convection-enhanced high-flux hemodialyzer. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2012;108(1):68–79.
   Google Scholar
• Leypoldt JK, Storr M, Agar BU, et al. Intradialytic kinetics of middle molecules during hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019;34(5):870–877.
   Google Scholar
• Schneditz D, 2001. Temperature and thermal balance in hemodialysis. In Seminars in dialysis (Vol. 14, No. 5). New York (US): Blackwell Science Inc., p. 357–364. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-139X.2001.00088.x.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi C, Lanzarone E, Casagrande G, et al. 2016. Identification of patient-specific parameters in a kinetic model of fluid and mass transfer during dialysis. In: Argiento R, Lanzarone E, Villalobos IA, Mattei A, editors. International conference on Bayesian statistics in action. Cham: Springer, 2016. p. 139–149.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi C, Lanzarone E, Casagrande G, et al. A Bayesian approach for the identification of patient-specific parameters in a dialysis kinetic model. Stat Methods Med Res. 2019;28(7):2069–2095.
   Google Scholar
• Casagrande G, Bianchi C, Vito D, et al. Patient-specific modeling of multicompartmental fluid and mass exchange during dialysis. Int J Artif Organs. 2016;39:220–227.
   Google Scholar
• Waniewski J, Poleszczuk J, Pietribiasi M, et al. Impact of solute exchange between erythrocytes and plasma on hemodialyzer clearance. Biocybern Biomed Eng. 2020;40:265–276.
   Google Scholar
• Maheshwari V, Thijssen S, Tao X, et al. In silico comparison of protein-bound uremic toxin removal by hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration, membrane adsorption, and binding competition. Nat Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Maheshwari V, Thijssen S, Tao X, et al. A novel mathematical model of protein-bound uremic toxin kinetics during hemodialysis. Nat Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Doucet A, De Freitas N, Gordon N. Sequential Monte Carlo methods in practice. New York: Springer; 2001; 178–195.
   Google Scholar
• Kaipio J, Somersalo E. (2004). Statistical and computational inverse problems, Applied Mathematical Sciences 160, Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ristic B, Arulampalam S, Gordon N. Beyond the Kalman filter. Boston: Artech House; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Arulampalam MS, Maskell S, Gordon N, et al. A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking. IEEE Trans Signal Process. 2002;50:174–188.
   Google Scholar
• Orlande HRB, Colaço MJ, Dulikravich GS, et al. State estimation problems in heat transfer. Int J Uncertainty Quant. 2012;2:239–258.
   Google Scholar
• Lamien B, Varon L, Orlande H. State estimation in bioheat transfer: a comparison of particle filter algorithms. Int J Numer Methods Heat Fluid Flow. 2017;27:615–638.
   Google Scholar
• Costa J, Orlande H, Campos Velho H, et al. Estimation of tumor size evolution using particle filters. J Comput Biol. 2015;22:150514113004000.
   Google Scholar
• Zydney AL. Bulk mass transport limitations during high-flux hemodialysis. Artif Organs. 1993;17(11):919–924.
   Google Scholar
• Patankar SV. Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow. New York: Taylor & Francis; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Ozisik M, Orlande H, Colaco M, et al. Finite difference methods in heat transfer. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2017.
   Google Scholar