Force-based stiffness mapping for early detection of breast cancer

References

• Radiology Society of North America. http://www.radiologyinfo.org/, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics. https://dceg.cancer.gov/news-events/news/2017/breast-density, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Samani A, Zubovits J, Plewes D. Elastic moduli of normal and pathological human breast tissues: an inversion-technique-based investigation of 169 samples. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52:1565–1576.
   Google Scholar
• Greenleaf JF, Fatemi M, Insana M. Selected methods for imaging elastic properties of biological tissues. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2003;5:57–78.
   Google Scholar
• Olson L, Throne R. An inverse problem approach to stiffness mapping for early detection of breast cancer. Inverse Probl Symposium. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Olson LG, Throne RD. An inverse problem approach to stiffness mapping for early detection of breast cancer. Inverse Probl Sci Eng. 2013;21(2):314–338.
   Google Scholar
• Olson L, Throne R. Early detection of breast cancer through an inverse problem approach to stiffness mapping: 3D results and variations in properties. Proceedings of the 12th U.S. National Congress on Computational Mechanics, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Olson LG, Throne RD, Nolte AJ, et al. An inverse problem approach to stiffness mapping for early detection of breast cancer: tissue phantom experiments. Inverse Probl Sci Eng. 2019;27(7):1006–1037.
   Google Scholar
• Doyley MM. Model-based elastography: a survey of approaches to the inverse elasticity problem. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57:R35–R73.
   Google Scholar
• Parker KJ, Doyley MM, Rubens DJ. Imaging the elastic properties of tissue: the 20 year perspective. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Alam SK, Garra BS. Tissue elasticity imaging. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Li G-Y, Cao Y. Mechanics of ultrasound elasticity. Proc R Soc. A. 2017;473:20160841.
   Google Scholar
• Bamber J, Cosgrove D, Dietrich CF, et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 1: basic principles and technology. Ultraschall Med. 2013;34:169–184.
   Google Scholar
• Săftoiu A, Gilja OH, Sidhu PS, et al. The EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations for the clinical practice of elastography in non-hepatic applications: update 2018. Ultraschall Med. 2019;40:425–453.
   Google Scholar
• Shiina T, Nightingale KR, Palmeri ML, et al. WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: Part 1: basic principles and terminology. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015;41(5):1126–1147.
   Google Scholar
• Barr RG, Nakashima K, Amy D, et al. WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: Part 2: breast. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015;41(5):1148–1160.
   Google Scholar
• Bayat M, Nabavizadeh A, Kumar V, et al. Automated in vivo sub-hertz analysis of viscoelasticity (SAVE) for evaluation of breast lesions. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2018;65(10):2237–2247.
   Google Scholar
• Bernal M, Chamming's F, Couade M, et al. In vivo quantification of the nonlinear shear modulus in breast lesions: feasibility study. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2016;63(1):101–109.
   Google Scholar
• Goswami S, Ahmed R, Doyley MM, et al. Nonlinear shear modulus estimation with bi-axial motion registered local strain. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2019;66(8):1292–1303.
   Google Scholar
• Hoerig C, Ghaboussi J, Insana MF. Data-driven elasticity imaging using cartesian neural network constitutive models and the autoprogressive method. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019;38(5):1150–1160.
   Google Scholar
• Seidl DT, Oberai AA, Barbone PE. The coupled adjoint-state equation in forward and inverse linear elasticity: incompressible plane stress. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2019;357:112588.
   Google Scholar
• Patel D, Tibrewala R, Vega A, et al. Circumventing the solution of inverse problems in mechanics through deep learning: application to elasticity imaging. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2019;353:448–466.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman PS. Tactile imaging [dissertation]. Harvard University; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Wellman PS, Dalton EP, Krag D, et al. Tactile imaging of breast masses. Arch Surg. 2001;136:204–208.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman CS, Jacobsen L, Bachman BA, et al. Digital documentation of the physical examination: moving the clinical breast exam to the electronic medical record. Am J Surgery. 2006;192(4):444–449.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss RE, Hartanto V, Perrotti M, et al. In vitro trial of the pilot prototype of the prostate mechanical imaging system. Urology. 2001;58(6):1059–1063.
   Google Scholar
• Niemczyk P, Cummings KB, Sarvazyan AP, et al. Correlation of mechanical imaging and histopathology of radical prostatectomy specimens: a pilot study for detecting breast cancer. J Urol. 1998;160:797–801.
   Google Scholar
• Sallaway L, Magee S, Shi J, et al. Detecting solid masses in phantom breast using mechanical indentation. Exp Mech. 2014;54:935–942.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney TJ, Airpetian A, Sarvazyan A. Tactile breast imaging to increase the sensitivity of breast examination. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(14S):1037.
   Google Scholar
• Helvie MA, Carson PL, Saravazyan A, et al. Mechanical imaging of the breast: a pilot trial. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003;29(5S):S112.
   Google Scholar
• Egorov V, Tsyuryupa S, Kanilo S, et al. Soft tissue elastometer. Med Eng Phys. 2008;30:206–212.
   Google Scholar
• Egorov V, Sarvazyan AP. Mechanical imaging of the breast. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2008;27(9):1275–1287.
   Google Scholar
• Egorov V, Kearney T, Pollak SB, et al. Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions by mechanical imaging. Breast Cancer Res Treatment. 2009;118(1):67–80.
   Google Scholar
• Egorov V, van Raalte H, Sarvazyan AP. Vaginal tactile imaging. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010;57(7):1736–1744.
   Google Scholar
• Sarvazyan A, Egorov V. Mechanical imaging – a technology for 3-d visualization and characterization of soft tissue abnormalities. A review. Curr Med Imaging Rev. 2012;8(1):64–73.
   Google Scholar
• van Raalte H, Egorov V. Characterizing female pelvic floor conditions by tactile imaging. Int Urogynecological J. 2015;26:607–609.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman CS, Son JS, Yered E, et al. Clinical studies of palpation imaging of the breast on over 1000 patients. 2014 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, vol. P1-02-09, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson J. Introduction to suretouch for clinicians. https://sureinc.us/physician-introduction-1/, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Xu X, Gifford-Hollingsworth C, Sensenig R, et al. Breast tumor detection using piezoelectric fingers: first clinical report. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(6):1168–1173.
   Google Scholar
• Xu X, Chung Y, Brooks AD, et al. Development of arry piezoelectric fingers towards in-vivo breast tumor detection. Rev Sci Instrum. 2016;87:124301.
   Google Scholar
• Yegingil H, Shih WY, Shih W-H. Probing model tumor interfacial properties using piezoelectric cantilevers. Rev Sci Instrum. 2010;81(095104):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Yegingil H, Shih WY, Shih W-H. All-electrical indentation shear modulus and elastic modulus measurement using a piezoelectric cantilever with a tip. J Appl Phys. 2007;101(054510):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Yegingil H, Shih WY, Shih W-H. Probing elastic tissue modulus and depth of bottom-supported inclusions in model tissues using piezoelectric cantilevers. Rev Sci Instrum. 2007;78(115101):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Szewczyk ST, Shih WY, Shih W-H. Palpationlike soft-material elastic modulus measurement using piezoelectric cantilevers. Rev Sci Instrum. 2006;77(044302):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Clanahan JM, Reddy S, Broach RB, et al. Clinical utility of a hand-held scanner for breast cancer early detection and patient triage. JCO Global Oncol. 2020;6:27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou C, Chase JG, Ismail H, et al. Silicone phantom validation of breast cancer tumor detection using nomical stiffness identification in digital imaging elasto-tomography. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2018;39:435–447.
   Google Scholar
• Hii AJH, Hann CE, Chase JG, et al. Fast normalized cross correlation for motion tracking using basis functions. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2006;82:144–156.
   Google Scholar
• Peters A, Milsant A, Rouze J, et al. Digital image-based elasto-tomography: proof of concept studies for surface based mechanical property reconstruction. JOSE Int J. 2004;47(4):1117–1123.
   Google Scholar
• Peters A, Wortmann S, Elliott R, et al. Digital image-based elasto-tomography: first experiments in surface based mechanical property estimation of gelatine phantoms. JOSE Int J. 2005;48(4):562–569.
   Google Scholar
• Peters A, Uwe-Berger H, Chase JG, et al. Digital image-based elasto-tomography: non-linear mechanical property reconstruction of homogeneous gelatine phantoms. Int J Inform Syst Sci. 2006;2(4):512–521.
   Google Scholar
• Peters A, Chase JG, Van Houten EEW. Digital image elasto-tomography: combinatorial and hybrid optimization algorithms for shape-based elastic property reconstruction. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008;55(11):2575–2583.
   Google Scholar
• Peters A, Chase JG, Van Houten EEW. Estimating elasticity in heterogeneous phantoms using digital image elasto-tomography. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2009;47:67–76.
   Google Scholar
• Hann CE, Chase JG, Chen X, et al. Strobe imaging system for digital image-based elasto-tomography breast cancer screening. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2009;56(8):3195–3202.
   Google Scholar
• Botterill T, Lotz T, Kashif A, et al. Reconstructing 3-d skin surface motion for the diet breast cancer screening system. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2014;33(4):1109–1118.
   Google Scholar
• Kashif AS, Lotz TF, Heeren AMW, et al. Separate modal analysis for tumor detection with a digital image elasto tomography (DIET) breast cancer screening system. Med Phys. 2013;40(11):113503:1–113503:8.
   Google Scholar
• Goenezen S, Kim BJ, Kotecha M, et al. Mechanics based tomography (MBT): validation using experimental data. J Mech Phys Solids. 2021;146:104187.
   Google Scholar
• Goenezen S, Luo P, Kim BJ, et al. Mechanics based tomography using camera images. Mol Cell Biomech. 2019;16:46–48.
   Google Scholar
• Luo P, Mei Y, Kotecha M, et al. Characterization of the stiffness distribution in two and three dimensions using boundary deformations: a preliminary study. MRS Commun. 2018;8:893–902.
   Google Scholar
• Mei Y, Wang S, Shen X, et al. Mechanics based tomography: a preliminary feasibility study. Sensors. 2017;17:1075.
   Google Scholar
• Mei Y, Wang S, Shen X, et al. Erratum: mechanics based tomography: a preliminary feasibility study. Sensors. 2018;18:384.
   Google Scholar
• Mei Y, Fulmer R, Raja V, et al. Estimating the non-homogeneous elastic modulus distribution from surface deformations. Int J Solids Struct. 2016;83:73–80.
   Google Scholar
• Krouskop TA, Wheeler TM, Kallel F, et al. Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression. Ultrason Imaging. 1998;20:260–274.
   Google Scholar
• Samani A, Plewes D. An inverse problem solution for measuring the elastic modulus of intact ex vivo breast tissue tumours. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52:1247–1260.
   Google Scholar
• Mehrabian H, Campbell G, Samani A. A constrained reconstruction technique of hyperelasticity parameters for breast cancer assessment. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55:7489–7508.
   Google Scholar
• O'Hagan JJ, Samani A. Measurement of the hyperelastic properties of 44 pathological ex vivo breast tissue samples. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54:2257–2569.
   Google Scholar
• O'Hagan JJ, Samani A. Measurement of the hyperelastic properties of tissue slices with tumour inclusion. Phys Med Biol. 2008;53:7087–7106.
   Google Scholar
• Goenezen S, Barbone P, Oberai AA. Solution of the nonlinear elasticity imaging inverse problem: the incompressible case. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2011;200:1406–1420.
   Google Scholar
• Oberai AA, Gokhale NH, Goenezen S, et al. Linear and nonlinear elasticity imaging of soft tissue in vivo: demonstration of feasibility. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54:1191–1207.
   Google Scholar
• Gokhale NH, Barbone PE, Oberai AA. Solution of the nonlinear elasticity imaging inverse problem: the compressible case. Inverse Probl. 2008;24(4):045010.
   Google Scholar
• Loughry CW, Sheffer DB, Price TE, et al. Breast volume measurement of 248 women using biostereometric analysis. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.. 1986;80(4):553–558.
   Google Scholar
• Loughry CW, Sheffer DB, Price TE, et al. Breast volume measurement of 598 women using biostereometric analysis. Ann Plast Surg. 1989;22(5):380–385.
   Google Scholar
• Kashif AS, Lotz TF, McGarry MD, et al. Silicone breast phantoms for elastographic imaging evaluation. Med Phys. 2013;40:063503.
   Google Scholar
• Love AE. A treatise on the mathematical theory of elasticity. 4th ed. New York (NY): Dover Publications; 1944. First American Printing of the 1927 edition.
   Google Scholar
• Beck J, Blackwell B, Clair CS. Inverse heat conduction: Ill posed problems. New York (NY): Wiley; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Sussman TD. On the finite element analysis of incompressible solids [dissertation]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• American Cancer Society. http://www.cancer.org/, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Ries LAG, Young JL, Keel GE, et al. SEER survival monograph: Cancer survival among adults: US SEER program, 1988–2001, patient and tumor characteristics. National Cancer Institute, SEER Program, NIH Pub. No. 07-6215, 2007. http://seer.cancer.gov/publications/survival/
   Google Scholar
• Olson LG, Throne RD. Early detection of breast cancer through an inverse problem approach to stiffness mapping: tissue phantom experiments with improved cost functions. 15th U.S. National Congress on Computational Mechanics, 2019.
   Google Scholar