A New Approach to Analytical Modeling of Mars’s Magnetic Field

References

• Riedler W, Möhlmann D, Oraevsky V, et al. Magnetic fields near Mars: first results. Nature. 1989;341(6243):604–607. doi:10.1038/341604a0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connerney JEP. Planetary magnetism. In: Shubert G, editor. Treatise on geophysics, 2nd edition, Vol. 10. Amsterdam, Oxford: Elsevier; 2015. p. 195–237.
   Google Scholar
• Acuna MH, Connerney JEP, Wasilewski P, et al. Magnetic field and plasma observations at Mars: initial results of the Mars Global Surveyor mission. Science. 1998;279:1676–1680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acuna MH, Connerney JEP, Ness NF, et al. Global distribution of crustal magnetism discovered by the Mars Global Surveyor MAG/ER experiment. Science. 1999;284:790–793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connerney JEP, Acuna MH, Ness NF, et al. Tectonic implications of Mars crustal magnetism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(42):14970–14975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connerney JEP, Acuna MH, Wasilewski PJ, et al. Magnetic lineations in the ancient crust of Mars. Science. 1999;284:794–798. doi:10.1126/science.284.5415.794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprenke KF, Baker LL. Magnetization, paleomagnetic Poles, and polar wander on Mars. Icarus. 2000;147:26–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurdy DM, Stefanick M. Vertical extrapolation of Mars magnetic potentials. J Geophys Res. 2004;109(E10):E10005), doi:10.1029/2004JE002277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arkani-Hamed J. An improved 50-degree spherical harmonic model of the magnetic field of Mars derived from both high-altitude and low-altitude data. J Geophys Res. 2002;107(E5), doi:10.1029/2001JE001496.
   Google Scholar
• Cain JC, Ferguson B, Mozzoni D. An n=90 internal potential function of the magnetic field of the Martian crustal magnetic field. J Geophys Res. 2003;108(E2):5008), doi:10.1029/2000JE001487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purucker M, Ravat D, Frey H, et al. An altitude-normalized magnetic map of Mars and its interpretation. Geophys Res Lett. 2000;27(16):2449–2452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langlais B, Purucker ME, Mandea M. Crustal magnetic field of Mars. J Geophys Res Planet. 2004;109(E2):E02008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittelholz A, Johnson CL, Morschhauser A. A New magnetic field activity proxy for Mars from MAVEN data. Geophys Res Lett. 2018;45:5899–5907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langlais B, Thébault E, Houliez A, et al. A new model of the crustal magnetic field of Mars using MGS and MAVEN. J. Geophys Res Planet. 2019;124:1542–1569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittelholz A, Connerney J, Espley J, et al. Preprint, Planetary Science Decadal Survey. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson CL, Mittelholz A, Langlais B, et al. Crustal and time-varying magnetic fields at the InSight landing site on Mars. Nat Geosci. 2020;13:199–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittelholz A, Johnson CL, Feinberg JM, et al. Timing of the martian dynamo: New constraints for a core field 4.5 and 3.7Ga ago, Science Advances. 2020, EABA0513. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aba0513.
   Google Scholar
• Backus G, Gilbert F. Numerical application of formalism for geophysical inverse problems. Geophys J Roy Astr Soc. 1967;13:247–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backus G, Gilbert F. The resolving power of gross Earth data. Geophys J Roy Astr Soc. 1968;16:169–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neubauer A. Tikhonov regularization for non-linear ill-posed problems: optimal convergence rates and finite-dimensional approximation. Inverse Probl. 1989;5:541–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neubauer A. Finite-dimensional approximation of Tikhonov regularized solutions of non-linear ill-posed problems. Numer Funct Anal Optim. 1990;11:85–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engl HW, et al. Convergence rates for Tikhonov regularization of non-linear ill-posed problems. Inverse Probl. 1989;5:523–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Kolotov II, Lukyanenko DV, et al. Reconstruction of magnetic susceptibility using full magnetic gradient data. Comput Math Math Phys. 2020;60(6):1000–1007. doi:10.1134/S096554252006010X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Leonov AS, Lukyanenko DV, et al. General Tikhonov regularization with applications in geoscience. CSIAM Trans Appl Math. 2020;1(1):53–85. doi:10.4208/csam.2020-0004.
   Google Scholar
• Wang YF, Fan SF, Leonov AS, et al. Non-smooth regularization and fast gradient algorithm for micropore structure reconstruction of shale. Chin J Geophys. 2020;63(5):2036–2042. doi:10.6038/cjg2020M0684.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Leonov AS, Lukyanenko DV, et al. On the phase correction in tomographic research. J Appl Ind Math. 2020;14(4):1–11. doi:10.1134/S1990478920040171.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Zhang Y, Lukyanenko D, et al. Recovering aerosol particle size distribution function on the set of bounded piecewise-convex functions. Inverse Probl Sci Eng. 2013;21:339–354. doi:10.1080/17415977.2012.700711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Lukyanenko D, Yagola A. An optimal regularization method for convolution equations on the sourcewise represented set. J Inverse ILL-Posed Probl. 2016;23(5):465–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong R, Hofmann B, Zhang Y. A new class of accelerated regularization methods, with application to bioluminescence tomography. Inverse Probl. 2020;36:055013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Hofmann B. Two new non-negativity preserving iterative regularization methods for ill-posed inverse problems. Inverse Probl Imaging. 2021;15:229–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strakhov V, Stepanova I. The S-approximation method and its application to gravity problems. Izv Phys Solid Earth. 2002;38-2:91–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strakhov V, Stepanova I. Solution of gravity problems by the S-approximation method (regional version). Izv Phys Solid Earth. 2002;38-7:535–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stepanova IE. On the S-approximation of the Earth’s gravity field. Inverse Probl Sci Eng. 2008;16(5):547–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stepanova IE. On the S-approximation of the Earth’s gravity field. regional version. Inverse Probl Sci Eng. 2009;17(8):1095–1111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stepanova IE, Kerimov IA, Raevskiy DN, et al. Improving the methods for processing large data in geophysics and geomorphology based on the modified S- and F-approximations. Izv Phys Solid Earth. 2020;56(3):364–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Hofmann B. On fractional asymptotical regularization of linear ill-posed problems in hilbert spaces. Fract Calc Appl Anal. 2019;22:699–721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Hofmann B. On the second-order asymptotical regularization of linear ill-posed inverse problems. Appl Anal. 2020;99:1000–1025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koshlyakov NS, Gliner EB. Osnovnoye differential’niya uravneniya mathematicheskoi fiziki (Basic Equations of Mathematical Physics), Moscow: Fizmatgiz. 1962 (In Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Carlson BC. Computing elliptic integrals by duplication. Numer Math. 1979;33:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson BC, Notis EM. Algorithm 577: algorithms for incomplete elliptic integrals. ACM Trans Math Software. 1981;7:398–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudkova TV, Stepanova IE, Batov AV, et al. Modified method S-, and R-approximations in solving the problems of Mars’s morphology. Inverse Probl Sci Eng. 2020;29(6):1–15. doi:10.1080/17415977.2020.1813125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stepanova IE, Raevsky DN. On solving reverse problems of geophysics applying the methods of the theory of dynamic systems. Geophys J. 2014;3(36):118–131. (in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Stepanova IE, Raevsky DN. On the solution of inverse problems of gravimetry. Izv Phys Solid Earth. 2015;2(51):207–218.
   Google Scholar
• Stepanova IE, Raevsky DN. The modified method of S-approximation. regional version. Izv Phys Solid Earth. 2015;2(51):197–206.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Gulliksson M, Hernandez Bennetts V, et al. Reconstructing gas distribution maps via an adaptive sparse regularization algorithm. Inverse Probl Sci Eng. 2016;24(7):1186–1204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Lukyanenko D, Yagola A. Using Lagrange principle for solving two-dimensional integral equation with a positive kernel. Inverse Probl Sci Eng. 2016;24(5):811–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stepanova IE, Raevskiy DN, Shchepetilov AV. Separation of potential fields generated by different sources based on modified s-approximations. Izv Phys Solid Earth. 2020;56(3):379–391. doi:10.1134/s106935132003012x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapmeyer-Endrun B, Panning MP, Bissig F, et al. Thickness and structure of the martian crust from InSight seismic data. Science. 2021;373(6553):438–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morschhauser A, Lesur V, Grott M. A spherical harmonic model of the lithospheric magnetic field of Mars. J Geophys Res Planet. 2014;119:1162–1188. doi:10.1002/2013JE004555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan L, Quantin C, Tauzin B, et al. Crust stratigraphy and heterogeneities of the first kilometers at the dichotomy boundary in western Elysium Planitia and implications for InSight lander. Icarus. 2020;338:113511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudkova TV, Stepanova IE, Batov AV. Density anomalies in subsurface layers of Mars: model estimates for the site of the InSight mission seismometer. Sol Syst Res. 2020;54:15–19. doi:10.1134/S0038094620010037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar