The study of the main parameters affecting the efficiency of Claus reactor and construction of linguistic models for assessing the quality of produced sulfur

References

• Serikov TP, Orazbayev BB. Process flow diagrams of oil and gas processing in Kazakhstan, P. 1. Moscow: Oil and Gas; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Vasiliev BT, Otvagina MI. Sulfuric acid technology. Moscow: Chemistry; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Zinchenko TO. Environmental optimization of sulfur recovery technology (on the example of Gazprom Dobycha Orenburg LLC). Moscow: National University of Oil and Gas ‘Gubkin University’; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Serikov TP, Serikova ZF, Orazbayev BB, et al. New process units in Atyrau oil refinery plant: sulfur recovery unit. Atyrau Univ Oil Gas; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Orazbayev BB, Orazbayeva KN, Utenova BE. Development of mathematical models and modeling of chemical engineering systems under uncertainty. Theor Found Chem Eng. 2014;48:138–147. doi: 10.1134/S0040579514020092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orazbayev BB, Ospanov EA, Orazbayeva KN, et al. Hybrid method for the development of mathematical models of a chemical engineering system in ambiguous condition. Math Model Comput Simulations. 2018;10:748–758. doi: 10.1134/S2070048219010125
   Google Scholar
• Antonov AV. System analysis. Mathematical models and methods. Inst Archeol Ethnogr Obninsk. 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Denisov AA. Modern problems of system analysis. Informational aspects. St. Petersbg: St Petersbg State Technol Univ; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlov SY, Kulov NN, Kerimov RM. Improvement of chemical engineering processes using systems analysis. Theor Found Chem Eng. 2014;48:117. doi: 10.1134/S0040579514020109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reverberi AP, Kuznetsov NT, Meshalkin VP, et al. Systematical analysis of chemical methods in metal nanoparticles synthesis. Theor Found Chem Eng. 2016;50:63. doi: 10.1134/S0040579516010127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gmurman VE. Theory of probability and mathematical statistics, 12th publ. Moscow: Higher education; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao Z-W, Wang D-H. Statistical inference for generalized random coefficient autoregressive model. Math Comput Model. 2012;56:152–166. doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2011.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Protodiakonov MM, Teder RI. Rational experiment planning technique. Moscow: Science; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Mathematical theory of experiment planning. Moscow: Fizmatizd “Nauka”; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• New ideas in experiment planning. Moscow: Main office of physical and mathematical literature of Nauka publishing office; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Meshalkin VP. Expert systems in chemical technology. Moscow: Chemistry; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Gronostajski Z. The expert system supporting the assessment of the durability of forging tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2016;82:1973–1991. doi: 10.1007/s00170-015-7522-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabzi HZ. Developing an intelligent expert system for streamflow prediction, integrated in a dynamic decision support system for managing multiple reservoirs: a case study. Expert Syst Appl. 2017;82:145–163. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.04.039
   Google Scholar
• Dubois D. The role of fuzzy sets indecision sciences: old techniques and new directions. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2011;184:3–28. doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2011.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Štampar S, Sokolič S, Karer G, et al. Theoretical and fuzzy modelling of a pharmaceutical batch reactor. Math Comput Model. 2011;53:637–645. doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2010.09.016
   Google Scholar
• Aliyev RA, Tserkovny AE, Mamedova GA. Production management with fuzzy initial information. Moscow: Energoatomizdat; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Scherbatov IA. Optimal control of Claus process catalytic stage. Astrakhan: 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Podshivalov AV, Vezirov RO, Telyashev EG. Modern technologies of sulfurous gas processing in oil refinery plant. Oil Process Petrochemistry. 2000;1:63–68.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong T. Improvement of sulfur recovery processes, oil and gas technologies. Hydrocarb Process. 2005;4:57–61.
   Google Scholar
• Schurin RM, Pliner VM, Ter-Saakova NB. Experimental investigation of Claus process thermal stage. Ind Sanit Gas Clean. 1994;4:21–22.
   Google Scholar
• Kharichko MA, Kievsky VY, Efimov VA. Experience in reconstruction of elemental sulfur recovery unit. Chem Fuel Oil Technol. 2005;5:27–31.
   Google Scholar
• Chekhonin MF, Zinchenko TO. Improvement of operational efficiency of sulfur recovery units. Reduction of hazardous emissions. In: Int Sci Technol Conf Call Dev Nat Gas Fields Contain Non-Hydrocarbon Components, Orenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Scherbatov IA, Protalinsky OM. Estimation of Claus process catalyst activity using intellectual model. In: Mater Int Sci Technol Conf Call Intellect Syst Intellect CAD (CAD-2005). Sci Publ 3 Parts; Moscow: Fizmatlit; 2005.p. 371–374.
   Google Scholar
• Mohamed AS, Sapuan SM, Ahmad M, et al. Modeling the technology transfer process in the petroleum industry. Math Comput Model. 2012;6:451–470. doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2011.08.025
   Google Scholar
• Orazbayeva KN. Aikyn emes ortada optimizatsiyalau kezinde koldanatyn term-zhyin anyktau zhene tiistilik functsialaryn kuru ishki algoritmderi (in Kazakh). Gylymi J “AtMGI Zharshysy. 2009;3:216–220.
   Google Scholar