302
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Spatial determinants of inventive capacity in Brazil: the role of inventor networks

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 186-207 | Received 17 Jun 2017, Published online: 02 Aug 2019

REFERENCES

  • Araújo, B. C., Cavalcante, L. R., & Alves, P. (2009). Variáveis proxy para os gastos empresariais em inovação com base no pessoal ocupado técnico-científico disponível na Relação Anual de Informações Sociais (RAIS). Radar: Tecnologia, Produção e Comércio Exterior, 5, 16–21.
  • Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28, 31–56. doi: 10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
  • Bettencourt, L. M. A., Lobo, J., Helbing, D., Kühnert, C., & West, G. B. (2007). Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 7301–7306. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0610172104
  • Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39, 61–74. doi: 10.1080/0034340052000320887
  • Breschi, S., & Lenzi, C. (2016). Co-invention networks and inventive productivity in US cities. Journal of Urban Economics, 92, 66–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2015.12.003
  • Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2009). Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: An anatomy of localized knowledge flows. Journal of Economic Geography, 9, 439–468. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbp008
  • Broekel, T. (2012). Collaboration intensity and regional innovation efficiency in Germany: A conditional efficiency approach. Industry and Innovation, 19(2), 155–179. doi: 10.1080/13662716.2012.650884
  • Broekel, T., Brenner, T., & Buerger, M. (2015). An investigation of the relation between cooperation intensity and the innovative success of German regions. Spatial Economic Analysis, 10(1), 52–78. doi: 10.1080/17421772.2014.992359
  • Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2006). In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science, 52(1), 68–82. doi:10.1287/rrmsc.1050.0470 doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0470
  • Chiarini, T., Rapini, M. S., & Silva, L. A. (2017). Access to knowledge and catch-up: Exploring some intellectual property rights data from Brazil and South Korea. Sci. Public Policy, 44, 95–110. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scw034
  • Cowan, R., & Jonard, N. (2004). Network structure and the diffusion of knowledge. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 28, 1557–1575. doi: 10.1016/j.jedc.2003.04.002
  • De Noni, I., Ganzaroli, A., & Orsi, L. (2017). The impact of intra- and inter-regional knowledge collaboration and technological variety on the knowledge productivity of European regions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 117, 108–118. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.01.003
  • De Noni, I., Orsi, L., & Belussi, F. (2018). The role of collaborative networks in supporting the innovation performances of lagging-behind European regions. Research Policy, 47(1), 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.006
  • Edquist, C. (ed.). (1997). Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations (pp. 1–35). London: Pinter.
  • Ejermo, O., & Karlsson, C. (2006). Interregional inventor networks as studied by patent coinventorships. Research Policy, 35(3), 412–430. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.001
  • Elhorst, J. P. (2003). Specification and estimation of spatial panel data models. International Regional Sciences Review, 26, 244–268. doi: 10.1177/0160017603253791
  • Elhorst, J. P. (2014). Spatial econometrics: From cross-section data to spatial panel. Springer, 1–125.
  • Feldman, M., & Florida, R. (1994). The geographic sources of innovation: Technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 84, 210–229. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1994.tb01735.x
  • Fitjar, R. D., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013). Firm collaboration and modes of innovation in Norway. Research Policy, 42(1), 128–138. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.05.009.
  • Fleming, L., King, C., & Juda, A. I. (2007). Small worlds and regional innovation. Organization Science, 18, 938–954. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0289
  • Geenhuizen, M. (2007). Modelling dynamics of knowledge networks and local connectedness: A case study of urban high-tech companies in The Netherlands. Ann. Reg. Sci, 41, 813–833. doi: 10.1007/s00168-007-0143-5
  • Gertler, M. S., & Levite, Y. M. (2005). Local nodes in global networks: The geography of knowledge flows in biotechnology innovation. Industry and Innovation, 12, 487–507. doi: 10.1080/13662710500361981
  • Grillitsch, M., & Nilsson, M. (2015). Innovation in peripheral regions: Do collaborations compensate for a lack of local knowledge spillovers? The Annals of Regional Science, 54(1), 299–321. doi: 10.1007/s00168-014-0655-8
  • Hassink, R. (2005). How to unlock regional economies from path dependency? From learning region to learning cluster. European Planning Studies, 13(4), 521–535. doi: 10.1080/09654310500107134
  • He, J., & Fallah, M. H. (2014). Dynamics of inventor networks and the evolution of technology clusters. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38, 2174–2200. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12007
  • Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577–598. doi: 10.2307/2118401
  • Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26, 1–18. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1
  • Kaufmann, A. (2007). Patterns of innovation relations in metropolitan regions: The case of the Vienna urban region. Ann. Reg. Sci, 41, 735–748. doi: 10.1007/s00168-007-0119-5
  • LeSage, J., & Pace, K. R. (2009). Introduction to spatial econometrics. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
  • Lesage, J. P., & Pace, R. K. (2014). The biggest myth in spatial econometrics. Econometrics, 2, 217–249. doi: 10.3390/econometrics2040217
  • Lobo, J., & Strumsky, D. (2008). Metropolitan patenting, inventor agglomeration and social networks: A tale of two effects. Journal of Urban Economics, 63, 871–884. doi: 10.1016/j.jue.2007.07.005
  • Miguélez, E., & Moreno, R. (2013a). Research networks and inventors’ mobility as drivers of innovation: Evidence from Europe. Regional Studies, 47, 1668–1685. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.618803
  • Miguelez, E., & Moreno, R. (2013b). Skilled labour mobility, networks and knowledge creation in regions: A panel data approach. The Annals of Regional Science, 51(1), 191–212. doi: 10.1007/s00168-012-0526-0
  • Miguélez, E., & Moreno, R. (2015). Knowledge flows and the absorptive capacity of regions. Research Policy, 44, 833–848. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.01.016
  • Nagaoka, S., Motohashi, K., & Goto, A. (2010). Patent statistics as an innovation indicator. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of economics of innovation (Chap. 25, pp. 1083–1127). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Nakamura, R., & Paul, E. J. M. (2009). Measuring agglomeration. Handbook of regional growth and development theories. Cap, 16, 305–328.
  • Ó hUallacháin, B., & Lee, D. 2014. Urban centers and networks of co-invention in American biotechnology. The Annals of Regional Science 52 (3): 799–823. doi:10.1007/s00168-014-0610-8.
  • Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostics tests for cross section dependence in panels, CWPE discussion paper, 2004.
  • Powell, S., & Grodal, W. W. (2005). Networks of innovators. In J. FAGERBERG, D. C. MOWERY, & R. R. NELSON (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 56–85). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Singh, J. (2005). Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Science, 51, 756–770. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0349
  • Strumsky, D., & Thill, J. C. (2013). Profiling US metropolitan regions by their social research networks and regional economic performance. Journal of Regional Science, 53, 813–833. doi: 10.1111/jors.12048
  • Torre, A. (2008). On the role played by temporary geographical proximity in knowledge transmission. Regional Studies, 42, 869–889. doi: 10.1080/00343400801922814

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.