Heterogeneous spatial dynamic panels with an application to US housing data

REFERENCES

• Aquaro, M., Bailey, N., & Pesaran, M. H. (2015). Quasi maximum likelihood estimation of spatial models with heterogeneous coefficients. CESifo Working Paper Series 5428, CESifo.
   Google Scholar
• Aquaro, M., Bailey, N., & Pesaran, M. H. (2021). Estimation and inference for spatial models with heterogeneous coefficients: An application to US house prices. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 36(1), 18–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2792
   Google Scholar
• Autant-Bernard, C., & LeSage, J. P. (2019). A heterogeneous coefficient approach to the knowledge production function. Spatial Economic Analysis, 14(2), 196–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2019.1562201
   Google Scholar
• Baicker, K. (2005). The spillover effects of state spending. Journal of Public Economics, 89(2), 529–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.11.003
   Google Scholar
• Bao, Y., Liu, X., & Yang, L. (2020). Indirect inference estimation of spatial autoregressions. Econometrics, 8(3), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics8030034
   Google Scholar
• Chan, J. C. C., & Grant, A. L. (2016). On the observed-data deviance information criterion for volatility modeling. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 14(4), 772–802. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbw002
   Google Scholar
• Debarsy, N., & LeSage, J. P. (2022). Bayesian model averaging for spatial autoregressive models based on convex combinations of different types of connectivity matrices. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 40(2), 547–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2020.1840993
   Google Scholar
• Elhorst, J. (2012). Dynamic spatial panels: Models, methods, and inferences. Journal of Geographical Systems, 14(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10109-011-0158-4
   Google Scholar
• Ertur, C., & Koch, W. (2007). Growth, technological interdependence and spatial externalities: Theory and evidence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(6), 1033–1062. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.963
   Google Scholar
• Fingleton, B. (2001). Equilibrium and economic growth: Spatial econometric models and simulations. Journal of Regional Science, 41(1), 117–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4146.00210
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., & Robinson, P. M. (2015). Inference on higher-order spatial autoregressive models with increasingly many parameters. Journal of Econometrics, 186(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2014.12.008
   Google Scholar
• Han, X., Hsieh, C.-S., & Lee, L.-F. (2017). Estimation and model selection of higher-order spatial autoregressive model: An efficient Bayesian approach. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 63, 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2016.12.003
   Google Scholar
• Han, X., & Lee, L.-F. (2016). Bayesian analysis of spatial panel autoregressive models with time-varying endogenous spatial weight matrices, common factors, and random coefficients. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 34(4), 642–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2016.1167058
   Google Scholar
• Jin, F., & Lee, L.-F. (2019). GEL estimation and tests of spatial autoregressive models. Journal of Econometrics, 208(2), 585–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2018.07.007
   Google Scholar
• Kelejian, H. H., & Piras, G. (2014). Estimation of spatial models with endogenous weighting matrices, and an application to a demand model for cigarettes. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 46, 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2014.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Kyriacou, M., Phillips, P. C. B., & Rossi, F. (2017). Indirect inference in spatial autoregression. The Econometrics Journal, 20(2), 168–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/ectj.12084
   Google Scholar
• Lam, C., & Souza, P. C. L. (2020). Estimation and selection of spatial weight matrix in a spatial lag model. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 38(3), 693–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2019.1569526
   Google Scholar
• Lee, L.-F. (2004). Asymptotic distributions of quasi-maximum likelihood estimators for spatial autoregressive models. Econometrica, 72(6), 1899–1925. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00558.x
   Google Scholar
• Lee, L.-F. (2007). GMM and 2SLS estimation of mixed regressive, spatial autoregressive models. Journal of Econometrics, 137(2), 489–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.10.004
   Google Scholar
• Lee, L.-F., & Liu, X. (2010). Efficient GMM estimation of high order spatial autoregressive models with autoregressive disturbances. Econometric Theory, 26(1), 187–230. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466609090653
   Google Scholar
• Lee, L.-F., & Yu, J. (2010). Estimation of spatial autoregressive panel data models with fixed effects. Journal of Econometrics, 154(2), 165–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2009.08.001
   Google Scholar
• Lee, L.-F., & Yu, J. (2014). Efficient GMM estimation of spatial dynamic panel data models with fixed effects. Journal of Econometrics, 180(2), 174–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2014.03.003
   Google Scholar
• LeSage, J. P., & Chih, Y.-Y. (2018). A Bayesian spatial panel model with heterogeneous coefficients. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 72, 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2017.02.007
   Google Scholar
• LeSage, J. P., & Pace, R. K. (2014). The biggest myth in spatial econometrics. Econometrics, 2(4), 217–249. https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics2040217
   Google Scholar
• LeSage, J. P., Vance, C., & Chih, Y.-Y. (2017). A Bayesian heterogeneous coefficients spatial autoregressive panel data model of retail fuel duopoly pricing. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 62, 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2016.11.003
   Google Scholar
• Lin, X. (2010). Identifying peer effects in student academic achievement by spatial autoregressive models with group unobservables. Journal of Labor Economics, 28(4), 825–860. https://doi.org/10.1086/653506
   Google Scholar
• Lin, X., & Weinberg, B. A. (2014). Unrequited friendship? How reciprocity mediates adolescent peer effects. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 48, 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2014.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X., Chen, J., & Cheng, S. (2018). A penalized quasi-maximum likelihood method for variable selection in the spatial autoregressive model. Spatial Statistics, 25, 86–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2018.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Parent, O., & LeSage, J. P. (2012). Spatial dynamic panel data models with random effects. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42(4), 727–738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2012.04.008
   Google Scholar
• Qu, X., Lee, L.-F., & Yu, J. (2017). QML estimation of spatial dynamic panel data models with endogenous time varying spatial weights matrices. Journal of Econometrics, 197(2), 173–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2016.11.004
   Google Scholar
• Qu, X., Wang, X., & Lee, L.-F. (2016). Instrumental variable estimation of a spatial dynamic panel model with endogenous spatial weights when T is small. The Econometrics Journal, 19(3), 261–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/ectj.12069
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, G. O., & Rosenthal, J. S. (2009). Examples of adaptive MCMC. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 18(2), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1198/jcgs.2009.06134
   Google Scholar
• Yang, C. F. (2021). Common factors and spatial dependence: An application to US house prices. Econometric Reviews, 40(1), 14–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2020.1741785
   Google Scholar