Evaluating the safety profile of focused ultrasound and microbubble-mediated treatments to increase blood-brain barrier permeability

References

• Pardridge WM. The blood-brain barrier: bottleneck in brain drug development. NeuroRx. 2005;2:3–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bauer H-C, Krizbai IA, Bauer H, et al. “You shall not pass”-tight junctions of the blood brain barrier. Front Neurosci. 2014;8:392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathiisen TM, Lehre KP, Danbolt NC, et al. The perivascular astroglial sheath provides a complete covering of the brain microvessels: an electron microscopic 3D reconstruction. Glia. 2010;58:1094–1103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armulik A, Genové G, Mäe M, et al. Pericytes regulate the blood–brain barrier. Nature. 2010;468:557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorne RG, Nicholson C. In vivo diffusion analysis with quantum dots and dextrans predicts the width of brain extracellular space. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:5567–5572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neeves KB, Sawyer AJ, Foley CP, et al. Dilation and degradation of the brain extracellular matrix enhances penetration of infused polymer nanoparticles. Brain Res. 2007;1180:121–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardridge WM. Drug transport across the blood–brain barrier. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012;32:1959–1972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doolittle ND, Miner ME, Hall WA, et al. Safety and efficacy of a multicenter study using intraarterial chemotherapy in conjunction with osmotic opening of the blood-brain barrier for the treatment of patients with malignant brain tumors. Cancer. 2000;88:637–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamai I, Tsuji A. Transporter-mediated permeation of drugs across the blood–brain barrier. J Pharm Sci. 2000;89:1371–1388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taché Y, Goto Y, Gunion MW, et al. Inhibition of gastric acid secretion in rats by intracerebral injection of corticotropin-releasing factor. Science. 1983;222:935–937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson LR, Frey WH 2nd. Intranasal delivery bypasses the blood-brain barrier to target therapeutic agents to the central nervous system and treat neurodegenerative disease. BMC Neurosci. 2008;9(Suppl 3):S5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang Y, Cooke MJ, Morshead CM, et al. Hydrogel delivery of erythropoietin to the brain for endogenous stem cell stimulation after stroke injury. Biomaterials. 2012;33:2681–2692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salahuddin TS, Johansson BB, Kalimo H, et al. Structural changes in the rat brain after carotid infusions of hyperosmolar solutions: A light microscopic and immunohistochemical study. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 1988;14:467–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynynen K, McDannold N, Vykhodtseva N, et al. Noninvasive MR imaging-guided focal opening of the blood-brain barrier in rabbits. Radiology. 2001;220:640–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly MA, Hough O, Hynynen K. Blood-brain barrier closure time after controlled ultrasound-induced opening is independent of opening volume. J Ultrasound Med. 2017;36:475–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDannold N, Arvanitis CD, Vykhodtseva N, et al. Temporary disruption of the blood-brain barrier by use of ultrasound and microbubbles: safety and efficacy evaluation in rhesus macaques. Cancer Res. 2012;72:3652–3663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn JG, Zwemer RL, Chick AJ, et al. A new method for the generation and use of focused ultrasound in experimental biology. J Gen Physiol. 1942;26:179–193.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bakay L, Ballantine HT Jr, Hueter TF, et al. Ultrasonically produced changes in the blood-brain barrier. AMA Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1956;76:457–467.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ballantine HT Jr, Bell E, Manlapaz J. Progress and problems in the neurological applications of focused ultrasound. J Neurosurg. 1960;17:858–876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesiwala AH, Farrell L, Wenzel HJ, et al. High-intensity focused ultrasound selectively disrupts the blood-brain barrier in vivo. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2002;28:389–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ophir J, Parker KJ. Contrast agents in diagnostic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1989;15:319–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly MA, Hynynen K. Blood-brain barrier: real-time feedback-controlled focused ultrasound disruption by using an acoustic emissions–based controller. Radiology. 2012;263:96–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treat LH, McDannold N, Vykhodtseva N. Targeted delivery of doxorubicin to the rat brain at therapeutic levels using MRI‐guided focused ultrasound. J Cancer. 2007;121:901–907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treat LH, McDannold N, Zhang Y, et al. Improved anti-tumor effect of liposomal doxorubicin after targeted blood-brain barrier disruption by MRI-guided focused ultrasound in rat glioma. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012;38:1716–1725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovacs Z, Werner B, Rassi A, et al. Prolonged survival upon ultrasound-enhanced doxorubicin delivery in two syngenic glioblastoma mouse models. J Control Release. 2014;187:74–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang J, Wu X, Wang Z, et al. Antitumor effect of docetaxel-loaded lipid microbubbles combined with ultrasound-targeted microbubble activation on VX2 rabbit liver tumors. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29:61–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alli S, Figueiredo CA, Golbourn B, et al. Brainstem blood brain barrier disruption using focused ultrasound: A demonstration of feasibility and enhanced doxorubicin delivery. J Control Release. 2018;281:29–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinoshita M, McDannold N, Jolesz FA, et al. Targeted delivery of antibodies through the blood-brain barrier by MRI-guided focused ultrasound. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;340:1085–1090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinoshita M, McDannold N, Jolesz FA, et al. Noninvasive localized delivery of Herceptin to the mouse brain by MRI-guided focused ultrasound-induced blood–brain barrier disruption. PNAS. 2006;103:11719–11723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordão JF, Thévenot E, Markham-Coultes K, et al. Amyloid-β plaque reduction, endogenous antibody delivery and glial activation by brain-targeted, transcranial focused ultrasound. Exp Neurol. 2013;248:16–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkins R, Burgess A, Ganguly M, et al. Focused ultrasound delivers targeted immune cells to metastatic brain tumors. Cancer Res. 2013;73:1892–1899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess A, Ayala-Grosso CA, Ganguly M, et al. Targeted delivery of neural stem cells to the brain using MRI-guided focused ultrasound to disrupt the blood-brain barrier. PLoS One. 2011;6:e27877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baseri B, Choi JJ, Deffieux T, et al. Activation of signaling pathways following localized delivery of systemically administered neurotrophic factors across the blood-brain barrier using focused ultrasound and microbubbles. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57:N65–N81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess A, Huang Y, Querbes W, et al. Focused ultrasound for targeted delivery of siRNA and efficient knockdown of Htt expression. J Control Release. 2012;163:125–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thévenot E, Jordão JF, O’Reilly MA, et al. Targeted delivery of self-complementary adeno-associated virus serotype 9 to the brain, using magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound. Hum Gene Ther. 2012;23:1144–1155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu P-H, Wei K-C, Huang C-Y, et al. Noninvasive and targeted gene delivery into the brain using microbubble-facilitated focused ultrasound. PLoS One. 2013;8:e57682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Olumolade OO, Sun T, et al. Noninvasive, neuron-specific gene therapy can be facilitated by focused ultrasound and recombinant adeno-associated virus. Gene Ther. 2015;22:104–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin C-Y, Hsieh H-Y, Pitt WG, et al. Focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening for non-viral, non-invasive, and targeted gene delivery. J Control Release. 2015;212:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead BP, Mastorakos P, Suk JS, et al. Targeted gene transfer to the brain via the delivery of brain-penetrating DNA nanoparticles with focused ultrasound. J Control Release. 2016;223:109–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead B, Mastorakos P, Suk JS, et al. Localized delivery of non-viral gene-bearing nanoparticles into the rat brain following focused ultrasound-mediated BBB opening. J Ther Ultrasound. 2015;3:P29.
   Google Scholar
• Scarcelli T, Jordão JF, O’Reilly MA, et al. Stimulation of hippocampal neurogenesis by transcranial focused ultrasound and microbubbles in adult mice. Brain Stimul. 2014;7:304–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney SJ, Shah K, Yeung S, et al. Focused ultrasound-induced neurogenesis requires an increase in blood-brain barrier permeability. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0159892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess A, Dubey S, Yeung S, et al. Alzheimer disease in a mouse model: MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound targeted to the hippocampus opens the blood-brain barrier and improves pathologic abnormalities and behavior. Radiology. 2014;273:736–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leinenga G, Götz J. Scanning ultrasound removes amyloid-β and restores memory in an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7:278ra33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poon CT, Shah K, Lin C, et al. Time course of focused ultrasound effects on β-amyloid plaque pathology in the TgCRND8 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Rep. 2018;8:14061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura T, Sharma G, Ishiguro K, et al. Phospho-Tau bar code: analysis of Phosphoisotypes of Tau and its application to tauopathy. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet RM, Van der Jeugd A, Leinenga G, et al. Combined effects of scanning ultrasound and a tau-specific single chain antibody in a tau transgenic mouse model. Brain. 2017;140:1220–1230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordão JF, Ayala-Grosso CA, Markham K, et al. Antibodies targeted to the brain with image-guided focused ultrasound reduces amyloid-beta plaque load in the TgCRND8 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS One. 2010;5:e10549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly MA, Jones RM, Barrett E, et al. Investigation of the safety of focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening in a natural canine model of aging. Theranostics. 2017;7:3573–3584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones RM, O’Reilly MA, Hynynen K. Passive mapping of acoustic sources within the human skull cavity with a hemispherical sparse array using computed tomography-based aberration corrections. J Acoust Soc Am. 2014;135:2208–2209.
   Google Scholar
• Carpentier A, Canney M, Vignot A, et al. Clinical trial of blood-brain barrier disruption by pulsed ultrasound. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8:343re2–re343re2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horodyckid C, Canney M, Vignot A, et al. Safe long-term repeated disruption of the blood-brain barrier using an implantable ultrasound device: a multiparametric study in a primate model. J Neurosurg. 2017;126:1351–1361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement GT, Hynynen K. A non-invasive method for focusing ultrasound through the human skull. Phys Med Biol. 2002;47:1219–1236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynynen K, McDannold N, Clement G, et al. Pre-clinical testing of a phased array ultrasound system for MRI-guided noninvasive surgery of the brain–a primate study. Eur J Radiol. 2006;59:149–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDannold N, Park E-J, Mei C-S, et al. Evaluation of three-dimensional temperature distributions produced by a low-frequency transcranial focused ultrasound system within ex vivo human skulls. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2010;57:1967–1976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones RM, O’Reilly MA, Hynynen K. Experimental demonstration of passive acoustic imaging in the human skull cavity using CT-based aberration corrections. Med Phys. 2015;42:4385–4400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Alkins R, Schwartz ML, et al. Opening the blood-brain barrier with mr imaging–guided focused ultrasound: preclinical testing on a trans–human skull porcine model. Radiology. 2017;282:123–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldwirt L, Canney M, Horodyckid C, et al. Enhanced brain distribution of carboplatin in a primate model after blood–brain barrier disruption using an implantable ultrasound device. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2016;77:211–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsman N, Ironside S, Alkins R, et al. Initial experience of blood-brain barrier opening for chemotherapeutic-drug delivery to brain tumours by MR-guided focused ultrasound. Neuro Oncol. 2017;19:vi9–vi9.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsman N, Meng Y, Bethune AJ, et al. Blood-brain barrier opening in Alzheimer’s disease using MR-guided focused ultrasound. Nat Commun. 2018;9:2336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovacs ZI, Kim S, Jikaria N, et al. Disrupting the blood-brain barrier by focused ultrasound induces sterile inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114:E75–E84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon D, Hynynen K. Acute inflammatory response following increased blood-brain barrier permeability induced by focused ultrasound is dependent on microbubble dose. Theranostics. 2017;7:3989–4000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon D, Hynynen K. Reply to Kovacs et al.: concerning acute inflammatory response following focused ultrasound and microbubbles in the brain. Theranostics. 2018;8:2249–2250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H-L L, C-H P, C-Y T, et al. Opening of the blood-brain barrier by low-frequency (28-kHz) ultrasound: a novel pinhole-assisted mechanical scanning device. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010;36:325–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bing KF, Howles GP, Qi Y, et al. Blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption using a diagnostic ultrasound scanner and definity® in mice. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009;35:1298–1308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz ML, Yeung R, Huang Y, et al. Skull bone marrow injury caused by MR-guided focused ultrasound for cerebral functional procedures. J Neurosurg. 2018;11:1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulkkinen A, Werner B, Martin E, et al. Numerical simulations of clinical focused ultrasound functional neurosurgery. Phys Med Biol. 2014;59:1679–1700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichardo S, Sin VW, Hynynen K. Multi-frequency characterization of the speed of sound and attenuation coefficient for longitudinal transmission of freshly excised human skulls. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:219–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajek D, Hynynen K. The application of sparse arrays in high frequency transcranial focused ultrasound therapy: a simulation study. Med Phys. 2013;40:122901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDannold N, Vykhodtseva N, Hynynen K. Blood-brain barrier disruption induced by focused ultrasound and circulating preformed microbubbles appears to be characterized by the mechanical index. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008;34:834–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovacs ZI, Tu T-W, Sundby M, et al. MRI and histological evaluation of pulsed focused ultrasound and microbubbles treatment effects in the brain. Theranostics. 2018;8:4837–4855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vykhodtseva N, McDannold N, Hynynen K. Induction of apoptosis in vivo in the rabbit brain with focused ultrasound and Optison®. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006;32:1923–1929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samiotaki G, Vlachos F, Tung Y-S, et al. A quantitative pressure and microbubble-size dependence study of focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening reversibility in vivo using MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2012;67:769–777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDannold N, Vykhodtseva N, Hynynen K. Effects of acoustic parameters and ultrasound contrast agent dose on focused-ultrasound induced blood-brain barrier disruption. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008;34:930–937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly MA, Waspe AC, Ganguly M, et al. Focused-ultrasound disruption of the blood-brain barrier using closely-timed short pulses: influence of sonication parameters and injection rate. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011/4;37:587–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi JJ, Selert K, Gao Z, et al. Noninvasive and localized blood-brain barrier disruption using focused ultrasound can be achieved at short pulse lengths and low pulse repetition frequencies. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2011;31:725–737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra R, Vykhodtseva N, Hynynen K. Influence of exposure time and pressure amplitude on blood-brain-barrier opening using transcranial ultrasound exposures. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2010;1:391–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song K-H, Fan AC, Hinkle JJ, et al. Microbubble gas volume: a unifying dose parameter in blood-brain barrier opening by focused ultrasound. Theranostics. 2017;7:144–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Meer SM, Dollet B, Voormolen MM, et al. Microbubble spectroscopy of ultrasound contrast agents. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007;121:648–656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi JJ, Feshitan JA, Baseri B, et al. Microbubble-size dependence of focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening in mice in vivo. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010;57:145–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong N, Hoff L, Skotland T, et al. Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: theoretical considerations and some measurements. Ultrasonics. 1992;30:95–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goertz DE, de Jong N, Van Der Steen AFW. Attenuation and size distribution measurements of definity and manipulated definity populations. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33:1376–1388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDannold N, Zhang Y, Vykhodtseva N. The effects of oxygen on ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier disruption in mice. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2017;43:469–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDannold N, Vykhodtseva N, Hynynen K. Use of ultrasound pulses combined with definity for targeted blood-brain barrier disruption: a feasibility study. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33:584–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfield BL, Huo X, Williams R, et al. The effect of preactivation vial temperature on the acoustic properties of DefinityTM. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012;38:1298–1305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itani M, Mattrey RF. The effect of inhaled gases on ultrasound contrast agent longevity in vivo. Mol Imaging Biol. 2012;14:40–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullin L, Gessner R, Kwan J, et al. Effect of anesthesia carrier gas on in vivo circulation times of ultrasound microbubble contrast agents in rats. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2011;6:126–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samiotaki G, Karakatsani ME, Buch A, et al. Pharmacokinetic analysis and drug delivery efficiency of the focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening in non-human primates. Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;37:273–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu S-Y, Sanchez CS, Samiotaki G, et al. Characterizing focused-ultrasound mediated drug delivery to the heterogeneous primate brain in vivo with acoustic monitoring. Sci Rep. 2016;6:37094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faez T, Emmer M, Docter M, et al. Characterizing the subharmonic response of phospholipid-coated microbubbles for carotid imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011;37:958–970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sijl J, Vos HJ, Rozendal T, et al. Combined optical and acoustical detection of single microbubble dynamics. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011;130:3271–3281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leighton TG. The acoustic bubble. London: Academic Press; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Prosperetti A. A general derivation of the subharmonic threshold for non-linear bubble oscillations. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013;133:3719–3726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin PA, Bjørnø L. Acoustically induced shear stresses in the vicinity of microbubbles in tissue. J Acoust Soc Am. 1982;71:728–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Kreider W, Brayman AA, et al. Blood vessel deformations on microsecond time scales by ultrasonic cavitation. Phys Rev Lett. 2011;106:034301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseinkhah N, Hynynen K. A three-dimensional model of an ultrasound contrast agent gas bubble and its mechanical effects on microvessels. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57:785–808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseinkhah N, Goertz DE, Hynynen K. Microbubbles and blood-brain barrier opening: a numerical study on acoustic emissions and wall stress predictions. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2015;62:1293–1304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tung Y-S, Vlachos F, Choi JJ, et al. In vivo transcranial cavitation threshold detection during ultrasound-induced blood–brain barrier opening in mice. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55:6141–6155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDannold N, Vykhodtseva N, Hynynen K. Targeted disruption of the blood-brain barrier with focused ultrasound: association with cavitation activity. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51:793–807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvanitis CD, Livingstone MS, Vykhodtseva N, et al. Controlled ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier disruption using passive acoustic emissions monitoring. PLoS One. 2012;7:e45783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun T, Zhang Y, Power C, et al. Closed-loop control of targeted ultrasound drug delivery across the blood-brain/tumor barriers in a rat glioma model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114:E10281–E10290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones RM, Deng L, Leung K, et al. Three-dimensional transcranial microbubble imaging for guiding volumetric ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier opening. Theranostics. 2018;8:2909–2926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huwyler J, Wu D, Pardridge WM. Brain drug delivery of small molecules using immunoliposomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:14164–14169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton JT, Haworth KJ, Pyne-Geithman G, et al. Ultrasound-mediated drug delivery for cardiovascular disease. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2013;10:573–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laing ST, Kim H, Kopechek JA, et al. Ultrasound-mediated delivery of echogenic immunoliposomes to porcine vascular smooth muscle cells in vivo. J Liposome Res. 2010;20:160–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpentier A, Canney M, Vignot A, et al. Temporary disruption of the blood-brain barrier using an implantable ultrasound system for recurrent glioblastoma patients under IV carboplatin chemotherapy: initial phase 1/2a clinical trial observations. J Ther Ultrasound. 2015;3:O14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Veltkamp R, Siebing DA, Sun L, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen reduces blood–brain barrier damage and edema after transient focal cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 2005;36:1679–1683.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg SM, Vernooij MW, Cordonnier C, et al. Cerebral microbleeds: a guide to detection and interpretation. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:165–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang F-Y, Liu S-H, Ho F-M, et al. Effect of ultrasound contrast agent dose on the duration of focused-ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier disruption. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009;126:3344–3349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheikov N, McDannold N, Sharma S, et al. Effect of focused ultrasound applied with an ultrasound contrast agent on the tight junctional integrity of the brain microvascular endothelium. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008;34:1093–1104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Xia C, Xue Y, et al. Synergistic effect of low-frequency ultrasound and low-dose bradykinin on increasing permeability of the blood-tumor barrier by opening tight junction. J Neurosci Res. 2009;87:2282–2289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marty B, Larrat B, Van Landeghem M, et al. Dynamic study of blood-brain barrier closure after its disruption using ultrasound: a quantitative analysis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2012;32:1948–1958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazekas F, Kleinert R, Roob G, et al. Histopathologic analysis of foci of signal loss on gradient-echo T2*-weighted MR images in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: evidence of microangiopathy-related microbleeds. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999;20:637–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsushima Y, Endo K. Hypointensities in the brain on T2*-weighted gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2006;35:140–150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Downs ME, Karakatsani ME, Buch AM, et al. Long-term safety of repeated blood-brain barrier opening via focused ultrasound with microbubbles in non-human primates performing a cognitive task. 2015;10:e0125911.
   Google Scholar
• Downs ME, Buch A, Karakatsani ME, et al. Blood-brain barrier opening in behaving non-human primates via focused ultrasound with systemically administered microbubbles. Sci Rep. 2015;5:15076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond SB, Treat LH, Dewey JD, et al. Ultrasound enhanced delivery of molecular imaging and therapeutic agents in Alzheimer’s disease mouse models. PLoS One. 2008;3:e2175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheikov N, McDannold N, Vykhodtseva N, et al. Cellular mechanisms of the blood-brain barrier opening induced by ultrasound in presence of microbubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2004;30:979–989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones R, Deng L, Leung K, et al. Repeated hippocampal blood-brain barrier opening controlled via three-dimensional transcranial acoustic imaging: safety study in a porcine model. 2017 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), Washington DC. 2017. p. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Hynynen K, McDannold N, Sheikov NA, et al. Local and reversible blood-brain barrier disruption by noninvasive focused ultrasound at frequencies suitable for trans-skull sonications. Neuroimage. 2005;24:12–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baseri B, Choi JJ, Tung Y-S, et al. Multi-modality safety assessment of blood-brain barrier opening using focused ultrasound and definity microbubbles: a short-term study. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010;36:1445–1459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon D, Bendayan R, Hynynen K. Acute effects of focused ultrasound-induced increases in blood-brain barrier permeability on rat microvascular transcriptome. Sci Rep. 2017;7:45657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobus T, Vykhodtseva N, Pilatou M, et al. Safety validation of repeated blood-brain barrier disruption using focused ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016;42:481–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDannold N, Vykhodtseva N, Raymond S, et al. MRI-guided targeted blood-brain barrier disruption with focused ultrasound: histological findings in rabbits. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2005;31:1527–1537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynynen K, McDannold N, Vykhodtseva N, et al. Focal disruption of the blood-brain barrier due to 260-kHz ultrasound bursts: a method for molecular imaging and targeted drug delivery. J Neurosurg. 2006;105:445–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H-L, Wai -Y-Y, Hsu P-H, et al. In vivo assessment of macrophage CNS infiltration during disruption of the blood-brain barrier with focused ultrasound: a magnetic resonance imaging study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2010;30:177–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon D, Mah E, Hynynen K. Angiogenic response of rat hippocampal vasculature to focused ultrasound-mediated increases in blood-brain barrier permeability. Sci Rep. 2018;8:12178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw CE, Dunbar PR, Macaulay HA, et al. Measurement of immune markers in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid of multiple sclerosis patients during clinical remission. J Neurol. 1995;242:53–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharief MK, Thompson EJ. Increased levels of circulating ICAM-1. in serum and cerebrospinal fluid of patients with active multiple sclerosis. Correlation with TNF-a and blood-brain barrier damage. J Neuroimmunol. 1993;43:15–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu J, Moochhala S, Kaur C, et al. Cellular inflammatory response associated with breakdown of the blood-brain barrier after closed head injury in rats. J Neurotrauma. 2001;18:399–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breckwoldt MO, Chen JW, Stangenberg L, et al. Tracking the inflammatory response in stroke in vivo by sensing the enzyme myeloperoxidase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:18584–18589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Tang XN, Yenari MA. The inflammatory response in stroke. J Neuroimmunol. 2007;184:53–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danton GH, Dietrich WD. Inflammatory mechanisms after ischemia and stroke. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2003;62:127–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton SJ, Perry VH. Differential blood-brain barrier breakdown and leucocyte recruitment following excitotoxic lesions in juvenile and adult rats. Exp Neurol. 1998;154:231–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacheaux LP, Ivens S, David Y, et al. Transcriptome profiling reveals TGF-beta signaling involvement in epileptogenesis. J Neurosci. 2009;29:8927–8935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voutsinos-Porche B, Koning E, Kaplan H, et al. Temporal patterns of the cerebral inflammatory response in the rat lithium-pilocarpine model of temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurobiol Dis. 2004;17:385–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotas ME, Medzhitov R. Homeostasis, inflammation, and disease susceptibility. Cell. 2015;160:816–827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekny M, Pekna M. Astrocyte reactivity and reactive astrogliosis: costs and benefits. Physiol Rev. 2014;94:1077–1098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekny M, Wilhelmsson U, Pekna M. The dual role of astrocyte activation and reactive gliosis. Neurosci Lett. 2014;565:30–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu X, Leak RK, Shi Y, et al. Microglial and macrophage polarization—new prospects for brain repair. Nat Rev Neurol. 2015;11:56–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas S-M, Rothwell NJ, Gibson RM. The role of inflammation in CNS injury and disease. Br J Pharmacol. 2006;147(Suppl 1):S232–S240.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Reilly MA, Jones RM, Hynynen K. Three-dimensional transcranial ultrasound imaging of microbubble clouds using a sparse hemispherical array. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2014;61:1285–1294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng L, O’Reilly MA, Jones RM, et al. A multi-frequency sparse hemispherical ultrasound phased array for microbubble-mediated transcranial therapy and simultaneous cavitation mapping. Phys Med Biol. 2016;61:8476–8501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crake C, Brinker ST, Coviello CM, et al. A dual-mode hemispherical sparse array for 3D passive acoustic mapping and skull localization within a clinical MRI guided focused ultrasound device. Phys Med Biol. 2018;63:065008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar