References
- Singh S, Young A, McNaught CE. The physiology of wound healing. Surg (United Kingdom). 2017;36:473-477.
- Okur ME, Karantas ID, Şenyiğit Z, et al. Recent trends on wound management: new therapeutic choices based on polymeric carriers. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2020;15:661–684.
- Gonzalez ACDO, Andrade ZDA, Costa TF, et al. Wound healing - A literature review. An Bras Dermatol. 2016;91:614–620.
- Serra MB, Barroso WA, Da SNN, et al. From inflammation to current and alternative therapies involved in wound healing [Internet]. Int. J. Inflam. Hindawi Limited. 2017 [cited 2021 Apr 29. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28811953/
- Jiji S, Udhayakumar S, Maharajan K, et al. Bacterial cellulose matrix with in situ impregnation of silver nanoparticles via catecholic redox chemistry for third degree burn wound healing .Carbohydr Polym [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Feb 11];245: Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0144861720307475
- Wallace HA, Basehore BM, Zito PM. Wound healing phases [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; 2021 [cited 2021 Jan 9]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29262065
- Las Heras K, Igartua M, Santos-Vizcaino E, et al. Chronic wounds: current status, available strategies and emerging therapeutic solutions. J Control Release [Internet]. 2020;328:532–550.
- Powers JG, Higham C, Broussard K, et al. Wound healing and treating wounds Chronic wound care and management. J Am Acad Dermatol [Internet]. 2016;74:607–625.
- Gompelman M, Van Asten SAV V, Peters EJGG. Update on the role of infection and biofilms in wound healing. Plast Reconstr Surg [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 Apr 18];138:61S–70S. Available from: http://journals.lww.com/00006534-201609001-00010.
- Wilkinson HN, Hardman MJ. The role of estrogen in cutaneous ageing and repair [Internet]. Maturitas. 2017 [cited 2020 Apr 21];60–64. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378512217306357
- Robinson H, Norton S, Jarrett P, et al. The effects of psychological interventions on wound healing: a systematic review of randomized trials. Br J Health Psychol [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 Apr 21];22:805–835. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12257
- Beitz JM. Pharmacologic impact (aka “breaking bad”) of medications on wound healing and wound development: a literature-based overview [Internet]. Ostomy Wound Manag. 2017 [cited 2020 Apr 22];18–35. Available from: www.o-wm.com
- Lou P, Liu S, Xu X, et al. Extracellular vesicle-based therapeutics for the regeneration of chronic wounds: current knowledge and future perspectives. Acta Biomater [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 14];119:42–56. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.11.001
- Xu Z, Han S, Gu Z, et al. Advances and impact of antioxidant hydrogel in chronic wound healing. Adv Healthc Mater. 2020; 9: 1901502.
- Ali NH, Amin MCIM, Ng SF. Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogels containing reduced graphene oxide (rGO) as a functional antibiofilm wound dressing. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Jun 23];30:629–645.
- Han G, Ceilley R. Chronic wound healing: a review of current management and treatments. Adv Ther. 2017;34:599–610.
- Kumar P, Kumar S, Udupa EP, et al. Role of angiogenesis and angiogenic factors in acute and chronic wound healing. Plast Aesthetic Res. 2015; 2: 243.
- Kapetanaki MG, Mora AL, Rojas M. Influence of age on wound healing and fibrosis. J Pathol. 2013;229:310–322.
- Evelhoch SR. Biofilm and chronic nonhealing wound infections. Surg Clin North Am [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 14];100:727–732.
- Alverdy JC. The wound environment, microbial virulence and postoperative infection: practical lessons for the surgeon. Cirugía Española (English Ed) [Internet]. 2018;96:612–619.
- Sharma AK, Dhasmana N, Dubey N, et al. Bacterial virulence factors: secreted for survival [internet]. Indian J Microbiol Springer. 2017 [cited 2021 Apr 19];1. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC5243249/
- Innes AJ, Mullish BH, Fernando F, et al. Faecal microbiota transplant: a novel biological approach to extensively drug-resistant organism-related non-relapse mortality. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2017; 52: 1452–1454.
- Alverdy JC, Hyoju SK, Weigerinck M, et al. The gut microbiome and the mechanism of surgical infection. Br J Surg. 2017; 104: e14–e23.
- Rabin N, Zheng Y, Opoku-Temeng C, et al. Biofilm formation mechanisms and targets for developing antibiofilm agents [Internet]. Future Med Chem Future Sci. 2015 [cited 2021 Apr 19];7:493–512. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4155/fmc.15.6
- Wi YM, Patel R. Understanding biofilms and novel approaches to the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of medical device-associated infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2018;32:915–929.
- Da Cunda P, Iribarnegaray V, Papa-Ezdra R, et al. Characterization of the different stages of biofilm formation and antibiotic susceptibility in a clinical Acinetobacter baumannii strain. Microb Drug Resist. 2020; 26: 569–575.
- Sen CK. Human wounds and its burden: an updated compendium of estimates [Internet]. Adv Wound Care. Mary Ann Liebert Inc. 2019 [cited 2021 Apr 19]. p. 39–48. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC6389759/.
- Vestby LK, Grønseth T, Simm R, et al. Bacterial biofilm and its role in the pathogenesis of disease [Internet]. Antibiotics. MDPI AG. 2020 [cited 2021 Apr 19];9: 59 Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC7167820/
- Roope LSJ, Smith RD, Pouwels KB, et al. The challenge of antimicrobial resistance: What economics can contribute [Internet]. Science. 2019 [cited 2021 Apr 19];364: eaau4679. Available from: https://science.sciencemag.org/content/364/6435/eaau4679.abstract
- Reygaert W. C. An overview of the antimicrobial resistance mechanisms of bacteria. AIMS Microbiol [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2021 Apr 19];4:482–501. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC6604941/
- Dadgostar P. Antimicrobial resistance: implications and costs. Infect Drug Resist [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 Apr 19];12: 3903–3910. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6929930/
- Parastan R, Kargar M, Solhjoo K, et al. Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: structures, antibiotic resistance, inhibition, and vaccines. Gene Rep Elsevier Inc. 2020;100739.
- Paterson IK, Hoyle A, Ochoa G, et al. Optimising antibiotic usage to treat bacterial infections. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2021 Apr 19];6:1–10. Available from: www.nature.com/scientificreports
- San Millan A. Evolution of plasmid-mediated antibiotic resistance in the clinical context. Trends Microbiol Elsevier Ltd. 2018; 26: 978–985.
- Li Q, Chang W, Zhang H, et al. The role of plasmids in the multiple antibiotic resistance transfer in esbls-producing Escherichia coli isolated from wastewater treatment plants. Front Microbiol [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 Apr 19];10:633. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00633/full
- Pachori P, Gothalwal R, Gandhi P. Emergence of antibiotic resistance Pseudomonas aeruginosa in intensive care unit; a critical review [Internet]. Genes Dis. 2019 [cited 2021 Apr 19];6109–119. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352304219300170
- Pang Z, Raudonis R, Glick BR, et al. Antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: mechanisms and alternative therapeutic strategies. Biotechnol Adv [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 Apr 19];37:177–192. Available from. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0734975018301976
- Yelin I, Kishony R. Antibiotic Resistance [Internet]. Cell. 2018 [cited 2021 Apr 19];172 (5):1136–1136.e1.
- Peterson E, Kaur P. Antibiotic Resistance Mechanisms in Bacteria: Relationships Between Resistance Determinants of Antibiotic Producers, Environmental Bacteria, and Clinical Pathogens. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1–27
- Boateng J, Catanzano O. Advanced therapeutic dressings for effective wound healing - a review. J Pharm Sci. 2015;104:3653–3680.
- Simões D, Miguel SP, Ribeiro MP, et al. Recent advances on antimicrobial wound dressing: a review. Eur J Pharm Biopharm [Internet]. 2018;127:130–141. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2018.02.022
- Öhnstedt E, Lofton Tomenius H, Vågesjö E, et al. The discovery and development of topical medicines for wound healing [Internet]. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. Taylor and Francis Ltd. 2019 [cited 2021 Mar 15];485–497. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/17460441.2019.1588879.
- Sehgal PK, Sripriya R, Senthilkumar M, et al. Drug delivery dressings [Internet]. Second Edi. Adv. Text. Wound Care Elsevier Ltd. 2019. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102192-7.00009-6.
- Deutsch CJ, Edwards DM, Myers S. Wound dressings. 2017;Br J Hosp Med. 78:C103–C109.
- Mousumi Sukul MS, Linh NTB, Min Y-K, et al. Effect of local sustainable release of BMP2-VEGF from nano-cellulose loaded in sponge biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) on bone regeneration. 2015;812–855.
- Wang B, Lv X, Chen S, et al. Bacterial cellulose/gelatin scaffold loaded with VEGF-silk fibroin nanoparticles for improving angiogenesis in tissue regeneration. Cellulose. 2017;24:5013–5024.
- Cao Y, Sun Z, Liao L, et al., Surface-structured bacterial cellulose loaded with hUSCs accelerate skin wound healing by promoting angiogenesis in rats. Biochem Biophys Res Commun [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 Jul 15];516:1167–1174. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31284954/
- Orlando I, Roy I. Cellulose-based hydrogels for wound healing. 2019. 1131–1148.
- Basu A, Lindh J, Ålander E, et al. On the use of ion-crosslinked nanocellulose hydrogels for wound healing solutions: physicochemical properties and application-oriented biocompatibility studies. Carbohydr Polym [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 Jul 22];174:299–308. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0144861717307105
- Mertaniemi H, Escobedo-Lucea C, Sanz-Garcia A, et al. Human stem cell decorated nanocellulose threads for biomedical applications. Biomaterials [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2021 Jul 22];82:208–220. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014296121501008X
- Gaspar-Pintiliescu A, Stanciuc AM, Craciunescu O. Natural composite dressings based on collagen, gelatin and plant bioactive compounds for wound healing: a review. Int J Biol Macromol Elsevier B.V 2019;138:854–865.
- Koehler J, Brandl FP, Goepferich AM. Hydrogel wound dressings for bioactive treatment of acute and chronic wounds. Eur Polym J. 2018;100:1–11.
- Sebri NJM, Amin KAM. Composite film of chitosan loaded norfloxacin with improved flexibility and antibacterial activity for wound dressing application. Orient J Chem. 2017;33:628–636.
- Cerchiara T, Abruzzo A, Ñahui Palomino RA, et al. Spanish Broom (Spartium junceum L.) fibers impregnated with vancomycin-loaded chitosan nanoparticles as new antibacterial wound dressing: preparation, characterization and antibacterial activity. Eur J Pharm Sci [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 Mar 15];99:105–112. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27931851/
- Kurczewska J, Pecyna P, Ratajczak M, et al. Halloysite nanotubes as carriers of vancomycin in alginate-based wound dressing. Saudi Pharm J [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 Mar 15];25:911–920. Available from:/pmc/articles/PMC5605850/
- Nøhr-Meldgaard K, Ovsepian A, Ingmer H, et al. Resveratrol enhances the efficacy of aminoglycosides against Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Antimicrob Agents [Internet]. 2018;52:390–396.
- Rajendran NK, Kumar SSD, Houreld NN, et al. A review on nanoparticle based treatment for wound healing. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol [Internet]. 2018;44:421–430.
- Montaser AS, Jlassi K, Ramadan MA, et al. Alginate, gelatin, and carboxymethyl cellulose coated nonwoven fabrics containing antimicrobial AgNPs for skin wound healing in rats. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021; 173: 203–210.
- Yang X, Wang B, Sha D, et al. Injectable and antibacterial ε-poly(L-lysine)-modified poly(vinyl alcohol)/chitosan/AgNPs hydrogels as wound healing dressings. Polymer (Guildf). 2021;212.
- Lv H, Cui S, Yang Q, et al. AgNPs-incorporated nanofiber mats: relationship between AgNPs size/content, silver release, cytotoxicity, and antibacterial activity. Mater Sci Eng C. 2021;118:111331
- Khorasani MT, Joorabloo A, Adeli H, et al. Enhanced antimicrobial and full-thickness wound healing efficiency of hydrogels loaded with heparinized ZnO nanoparticles: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;166:200–212.
- Gong CP, Luo Y, Pan YY. Novel synthesized zinc oxide nanoparticles loaded alginate-chitosan biofilm to enhanced wound site activity and anti-septic abilities for the management of complicated abdominal wound dehiscence. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol. 2019;192:124–130.
- Ayh NA, Katas H, Habideen NH, et al. Dual-action of thermoresponsive gels containing DsiRNA-loaded gold nanoparticles for diabetic wound therapy: characterization, in vitro safety and healing efficacy. Saudi Pharm J. 2020; 28: 1420–1430.
- Menazea AA, Ahmed MK. Wound healing activity of chitosan/polyvinyl alcohol embedded by gold nanoparticles prepared by nanosecond laser ablation. J Mol Struct. 2020;1217:128401
- Yilmaz AC, Aygin D. Honey dressing in wound treatment: a systematic review. Complement. Ther. Med. Churchill Livingstone. 2020;102388 Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102388
- Lamarra J, Bucci P, Giannuzzi L, et al. Biomaterial-based dressings as vehicle for chitosan-encapsulated cabreuva essential oil: cytotoxicity and regenerative activity. React Funct Polym. 2020; 156: 104728.
- Okur ME, Karantas ID, Şenyiğit Z, et al. Recent trends on wound management: new therapeutic choices based on polymeric carriers. Asian J. Pharm. Sci. Elsevier. 2020;15:661–684.
- Tamahkar E, Özkahraman B, Süloğlu AK, et al. A novel multilayer hydrogel wound dressing for antibiotic release. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2020;58:1–7.
- Parthasarathy R, Monette CE, Bracero S, et al. Methods for field measurement of antibiotic concentrations: limitations and outlook [Internet]. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. Oxford University Press. 2018; [cited 2021 Mar 16];105. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/femsec/article/94/8/fiy105/5033401.
- Kalunke RM, Grasso G, D’Ovidio R, et al. Detection of ciprofloxacin residues in cow milk: a novel and rapid optical β-galactosidase-based screening assay. Microchem J [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2021 Mar 17];136:128–132. Available from: https://moh-it.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/detection-of-ciprofloxacin-residues-in-cow-milk-a-novel-and-rapid
- Wiegand C, Hipler U-C, Elsner P, et al. Clinical efficacy of dressings for treatment of heavily exuding chronic wounds. Chronic Wound Care Manag Res. 2015;101 Doi:https://doi.org/10.2147/CWCMR.S60315
- Pacheco MS, Kano GE, Paulo L de A, et al. Silk fibroin/chitosan/alginate multilayer membranes as a system for controlled drug release in wound healing. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;152:803–811.
- Renuka M, Nishadh P, Jigar S, et al. Mucoadhesive wound healing film of Doxycycline hydrochloride. Int J Drug Dev Res [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2021 Mar 22];4:128–140. Available from:http://www.ijddr.in
- Alam AKMM, Shubhra QTH. Surface modified thin film from silk and gelatin for sustained drug release to heal wound. J Mater Chem B [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2021 Mar 22];3:6473–6479. Available from: https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2015/tb/c5tb00920k
- Tomoda BT, Corazza FG, Beppu MM, et al. Silk fibroin membranes with self-assembled globular structures for controlled drug release. J Appl Polym Sci. 2020;137:48763
- Mobed-Miremadi M, Nagendra RK, Ramachandruni SL, et al. Polystyrene microsphere and 5-fluorouracil release from custom-designed wound dressing films. Prog Biomater. 2013;2:1.
- Trevisol TC, Scartazzini L, Valério A, et al. Diclofenac release from alginate/carboxymethyl cellulose mono and bilayer films for wound dressing applications. Cellulose. 2020;27:6629–6642.
- Ghosal K, Agatemor C, Špitálsky Z, et al. Electrospinning tissue engineering and wound dressing scaffolds from polymer-titanium dioxide nanocomposites. Chem Eng J [Internet]. 2019;358:1262–1278.
- Sikka MP, Midha VK. The role of biopolymers and biodegradable polymeric dressings in managing chronic wounds [Internet]. Second Edi. Adv. Text. Wound Care. Elsevier Ltd. 2019; doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102192-7.00016-3.
- Song R, Murphy M, Li C, et al. Current development of biodegradable polymeric materials for biomedical applications [Internet]. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. Dove Medical Press Ltd. 2018 [cited 2020 Jul 17];12:3117–3145. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC6161720/?report=abstract
- Oprea M, Voicu SI. Recent advances in composites based on cellulose derivatives for biomedical applications. Carbohydr Polym [Internet]. 2020;247:116683.
- Piraino F, Selimovic S.A Current View of Functional Biomaterials for Wound Care, Molecular and Cellular Therapies. Biomed Res Int [Internet]. 2015;2015:1–10
- Khorasani MT, Joorabloo A, Moghaddam A, et al. Incorporation of ZnO nanoparticles into heparinised polyvinyl alcohol/chitosan hydrogels for wound dressing application. Int J Biol Macromol [Internet]. 2018;114:1203–1215. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.04.010
- Park KH, Kwon JB, Park JH, et al. Collagen dressing in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer: a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, single-center study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;156:107861.
- Mokhena TC, Mochane MJ, Mtibe A, et al. Electrospun alginate nanofibers toward various applications: a review. Materials (Basel). 2020; 13: 1–24.
- Sulaeva I, Hettegger H, Bergen A, et al. Fabrication of bacterial cellulose-based wound dressings with improved performance by impregnation with alginate. Mater Sci Eng C. 2020;110:110619
- Szymańska M, Karakulska J, Sobolewski P, et al. Glycoside hydrolase (PelAh) immobilization prevents Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation on cellulose-based wound dressing. Carbohydr Polym. 2020;246:116625
- Farahani H, Barati A, Arjomandzadegan M, et al. Nanofibrous cellulose acetate/gelatin wound dressing endowed with antibacterial and healing efficacy using nanoemulsion of Zataria multiflora. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;162:762–773.
- Forero-Doria O, Polo E, Marican A, et al. Supramolecular hydrogels based on cellulose for sustained release of therapeutic substances with antimicrobial and wound healing properties. Carbohydr Polym. 2020;242:116383
- Hickey RJ, Pelling AE. Cellulose biomaterials for tissue engineering [Internet]. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019 [cited 2021 Apr 28]; 7:45. Available from: www.frontiersin.org
- Onishi H, Machida Y, Santhini E, et al. Novel textiles in managing burns and other chronic wounds. Adv Text Wound Care Woodhead Publishing. 2019;211–260
- Chun C, Lee DY, Kim JT, et al. Effect of molecular weight of hyaluronic acid (HA) on viscoelasticity and particle texturing feel of HA dermal biphasic fillers. Biomater Res [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2021 Jul 22];20:1–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-016-0073-3
- David G. Collagen-based 3D structures-versatile, efficient materials for biomedical applications. Biopolym Formul Biomed Food Appl Elsevier.2020;881–906.
- Kadouche S, Farhat M, Lounici H, et al. Low cost chitosan biopolymer for environmental use made from abundant shrimp wastes. Waste Biomass Valorization [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 Jul 22];8:401–406. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-016-9593-2
- Fu LH, Qi C, Ma MG, et al. Multifunctional cellulose-based hydrogels for biomedical applications. J Mater Chem B. 2019;7:1541–1562.
- Alavi M, Nokhodchi A. An overview on antimicrobial and wound healing properties of ZnO nanobiofilms, hydrogels, and bionanocomposites based on cellulose, chitosan, and alginate polymers. Carbohydr Polym [Internet]. 2020;227:115349.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115349
- Mohan S, Oluwafemi OS, Kalarikkal N, et al. Biopolymers – application in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology. Recent Adv Biopolym [Internet]. InTech; 2016 [cited 2020 Jun 23; Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/books/recent-advances-in-biopolymers/biopolymers-application-in-nanoscience-and-nanotechnology.
- Zainal SH, Mohd NHH, Suhaili N, et al. Preparation of Cellulose-based Hydrogel: a Review. J Mater Res Technol [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Jan 9];10:935–952. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2238785420320895
- Zhong C. Industrial-Scale Production and Applications of Bacterial Cellulose. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:1–19.
- Widiarto S, Yuwono SD, Rochliadi A, et al. Preparation and Characterization of Cellulose and Nanocellulose from Agro-industrial Waste - Cassava Peel. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng [Internet]. 2017;176:012052
- Dai L, Cheng T, Duan C, et al. 3D printing using plant-derived cellulose and its derivatives: a review. Carbohydr Polym [Internet]. 2019;203:71–86.Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.09.027
- Salari M, Sowti Khiabani M, Rezaei Mokarram R, et al. Preparation and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from bacterial cellulose produced in sugar beet molasses and cheese whey media. Int J Biol Macromol [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 Jan 17];122:280–288. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141813017337765
- Reddy KO, Maheswari CU, Dhlamini MS, et al. Extraction and characterization of cellulose single fibers from native African Napier grass. Carbohydr Polym [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2021 Jan 17];188:85–91. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014486171830136X
- Wang J, Liu M, Duan C, et al. Preparation and characterization of cellulose-based adsorbent and its application in heavy metal ions removal. Carbohydr Polym [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 Jan 17];206:837–843. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0144861718313936
- Szymanska-Chargot M, Chylinska M, Gdula K, et al. Isolation and characterization of cellulose from different fruit and vegetable pomaces. Polymers (Basel) [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 Jan 17];9. Available from: www.mdpi.com/journal/polymers.
- Hemmati F, Jafari SM, Kashaninejad M, et al. Synthesis and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals derived from walnut shell agricultural residues. Int J Biol Macromol [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2021 Jan 17];120:1216–1224. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014181301832049X
- Leite ALMP, Zanon CD, Menegalli FC. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from cassava root bagasse and peelings. Carbohydr Polym [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 Jan 17];157:962–970. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0144861716312140
- Chieng BW, Lee SH, Ibrahim NA, et al. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from oil palm mesocarp fiber. Polymers (Basel) [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 Jan 17];9. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/9/8/355.
- Thambiraj S, Ravi Shankaran D. Preparation and physicochemical characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from industrial waste cotton. Appl Surf Sci [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 Jan 17];412:405–416. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169433217309704
- Kruer-Zerhusen N, Cantero-Tubilla B, Wilson DB. Characterization of cellulose crystallinity after enzymatic treatment using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Cellulose [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2021 Jan 17];25:37–48.
- Zhang H, Liu Y, Cui S, et al. Cellulose nanofibers electrospun from aqueous conditions. Cellulose [Internet]. 2020;27:8695–8708.
- Liu J, Chinga-Carrasco G, Cheng F, et al. Hemicellulose-reinforced nanocellulose hydrogels for wound healing application. Cellulose. 2016; 23: 3129–3143.
- Gan S, Zakaria S, Chia CH, et al. Highly porous regenerated cellulose hydrogel and aerogel prepared from hydrothermal synthesized cellulose carbamate. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0173743
- Chiaoprakobkij N, Seetabhawang S, Sanchavanakit N, et al. Fabrication and characterization of novel bacterial cellulose/alginate/gelatin biocomposite film. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2019; 30: 961–982.
- Maia AL, Lins EM, Aguiar JLA, et al. Bacterial cellulose biopolymer film and gel dressing for the treatment of ischemic wounds after lower limb revascularization. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2019;46:1–11
- Khamrai M, Banerjee SL, Kundu PP. Modified bacterial cellulose based self-healable polyelectrolyte film for wound dressing application. 2017;Carbohydr Polym. 174:580–590.
- Kiti K, Suwantong O. The potential use of curcumin-β-cyclodextrin inclusion complex/chitosan-loaded cellulose sponges for the treatment of chronic wound. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;164:3250–3258.
- de Oliveira GV, Gold MH. Hydrocolloid dressings can be used to treat hypertrophic scars: an outpatient dermatology service devoted to treat keloids and challenging scars. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020;19:3344–3348.
- Ferreira FV, Otoni CG, De France KJ, et al. Porous nanocellulose gels and foams: breakthrough status in the development of scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater Today Elsevier B.V. 2020;126–141. 37
- Thomas D, Nath MS, Mathew N, et al. Alginate film modified with aloe vera gel and cellulose nanocrystals for wound dressing application: preparation, characterization and in vitro evaluation. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2020;59:101894
- Zhang M, Yang M, Woo MW, et al. High-mechanical strength carboxymethyl chitosan-based hydrogel film for antibacterial wound dressing. Carbohydr Polym. 2021;256:117590
- Mirmajidi T, Chogan F, Rezayan AH, et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of a nanofiber wound dressing loaded with melatonin. Int J Pharm. 2021;596:120213
- Kong D, Zhang Q, You J, et al. Adhesion loss mechanism based on carboxymethyl cellulose-filled hydrocolloid dressings in physiological wounds environment. Carbohydr Polym [Internet]. 2020;235:115953. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.115953.
- Namviriyachote N, Lipipun V, Akkhawattanangkul Y, et al. Development of polyurethane foam dressing containing silver and asiaticoside for healing of dermal wound. Asian J Pharm Sci [Internet]. 2019;14:63–77
- Singh B, Singh J. Rajneesh. Application of tragacanth gum and alginate in hydrogel wound dressing’s formation using gamma radiation Carbohydr Polym Technol Appl [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Mar 22];2:100058. Available fromhttps://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2666893921000268
- Zeng D, Shen S, Fan D. Molecular design, synthesis strategies and recent advances of hydrogels for wound dressing applications. Chinese J. Chem. Eng Elsevier BV. 2021;30:308–320
- Zubik K, Singhsa P, Wang Y, et al. Thermo-responsive poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-cellulose nanocrystals hybrid hydrogels for wound dressing. Polymers (Basel) [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 Jul 22];9. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/187980.
- Muchová M, Münster L, Capáková Z, et al. Design of dialdehyde cellulose crosslinked poly(vinyl alcohol) hydrogels for transdermal drug delivery and wound dressings. Mater Sci Eng C [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Jan 10];116:111242.
- Du S, Chen X, Chen X, et al. Covalent chitosan-cellulose hydrogels via Schiff-base reaction containing macromolecular microgels for pH-sensitive drug delivery and wound dressing. Macromol Chem Phys [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 Jul 22];220. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/macp.201900399.
- Xu J, Wang H, Jiang L, et al. Preparation of cellulose hydrogel dressing with evenly dispersed hydrophobic drugs by hydrogen bonding and encapsulation methods. Macromol Mater Eng [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Jul 22];2100286. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.202100286.
- Badshah M, Ullah H, Khan AR, et al. Surface modification and evaluation of bacterial cellulose for drug delivery. Int J Biol Macromol [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2021 Jul 22];113:526–533. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141813017336553
- Ciolacu DE, Nicu R, Ciolacu F. Cellulose-based hydrogels as sustained drug-delivery systems Materials (Basel) [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Jul 22];13:1–37. Available from/pmc/articles/PMC7700533/
- Maver T, Maver U, Mostegel F, et al. Cellulose based thin films as a platform for drug release studies to mimic wound dressing materials. Cellulose [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2020 Jun 2];22:749–761. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-014-0515-9
- Kumar U. Dressing Materials. Bedside Clin Orthop (Ward Round Tables). 2017: 17
- Bombaldi de Souza RF, Bombaldi de Souza FC, Bierhalz ACK, et al. Biopolymer-based films and membranes as wound dressings. Biopolym Membr Film [Internet]. Elsevier; 2020. p. 165–194. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780128181348000079
- Kim PJ, Applewhite A, Dardano AN, et al. Use of a novel foam dressing with negative pressure wound therapy and instillation: recommendations and clinical experience. Wounds a Compend Clin Res Pract [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Jun 4];30:S1–S17. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29723142
- Chaganti P, Gordon I, Chao JH, et al. A systematic review of foam dressings for partial thickness burns. Am J Emerg Med [Internet]. 2019;37:1184–1190.
- Fan X, Yang L, Wang T, et al. pH-responsive cellulose-based dual drug-loaded hydrogel for wound dressing. Eur Polym J [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 Feb 8];121. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014305719310973.
- El Fawal GF, Abu-Serie MM, Hassan MA, et al. Hydroxyethyl cellulose hydrogel for wound dressing: fabrication, characterization and in vitro evaluation. Int J Biol Macromol [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2021 Feb 8];111:649–659. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141813017341417
- Yin F, Lin L, Zhan S. Preparation and properties of cellulose nanocrystals, gelatin, hyaluronic acid composite hydrogel as wound dressing. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2019;30:190–201.
- Bowler PG, Parsons D. Combatting wound biofilm and recalcitrance with a novel anti-biofilm Hydrofiber® wound dressing. Wound Med. 2016;14:6–11.
- Samadian H, Zamiri S, Ehterami A, et al. Electrospun cellulose acetate/gelatin nanofibrous wound dressing containing berberine for diabetic foot ulcer healing: in vitro and in vivo studies. Sci Rep. 2020; 10: 1–12.
- Homaeigohar S, Boccaccini AR. Antibacterial biohybrid nanofibers for wound dressings. Acta Biomater [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 23];107:25–49. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.02.022
- Liu F, Li X, Wang L, et al. Sesamol incorporated cellulose acetate-zein composite nanofiber membrane: an efficient strategy to accelerate diabetic wound healing. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020; 149: 627–638.
- Modulevsky DJ, Cuerrier CM, Pelling AE. Biocompatibility of subcutaneously implanted plant-derived cellulose biomaterials. PLoS One. 2016;11:1–19.
- Liang W, Jiang M, Zhang J, et al. Novel antibacterial cellulose diacetate-based composite 3D scaffold as potential wound dressing. J Mater Sci Technol [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Jan 10]; Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1005030220310215.
- Cacicedo ML, Pacheco G, Islan GA, et al. Chitosan-bacterial cellulose patch of ciprofloxacin for wound dressing: preparation and characterization studies. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020; 147: 1136–1145.
- Rakhshaei R, Namazi H. A potential bioactive wound dressing based on carboxymethyl cellulose/ZnO impregnated MCM-41 nanocomposite hydrogel. Mater Sci Eng C [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 Jun 23];73:456–464. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928493116327564
- Anjum A, Sim CH, Ng SF. Hydrogels containing antibiofilm and antimicrobial agents beneficial for biofilm-associated wound infection: formulation characterizations and in vitro study AAPS PharmSciTech [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2021 Jul 21];19:1219–1230. Available fromhttps://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-017-0937-4
- Lemnaru GM, Truşcă RD, Ilie CI, et al. Antibacterial activity of bacterial cellulose loaded with bacitracin and amoxicillin: in vitro studies. Molecules [Internet]. 2020;25. Available from: www.mdpi.com/journal/molecules.
- Kida D, Gladysz O, Szulc M, et al. Development and evaluation of a polyvinylalcohol - Cellulose derivative-based film with povidone- iodine predicted for wound treatment. Polymers (Basel) [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Jul 22];12:1271. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/12/6/1271/htm
- Huang R, Tan L, Cai B, et al. Preparation, characterization and in vitro release study of drug-loaded sodium carboxy-methylcellulose/chitosan composite sponge. Mishra YK, editor. PLoS One [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2021 Jan 18];13:e0206275. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206275.
- Volova TG, Shumilova AA, Shidlovskiy IP, et al. Antibacterial properties of films of cellulose composites with silver nanoparticles and antibiotics. Polym Test [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2021 Jan 18];65:54–68. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0142941817311248
- Park SU, Lee BK, Kim MS, et al. The possibility of microbial cellulose for dressing and scaffold materials. Int Wound J. 2014;11:35–43.
- Alvarez OM, Phillips TJ, Menzoian JO, et al. An RCT to compare a bio-cellulose wound dressing with a non-adherent dressing in VLUs. J Wound Care. 2012;21:448–453.
- Farida Tabri F. The comparison of biocellulose wound dressing and normal saline dressing in the process of wound healing in mice skin. Int J Med Rev Case Reports. 2018;3:198–201
- Hoon R, Ann-Oster G, Damien C, et al. Microbial cellulose wound dressing for treating chronic wounds. 2005;10–13.
- Yu C-M, Lien -C-C. BIOCELLULOSE DRESSING AND METHOD FOR PREPARING THE SAME. 2013.
- Mohamad N, Loh EYX, Fauzi MB, et al. In vivo evaluation of bacterial cellulose/acrylic acid wound dressing hydrogel containing keratinocytes and fibroblasts for burn wounds. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2019;9:444–452.
- Brassolatti P, Kido HW, Bossini PS, et al. Bacterial cellulose membrane used as biological dressings on third-degree burns in rats. Biomed Mater Eng [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2021 Apr 28];29:29–42. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29254071/
- Sajjad W, Khan T, Ul-Islam M, et al. Development of modified montmorillonite-bacterial cellulose nanocomposites as a novel substitute for burn skin and tissue regeneration. Carbohydr Polym [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 Jan 18];206:548–556. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0144861718313560
- Rahman MM, Netravali AN. Aligned bacterial cellulose arrays as “green” nanofibers for composite materials. ACS Macro Lett. 2016;5:1070–1074.
- Gromovykh TI, Pigaleva MA, Gallyamov MO, et al. Structural organization of bacterial cellulose: the origin of anisotropy and layered structures. Carbohydr Polym [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 May 20];237:116140.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116140
- Portela R, Leal CR, Almeida PL, et al. Bacterial cellulose: a versatile biopolymer for wound dressing applications. Microb Biotechnol. 2019;12:586–610.
- Khalid A, Ullah H, Ul-Islam M, et al. Bacterial cellulose-TiO2 nanocomposites promote healing and tissue regeneration in burn mice model. RSC Adv. 2017;7:47662–47668.
- Li Y, Jiang H, Zheng W, et al. Bacterial cellulose-hyaluronan nanocomposite biomaterials as wound dressings for severe skin injury repair. J Mater Chem B. 2015;3:3498–3507.
- Cazón P, Vázquez M. Improving bacterial cellulose films by ex-situ and in-situ modifications: a review. Food Hydrocoll. 2021;113:106514.
- Naomi R, Idrus RBH, Fauzi MB. Plant-vs. Bacterial-derived cellulose for wound healing: a review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:1–25.
- Choi SM, Shin EJ. The Nanofication and Functionalization of Bacterial Cellulose and Its Applications. Nanomaterials [Internet]. 2020;10:406
- Gorgieva S, Trček J. Bacterial cellulose: production, modification and perspectives in biomedical applications [Internet]. Nanomaterials MDPI AG. 2019 [cited 2021 Jan 10]. 1352. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/9/10/1352. 9
- Zmejkoski D, Spasojević D, Orlovska I, et al. Bacterial cellulose-lignin composite hydrogel as a promising agent in chronic wound healing. Int J Biol Macromol [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Jul 17];118:494–503. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29909035/
- Portal O, Clark WA, Levinson DJ. Microbial cellulose wound dressing in the treatment of nonhealing lower extremity ulcers Wounds a Compend Clin Res Pract [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2020 Feb 17];21:1–3. Available from: https://europepmc.org/abstract/med/25904579
- Kim J, Kim SW, Park S, et al. Bacterial cellulose nanofibrillar patch as a wound healing platform of tympanic membrane perforation. Adv Healthc Mater [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2020 Jul 17];2:1525–1531.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201200368
- Van Zyl EM, Coburn JM. Hierarchical structure of bacterial-derived cellulose and its impact on biomedical applications. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng Elsevier Ltd2019; 24: 122–130
- Zheng L, Li S, Luo J, et al. Latest advances on bacterial cellulose-based antibacterial materials as wound dressings. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020; 8: 1–15.
- Moniri M, Moghaddam AB, Azizi S, et al. Production and status of bacterial cellulose in biomedical engineering [Internet]. Nanomaterials. MDPI AG. 2017;7:257[cited 2020 Jul 17]. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC5618368/?report=abstract
- Goldberg SR, Diegelmann RF. What makes wounds chronic. Surg Clin North Am W.B. Saunders. 2020;100:681–693
- Basu P, Saha N, Alexandrova R, et al. Calcium phosphate incorporated bacterial cellulose-polyvinylpyrrolidone based hydrogel scaffold: structural property and cell viability study for bone regeneration application. Polymers (Basel) [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 Feb 8];11:1821. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/11/11/1821
- Gao M, Li J, Bao Z, et al. A natural in situ fabrication method of functional bacterial cellulose using a microorganism. Nat Commun [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 Feb 8];10:1–10. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07879-3.
- Qiao K, Zheng Y, Guo S, et al. Hydrophilic nanofiber of bacterial cellulose guided the changes in the micro-structure and mechanical properties of nf-BC/PVA composites hydrogels. Compos Sci Technol [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2020 Jul 17];118:47–54. Available from: https://www.infona.pl//resource/bwmeta1.element.elsevier-8e20accd-1e10-371a-a01e-49268b044a5d
- Chang WS, Chen HH. Physical properties of bacterial cellulose composites for wound dressings. Food Hydrocoll [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 Jul 17];53:75–83.
- Savitskaya IS, Kistaubayeva AS, Digel IE, et al. Physicochemical and antibacterial properties of composite films based on bacterial cellulose and chitosan for wound dressing materials. Eurasian Chem J. 2017; 19: 255–264.
- Wahid F, Hu XH, Chu LQ, et al. Development of bacterial cellulose/chitosan based semi-interpenetrating hydrogels with improved mechanical and antibacterial properties. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;122:380–387.
- Pang M, Huang Y, Meng F, et al. Application of bacterial cellulose in skin and bone tissue engineering. Eur Polym J [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 23];122:109365. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.109365
- Ye S, Jiang L, Wu J, et al. Flexible amoxicillin-grafted bacterial cellulose sponges for wound dressing: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10:5862–5870.
- Bernardelli de Mattos I, Nischwitz SP, Tuca AC, et al. Delivery of antiseptic solutions by a bacterial cellulose wound dressing: uptake, release and antibacterial efficacy of octenidine and povidone-iodine. Burns. 2020;46. 918–927.
- Cavalcanti LM, Pinto FCM, De Oliveira GM, et al. Eficácia da membrana de celulose bacteriana no tratamento de úlceras venosas de membros inferiores: estudo randomizado e controlado. Rev Col Bras Cir [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 Jan 11];44:72–80. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69912017000100072&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en
- Phanthong P, Reubroycharoen P, Hao X, et al. Nanocellulose: extraction and application. Carbon Resour Convers. 2018;1:32–43.
- Kian LK, Saba N, Jawaid M, et al. A review on processing techniques of bast fibers nanocellulose and its polylactic acid (PLA) nanocomposites. Int J Biol Macromol [Internet]. 2019;121:1314–1328.
- Badhe RV, Godse A, Ahinkar A. Biomaterials in 3d printing: a special emphasis on nanocellulose [Internet]. Indian J. Pharm. Educ. Res. 2020 [cited 2021 Feb 8]; 54:526–540. Available from: www.ijper.org.
- Moohan J, Stewart SA, Espinosa E, et al. Cellulose nanofibers and other biopolymers for biomedical applications. A Review. Appl Sci. 2020;10:65
- Curvello R, Raghuwanshi VS, Garnier G. Engineering nanocellulose hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv Colloid Interface Sci [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Aug 11];267:47–61. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0001868619300028
- Md Abu T, Zahan KA, Rajaie MA, et al. Nanocellulose as drug delivery system for honey as antimicrobial wound dressing. Mater Today Proc. 2020;31:14–17.
- Poonguzhali R, Khaleel Basha S, Sugantha Kumari V. Novel asymmetric chitosan/PVP/nanocellulose wound dressing: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. 2018;Int J Biol Macromol. 112:1300–1309.
- Lu T, Li Q, Chen W, et al. Composite aerogels based on dialdehyde nanocellulose and collagen for potential applications as wound dressing and tissue engineering scaffold. Compos Sci Technol [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2020 Feb 17];94:132–138. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266353814000311
- Fernandes SN, Almeida PL, Monge N, et al. Mind the microgap in iridescent cellulose nanocrystal films. Adv Mater [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 Jan 11];29:1603560.
- Xu Q, Ji Y, Sun Q, et al. Fabrication of cellulose nanocrystal/chitosan hydrogel for controlled drug release. Nanomaterials 2019; 9:253
- Sun Y, Chu Y, Wu W, et al. Nanocellulose-based lightweight porous materials: a review. Carbohydr Polym [Internet]. 2021;255:117489.
- Ahn S, Chantre CO, Gannon AR, et al. Soy protein/cellulose nanofiber scaffolds mimicking skin extracellular matrix for enhanced wound healing. Adv Healthc Mater [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2021 Feb 8];7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201701175.
- Cheng KC, Huang CF, Wei Y, et al. Novel chitosan–cellulose nanofiber self-healing hydrogels to correlate self-healing properties of hydrogels with neural regeneration effects. NPG Asia Mater [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 Feb 8];11. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41427-019-0124-z.
- Shefa AA, Amirian J, Kang HJ, et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of effectiveness of a novel TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofiber-silk fibroin scaffold in wound healing. Carbohydr Polym [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 Feb 8];177:284–296. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014486171730992X
- Zhang S, Li J, Chen S, et al. Oxidized cellulose-based hemostatic materials. Carbohydr Polym [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 23];230:115585.
- Toshikj E, Tarbuk A, Grgić K, et al. Influence of different oxidizing systems on cellulose oxidation level: introduced groups versus degradation model. Cellulose [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 Jan 11];26:777–794. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-018-2133-4
- Yildir E. Physically and chemically modified cellulose for drug delivery. 2018.
- Tanaka S, Sato N, Fujioka H, et al. Breast conserving surgery using volume replacement with oxidized regenerated cellulose: a cosmetic outcome analysis. Breast J. 2014;20:154–158.
- Chiara O, Cimbanassi S, Bellanova G, et al. A systematic review on the use of topical hemostats in trauma and emergency surgery. BMC Surg. 2018;18:1–20.
- De Araújo Júnior AM, Braido G, Saska S, et al. Regenerated cellulose scaffolds: preparation, characterization and toxicological evaluation. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;136:892–898.
- Aydemir Sezer U, Sahin İ, Aru B, et al. Cytotoxicity, bactericidal and hemostatic evaluation of oxidized cellulose microparticles: structure and oxidation degree approach. Carbohydr Polym. 2019;219:87–94.
- Chowdhry SA. Use of oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC)/collagen/silver-ORC dressings to help manage skin graft donor site wounds. JPRAS Open. 2019;22:33–40.
- Lewis KM, Spazierer D, Urban MD, et al. Comparison of regenerated and non-regenerated oxidized cellulose hemostatic agents. Eur Surg - Acta Chir Austriaca. 2013;45:213–220.
- Wagenhäuser MU, Mulorz J, Ibing W, et al. Oxidized (non)-regenerated cellulose affects fundamental cellular processes of wound healing. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 Jun 9];6:32238. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27557881
- Cullen BM, Serena TE, Gibson MC, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing collagen/oxidized regenerated cellulose/silver to standard of care in the management of venous leg ulcers. Adv Ski Wound Care [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 Apr 29];30:464–468. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28914681/
- Veves A, Sheehan P, Pham HT. A randomized, controlled trial of Promogran (a collagen/oxidized regenerated cellulose dressing) vs standard treatment in the management of diabetic foot ulcers. Arch Surg. 2002;137:822–827.
- Pathak TK, Kroon RE, Craciun V, et al. Influence of Ag, Au and Pd noble metals doping on structural, optical and antimicrobial properties of zinc oxide and titanium dioxide nanomaterials. Heliyon. 2019;5:e01333.
- Shanmuganathan R, LewisOscar F, Shanmugam S, et al. Core/shell nanoparticles: synthesis, investigation of antimicrobial potential and photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 2020;202:111729
- Pugazhendhi A, Kumar SS, Manikandan M, et al. Photocatalytic properties and antimicrobial efficacy of Fe doped CuO nanoparticles against the pathogenic bacteria and fungi. Microb Pathog. 2018;122:84–89.
- Garza-Cervantes JA, Mendiola-Garza G, de Melo EM, et al. Antimicrobial activity of a silver-microfibrillated cellulose biocomposite against susceptible and resistant bacteria. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1–7.
- Kanikireddy V, Varaprasad K, Jayaramudu T, et al. Carboxymethyl cellulose-based materials for infection control and wound healing: a review. Int J Biol Macromol [Internet]. 2020;164:963–975. Available from.
- Saladino ML, Markowska M, Carmone C, et al. Graphene oxide carboxymethylcellulose nanocomposite for dressing materials. Materials (Basel) [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Apr 19];13:1980. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/8/1980
- Percival SL, Thomas J, Linton S, et al. The antimicrobial efficacy of silver on antibiotic-resistant bacteria isolated from burn wounds. Int Wound J [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2021 Apr 19];9:488–493. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00903.x
- Ao H, Jiang W, Nie Y, et al. Engineering quaternized chitosan in the 3D bacterial cellulose structure for antibacterial wound dressings. Polym Test [Internet]. 2020;86:106490.
- Zizovic I, Senerovic L, Moric I, et al. Utilization of supercritical carbon dioxide in fabrication of cellulose acetate films with anti-biofilm effects against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. J Supercrit Fluids [Internet]. 2018;140:11–20.
- Håkansson J, Björn C, Lindgren K, et al. Efficacy of the novel topical antimicrobial agent pxl150 in a mouse model of surgical site infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:2982–2984.
- Carpenter BL, Feese E, Sadeghifar H, et al. Porphyrin-cellulose nanocrystals: a photobactericidal material that exhibits broad spectrum antimicrobial activity. Photochem Photobiol. 2012;88:527–536.
- Tavakolian M, Okshevsky M, Van De Ven TGM, et al. Developing antibacterial nanocrystalline cellulose using natural antibacterial agents. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10:33827–33838.
- Tavakolian M, Munguia-Lopez JG, Valiei A, et al. Highly absorbent antibacterial and biofilm-disrupting hydrogels from cellulose for wound dressing applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12:39991–40001.
- Califano D, Patenall BL, Kadowaki MAS, et al. Enzyme-functionalized cellulose beads as a promising antimicrobial material. Biomacromolecules. 2021;22:754–762.
- Otoni CG, Figueiredo JSL, Capeletti LB, et al. Tailoring the antimicrobial response of cationic nanocellulose-based foams through cryo-templating. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2019;2:1975–1986.
- Hassan G, Forsman N, Wan X, et al. Dehydroabietylamine-based cellulose nanofibril films: a new class of sustainable biomaterials for highly efficient, broad-spectrum antimicrobial effects. ACS Sustain Chem Eng.2019;7: 5002–5009.
- Čolić M, Tomić S. Bekić M. Immunological aspects of nanocellulose. Immunol Lett. 2020;222:80–89.
- Lopes VR, Sanchez-Martinez C, Strømme M, et al. In vitro biological responses to nanofibrillated cellulose by human dermal, lung and immune cells: surface chemistry aspect. Part Fibre Toxicol [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 Jan 11];14:1. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-016-0182-0
- Bacakova L, Pajorova J, Bacakova M, et al. Versatile application of nanocellulose: from industry to skin tissue engineering and wound healing. Nanomaterials [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2021 Jan 11];9:164. Available from: http://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/9/2/164
- Moreira S, Silva NB, Almeida-Lima J, et al. BC nanofibres: in vitro study of genotoxicity and cell proliferation. Toxicol Lett. 2009;189:235–241.
- Endes C, Camarero-Espinosa S, Mueller S, et al. A critical review of the current knowledge regarding the biological impact of nanocellulose. J Nanobiotechnology [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2021 Jul 15];14:78. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-016-0230–9
- Ciecholewska-Juśko D, Żywicka A, Junka A, et al. Superabsorbent crosslinked bacterial cellulose biomaterials for chronic wound dressings. Carbohydr Polym. 2021;253:117247
- Jeong S, Lee SE, Yang H, et al. Toxicologic evaluation of bacterial synthesized cellulose in endothelial cells and animals. Mol Cell Toxicol [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2021 Jul 15];6:373–380. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13273-010-0049-7