State-of-the-art of ultrasound-triggered drug delivery from ultrasound-responsive drug carriers

References

• Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papac RJ. Origins of cancer therapy. Yale J Biol Med. 2001 Nov-Dec;74(6):391–398.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Traverso LW. Pancreatic cancer: surgery alone is not sufficient. Surg Endosc. 2006 Apr;20(2):S446–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chabner BA, Roberts TG. Timeline: chemotherapy and the war on cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005 Jan;5(1):65–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventola CL. Cancer immunotherapy, part 3: challenges and future trends. Pharm Ther. 2017 Aug;42(8):514–521.
   Google Scholar
• Leinenga G, Langton C, Nisbet R, et al. Ultrasound treatment of neurological diseases—current and emerging applications. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016;12(3):161–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabut C, Yoo S, Hurt RC, et al. Ultrasound technologies for imaging and modulating neural activity. Neuron. 2020;108(1):93–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooiman K, Roovers S, Langeveld SA, et al. Ultrasound-responsive cavitation nuclei for therapy and drug delivery. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020;46(6):1296–1325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandan R, Mehta S, Banerjee R. Ultrasound-responsive carriers for therapeutic applications. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2020;6(9):4731–4747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin Low S, Nong Lim C, Yew M, et al. Recent ultrasound advancements for the manipulation of nanobiomaterials and nanoformulations for drug delivery. Ultrason Sonochem. 2021 Dec;80:105805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aarli SJ, Novotny V, Thomassen L, et al. Persistent microembolic signals in the cerebral circulation on transcranial doppler after intravenous sulfur hexafluoride microbubble infusion. J Neuroimaging. 2020 Mar;30(2):146–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandan R, Mehta S, Banerjee R. Ultrasound-responsive carriers for therapeutic applications. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2020 Sep 14;6(9):4731–4747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooiman K, Roovers S, Langeveld SAG, et al. Ultrasound-responsive cavitation nuclei for therapy and drug delivery. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020 Jun;46(6):1296–1325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lentacker I, De Cock I, Deckers R, et al. Understanding ultrasound induced sonoporation: definitions and underlying mechanisms. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014 Jun;72:49–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escoffre JM, Bouakaz A. Minireview: biophysical mechanisms of cell membrane sonopermeabilization. Knowns and Unknowns. Langmuir. 2019 Aug 6;35(31):10151–10165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Wan JM, Yu AC. Membrane perforation and recovery dynamics in microbubble-mediated sonoporation. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013 Dec;39(12):2393–2405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho YJ, Huang CC, Fan CH, et al. Ultrasonic technologies in imaging and drug delivery. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2021 Sep;78(17–18):6119–6141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deprez J, Lajoinie G, Engelen Y, et al. Opening doors with ultrasound and microbubbles: beating biological barriers to promote drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021 May;172:9–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lea-Banks H, O’Reilly MA, Hynynen K. Ultrasound-responsive droplets for therapy: a review. J Control Release. 2019 Jan 10;293:144–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas RG, Jonnalagadda US, Kwan JJ. Biomedical applications for gas-stabilizing solid cavitation agents. Langmuir. 2019 Aug 6;35(31):10106–10115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An J, Hu YG, Li C, et al. A pH/Ultrasound dual-response biomimetic nanoplatform for nitric oxide gas-sonodynamic combined therapy and repeated ultrasound for relieving hypoxia. Biomaterials. 2020 Feb;230:119636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdeau RW, Lee-Gosselin A, Lakshmanan A, et al. Acoustic reporter genes for noninvasive imaging of microorganisms in mammalian hosts. Nature. 2018;553(7686):86–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen TM, Cullis PR. Drug delivery systems: entering the mainstream. Science. 2004 Mar 19;303(5665):1818–1822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dayton P, Klibanov A, Brandenburger G, et al. Acoustic radiation force in vivo: a mechanism to assist targeting of microbubbles. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1999 Oct;25(8):1195–1201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shortencarier MJ, Dayton PA, Bloch SH, et al. A method for radiation-force localized drug delivery using gas-filled lipospheres. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2004 Jul;51(7):822–831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collis J, Manasseh R, Liovic P, et al. Cavitation microstreaming and stress fields created by microbubbles. Ultrasonics. 2010 Feb;50(2):273–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beekers I, Vegter M, Lattwein KR, et al. Opening of endothelial cell-cell contacts due to sonoporation. J Control Release. 2020 Jun 10;322:426–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Presset A, Bonneau C, Kazuyoshi S, et al. Endothelial cells, first target of drug delivery using microbubble-assisted ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020 Jul;46(7):1565–1583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen KT, Wei KC, Liu HL. Focused ultrasound combined with microbubbles in central nervous system applications. Pharmaceutics. 2021 Jul 15;13(7):1084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ter Haar G. Safety and bio-effects of ultrasound contrast agents. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2009 Aug;47(8):893–900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho YJ, Wang TC, Fan CH, et al. Current progress in antivascular tumor therapy. Drug Discov Today. 2017 Oct;22(10):1503–1515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram N, McVeigh LE, Abou-Saleh RH, et al. Ultrasound-triggered therapeutic microbubbles enhance the efficacy of cytotoxic drugs by increasing circulation and tumor drug accumulation and limiting bioavailability and toxicity in normal tissues. Theranostics. 2020;10(24):10973–10992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan CH, Ting CY, Liu HL, et al. Antiangiogenic-targeting drug-loaded microbubbles combined with focused ultrasound for glioma treatment. Biomaterials. 2013 Mar;34(8):2142–2155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charalambous A, Mico V, McVeigh LE, et al. Targeted microbubbles carrying lipid-oil-nanodroplets for ultrasound-triggered delivery of the hydrophobic drug, combretastatin A4. Nanomedicine. 2021 Aug;36:102401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Wang S, Deng Z, et al. Ultrasound-triggered drug delivery for breast tumor therapy through iRGD-targeted paclitaxel-loaded liposome-microbubble complexes. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2018 Aug 1;14(8):1384–1395.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prausnitz MR, Mitragotri S, Langer R. Current status and future potential of transdermal drug delivery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004 Feb;3(2):115–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedadghavami A, Zhang C, Bajpayee AG. Overcoming negatively charged tissue barriers: drug delivery using cationic peptides and proteins. Nano Today. 2020 Oct;34:100898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg N, Perry L, Deodhar A. Intra-articular and soft tissue injections, a systematic review of relative efficacy of various corticosteroids. Clin Rheumatol. 2014 Dec;33(12):1695–1706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Y, Tao W, Krebs SJ, et al. Vaccine delivery to the oral cavity using coated microneedles induces systemic and mucosal immunity. Pharm Res. 2014 Sep;31(9):2393–2403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoellhammer CM, Blankschtein D, Langer R. Skin permeabilization for transdermal drug delivery: recent advances and future prospects. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2014 Mar;11(3):393–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park D, Park H, Seo J, et al. Sonophoresis in transdermal drug deliverys. Ultrasonics. 2014 Jan;54(1):56–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y-J H, Hsu H-C, Kang S-T, et al. Ultrasonic transdermal delivery system with acid–base neutralization-generated CO2 microbubble cavitation. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2020;3(4):1968–1975.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liao AH, Ma WC, Wang CH, et al. Penetration depth, concentration and efficiency of transdermal alpha-arbutin delivery after ultrasound treatment with albumin-shelled microbubbles in mice. Drug Deliv. 2016 Sep;23(7):2173–2182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta AM, Sonabend AM, Bruce JN. Convection-enhanced delivery. Neurotherapeutics. 2017 Apr;14(2):358–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olbricht W, Sistla M, Ghandi G, et al. Time-reversal acoustics and ultrasound-assisted convection-enhanced drug delivery to the brain. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Aug;134(2):1569–1575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mano Y, Saito R, Haga Y, et al. Intraparenchymal ultrasound application and improved distribution of infusate with convection-enhanced delivery in rodent and nonhuman primate brain. J Neurosurg. 2016 May;124(5):1490–1500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs SK, Monsky WL, Yuan F, et al. Regulation of transport pathways in tumor vessels: role of tumor type and microenvironment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Apr 14;95(8):4607–4612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Wang J, Wientjes MG, et al. Delivery of nanomedicines to extracellular and intracellular compartments of a solid tumor. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012 Jan;64(1):29–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams R, Wright C, Cherin E, et al. Characterization of submicron phase-change perfluorocarbon droplets for extravascular ultrasound imaging of cancer. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013 Mar;39(3):475–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfield BL, Yoo K, Liu J, et al. Investigating the accumulation of submicron phase-change droplets in tumors. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020 Oct;46(10):2861–2870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang J, Nakamura H, Maeda H. The EPR effect: unique features of tumor blood vessels for drug delivery, factors involved, and limitations and augmentation of the effect. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2011 Mar 18;63(3):136–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu X, Ho W, Zhang X, et al. Cancer nanomedicine: from targeted delivery to combination therapy. Trends Mol Med. 2015 Apr;21(4):223–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin JD, Seano G, Jain RK. Normalizing function of tumor vessels: progress, opportunities, and challenges. Annu Rev Physiol. 2019 Feb 10;81:505–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho YJ, Li JP, Fan CH, et al. Ultrasound in tumor immunotherapy: current status and future developments. J Control Release. 2020 Apr 14;323:12–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu Y, Ren K, Zhao W, et al. A “dual-guide” bioinspired drug delivery strategy of a macrophage-based carrier against postoperative triple-negative breast cancer recurrence. J Control Release. 2021 Jan 10;329:191–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger TEG, Thorek DLJ, Denmeade SR, et al. Concise review: mesenchymal stem cell-based drug delivery: the good, the bad, the ugly, and the promise. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2018 Sep;7(9):651–663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho YJ, Chang HC, Lin CW, et al. Oscillatory behavior of microbubbles impacts efficacy of cellular drug delivery. J Control Release. 2021 May 10;333:316–327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan CH, Lee YH, Ho YJ, et al. Macrophages as drug delivery carriers for acoustic phase-change droplets. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2018 Jul;44(7):1468–1481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho YJ, Chiang YJ, Kang ST, et al. Camptothecin-loaded fusogenic nanodroplets as ultrasound theranostic agent in stem cell-mediated drug-delivery system. J Control Release. 2018 May 28;278:100–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang YY, Li QY, Guo XS, et al. Mechanisms underlying sonoporation: interaction between microbubbles and cells. Ultrason Sonochem. 2020 Oct;67:105096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upadhyay A, Dalvi SV. Microbubble formulations: synthesis, stability, modeling and biomedical applications. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019 Feb;45(2):301–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Q, Zhou Y, Chen J, et al. Gene therapy for drug-resistant glioblastoma via lipid-polymer hybrid nanoparticles combined with focused ultrasound. Int J Nanomedicine. 2021;16:185–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu S, Zhao P, Deng Y, et al. Mechanistic insights and therapeutic delivery through micro/nanobubble-assisted ultrasound. Pharmaceutics. 2022 Feb 22;14(3):480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diakova GB, Wang M, Unnikrishnan S, et al. Preparation and characterization of targeted microbubbles. J Vis Exp. 2021 Sep;4(175):e62370.
   Google Scholar
• Kim D, Lee SS, Moon H, et al. PD-L1 targeting immune-microbubble complex enhances therapeutic index in murine colon cancer models. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2020 Dec 23;14(1):6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caskey CF, Qin S, Dayton PA, et al. Microbubble tunneling in gel phantoms. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 May;125(5):El183–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvanitis CD, Bazan-Peregrino M, Rifai B, et al. Cavitation-enhanced extravasation for drug delivery. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011 Nov;37(11):1838–1852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cock I, Lajoinie G, Versluis M, et al. Sonoprinting and the importance of microbubble loading for the ultrasound mediated cellular delivery of nanoparticles. Biomaterials. 2016 Mar;83:294–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao AH, Hung CR, Chen HK, et al. Ultrasound-mediated EGF-coated-microbubble cavitation in dressings for wound-healing applications. Sci Rep. 2018 May 29;8(1):8327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang P, Yin T, Li J, et al. Ultrasound-responsive microbubbles for sonography-guided siRNA delivery. Nanomedicine. 2016 May;12(4):1139–1149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao AH, Lin KH, Chuang HC, et al. Low-frequency dual-frequency ultrasound-mediated microbubble cavitation for transdermal minoxidil delivery and hair growth enhancement. Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 9;10(1):4338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nittayacharn P, Yuan HX, Hernandez C, et al. Enhancing tumor drug distribution with ultrasound-triggered nanobubbles. J Pharm Sci. 2019 Sep;108(9):3091–3098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen M, Liang X, Gao C, et al. Ultrasound triggered conversion of porphyrin/camptothecin-fluoroxyuridine triad microbubbles into nanoparticles overcomes multidrug resistance in colorectal cancer. ACS Nano. 2018 Jul 24;12(7):7312–7326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huynh E, Leung BY, Helfield BL, et al. In situ conversion of porphyrin microbubbles to nanoparticles for multimodality imaging. Nat Nanotechnol. 2015 Apr;10(4):325–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prabhakar A, Banerjee R. Nanobubble liposome complexes for diagnostic imaging and ultrasound-triggered drug delivery in cancers: a theranostic approach. ACS Omega. 2019 Sep 24;4(13):15567–15580.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao S, Cheng X, Li J. Lipid nanobubbles as an ultrasound-triggered artesunate delivery system for imaging-guided, tumor-targeted chemotherapy. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:1841–1850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song W, Luo Y, Zhao Y, et al. Magnetic nanobubbles with potential for targeted drug delivery and trimodal imaging in breast cancer: an in vitro study. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2017 May;12(9):991–1009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie X, Lin W, Li M, et al. Efficient siRNA delivery using novel cell-penetrating peptide-siRNA conjugate-loaded nanobubbles and ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016 Jun;42(6):1362–1374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Wu Z, Zhang J, et al. Instant ultrasound-evoked precise nanobubble explosion and deep photodynamic therapy for tumors guided by molecular imaging. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021 May 12;13(18):21097–21107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perera RH, Abenojar E, Nittayacharn P, et al. Intracellular vesicle entrapment of nanobubble ultrasound contrast agents targeted to PSMA promotes prolonged enhancement and stability in vivo and in vitro. Nanotheranostics. 2022;6(3):270–285.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jose AD, Wu Z, Thakur SS. A comprehensive update of micro-and nanobubbles as theranostics in oncology. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2022;172:123–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang ST, Huang YL, Yeh CK. Characterization of acoustic droplet vaporization for control of bubble generation under flow conditions. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014 Mar;40(3):551–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang WQ, Shi YH, Abd Shukor S, et al. Phase-shift nanodroplets as an emerging sonoresponsive nanomaterial for imaging and drug delivery applications. Nanoscale. 2022 Feb 24;14(8):2943–2965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong Q, Yoon BC, Aryal M, et al. Polymeric perfluorocarbon nanoemulsions are ultrasound-activated wireless drug infusion catheters. Biomaterials. 2019 Jun;206:73–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheeran PS, Yoo K, Williams R, et al. More than bubbles: creating phase-shift droplets from commercially available ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016 Oct 07;43(2):531–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannah AS, Luke GP, Emelianov SY. Blinking phase-change nanocapsules enable background-free ultrasound imaging. Theranostics. 2016;6(11):1866–1876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lea-Banks H, Hynynen K. Sub-millimetre precision of drug delivery in the brain from ultrasound-triggered nanodroplets. J Control Release. 2021 Oct 10;338:731–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Airan RD, Meyer RA, Ellens NP, et al. Noninvasive targeted transcranial neuromodulation via focused ultrasound gated drug release from nanoemulsions. Nano Lett. 2017 Feb 8;17(2):652–659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho YJ, Chang YC, Yeh CK. Improving nanoparticle penetration in tumors by vascular disruption with acoustic droplet vaporization. Theranostics. 2016;6(3):392–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Y, Qin D, Zhang J, et al. Occlusion and rupture of ex vivo capillary bifurcation due to acoustic droplet vaporization. Appl Phys Lett. 2018 Jun 4;112(23):233701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho YJ, Yeh CK. Concurrent anti-vascular therapy and chemotherapy in solid tumors using drug-loaded acoustic nanodroplet vaporization. Acta Biomater. 2017 Feb;49:472–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu YX, Xue S, Long T, et al. Opto-acoustic synergistic irradiation for vaporization of natural melanin-cored nanodroplets at safe energy levels and efficient sono-chemo-photothermal cancer therapy. Theranostics. 2020;10(23):10448–10465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouco H, García-García P, Évora C, et al. Screening strategies for surface modification of lipid-polymer hybrid nanoparticles. Int J Pharm. 2022 Jul;7:121973.
   Google Scholar
• Xue J, Zhu Y, Bai S, et al. Nanoparticles with rough surface improve the therapeutic effect of photothermal immunotherapy against melanoma. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2022 Jun;12(6):2934–2949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishibashi K, Shimada K, Kawato T, et al. Inhibitory effects of low-energy pulsed ultrasonic stimulation on cell surface protein antigen C through heat shock proteins GroEL and DnaK in Streptococcus mutans. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76(3):751–756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pecha R, Gompf B. Microimplosions: cavitation collapse and shock wave emission on a nanosecond time scale. Phys Rev Lett. 2000 Feb 07;84(6):1328–1330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin Q, Lin C-Y, Kang S-T, et al. Superhydrophobic silica nanoparticles as ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrason Sonochem. 2017 May 01;36:262–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris JL, Cabañas MV, Manzano M, et al. Polymer-grafted mesoporous silica nanoparticles as ultrasound-responsive drug carriers. ACS Nano. 2015 Nov 24;9(11):11023–11033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris JL, Villaverde G, Cabañas MV, et al. From proof-of-concept material to PEGylated and modularly targeted ultrasound-responsive mesoporous silica nanoparticles. J Mat Chem B. 2018;6(18):2785–2794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Shi J, Meng X, et al. ROS-activated nanoscale coordination polymers for enhanced ultrasound-mediated therapy for the treatment of cancer. Acta Biomater. 2022 Feb 25;143(15): 372–380 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yildirim A, Chattaraj R, Blum NT, et al. Understanding acoustic cavitation initiation by porous nanoparticles: toward nanoscale agents for ultrasound imaging and therapy. Chem Mater. 2016;28(16):5962–5972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan JJ, Myers R, Coviello CM, et al. Ultrasound-propelled nanocups for drug delivery. Small. 2015 Oct 01;11(39):5305–5314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan JJ, Graham S, Myers R, et al. Ultrasound-induced inertial cavitation from gas-stabilizing nanoparticles. Phys Rev E. 2015 Aug 19;92(2):023019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min HS, Son S, You DG, et al. Chemical gas-generating nanoparticles for tumor-targeted ultrasound imaging and ultrasound-triggered drug delivery. Biomaterials. 2016;108:57–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen K-J, Liang H-F, Chen H-L, et al. A thermoresponsive bubble-generating liposomal system for triggering localized extracellular drug delivery. ACS nano. 2013;7(1):438–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu T, Zhang N, Wang Z, et al. Endogenous catalytic generation of O(2) bubbles for in situ ultrasound-guided high intensity focused ultrasound ablation. ACS Nano. 2017 Sep 26;11(9):9093–9102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeifer F. Distribution, formation and regulation of gas vesicles. Nature Rev Microbiol. 2012;10(10):705–715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou X, Qiu Z, Xian Q, et al. Precise ultrasound neuromodulation in a deep brain region using nano gas vesicles as actuators. Adv Sci. 2021;8(21):2101934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar-Zion A, Nourmahnad A, Mittelstein DR, et al. Acoustically triggered mechanotherapy using genetically encoded gas vesicles. Nat Nanotechnol. 2021;16(12):1403–1412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song L, Hou X, Wong KF, et al. Gas-filled protein nanostructures as cavitation nuclei for molecule-specific sonodynamic therapy. Acta Biomater. 2021;136:533–545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris JL, de la Torre P, Cabañas MV, et al. Suicide-gene transfection of tumor-tropic placental stem cells employing ultrasound-responsive nanoparticles. Acta Biomater. 2019 Jan 01;83:372–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang D, Yao Y, Xiao Y, et al. Ultrasound responsive erythrocyte membrane-derived hybrid nanovesicles with controlled drug release for tumor therapy. Nanoscale. 2021;13(22):9945–9951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Zhao K, Cao J, et al. Ultrasound responsive self-assembled micelles loaded with hypocrellin for cancer sonodynamic therapy. Int J Pharm. 2021 Oct 25;608:121052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu P, Dong W, Guo X, et al. ROS-responsive blended nanoparticles: cascade-amplifying synergistic effects of sonochemotherapy with on-demand boosted drug release during SDT process. Adv Healthc Mater. 2019 Sep 01;8(18):1900720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y-J H, C-H W, Q-f J, et al. Superhydrophobic drug-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles capped with β-cyclodextrin for ultrasound image-guided combined antivascular and chemo-sonodynamic therapy. Biomaterials. 2020 Feb 01;232:119723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min KH, Min HS, Lee HJ, et al. pH-controlled gas-generating mineralized nanoparticles: a theranostic agent for ultrasound imaging and therapy of cancers. ACS nano. 2015;9(1):134–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min B, Bae IY, Lee HG, et al. Utilization of pectin-enriched materials from apple pomace as a fat replacer in a model food system. Bioresour Technol. 2010 Jul;101(14):5414–5418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung MF, Chen KJ, Liang HF, et al. A liposomal system capable of generating CO2 bubbles to induce transient cavitation, lysosomal rupturing, and cell necrosis. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2012 Oct 1;51(40):10089–10093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar-Zion A, Nourmahnad A, Mittelstein DR, et al. Acoustically triggered mechanotherapy using genetically encoded gas vesicles. Nat Nanotechnol. 2021 Dec;16(12):1403–1412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Y, Lin L, Zhang Z, et al. Drug-loaded nanoparticles conjugated with genetically engineered bacteria for cancer therapy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2022;606:29–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huebsch N, Kearney CJ, Zhao X, et al. Ultrasound-triggered disruption and self-healing of reversibly cross-linked hydrogels for drug delivery and enhanced chemotherapy. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2014;111(27):9762–9767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin H, Tan H, Zhao L, et al. Ultrasound-triggered thrombolysis using urokinase-loaded nanogels. Int J Pharm. 2012;434(1–2):384–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao A-H, Chung H-Y, Chen W-S, et al. Efficacy of combined ultrasound-and-microbubbles-mediated diclofenac gel delivery to enhance transdermal permeation in adjuvant-induced rheumatoid arthritis in the rat. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016;42(8):1976–1985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima EG, Durney KM, Sirsi SR, et al. Microbubbles as biocompatible porogens for hydrogel scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 2012;8(12):4334–4341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durney K, Sirsi S, Nover A, et al. editors. Using microbubbles to modulate hydrogel scaffold properties for cartilage tissue engineering. Rosemont, IL, USA: Orthopaedic Research Society; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein-Barash H, Orbey G, Polat BE, et al. A microcomposite hydrogel for repeated on-demand ultrasound-triggered drug delivery. Biomaterials. 2010;31(19):5208–5217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabiilli ML, Wilson CG, Padilla F, et al. Acoustic droplet–hydrogel composites for spatial and temporal control of growth factor delivery and scaffold stiffness. Acta Biomater. 2013;9(7):7399–7409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozdas MS, Shah AS, Johnson PM, et al. Non-invasive molecularly-specific millimeter-resolution manipulation of brain circuits by ultrasound-mediated aggregation and uncaging of drug carriers. Nat Commun. 2020 Oct 1;11(1):4929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kheirolomoom A, Dayton PA, Lum AF, et al. Acoustically-active microbubbles conjugated to liposomes: characterization of a proposed drug delivery vehicle. J Control Release. 2007 Apr 23;118(3):275–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wamel A, Sontum PC, Healey A, et al. Acoustic Cluster Therapy (ACT) enhances the therapeutic efficacy of paclitaxel and Abraxane® for treatment of human prostate adenocarcinoma in mice. J Control Release. 2016 Aug 28;236:15–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ksotopoulis S, Stigen E, Popa M, et al. Sonoporation with Acoustic Cluster Therapy (ACT®) induces transient tumour volume reduction in a subcutaneous xenograft model of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Control Release. 2017 Jan 10;245:70–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush N, Healey A, Shah A, et al. Theranostic attributes of acoustic cluster therapy and its use for enhancing the effectiveness of liposomal doxorubicin treatment of human triple negative breast cancer in mice. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wamel AV, Healey A, Sontum PC, et al. Acoustic Cluster Therapy (ACT) - pre-clinical proof of principle for local drug delivery and enhanced uptake. J Control Release. 2016 Feb 28;224:158–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerji U, Tiu CD, Curcean A, et al. Phase I trial of acoustic cluster therapy (ACT) with chemotherapy in patients with liver metastases of gastrointestinal origin (ACTIVATE study). J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(15): TPS3145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar