Maneuvering Together to Develop New Practices: Examining Our Collaborative Processes

References

• BacharachN. (n.d.). Using co-teaching during the student teaching experience. American Association of State Colleges and Universities. Retrieved from http://www.aascu.org/uploadedFiles/AASCU/Content/Root/Programs/TeacherEducation/07_st_cloud.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• BerryA., & LoughranJ. J. (2002). Developing an understanding of learning to teach in teacher education. In J.Loughran & T.Russell (Eds.), Improving teacher education practices through self-study (pp. 13–29). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• BrubakerN., & OvensA. (2012). Implementing individualized grading contracts: Perspectives of two teacher educators. In J.Young, L. B.Erickson, & S.Pinnegar (Eds.), Extending inquiry communities: Illuminating teacher education through self-study (Proceedings of the ninth international conference on self-study of teacher education practices) (pp. 60–63). Provo, UT: Brigham Young University.
   Google Scholar
• BullockS., & RussellT. (2012). Developing coherence at the end of a preservice methods course. In J.Young, L. B.Erickson, & S.Pinnegar (Eds.), Extending inquiry communities: Illuminating teacher education through self-study (pp. 64–67). Provo, UT: Brigham Young University.
   Google Scholar
• BulloughJr., R. V., & PinnegarS. (2001). Guidelines for quality in autobiographical forms of self-study research. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 13–21.
   Google Scholar
• ClandininD. J., & ConnellyF. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-SmithM., & LytleS. L. (1993). Inside–outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-SmithM., & LytleS. L. (2007). Practitioner inquiry, knowledge, and university culture. In J.Loughran, M. L.Hamilton, V. K.LaBoskey, & T.Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 601–649). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• CoiroJ., KnobelM., LankshearC., & LeuD. J. (2009). Central issues in new literacies and new literacy research. In J.Coiro, M.Knoble, C.Lankshear, & D. J.Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 13–23). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• CreswellJ. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• DuFourR. (2004). What is a professional learning community?Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• DuFourR., & EakerR. (1998). Professional learning comminutes at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
   Google Scholar
• EastK., & FitzgeraldL. (2006). Collaboration over the long term. In L.Fitzgerald, M. L.Heston, & D. L.Tidwell (Eds.), Collaboration and community: Pushing boundaries through self-study (Proceedings of the sixth international conference on self-study of teacher education practices) (pp. 72–74). Cedar Falls: University of Northern Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• FeldmanA., PaughP., & MillsG. (2007). Self-study through action research. In J.Loughran, M. L.Hamilton, V. K.LaBoskey, & T.Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 943–978). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• FitzgeraldL., EastK., HestonM., & MillerC. (2002). Professional intimacy: Transforming communities of practice. In C.Kosnik, A.Freese, & A. P.Samaras (Eds.), Making a difference in teacher education through self-study (Proceedings of the fourth international conference on self-study of teacher education practices) (pp. 77–80). Toronto, ON: OISE/University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• GarbettD., & HeapR. (2010). A tale of two blackboards: Team teaching. In L. B.Erickson, J. R.Young, & S.Pinnegar (Eds.), Navigating the public and the private: Negotiating the diverse landscape of teacher education (Proceedings of the eighth international conference on self-study of teacher education practices) (pp. 93–96). Provo, UT: Brigham Young University.
   Google Scholar
• GriffithsM., PoursanidouD., SimmsM., & WindleJ. (2006). Defining workspaces, defining ourselves. In L.Fitzgerald, M. L.Heston, & D. L.Tidwell (Eds.), Collaboration and community: Pushing boundaries through self-study (Proceedings of the sixth international conference on self-study of teacher education practices) (pp. 288–289). Cedar Falls, IA: University of Northern Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• GuôjónsdóttirH., & JónsdóttirS. (2012). Preparing teachers to teach diverse groups of learners in a changing world. In J.Young, L. B.Erickson, & S.Pinnegar (Eds.), Extending inquiry communities: Illuminating teacher education through self-study (Proceedings of the ninth international conference on self-study of teacher education practices) (pp. 151–154). Provo, UT: Brigham Young University.
   Google Scholar
• HamiltonM. L., & PinnegarS. (2013). A topography of collaboration: Methodology, identity and community in self-study of practice research. Studying Teacher Education, 9, 74–89.
   Google Scholar
• HargreavesA., & FullanM. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• HatchT., & GrossmanP. (2009). Learning to look beyond the boundaries of representation: Using technology to examine teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 70–85.
   Google Scholar
• HuberJ., & ClandininD. J. (2005). Living in tension: Negotiating a curriculum of lives on the professional knowledge landscape. In J.Brophy & S.Pinnegar (Eds.), Learning from research on teaching: Perspective, methodology, and representation (pp. 317–340). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• KluthP., & StrautD. (2003). Do as we say and as we do: Teaching and modeling collaborative practice in the university classroom. Journal of Teacher Education, 54, 228–240.
   Google Scholar
• LaBoskeyV. K. (2007). The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings. In J.Loughran, M. L.Hamilton, V. K.LaBoskey, & T.Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 817–870). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• LeanaC. R. (2010). Social capital: The collective component of teacher quality. Collective Practice, Quality Teaching, 27, 16–23.
   Google Scholar
• LeuD. J. (2002). The new literacies: Research on reading instruction with the Internet. In A. E.Farstrup & S. J.Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 310–336). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• LiebermanA., & MillerL. (2008). Teachers in professional communities: Improving teaching and learning. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• LoughranJ. (2006). Developing a pedagogy of teacher education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• LoughranJ. (2007). A history and context of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices. In J. J.Loughran, M. L.Hamilton, V. K.LaBoskey, & T.Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 7–39). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• LoughranJ., KorthagenF., & RussellT. (2008). Teacher education making a difference: Developing foundational principles of practice. In C. J.Craig & L. F.Deretchin (Eds.), Imagining a renaissance in teacher education (pp. 405–421). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• MartinS. D., & DismukeS. (2014). Keeping current: Including technology in a writing methods course. In D.Garbett & A.Ovens (Eds.), Changing practices for changing times: Past, present, and future possibilities for self-study research (Proceedings of the tenth international conference on self-study of teacher education practices) (pp. 148–150). Auckland: University of Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• MartinS. D., SnowJ., & TorrezC. F. (2011). Navigating the terrain of third space: Tensions with/in relationships in school–university partnerships. Journal of Teacher Education, 62, 299–311.
   Google Scholar
• MilesM. B., & HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• MinnettA. (2003). Collaboration and sharing reflections in the classroom. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 9, 279–285.
   Google Scholar
• MitchellC., PithouseK., & MoletsaneR. (2009). The social self in self-study: Author conversations. In K.Pithouse, C.Mitchell, & R.Moletsane (Eds.), Making connections: Self-study and social action (pp. 11–23). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• PinnegarS., & HamiltonM. L. (2009). Self-study of practice as a genre of qualitative research. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• RavitchD. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• RichertA. (1997). Teaching teachers for the challenge of change. In J.Loughran & T.Russell (Eds.), Teaching about teaching: Purpose, passion, and pedagogy in teacher education (pp. 73–94). London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• SchönD. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• SnowJ. L., & MartinS. D. (2014). Confessions of practice: Multi-dimensional interweavings of our work as teacher educators. The New Educator, 10, 331–353.
   Google Scholar
• TidwellD., & FitzgeraldL. (2007). Self-study as teaching. In J.Loughran, M. L.Hamilton, V. K.LaBoskey, & T.Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 69–102). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• WengerE. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• WertschJ. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• WertschJ. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar