References

• Barnes, D. (1998). Foreword: Looking forward: The concluding remarks at the Castle Conference. In M. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Reconceptualizing teaching practice: Self-study in teacher education (pp. 9–14). London, UK: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, J., & Hunter, A. (2006). Foundations of multimethod research: Synthesizing styles. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781412984294
   Google Scholar
• Bullough, R. V., Jr., & Pinnegar, S. (2001). Guidelines for quality in autobiographical forms of self-study research. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 13–21.10.3102/0013189X030003013
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, A., & Erickson, G. (2004). The nature of teaching and learning in self-study. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 41–67). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.10.1007/978-1-4020-6545-3
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2004). Practitioner inquiry, knowledge, and university culture. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 601–649). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the next generation. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, A., & Kallick, B. (1993). Through the lens of a critical friend. Educational Leadership, 51(2), 49–51.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, C. J. (2009). Trustworthiness in self-study research. In C. A. Lassonde, S. Galman, & C. Kosnik (Eds.), Self-study research methodologies for teacher educators (pp. 21–34). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (1970). Sociological methods: A sourcebook. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1–28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Boston, MA: D. C. Heath & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Donolo, D. S. (2009). Triangulación: procedimiento incorporado a nuevas metodologías de investigación [Triangulation: A procedure incorporated into new research methodologies]. Revista Digital Universitaria, 10(8), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
   Google Scholar
• Ezer, H. (2009). Self-study approaches and the teacher-inquirer: Instructional situations case analysis, critical autobiography, and action research. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Garbett, D., & Ovens, A. (Eds.). (2014). Changing practices for changing times: Past, present and future possibilities for self-study research (Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Self-study of Teacher Education Practices). Auckland, New Zealand: University of Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Given, L. M. (Ed.). (2008). The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781412963909
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. L., & Pinnegar, S. (2015). Considering the role of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices research in transforming urban classrooms. Studying Teacher Education, 11(2), 180–190. doi:10.1080/17425964.2015.1045775
   Google Scholar
• Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (Eds.). (1988). The action research planner. Geelong, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kosnik, C., Beck, C., Freese, A. R., & Samaras, A. P. (Eds.). (2006). Making a difference in teacher education through self-study: Studies of personal, professional, and program renewal. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• LaBoskey, V. K. (1994). Development of reflective practice: A study of pre-service teachers. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• LaBoskey, V. K. (2004). The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 817–869). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.10.1007/978-1-4020-6545-3
   Google Scholar
• LaBoskey, V. K., & Richert, A. E. (2015). Self-study as a means for urban teachers to transform academics. Studying Teacher Education, 11(2), 164–179.10.1080/17425964.2015.1045774
   Google Scholar
• Lassonde, C., Galman, S., & Kosnik, C. (2009). Self-study research methodologies for teacher educators. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355
   Google Scholar
• Lighthall, F. F. (2004). Fundamental features and approaches of the S-STEP enterprise. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 193–245). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.10.1007/978-1-4020-6545-3
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, J. (2007). Researching teacher education practices: Responding to the challenges, demands, and expectations of self-study. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 12–20.10.1177/0022487106296217
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, J., Hamilton, M. L., LaBoskey, V. K., & Russell, T. (Eds.). (2004). International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, J., & Northfield, J. (1998). A framework for the development of self-study practice. In M. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Reconceptualizing teacher practice: Self-study for teacher education (pp. 7–18). London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2006). All you need to know about action research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens, D. M. (2003). Mixed methods and the politics of human research: The transformative-emancipatory perspective. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 135–164). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mishler, E. (1990). Validation in inquiry-guided research: The role of exemplars in narrative studies. Harvard Educational Review, 60, 415–443.10.17763/haer.60.4.n4405243p6635752
   Google Scholar
• Munby, H., & Russell, T. (1995). Towards rigour with relevance: How can teachers and teacher educators claim to know? In T. Russell & F. Korthagen (Eds.), Teachers who teach teachers: Reflections on teacher education (pp. 172–184). London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, M., & Parker, N. (2013). ‘Unsatisfactory saturation’: A critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 13(2), 190–197.10.1177/1468794112446106
   Google Scholar
• Pagano, J. A. (1991). Moral fictions: The dilemma of theory and practice. In C. Witherell & N. Noddings (Eds.), Stories lives tell: Narrative and dialogue in education (pp. 193–206). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Placier, P., Pinnegar, S., Hamilton, M. L., & Guilfoyle, K. (2005). Exploring the concept of dialogue in the self-study of teaching practices. In C. Kosnik, C. Beck, A. R. Freese, & A.P. Samaras (Eds.), Making a difference in teacher education through self-study (pp. 51–64). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-3528-4
   Google Scholar
• Russell, T. (2007). How experience changed my values as a teacher educator. In T. Russell & J. Loughran (Eds.), Enacting a pedagogy of teacher education: Values, relationships and practices (pp. 182–191). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Samaras, A. P. (2002). Self-study for teacher educators: Crafting a pedagogy for educational change. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Samaras, A. P. (2011). Self-study teacher research: Improving your practice through collaborative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Samaras, A. P., & Freese, A. R. (2006). Self-study of teaching practices: Primer. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Schuck, S., & Russell, T. (2005). Self-study, critical friendship, and the complexities of teacher education. Studying Teacher Education: A Journal of Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices, 1(2), 107–121.10.1080/17425960500288291
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13, 3–21.
   Google Scholar
• Vanassche, E., & Kelchtermans, G. (2015). The state of the art in self-study of teacher education practices: A systematic literature review. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(4), 508–528.10.1080/00220272.2014.995712
   Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K. (2007). Accumulating knowledge across self-studies in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 36–46.10.1177/0022487106296219
   Google Scholar