References

• American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. (2013). The changing teacher preparation profession. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://secure.aacte.org/apps/rl/res_get.php?fid=145
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, T., Varnhagen, S., & Campbell, K. (1998). Faculty adoption of teaching and learning technologies: Contrasting earlier adopters and mainstream faculty. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 28(2/3), 71–98.
   Google Scholar
• Brzycki, D., & Dudt, K. (2005). Overcoming barriers to technology use in teacher preparation programs. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 619–641.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, G., George, M., Shoffner, M., Bolick, C., Lee, J., Anderson, J., & Brown, A. (2012). Editorial: Implementing the teacher education initiative. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 12(2), 115–121.
   Google Scholar
• Carbonell, K. B., Dailey-Hebert, A., & Gijselaers, W. (2013). Unleashing the creative potential of faculty to create blended learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 29–37.10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuang, H. (2004). Sustainable faculty development: Issues in technology for teacher education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
   Google Scholar
• Clandinin, J. (2000). Learning to teach: A question of knowledge. Education Canada, 40(1), 28–35.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2004). Practioner inquiry, knowledge, and university culture. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 601–649). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Collopy, R. M. B., & Arnold, J. M. (2009). To blend or not to blend: Online and blended learning environments in undergraduate teacher education. Issues in Teacher Education, 18(2), 85–101.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124–130.10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutri, R. M., Whiting, E. F., & Pinnegar, S. (2015). Activating emotional and analytic engagement in blended learning: A multicultural teacher education example (Bank Street Occasional Paper Series, 34). Retrieved from https://educate.bankstreet.edu/occasional-paper-series/vol2015/iss34/6/
   Google Scholar
• Dacey, C., Abrams, L., Strom, K., & Mills, T. (2017). The future of self-study: Through and with technology. In D. Garbett & A. Ovens (Eds.), Being self-study researchers in a digital world (pp. 167–173). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-39478-7
   Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P.A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61.10.1007/BF02299597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.10.1007/BF02504683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freidus, H. & Kruger, M. W. (2017). Building community and capacity: Self-study and the development of social constructivist online teaching. In D. Garbett & A. Ovens (Eds.), Being self-study researchers in a digital world (pp. 103–116). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-39478-7
   Google Scholar
• Garbett, D. & Ovens, A. (2017). Being self-study researchers in a digital world: Future oriented research and pedagogy in teacher education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-39478-7
   Google Scholar
• Graham, C. R., Henrie, C. R., & Gibbons, A. S. (2014). Developing models and theory for blended learning research. Blended learning: Research perspectives, 2, 13–33.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. L. (1998). Introduction: Reconceptualizing teacher practice. In M. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Reconceptualizing teaching practice: Self-study in teacher education (pp. 1–4). London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. L., & Pinnegar, S. (2014). Intimate scholarship in research: An example from self-study of teaching and teacher education practices methodology. Learning Landscapes, 8(1), 153–171.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. L. & Pinnegar, S. (2017). Self-study of teaching and teacher education practices methodology and the digital turn. In D. Garbett & A. Ovens (Eds.), Being self-study researchers in a digital world (pp. 11–29). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-39478-7
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, D. M. (1998). Adoption patterns of faculty who integrate computer technology for teaching and learning in higher education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Calgary, AB: University of Calgary. Retrieved from http://people.ucalgary.ca/~dmjacobs/phd/dissertation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jellison, J. M. (2006). Managing the dynamics of change: The fastest path to creating an engaged and productive workforce. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Keengwe, J., & Kang, J. J. (2012). Blended learning in teacher preparation programs: A literature review. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 8(2), 81–93.10.4018/IJICTE
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, K., & Archambault, L. (2013). Partnering for success: A 21st century model for teacher preparation. International Association for K-12 Online Learning. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED561281.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2013). Examining some assumptions and limitations of research on the effects of emerging technologies for teaching and learning in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44, 536–543. doi:10.1111/bjet.12049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaBoskey, V. K. (2004). The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 817–869). Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-1-4020-6545-3
   Google Scholar
• Liu, L. B., Baker, L. L., & Milman, N. B. (2014). Technological innovation in twenty-first century multicultural teacher preparation. Journal for Multicultural Education, 8(1), 54–67. doi:10.1108/JME-02-2013-0005
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, J. (2017). The digital impact on self-study. In D. Garbett & A. Ovens (Eds.), Being self-study researchers in a digital world (pp. 175–181). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-39478-7
   Google Scholar
• Mena, J., & Russell, T. (2017). Collaboration, multiple methods, trustworthiness: issues arising from the 2014 international conference on self-study of teacher education practices. Studying Teacher Education, 13(1), 105–122. doi:10.1080/17425964.2017.1287694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017.10.1111/tcre.2006.108.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Zhao, Y. (2007). Faculty development by design: Integrating technology in higher education. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolle, P. S., & Lou, Y. (2008). Technology adoption into teaching and learning by mainstream university faculty: A mixed methodology study revealing the “how, when, why, and why not”. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 39(3), 235–265.10.2190/EC.39.3.c
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, K. M. & Stallings, D. T. (2014). Preparing teachers for emerging blended learning environments. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 22(1), 57–81.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. (2011). Technological determinism in educational technology research: Some alternative ways of thinking about the relationship between learning and technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 373–384. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00406.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Glazewski, K. D., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2010). Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: Addressing professional and student needs. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1321–1335.10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinnegar, S., & Hamilton, M. L. (2010). Self-study of practice as a genre of qualitative research: Theory, methodology, and practice. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Elements of diffusion. Diffusion of Innovations, 5, 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Surry, D. W., & Land, S. M. (2000). Strategies for motivating higher education faculty to use technology. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 37(2), 145–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, J. (1989). Creating a living educational theory from questions of the kind, ‘how do i improve my practice?’. Cambridge Journal of Education, 19(1), 41–52. doi:10.1080/0305764890190106
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar