References

• Abrams, L., Strom,K., Abi-Hanna, R., Dacey, C., & Dauplaise, J., (2014). Engaging with theory through self-study. In D. Garbett & A. Ovens (eds.), Changing practices for changing times: Past, present and future possibilities for self-study research (Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Self Study of Teacher Education Practices, pp. 20–22). Auckland, NZ: University of Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822388128
   Google Scholar
• Barak, J. (2015). Augmented becoming: Personal reflections on collaborative experience. Studying Teacher Education, 11(1), 49–63. doi:10.1080/17425964.2015.1013027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2016, November). The critical posthumanities. Paper presented at the Summer Institute of the Antipodes, Penrith, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2017, August). The posthuman condition. Presentation at the University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, I. (2008). A reader’s guide to Anti-Oedipus. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Bullock, S., & Fletcher, T. (2017). Teaching about using technology: Using embodiment to interpret online pedagogies of teacher education. In D. Garbett & A. Ovens (eds.), Being self-study researchers in a digital world (pp. 37–50). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bullough, Jr., R. V., & Pinnegar, S. (2001). Guidelines for quality in autobiographical forms of self-study research. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 13–21. doi:10.3102/0013189x030003013
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, C. J. (2009). Trustworthiness in self-study research. In C. A. Lassonde, S. Galman, & C. Kosnik (eds.), Self-study methodologies for teacher educators (pp. 21–34). Rotterdam: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1988). Spinoza: Practical philosophy. San Francisco, CA: City Lights.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (2004a). The logic of sense. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (2004b). Desert Islands: And Other Texts, 1953–1974. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forgasz, R., McDonough, S., & Berry, A. (2014). Embodied approaches to S-STEP research into teacher educator emotion. In A. Ovens & D. Garbett (eds.), Changing practices for changing times: Past, present and future possibilities for self-study research (pp. 82–85). Auckland, NZ: University of Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Garbett, D., & Ovens, A. (2017). Being self-study researchers in a digital world. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-39478-7
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. L., & Pinnegar, S. (2009). Self-study of practice as a genre of qualitative research: Theory, methodology, and practice. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, M. L., & Pinnegar, S. (2017). Self-study of teaching and teacher education practices methodology and the digital turn. In D. Garbett & A. Ovens (Eds.), Being self-study researchers in a digital world (pp. 17–35). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kosnik, C., Freese, A., Samaras, A., & Beck, C. (Eds.). (2006). Making a difference in teacher education through self study: Studies of personal, professional, and program renewal. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• LaBoskey, V. K. (2004). The methodology of self-study and its theoretical underpinnings. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 817–869). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.10.1007/978-1-4020-6545-3
   Google Scholar
• Lather, P. A. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy with/in the postmodern. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, J. (2005). Researching teaching about teaching: Self-study of teacher education practices. Studying Teacher Education, 1(1), 5–16. doi:10.1080/17425960500039777
   Google Scholar
• MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658–667. doi:10/1080/09518398.2013.788755
   Google Scholar
• Pithouse-Morgan, K., & Samaras, A. P. (2014). Thinking in space: Learning about dialogue as method from a trans-continental conversation about trans-disciplinary self-study of professional practice. In D. Garbett & A. Ovens (Eds.), Changing practices for changing times: Past, present and future possibilities of self-study research ( Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Self-Study of Teacher Education Practices, pp. 167–170). Auckland, New Zealand: University of Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Placier, P., Pinnegar, S., Hamilton, M. L., & Guilfoyle, K. (2005). Exploring the concept of dialogue in the self-study of teaching practices. In C. Kosnik, A. Freese, A. Samaras, & C. Beck (Eds.), Making a difference in teacher education through self study: Studies of personal, professional, and program renewal (pp. 51–64). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-3528-4
   Google Scholar
• Russell, T. (2004). Tracking the development of self-study in teacher education research and practice. In J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, & T. Russell (Eds.), International handbook of self-study of teaching and teacher education practices (pp. 1191–1210). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.10.1007/978-1-4020-6545-3
   Google Scholar
• Saldana, J. (2009). The qualitative coding manual for researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schuck, S., & Russell, T. (2005). Self-study, critical friendship, and the complexities of teacher education. Studying Teacher Education, 1(2), 107–121. doi:10.1080/17425960500288291
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. (2000). Poststructural feminism in education: An overview. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(5), 477–515. doi:10.1080/09518390050156422
   Google Scholar
• St. Pierre, E. A. (2001). Coming to theory: Finding Foucault and Deleuze. In K. Weiler (ed.), Reading, resisting, and revisioning male theorists in education and cultural studies (pp. 141–164). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Strom, K. (2015). Teaching as assemblage: Negotiating learning and practice in the first year of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(4), 321–333. doi:10.1177/0022487115589990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strom, K., Abi-Hanna, R., Dacey, C., & Duplaise, J. (2014). Exploring and connecting lines of flight. In M. Taylor & L. Coia (eds.), Gender, feminism, and queer theory in the self-study of teacher education practices (pp. 31–44). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Strom, K., Abrams, L., Dacey, C., & Mills, T. (2016). “I, teacher educator”: Grappling with ethical responsibility, hybrid pedagogies, and neoliberal agendas in mangled educational spaces. In D. Garbett & A. Ovens (eds.), Enacting self-study as methodology for professional inquiry (pp. 53–59). Auckland, New Zealand: University of Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Strom, K., & Martin, A. (2017). Thinking with theory in an era of Trump. Issues in Teacher Education, 26(3), 3–22.
   Google Scholar