Transitioning to Teaching Science in Higher Education: Exploring Informal Dialogical Approaches to Teaching in a Formal Educational Setting

References

• Aguiar, O. G., Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. (2010). Learning from and responding to students’ questions: The authoritative and dialogic tension. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(2), 174–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, J., Park Rogers, M., & Borowski, R. (2016). “I am out of my comfort zone”: Self-study of the struggle of adapting to the professional identity of a teacher educator. Studying Teacher Education, 12(3), 320–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C. W. (2007). Perspectives on science learning. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 3–30). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J., & Hyslop-Margison, E. (2006). Collaborative learning and dialogue: Democratic learning in adult education. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 20(4), 6–15. http://education.fiu.edu/newhorizons
   Google Scholar
• Baker, A. R., Lin, T., Chen, J., Paul, N., Anderson, R. C., & Nguyen-Jahiel, K. (2017). Effects of teacher framing on student engagement during collaborative reasoning discussions. Contemporary Education, 51, 253–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookfield, S. D., & Preskill, S. (1999). Discussion as a way of teaching: Tools and techniques for democratic classrooms. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Cerbin, W. (2010). Collaborative learning techniques workshop handouts: April 23, 2010. Collaborative Learning Techniques Workshop. Center for Advancing Teaching & Learning, UW-La Crosse.
   Google Scholar
• Coia, L., & Tayor, M. (2009). Co/autoethnography: Exploring our teaching selves collaboratively. In D. L. Tidwell, M. L. Heston, & L. M. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Research methods for the self-study of practice (pp. 3–16). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ellsworth, E. (1989). Why doesn’t this feel empowering? working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 59(3), 297–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engin, M. (2017). Contributions and silence in academic talk: Exploring learner experiences of dialogic interaction. Learning, Culture, and Social Interaction, 12, 78–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2002). Lessons without limits: How free-choice learning is transforming education. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, A. N., & Schrodt, P. (2016). Teacher discussion facilitation: A new measure and its associations with students’ perceived understanding, interest, and engagement. Communication Education, 65(4), 445–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, M. J., & Wargo, B. M. (2012). Dialogic framing of scientific content for conceptual and epistemic understanding. Science Education, 96(3), 369–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freire. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York City, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Gatzke, J. M., Buck, G. A., & Akerson, V. L. (2015). More than just playing outside: A self-study on finding my identity as an environmental educator in science education. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 10(3), 319–335.
   Google Scholar
• Grimmett, H. (2016). The problem of “just tell us”: Insights from playing with poetic inquiry and dialogical self theory. Studying Teacher Education, 12(1), 37–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, E. (2018). Understanding classroom silence: How students’ perceptions of power influence participation in discussion-based composition classrooms. Teaching English in the Two Year College, 45(3), 284–305.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchen, J. (2009). Passages: Improving teacher education through narrative self-study. In D. L. Tidwell, M. L. Heston, & L. M. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Research methods for the self-study of practice (pp. 35–51). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, R., & Kapur, M. (2018). Preparation for future collaboration: Cognitively preparing for learning from collaboration. The Journal of Experimental Education, 86(4), 546–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, J., & Berry, A. (2005). Modeling by teacher educators. Teaching & Teacher Education, 21, 193–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McComas, W. (1996). Ten myths of science: Re-examining what we think we know about the nature of science. School Science and Mathematics, 96(1), 10–16.
   Google Scholar
• Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Melville, W., Kerr, D., Verma, G., & Campbell, T. (2018). Science education and student autonomy. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 18, 87–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezirow, J. (1985). Concept and action in adult education. Adult Education Quarterly, 35(3), 142–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezirow, J. (1994). Understanding transformation theory. Adult Education Quarterly, 44(4), 222–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New directions in adult and continuing education, 74, 5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Morettini, B. W., Brown, C. M., & Viator, M. G. (2019). Gaining a better understanding of self: A self-study in cultural competence in teacher education. The Teacher Educator, 53(4), 355–366.
   Google Scholar
• Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor, K. J. (2013). Class participation: Promoting in-class student engagement. Education, 133(3), 340–344.
   Google Scholar
• Patall, E. A., Steingut, R. R., Vasquez, A. C., Trimble, S. S., Pituch, K. A., & Freeman, J. L. (2018). Daily autonomy supporting or thwarting and students’ motivation and engagement in the high school science classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(2), 269–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinnegar, S., & Hamilton, M. L. (2009). Self-study of practice as a genre of qualitative research. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Quicke, J. (2001). The science curriculum and education for democracy in the risk society. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(1), 113–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2016). The power of interest for motivation and engagement. New York, NY, US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Samaras, A. P. (2011). Self-study teacher research: Improving your practice through collaborative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Tidwell, D. L., Heston, M. L., & Fitzgerald, L. M. (2009). Introduction. In D. L. Tidwell, M. L. Heston, & L. M. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Research methods for the self-study of practice (pp. xiii–xxii). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, X., Anderson, R. C., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., & Miller, B. (2013). Enhancing motivation and engagement through collaborative discussion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 622–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar