327
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Regular Features

A mixed approach to investigating public acceptance of elite sport policy in Taiwan: antecedents and prediction

&

References

  • Ajzen, I., and M. Fishbein. 1980. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Allison, L., and T. Monnington. 2002. “Sport, Prestige and International Relations.” Government and Opposition 37 (1): 106–134. doi:10.1111/1477-7053.00089.
  • Böhlke, N. 2007. “New Insights in the Nature of Best Practice in Elite Sport System Management Exemplified with the Organisation of Coach Education.” New Studies in Athletics 21: 49–59.
  • Böhlke, N., and L. Robinson. 2009. “Benchmarking of Elite Sport Systems.” Management Decision 47 (1): 67–84. doi:10.1108/00251740910929704.
  • Buchholz, R. A., and S. B. Rosenthal. 2004. “Stakeholder Theory and Public Policy: How Governments Matter.” Journal of Business Ethics 51 (2): 143–153. doi:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000033608.61005.1f.
  • Churchill, G. A. 1979. “A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs.” Journal of Marketing Research 16 (1): 64–73. doi:10.1177/002224377901600110.
  • Creswell, J. W., and V. L. P. Clark. 2011. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Cobb, M., and Macoubrie, J. 2004. “Public perceptions about nanotechnology: Risks, benefits and trust.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 6: 395–405.
  • De Bosscher, V., P. De Knop, M. van Bottenburg, and S. Shibli. 2006. “A Conceptual Framework for Analyzing Sports Policies Factors Leading to International Sporting Success.” European Sport Management Quarterly 6 (2): 185–215. doi:10.1080/16184740600955087.
  • De Bosscher, V., S. Shibli, H. Westerbeek, and M. van Bottenburg. 2015. Successful Elite Sport Policies: An International Comparison of the Sport Policy Factors Leading to International Sporting Success (SPLISS 2.0) in 15 Nations. Aachen: Meyer & Meyer.
  • De Bosscher, V., P. Sotiriadou, and M. van Bottenburg. 2013. “Scrutinizing the Sport Pyramid Metaphor: An Examination of the Relationship between Elite Success and Mass Participation in Flanders.” International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics 5 (3): 319–339. doi:10.1080/19406940.2013.806340.
  • De Rycke, J., and V. De Bosscher. 2019. “Mapping the Potential Societal Impacts Triggered by Elite Sport: A Conceptual Framework.” International Journal of Sport and Politics 11 (3): 485–502. doi:10.1080/19406940.2019.1581649.
  • De Rycke, J., V. De Bosscher, H. Funahashi, and P. Sotiriadou. 2019. “Public Perceptions of the Societal Impact of Elite Sport: Scale Development and Testing.” Journal of Sport Management 33 (6): 560–571. doi:10.1123/jsm.2018-0295.
  • Denham, B. E. 2010. “Correlates of Pride in the Performance Success of United States Athletes Competing on an International Stage.” International Review for the Sociology of Sport 45 (4): 457–473. doi:10.1177/1012690210373540.
  • Dóczi, T. 2012. “Gold Fever (?): Sport and National Identity – The Hungarian Case.” International Review for the Sociology of Sport 47 (2): 165–182. doi:10.1177/1012690210393828.
  • Eagly, A. H., and S. Chaiken. 1993. The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
  • Fishbein, M. 1963. “An Investigation of the Relationship between Beliefs about an Object and the Attitude toward That Object.” Human Relations 16 (3): 233–239. doi:10.1177/001872676301600302.
  • Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.
  • Friedman, M. T., and D. S. Mason. 2004. “A Stakeholder Approach to Understanding Economic Development Decision Making: Public Subsidies for Professional Sport Facilities.” Economic Development Quarterly 18 (3): 236–254. doi:10.1177/0891242404265795.
  • Friedman, M. T., M. M. Parent, and D. S. Mason. 2004. “Building a Framework for Issues Management in Sport through Stakeholder Theory.” European Sport Management Quarterly 4 (3): 170–190. doi:10.1080/16184740408737475.
  • Funahashi, H., V. De Bosscher, and Y. Mano. 2015. “Understanding Public Acceptance of Elite Sport Policy in Japan: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach.” European Sport Management Quarterly 15 (4): 478–504. doi:10.1080/16184742.2015.1056200.
  • Green, M., and B. Houlihan. 2005. Elite Sport Development: Policy Learning and Political Priorities. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Grix, J., and F. Carmichael. 2012. “Why Do Governments Invest in Elite Sport? A Polemic.” International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics 4 (1): 73–90. doi:10.1080/19406940.2011.627358.
  • Hair, J. F., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, R. E. Anderson, and R. L. Tatham. 2006. Mulivaraite Data Analysis. 6th ed.Prentice, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Hallmann, K., C. Breuer, and B. Kühnreich. 2013. “Happiness, Pride and Elite Sporting Success: What Population Segments Gain Most from National Athletic Achievements?” Sport Management Review 16 (2): 226–235. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2012.07.001.
  • Hong, E. 2011. “Elite Sport and Nation-Building in South Korea: South Korea as the Dark Horse in Global Elite Sport.” The International Journal of the History of Sport 28 (7): 977–989. doi:10.1080/09523367.2011.563630.
  • Houlihan, B. 2005. “Public Sector Sport Policy: Developing a Framework for Analysis.” International Review for the Sociology of Sport 40 (2): 163–185. doi:10.1177/1012690205057193.
  • Houlihan, B. 2009. “Mechanisms of International Influence on Domestic Elite Sport Policy.” International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics 1 (1): 51–69. doi:10.1080/19406940902739090.
  • Houlihan, B., and M. Green. 2008. Comparative Elite Sport Development: Systems, Structures and Public Policy. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • Houlihan, B., and J. Zheng. 2013. “The Olympics and Elite Sport Policy: Where Will It All End?” The International Journal of the History of Sport 30 (4): 338–355. doi:10.1080/09523367.2013.765726.
  • Hussein, A. 2009. “The Use of Triangulation in Social Sciences Research: Can Qualitative and Quantitative Methods Be Combined?” Journal of Comparative Social Work 4 (1): 106–112. doi:10.31265/jcsw.v4i1.48.
  • Hutahaean, M. 2016. “The Importance of Stakeholders Approach in Public Policy Making.” Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research 84: 462–466.
  • Jones, T., and A. Wicks. 1999. “Convergent Stakeholder Theory.” Academy of Management Review 24 (2): 206–221. doi:10.5465/amr.1999.1893929.
  • Kavetsos, G., and S. Szymanski. 2010. “National Well-Being and International Sports Events.” Journal of Economic Psychology 31 (2): 158–171. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2009.11.005.
  • Laamrani El Idrissi, S., and O. Taouab. 2019. “The New Public Management and Stakeholders Theory Applied to the Territorial Intelligence.” International Journal of Scientific Research and Management 7 (2): 978–985.
  • Lindgreen, A., Y. Xu, F. Maon, and J. Wilcock. 2012. “Corporate Social Responsibility Brand Leadership: A Multiple Case Study.” European Journal of Marketing 46 (7/8): 933–965. doi:10.1108/03090561211230142.
  • Maor, M., and R. Sulitzeanu-Kenan. 2016. “Responsive Change: Agency Output Response to Reputational Threats.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 26 (1): 31–44.
  • Mitchell, H., H. Spong, and M. Stewart. 2012. “Gambling with Public Money: An Economic Analysis of National Sports Team Funding.” The Economic and Labour Relations Review 23 (2): 7–22. doi:10.1177/103530461202300202.
  • National Sports Act. 2017. National Sports Act. Accessed 20 December 2019. https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0120001
  • Newman, J., A. Cherney, and B. W. Head. 2016. “Do Policy Makers Use Academic Research? Reexamining the ‘Two Communities’ Theory of Research Utilization.” Public Administration Review 76 (1): 24–32. doi:10.1111/puar.12464.
  • NFP Research Report. 2018. Review on the 2019 National Sport Policy Budgets in Taiwan. Accessed 2 January 2020. https://www.npf.org.tw/2/19576
  • Nunnally, J. C., and I. H. Bernstein. 1994. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Oakley, B., and M. Green. 2001. “The Production of Olympic Champions: International Perspectives on Elite Sport Development System.” European Journal for Sport Management 8: 83–105.
  • Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publication.
  • Pluye, P., and Q. N. Hong. 2014. “Combining the Power of Stories and the Power of Numbers: Mixed Methods Research and Mixed Studies Reviews.” Annual Review of Public Health 35 (1): 29–45. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182440.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., S. B. MacKenzie, J. Y. Lee, and N. P. Podsakoff. 2003. “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies.” Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5): 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
  • Preuss, H. 2009. “Opportunity Costs and Efficiency of Investments in Mega Sport Events.” Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events 1 (2): 131–140. doi:10.1080/19407960902992183.
  • Rowen, I. 2015. “Inside Taiwan’s Sunflower Movement: Twenty-Four Days in a Student-Occupied Parliament, and the Future of the Region.” The Journal of Asian Studies 74 (1): 5–21. doi:10.1017/S0021911814002174.
  • Scholderer, J., and L. J. Frewer. 2003. “The Biotechnology Communication Paradox: Experimental Evidence and the Need for the New Strategy.” Journal of Consumer Policy 26 (2): 125–157. doi:10.1023/A:1023695519981.
  • Siegrist, M. 2000. “The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology.” Risk Analysis 20 (2): 195–204. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.202020.
  • Skille, E. Å. 2011. “Sport for All in Scandinavia: Sport Policy and Participation in Norway, Sweden and Denmark.” International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics 3 (3): 327–339. doi:10.1080/19406940.2011.596153.
  • Stewart, B., M. Nicholson, A. Smith, and H. Westerbeek. 2004. Australian Sport: Better by Design? The Evolution of Australian Sport Policy. Abington: Routledge.
  • Sunflower Student Movement. 2014. Sunflower Student Movement in 2014. Accessed 26 August 2019. http://en.bp.ntu.edu.tw/?p=1648
  • Truyens, J., V. De Bosscher, B. Heyndels, and H. Westerbeek. 2014. “A Resource-Based Perspective on Countries’ Competitive Advantage in Elite Athletics.” International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics 6 (3): 459–489. doi:10.1080/19406940.2013.839954.
  • van Hilvoorde, I., A. Elling, and R. Stokvis. 2010. “How to Influence National Pride? The Olympic Medal Index as a Unifying Narrative.” International Review for the Sociology of Sport 45 (1): 87–102. doi:10.1177/1012690209356989.
  • Visschers, V. H., C. Keller, and M. Siegrist. 2011. “Climate Change Benefits and Energy Supply Benefits as Determinants of Acceptance of Nuclear Power Stations: Investigating an Explanatory Model.” Energy Policy 39 (6): 3621–3629. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.064.
  • Wicker, P., K. Hallmann, C. Breuer, and S. Feiler. 2012. “The Value of Olympic Success and the Intangible Effects of Sport Events: A Contingent Valuation Approach in Germany.” European Sport Management Quarterly 12 (4): 337–355. doi:10.1080/16184742.2012.693117.
  • Wicker, P., J. Prinz, and T. von Hanau. 2012. “Estimating the Value of National Sporting Success.” Sport Management Review 15 (2): 200–210. doi:10.1016/j.smr.2011.08.007.
  • Yeasmin, S., and K. F. Rahman. 2012. “Triangulation Research Method as the Tool of Social Science Research.” BUP Journal 1 (1): 154–163.
  • Zeimers, G., C. Anagnostopoulos, T. Zintz, and A. Willem. 2019. “Organizational Learning for Corporate Social Responsibility in Sport Organizations.” European Sport Management Quarterly 19 (1): 80–101. doi:10.1080/16184742.2018.1546752.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.