The effects of climbing’s inclusion in the Olympic Games: a controversial innovation process in France?

References

• Akrich, M., M. Callon, B. Latour, and A. Monaghan. 2002. “The Key to Success in Innovation Part I: The Art of Interessement.” International Journal of Innovation Management 6 (2): 187–206. doi:10.1142/S1363919602000550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akrich, M. 2003. “La construction d’un système socio-technique. Esquisse pour une anthropologie des techniques.” Anthropologie et Sociétés 13 (2): 31–54. doi:10.7202/015076ar.
   Google Scholar
• Akrich, M. 2006. “The Technical Objects and Their Users.” In Sociologie de la traduction: Textes fondateurs, edited by B. Latour, M. Akrich and M. Callon, 179–199. Paris : Presse des Mines.
   Google Scholar
• Akrich, M., M. Callon, and B. Latour. (Eds.) 2006. “Sociologie de la traduction: Textes fondateurs.” Paris: Presses des Mines doi:10.4000/books.pressesmines.1181.
   Google Scholar
• Amblard, H. P. Bernoux, G. Herreros, and Y. F. Livan. 1996. Les nouvelles approches sociologiques des organisations. Paris, Le Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Aubel, O. 2000. “La médiatisation d’une pratique sportive secondaire, l’escalade libre, dans la presse sportive spécialisée.” Regards sociologiques 20: 107–125.
   Google Scholar
• Aubel, O. 2005. L’escalade libre en France: sociologie d’une prophétie sportive. Paris: L’Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Aubel, O., and F. Ohl. 2004. “The Denegation of the Economy: The Example of Climbing in France.” International Review for the Sociology of Sport 39 (2): 123–137. doi:10.1177/1012690204043457.
   Google Scholar
• Batuev, M. 2015. “‘Free Sports’: Organizational Evolution from Participatory Activities to Olympic Sports.”
   Google Scholar
• Batuev, M., and L. Robinson. 2017. “How Skateboarding Made It to the Olympics: An Institutional Perspective.” International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing 17 (4/5/6): 381–402. doi:10.1504/IJSMM.2017.087446.
   Google Scholar
• Batuev, M., and L. Robinson. 2019. “Organizational Evolution and the Olympic Games: The Case of Sport Climbing.” Sport in Society 22 (10): 1674–1690. doi:10.1080/17430437.2018.1440998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biard, E. 2012. “Facteurs de diffusion des pratiques sportives hors cadre et stratégie des acteurs: études de cas comparatives dans la délocalisation des sports de nature aux milieux urbains.” (Doctoral dissertation., Paris 11).
   Google Scholar
• Bloor, D. 1984. “The Sociology of Reasons: Or Why “Epistemic Factors” Are Really “Social Factors.” In Scientific Rationality: The Sociological Turn, 295–324. Springer, Dordrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Bogardus, L. M. 2012. “The Bolt Wars.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 41 (3): 283–308. doi:10.1177/0891241611426429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutroy, É., B. Soulé, and B. Vignal. 2014. “Analyse sociotechnique d’une innovation sportive: le cas du kitesurf.” Innovations 43 (1): 163–185.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. 1984. “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay.” The Sociological Review 32 (1_suppl): 196–233. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00113.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chappelet, J.-L. 2016. “From Olympic Administration to Olympic Governance.” Sport in Society 19 (6): 739–751. doi:10.1080/17430437.2015.1108648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chateauraynaud, F. 2006. Les asymétries de prises. Des formes de pouvoir dans un monde en réseaux. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/file/index/docid/111674/filename/Les_asymetries_de_prises2006.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chateauraynaud, F. 2007. “La contrainte argumentative. Les formes de l’argumentation entre cadres délibératifs et puissances d’expression politiques. Revue européenne des sciences sociales.” European Journal of Social Sciences 45 (136): 129–148.
   Google Scholar
• DiCicco‐Bloom, B., and B. F. Crabtree. 2006. “The Qualitative Research Interview.” Medical Education 40 (4): 314–321. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douet Guérin, M. 2013. “Pratiques sportives, normes et socialisation: représentations sociales de la norme en basket-ball, escalade et paintball.” (Doctoral dissertation., Paris 5).
   Google Scholar
• Dumont, G. 2017. “The Beautiful and the Damned: The Work of New Media Production in Professional Rock Climbing.” Journal of Sport and Social Issues 41 (2): 99–117. doi:10.1177/0193723516686285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumont, G. 2018. Grimpeur professionnel: Le travail créateur sur le marché du sponsoring. Paris: Éditions de l’École des hautes études en sciences sociales.
   Google Scholar
• Elias, N., and Dunning E. 1994. Sport et civilisation. Paris: Fayard.
   Google Scholar
• Gloria, A., and M. Raspaud. 2002. La création de la Fédération Française de l’Escalade. Consensus et conflits au sein des institutions de sports de montagne. Communication au premier congrès de la Société de Sociologie du Sport de Langue Française. Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, 28–30.
   Google Scholar
• Gloria, A., and M. Raspaud. 2006. “Émergence des compétitions d’escalade en France (1980–1987). Genèse d’une offre fédérale.” Staps 71 (1): 99–114.
   Google Scholar
• Guttmann, A. 1978. From Ritual to Record: The Nature of Modern Sports. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hallé, J., B. Vignal, and B. Soulé. 2016. “L’innovation n’est pas un long fleuve tranquille.” Annales des Mines – Gérer et comprendre N° 123 (1): 24–34. FFE. doi:10.3917/geco1.123.0024.
   Google Scholar
• Haye, L., and J. P. Mounet. 2014. “Off-Road Recreation in the Pilat Regional Natural Park (France). Controversy, Conflict and Cooperation Dynamics of a Non-Stabilized Network.” Loisir et Société/Society and Leisure 37 (1): 163–181. doi:10.1080/07053436.2014.882476.
   Google Scholar
• Heino, R. 2000. “New Sports: What Is So Punk about Snowboarding?” Journal of Sport and Social Issues 24 (2): 176–191. doi:10.1177/0193723500242005.
   Google Scholar
• Hoibian, O. 1995. “De l’alpinisme à l’escalade libre: l’invention d’un style? STAPS.” Sciences et techniques des activités physiques et sportives, 36: 7–15.
   Google Scholar
• Honea, J. C. 2013. “Beyond the Alternative vs. mainstream Dichotomy: Olympic BMX and the Future of Action Sports.” The Journal of Popular Culture 46 (6): 1253–1275. doi:10.1111/jpcu.12087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horne, J., and W. Manzenreiter. 2006. “Sports Mega-Events: social Scientific Analyses of a Global Phenomenon.” The Sociological Review 54 (2_suppl): 1–187. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00650.x.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1996. “On Actor-Network Theory: A Few Clarifications.” Soziale welt 47: 369–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. 1994. Organizing modernity (pp. 100–104). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. 2009. “Actor Network Theory and Material Semiotics.” In Turner, B.S. (ed) The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, 141–158. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Lemieux, C. 2007. “À quoi sert l’analyse des controverses? Mil neuf cent.” Revue d’histoire intellectuelle 25 (1): 191–212.
   Google Scholar
• Loret, A. 1995. “Génération glisse: dans l’eau, l’air, la neige… la révolution du sport des « années fun.” Paris: Autrement.
   Google Scholar
• MacAloon, J. J. 2016. “Agenda 2020 and the Olympic Movement.” Sport in Society 19 (6): 767–785. doi:10.1080/17430437.2015.1119960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., and E. J. Tisdell. 2015. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Natow, R. S. 2020. “The Use of Triangulation in Qualitative Studies Employing Elite Interviews.” Qualitative Research 20 (2): 160–173. doi:10.1177/1468794119830077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pack, S. M., andHedlund, D., P. 2020. “Inclusion of Electronic Sports in the Olympic Games for the Right (or Wrong) Reasons.” International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics 12 (3): 485–495. doi:10.1080/19406940.2020.1801796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paget, E., F. Dimanche, and J. P. Mounet. 2010. “A Tourism Innovation Case: An Actor-Network Approach.” Annals of Tourism Research 37 (3): 828–847. doi:10.1016/j.annals.2010.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pociello, C. 2015. Les cultures sportives: pratiques, représentations et mythes sportifs. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Rech, Y., and É. Paget. 2017. “Saisir les transformations des sports de nature par la théorie de l’acteur-réseau.” Sciences de la société 101: 48–63. doi:10.4000/sds.6137.
   Google Scholar
• Rech, Y., E. Paget, and F. Dimanche. 2019. “Uncertain Tourism: Evolution of a French Winter Sports Resort and Network Dynamics.” Journal of Destination Marketing & Management 12 (12): 95–104. doi:10.1016/j.jdmm.2019.03.003.
   Google Scholar
• Rickly, J. M. 2016. “Lifestyle Mobilities: A Politics of Lifestyle Rock Climbing.” Mobilities 11 (2): 243–263. doi:10.1080/17450101.2014.977667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinehart, R. E., and Sydnor, S., Ed. 2012. To the Extreme: Alternative Sports, Inside and Out. New York: Suny Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soulé, B., and S. Walk. 2007. “Comment rester « alternatif »? Sociologie des pratiquants sportifs en quête d’authenticité subculturelle.” Corps 2(1): 67–72.
   Google Scholar
• Soulé, B., B. Lefèvre, V. Reynier, É. Boutroy, F. Roux, and V. Boudières. 2015. “La construction des risques liés aux pratiques sportives de montagne. Analyse de la production et de la diffusion des connaissances sur les accidents en France.” Communication. Information médias théories pratiques 33 (1).
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe, H., and G. Dumont. 2019. “The Professionalization of Action Sports: Mapping Trends and Future Directions.” Sport in Society 22 (10): 1639–1654. doi:10.1080/17430437.2018.1440715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorpe, H., and B. Wheaton. 2016. “Youth Perceptions of the Olympic Games: Attitudes Towards Action Sports at the YOG and Olympic Games.” Final report for the IOC Olympic Studies Centre. Accessed July 10, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe, H., and B. Wheaton. 2011. “Generation X Games’, Action Sports and the Olympic Movement: Understanding the Cultural Politics of Incorporation.” Sociology 45 (5): 830–847. doi:10.1177/0038038511413427.
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe, H., and B. Wheaton. 2019. “The Olympic Games, Agenda 2020 and Action Sports: The Promise, Politics and Performance of Organisational Change.” International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics 11 (3): 465–483. doi:10.1080/19406940.2019.1569548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viollet, B., Scelles, N., and Ferrand, A. 2020. “The Engagement of Actors during the Formulation of a National Federation Sport Policy: An Analysis within the French Rugby Union.” International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics 12 (1): 49–71. doi:10.1080/19406940.2019.1634621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. 2003. Case study research: Design and methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar