Advanced search
Publication Cover
Expert Review of Medical Devices Volume 13, 2016 - Issue 12
Submit an article Journal homepage
210
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Device Profile

Evaluation of Aesculap Implant Systems activl Artificial Disc for the treatment of degenerative disc disease

Daniel SheinOrthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USAView further author information
,
Jennifer ShueOrthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USAView further author information
&
Federico GirardiOrthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USACorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
Pages 1069-1072 | Received 31 Jan 2016, Accepted 01 Nov 2016, Published online: 22 Nov 2016

References

  • Kostuik JP. Complications and surgical revision for failed disc arthroplasty. Spine J. 2004;4(6 suppl):289S–291S.
  • Guyer RD, Tromanhauser SG, Regan JJ. An economic model of one-level lumbar arthroplasty versus fusion. Spine. 2007;7(5):558–562.
  • Hilibrand AS, Robbins M. Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J. 2004;4(6 suppl):190S–194S.
  • Lin EL, Jc W. Total disk arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14:705–714.
  • Putzier M, Funk JF, Schneider SV, et al. Charité total disc replacement – clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:183–195.
  • Madigan L, Vaccaro AR, Spector LR, et al. Management of symptomatic lumbar degenerative disk disease. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009 Feb;17(2):102–111.
  • Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Sd H. Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion: a review of clinical, biomechanical, and radiologic studies. Am J Orthop. 1999;28:336–340.
  • Kornblum MB, Fischgrund JS, Herkowitz HN, et al. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective long-term study comparing fusion and pseudarthrosis. Spine. 2004;29:726–733.
  • McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Holsapple G, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus fusion: part II. Evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes. Spine. 2005;30:1576–1583.
  • Garcia R Jr, Yue JJ, Blumenthal S, et al. Lumbar total disc replacement for discogenic low back pain: two-year outcomes of the activL multicenter randomized controlled IDE clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Dec;40(24):1873–1881.
  • Shim CS, Lee S, Maeng DH, et al. Vertical split fracture of the vertebral body following total disc replacement using ProDisc: report of two cases. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18:465–469.
  • Fernstrom U. Arthroplasty with intercorporal endoprosthesis in herniated disc and in painful disc. Acta Chir Scand Suppl. 1966;357:154–159.
  • Wei J, Song Y, Sun L, et al. Comparison of artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int Orthop. 2013;37(7):1315–1325.
  • Rao MJ, Cao SS. Artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for lumbar degenerative disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014;134(2):149–158.
  • Zigler J, Delamarter R, Spivak JM, et al. Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32:1155–1162.
  • Van Den Eerenbeemt KD, Ostelo RW, Van Royen BJ, et al. Total disc replacement surgery for symptomatic degenerative lumbar disc disease: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:1262–1280.
  • Regan JJ, McAfee PC, Blumenthal SL, et al. Evaluation of surgical volume and the early experience with lumbar total disc replacement as part of the investigational device exemption study of the Charité Artificial Disc. Spine. 2006;31:2270–2276.
  • Ghiselli G, Wang JC, Bhatia NN, et al. Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:1497–1503.
  • Berg S, Tullberg T, Branth B, et al. Total disc replacement compared to lumbar fusion: a randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2009;18:1512–1519.
  • Lemaire JP, Carrier H, Ali EHS, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes with the Charite artificial disc: a 10-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18:353–359.
  • Guyer RD, McAfee PC, Banco RJ, et al. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the Charité Artificial Disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up. Spine J. 2009;9:374–386.3.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.