Clinical applications of sonoelastography

References

• Garra BS. Elastography: current status, future prospects, and making it work for you. Ultrasound Q. 2011;27(3):177–186. Epub 2011 Aug 30. PubMed PMID: 21873855. DOI:10.1097/RUQ.0b013e31822a2138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology. 2006;239(2):341–350. PubMed PMID: 16484352 DOI:10.1148/radiol.2391041676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsutsumi M, Miyagawa T, Matsumura T, et al. Real-time balloon inflation elastography for prostate cancer detection and initial evaluation of clinicopathologic analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. [ Epub 2010 May 22]. 2010;194(6):W471–6. doi:10.2214/ajr.09.3301
   Google Scholar
• Shiina T. JSUM ultrasound elastography practice guidelines: basics and terminology. J Med Ultrason (2001). [ Epub 2013 Oct 01]. 2013;40(4):309–323. doi:10.1007/s10396-013-0490-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr RG, Ferraioli G, Palmeri ML, et al. Elastography assessment of liver fibrosis: society of radiologists in ultrasound consensus conference statement. Ultrasound Q. 2016;32(2):94–107. PubMed PMID: 27233069 .DOI:10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinz T, Hoeller T, Wenzel J, et al. Real-time tissue elastography as promising diagnostic tool for diagnosis of lymph node metastases in patients with malignant melanoma: a prospective single-center experience. Dermatology. 2013;226(1):81–90. PubMed PMID: 23548643. DOI:10.1159/000346942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junker D, De Zordo T, Quentin M, et al. Real-time elastography of the prostate. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:180804. PubMed PMID: 24967334; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4054974. DOI:10.1155/2014/180804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzilcioglu MS, Duymus M, Avcu S. Sonographic elastography of the thyroid gland. Pol J Radiol. 2016;81:152–156. Epub 2016 Apr 23. PubMed PMID: 27103947; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4827517. DOI:10.12659/pjr.896178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fruscalzo A, Mazza E, Feltovich H, et al. Cervical elastography during pregnancy: a critical review of current approaches with a focus on controversies and limitations. J Med Ultrason (2001). 2016;43:493–504. Epub 2016 Jun 05. PubMed PMID: 27259500. DOI:10.1007/s10396-016-0723-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihara M, Hayashi Y, Murai N, et al. Regional diagnosis of lymphoedema and selection of sites for lymphaticovenular anastomosis using elastography. Clin Radiol. 2011;66(8):715–719. PubMed PMID: 21524415. DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2011.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute of M, National Research Council Committee on New Approaches to Early D, Diagnosis of Breast C. The national academies collection: reports funded by national institutes of health. Joy JE, Penhoet EE, Petitti DB, editors. In: Saving women’s lives: strategies for improving breast cancer detection and diagnosis. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US) National Academy of Sciences; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Faruk T, Islam MK, Arefin S, et al. The journey of elastography: background, current status, and future possibilities in breast cancer diagnosis. Clin Breast Cancer. 2015;15(5):313–324. PubMed PMID: 25858446. DOI:10.1016/j.clbc.2015.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong LC, Sim LS, Lee YS, et al. A prospective study to compare the diagnostic performance of breast elastography versus conventional breast ultrasound. Clin Radiol. 2010;65(11):887–894. PubMed PMID: 20933643. DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2010.06.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcinski S, Farrokh A, Weber S, et al. Multicenter study of ultrasound real-time tissue elastography in 779 cases for the assessment of breast lesions: improved diagnostic performance by combining the BI-RADS(R)-US classification system with sonoelastography. Ultraschall Med. 2010;31(5):484–491. PubMed PMID: 20408116. DOI:10.1055/s-0029-1245282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raza S, Odulate A, Ong EM, et al. Using real-time tissue elastography for breast lesion evaluation: our initial experience. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29(4):551–563. Epub 2010 Apr 09. PubMed PMID: 20375374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K, et al. Invasive breast cancer: relationship between shear-wave elastographic findings and histologic prognostic factors. Radiology. 2012;263(3):673–677. PubMed PMID: 22523322. DOI:10.1148/radiol.12111317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JH, Kim SH, Kang BJ, et al. Role and clinical usefulness of elastography in small breast masses. Acad Radiol. 2011;18(1):74–80. PubMed PMID: 21115376. DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2010.07.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho N, Moon WK, Park JS. Real-time US elastography in the differentiation of suspicious microcalcifications on mammography. Eur Radiol. 2009;19(7):1621–1628. PubMed PMID: 19224219. DOI:10.1007/s00330-009-1335-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regini E, Bagnera S, Tota D, et al. Role of sonoelastography in characterising breast nodules. Preliminary experience with 120 lesions. Radiol Med. 2010;115(4):551–562. PubMed PMID: 20177990. DOI:10.1007/s11547-010-0518-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhi H, Xiao XY, Yang HY, et al. Ultrasonic elastography in breast cancer diagnosis: strain ratio vs 5-point scale. Acad Radiol. 2010;17(10):1227–1233. PubMed PMID: 20650662. DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2010.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho N, Moon WK, Kim HY, et al. Sonoelastographic strain index for differentiation of benign and malignant nonpalpable breast masses. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29(1):1–7. PubMed PMID: 20040770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yerli H, Yilmaz T, Kaskati T, et al. Qualitative and semiquantitative evaluations of solid breast lesions by sonoelastography. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30(2):179–186. PubMed PMID: 21266555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang JM, Moon WK, Cho N, et al. Breast mass evaluation: factors influencing the quality of US elastography. Radiology. 2011;259(1):59–64. PubMed PMID: 21330569. DOI:10.1148/radiol.10101414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tada T, Kumada T, Toyoda H, et al. Utility of real-time shear wave elastography for assessing liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection without cirrhosis: comparison of liver fibrosis indices. Hepatol Res. 2015;45(10):E122–9. PubMed PMID: 25580959. DOI:10.1111/hepr.12476
   Google Scholar
• Castera L, Negre I, Samii K, et al. Pain experienced during percutaneous liver biopsy. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md). [ Epub 1999 Dec 28]. 1999;30(6):1529–1530. doi:10.1002/hep.510300624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandrin L, Fourquet B, Hasquenoph JM, et al. Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003;29(12):1705–1713. PubMed PMID: 14698338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziol M, Handra-Luca A, Kettaneh A, et al. Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis by measurement of stiffness in patients with chronic hepatitis. C Hepatology (Baltimore, Md). 2005;41(1):48–54. PubMed PMID: 15690481. DOI:10.1002/hep.20506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrich-Rust M, Ong MF, Martens S, et al. Performance of transient elastography for the staging of liver fibrosis: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(4):960–974. PubMed PMID: 18395077. DOI:10.1053/j.gastro.2008.01.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castera L, Foucher J, Bernard PH, et al. Pitfalls of liver stiffness measurement: a 5-year prospective study of 13,369 examinations. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md). [ Epub 2010 Jan 12]. 2010;51(3):828–835. doi:10.1002/hep.23425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castera L, Vergniol J, Foucher J, et al. Prospective comparison of transient elastography, fibrotest, APRI, and liver biopsy for the assessment of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology. 2005;128(2):343–350. PubMed PMID: 15685546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraioli G, Tinelli C, Dal Bell B, et al. Accuracy of real-time shear wave elastography for assessing liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C: a pilot study. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md). [ Epub 2012 Jul 07]. 2012;56(6):2125–2133. doi:10.1002/hep.25936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arena U, Vizzutti F, Abraldes JG, et al. Reliability of transient elastography for the diagnosis of advanced fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Gut. 2008;57(9):1288–1293. PubMed PMID: 18448567. DOI:10.1136/gut.2008.149708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk GD, Astemborski J, Mehta SH, et al. Assessment of liver fibrosis by transient elastography in persons with hepatitis C virus infection or HIV-hepatitis C virus coinfection. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48(7):963–972. PubMed PMID: 19236273; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2715996. DOI:10.1086/597350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergara S, Macias J, Rivero A, et al. The use of transient elastometry for assessing liver fibrosis in patients with HIV and hepatitis C virus coinfection. Clin Infect Dis. [ Epub 2007 Sep 21]. 2007;45(8):969–974. doi:10.1086/521857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobili V, Vizzutti F, Arena U, et al. Accuracy and reproducibility of transient elastography for the diagnosis of fibrosis in pediatric nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md). 2008;48(2):442–448. PubMed PMID: 18563842. DOI:10.1002/hep.22376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaia S, Carenzi S, Barilli AL, et al. Reliability of transient elastography for the detection of fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and chronic viral hepatitis. J Hepatol. 2011;54(1):64–71. PubMed PMID: 20932598. DOI:10.1016/j.jhep.2010.06.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corpechot C, El Naggar A, Poujol-Robert A, et al. Assessment of biliary fibrosis by transient elastography in patients with PBC and. PSC Hepatology (Baltimore, Md). 2006;43(5):1118–1124. PubMed PMID: 16628644. DOI:10.1002/hep.21151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corpechot C, Carrat F, Poujol-Robert A, et al. Noninvasive elastography-based assessment of liver fibrosis progression and prognosis in primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md). 2012;56(1):198–208. PubMed PMID: 22271046. DOI:10.1002/hep.25599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bavu E, Gennisson JL, Couade M, et al. Noninvasive in vivo liver fibrosis evaluation using supersonic shear imaging: a clinical study on 113 hepatitis C virus patients. Ultrasound Med Biol. [ Epub 2011 Jul 22]. 2011;37(9):1361–1373. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.05.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassinotto C, Lapuyade B, Mouries A, et al. Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis with impulse elastography: comparison of supersonic shear imaging with arfi and fibroScan(R). J Hepatol. 2014;61(3):550–557. PubMed PMID: 24815876. DOI:10.1016/j.jhep.2014.04.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bota S, Herkner H, Sporea I, et al. Meta-analysis: ARFI elastography versus transient elastography for the evaluation of liver fibrosis. Liver Int. 2013;33(8):1138–1147. PubMed PMID: 23859217. DOI:10.1111/liv.12240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrich-Rust M, Nierhoff J, Lupsor M, et al. Performance of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging for the staging of liver fibrosis: a pooled meta-analysis. J Viral Hepat. 2012;19(2):e212–9. PubMed PMID: 22239521. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2893.2011.01537.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samir AE, Dhyani M, Vij A, et al. Shear-wave elastography for the estimation of liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease: determining accuracy and ideal site for measurement. Radiology. 2015;274(3):888–896. PubMed PMID: 25393946; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4455676. DOI:10.1148/radiol.14140839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sipos JA. Advances in ultrasound for the diagnosis and management of thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2009;19(12):1363–1372. PubMed PMID: 20001718. DOI:10.1089/thy.2009.1608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudea SM, Botar-Jid C. Ultrasound elastography in thyroid disease. Med Ultrason. 2015;17(1):74–96. PubMed PMID: 25745661. DOI:10.11152/mu.2013.2066.171.smd
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuzhen C. Comparison analysis between conventional ultrasonography and ultrasound elastography of thyroid nodules. Eur J Radiol. [ Epub 2011 Oct 04]. 2012;81(8):1806–1811. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.02.070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rago T, Santini F, Scutari M, et al. Elastography: new developments in ultrasound for predicting malignancy in thyroid nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92(8):2917–2922. PubMed PMID: 17535993. DOI:10.1210/jc.2007-0641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rago T, Vitti P, Chiovato L, et al. Role of conventional ultrasonography and color flow-doppler sonography in predicting malignancy in ‘cold’ thyroid nodules. Eur J Endocrinol. 1998;138(1):41–46. PubMed PMID: 9461314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, et al.; American Thyroid Association Guidelines Taskforce on Thyroid N, Differentiated Thyroid C. Revised American thyroid association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2009;19(11):1167–1214. PubMed PMID: 19860577. DOI:10.1089/thy.2009.0110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gharib H, Papini E, Valcavi R, et al. American association of clinical endocrinologists and associazione medici endocrinologi medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules. Endocr Pract. 2006;12(1):63–102. PubMed PMID: 16596732. DOI:10.4158/EP.12.1.63
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Menzilcioglu MS, Duymus M, Gungor G, et al. The value of real-time ultrasound elastography in chronic autoimmune thyroiditis. Br J Radiol. 2014;87(1044):20140604. PubMed PMID: 25315887; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4243205. DOI:10.1259/bjr.20140604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrich-Rust M, Romenski O, Meyer G, et al. Acoustic radiation force impulse-imaging for the evaluation of the thyroid gland: a limited patient feasibility study. Ultrasonics. 2012;52(1):69–74. PubMed PMID: 21788057. DOI:10.1016/j.ultras.2011.06.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rago T, Vitti P. Potential value of elastosonography in the diagnosis of malignancy in thyroid nodules. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;53(5):455–464. PubMed PMID: 19910898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bojunga J, Herrmann E, Meyer G, et al. Real-time elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: a meta-analysis. Thyroid. 2010;20(10):1145–1150. PubMed PMID: 20860422. DOI:10.1089/thy.2010.0079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyshchik A, Higashi T, Asato R, et al. Thyroid gland tumor diagnosis at US elastography. Radiology. [ Epub 2005 Aug 25]. 2005;237(1):202–211. doi:10.1148/radiol.2363041248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garino F, Deandrea M, Motta M, et al. Diagnostic performance of elastography in cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules. Endocrine. [ Epub 2014 Oct 03]. 2015;49(1):175–183. doi:10.1007/s12020-014-0438-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong Y, Liu X, Li Z, et al. Real-time ultrasound elastography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28(7):861–867. Epub 2009 Jun 24. PubMed PMID: 19546328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczepanek-Parulska E, Wolinski K, Stangierski A, et al. Comparison of diagnostic value of conventional ultrasonography and shear wave elastography in the prediction of thyroid lesions malignancy. PLoS One. [ Epub 2013 Dec 07]. 2013;8(11):e81532. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081532
   Google Scholar
• Xu JM, Xu XH, Xu HX, et al. Prediction of cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with papillary thyroid cancer using combined conventional ultrasound, strain elastography, and acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography. Eur Radiol. [ Epub 2015 Nov 13]. 2016;26(8):2611–2622. doi:10.1007/s00330-015-4088-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantisani V, Lodise P, Grazhdani H, et al. Ultrasound elastography in the evaluation of thyroid pathology. Current status. Eur J Radiol. [ Epub 2013 Jun 15]. 2014;83(3):420–428. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.05.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczepanek-Parulska E, Wolinski K, Stangierski A, et al. Biochemical and ultrasonographic parameters influencing thyroid nodules elasticity. Endocrine. [ Epub 2014 Feb 19]. 2014;47(2):519–527. doi:10.1007/s12020-014-0197-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatia KS, Rasalkar DP, Lee YP, et al. Cystic change in thyroid nodules: a confounding factor for real-time qualitative thyroid ultrasound elastography. Clin Radiol. [ Epub 2011 May 03]. 2011;66(9):799–807. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2011.03.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yerli H, Yilmaz T, Oztop I. Clinical importance of diastolic sonoelastographic scoring in the management of thyroid nodules. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34(3):E27–30. PubMed PMID: 22033714. DOI:10.3174/ajnr.A2751
   Google Scholar
• Gomez Veiga F, Ponce Reixa J, Barbagelata Lopez A, et al. [Current role of PSA and other markers in the diagnosis of prostate cancer]. Arch Esp Urol. 2006;59(10):1069–1082. Epub 2007 Feb 08. PubMed PMID: 17283720.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heidenreich A, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, et al. [EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part I: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease]. Actas Urol Esp. [ Epub 2011 Jul 16]. 2011;35(9):501–514. doi:10.1016/j.acuro.2011.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borza T, Konijeti R, Kibel AS. Early detection, PSA screening, and management of overdiagnosis. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2013;27(6):1091–110, vii. PubMed PMID: 24188254. DOI:10.1016/j.hoc.2013.08.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagel KN, Schouten MG, Hambrock T, et al. Differentiation of prostatitis and prostate cancer by using diffusion-weighted MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy at 3 T. Radiology. [ Epub 2013 Jan 19]. 2013;267(1):164–172. doi:10.1148/radiol.12111683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock M, Von Bodman C, Sommerer F, et al. Comparison of real-time elastography with grey-scale ultrasonography for detection of organ-confined prostate cancer and extra capsular extension: a prospective analysis using whole mount sections after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2011;108(8 Pt 2):E217–22. PubMed PMID: 21819532. DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10209.x
   Google Scholar
• Salomon G, Kollerman J, Thederan I, et al. Evaluation of prostate cancer detection with ultrasound real-time elastography: a comparison with step section pathological analysis after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2008;54(6):1354–1362. PubMed PMID: 18374470. DOI:10.1016/j.eururo.2008.02.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walz J, Marcy M, Maubon T, et al. [Real time elastography in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: comparison of preoperative imaging and histology after radical prostatectomy]. Prog Urol. 2011;21(13):925–931. PubMed PMID: 22118357. DOI:10.1016/j.purol.2011.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aigner F, Pallwein L, Schocke M, et al. Comparison of real-time sonoelastography with T2-weighted endorectal magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer detection. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30(5):643–649. Epub 2011 Apr 30. PubMed PMID: 21527612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelzer AE, Heinzelbecker J, Weiss C, et al. Real-time sonoelastography compared to magnetic resonance imaging using four different modalities at 3.0 T in the detection of prostate cancer: strength and weaknesses. Eur J Radiol. [ Epub 2013 Jan 01]. 2013;82(5):814–821. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.11.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junker D, Schafer G, Kobel C, et al. Comparison of real-time elastography and multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection: a whole-mount step-section analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(3):W263–9. PubMed PMID: 24555623. DOI:10.2214/AJR.13.11061
   Google Scholar
• Barr RG, Memo R, Schaub CR. Shear wave ultrasound elastography of the prostate: initial results. Ultrasound Q. 2012;28(1):13–20. PubMed PMID: 22357224. DOI:10.1097/RUQ.0b013e318249f594
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Tang J, Li YM, et al. Differentiation of prostate cancer from benign lesions using strain index of transrectal real-time tissue elastography. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(5):857–862. PubMed PMID: 21392908. DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.02.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walz J, Marcy M, Pianna JT, et al. Identification of the prostate cancer index lesion by real-time elastography: considerations for focal therapy of prostate cancer. World J Urol. 2011;29(5):589–594. PubMed PMID: 21614469. DOI:10.1007/s00345-011-0688-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aigner F, Pallwein L, Junker D, et al. Value of real-time elastography targeted biopsy for prostate cancer detection in men with prostate specific antigen 1.25 ng/ml or greater and 4.00 ng/ml or less. J Urol. 2010;184(3):913–917. PubMed PMID: 20643432. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2010.05.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallwein L, Mitterberger M, Struve P, et al. Comparison of sonoelastography guided biopsy with systematic biopsy: impact on prostate cancer detection. Eur Radiol. 2007;17(9):2278–2285. PubMed PMID: 17342485. DOI:10.1007/s00330-007-0606-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock M, Von Bodman C, Palisaar RJ, et al. The impact of real-time elastography guiding a systematic prostate biopsy to improve cancer detection rate: a prospective study of 353 patients. J Urol. 2012;187(6):2039–2043. PubMed PMID: 22498211. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2012.01.063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygard Y, Haukaas SA, Waage JE, et al. Combination of real-time elastography and urine prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3) detects more than 97% of significant prostate cancers. Scand J Urol. [ Epub 2012 Oct 06]. 2013;47(3):211–216. doi:10.3109/00365599.2012.727859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brock M, Eggert T, Palisaar RJ, et al. Multiparametric ultrasound of the prostate: adding contrast enhanced ultrasound to real-time elastography to detect histopathologically confirmed cancer. J Urol. 2013;189(1):93–98. PubMed PMID: 23164379. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junker D, Schafer G, Aigner F, et al. Potentials and limitations of real-time elastography for prostate cancer detection: a whole-mount step section analysis. Scientific World J. 2012;2012:193213. PubMed PMID: 23346015; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3549343. DOI:10.1100/2012/193213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swiatkowska-Freund M, Preis K. Elastography of the uterine cervix: implications for success of induction of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38(1):52–56. PubMed PMID: 21484905. DOI:10.1002/uog.9021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop EH. Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet Gynecol. 1964;24:266–268. PubMed PMID: 14199536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross MG, Beall MH. Prediction of preterm birth: nonsonographic cervical methods. Semin Perinatol. 2009;33(5):312–316. PubMed PMID: 19796728. DOI:10.1053/j.semperi.2009.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hee L, Rasmussen CK, Schlutter JM, et al. Quantitative sonoelastography of the uterine cervix prior to induction of labor as a predictor of cervical dilation time. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. [ PubMed PMID: 24702544]. 2014;93(7):684–690. doi:10.1111/aogs.12389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fruscalzo A, Londero AP, Frohlich C, et al. Quantitative elastography of the cervix for predicting labor induction success. Ultraschall Med. 2015;36(1):65–73. PubMed PMID: 24557633. DOI:10.1055/s-0033-1355572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang HS, Sohn IS, Kwon HS. Imaging analysis of cervical elastography for prediction of successful induction of labor at term. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32(6):937–946. PubMed PMID: 23716514. DOI:10.7863/ultra.32.6.937
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muscatello A, Di Nicola M, Accurti V, et al. Sonoelastography as method for preliminary evaluation of uterine cervix to predict success of induction of labor. Fetal Diagn Ther. [ Epub 2013 Nov 20]. 2014;35(1):57–61. doi:10.1159/000355084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Londero AP, Schmitz R, Bertozzi S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of cervical elastography in predicting labor induction success: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Perinat Med. [ Epub 2015 May 27]. 2016;44(2):167–178. doi:10.1515/jpm-2015-0035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs T, Woyton R, Pomorski M, et al. Sonoelastography of the uterine cervix as a new diagnostic tool of cervical assessment in pregnant women - preliminary report. Ginekol Pol. 2013;84(1):12–16. PubMed PMID: 23488304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez-Andrade E, Garcia M, Ahn H, et al. Strain at the internal cervical os assessed with quasi-static elastography is associated with the risk of spontaneous preterm delivery at </=34 weeks of gestation. J Perinat Med. [ Epub 2015 Mar 18]. 2015;43(6):657–666. doi:10.1515/jpm-2014-0382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez-Andrade E, Romero R, Korzeniewski SJ, et al. Cervical strain determined by ultrasound elastography and its association with spontaneous preterm delivery. J Perinat Med. [ Epub 2013 Dec 21]. 2014;42(2):159–169. doi:10.1515/jpm-2013-0277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobbing K, Fruscalzo A, Hammer K, et al. Quantitative elastography of the uterine cervix as a predictor of preterm delivery. J Perinatol. [ Epub 2014 May 09]. 2014;34(10):774–780. doi:10.1038/jp.2014.87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wozniak S, Czuczwar P, Szkodziak P, et al. Elastography in predicting preterm delivery in asymptomatic, low-risk women: a prospective observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:238. Epub 2014 Jul 22 PubMed PMID: 25041946; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4223586. DOI:10.1186/1471-2393-14-238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas A, Kummel S, Gemeinhardt O, et al. Real-time sonoelastography of the cervix: tissue elasticity of the normal and abnormal cervix. Acad Radiol. 2007;14(2):193–200. PubMed PMID: 17236992. DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2006.11.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoelinga B, Hehenkamp WJ, Brolmann HA, et al. Real-time elastography for assessment of uterine disorders. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43(2):218–226. PubMed PMID: 23703939. DOI:10.1002/uog.12519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank ML, Schafer SD, Mollers M, et al. Importance of transvaginal elastography in the diagnosis of uterine fibroids and adenomyosis. Ultraschall Med. 2015 PubMed PMID: 26274380. DOI:10.1055/s-0035-1553266
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lassau N, Chami L, Peronneau P. [Imaging of melanoma: accuracy of ultrasonography before and after contrast injection for diagnostic and early evaluation of treatments]. Bull Cancer. 2007;94(1):93–98. PubMed PMID: 17237009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giovagnorio F, Andreoli C, De Cicco ML. Color doppler sonography of focal lesions of the skin and subcutaneous tissue. J Ultrasound Med. 1999;18(2):89–93. PubMed PMID: 10206814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chami L, Lassau N, Chebil M, et al. Imaging of melanoma: usefulness of ultrasonography before and after contrast injection for diagnosis and early evaluation of treatment. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2011;4:1–6. PubMed PMID: 21673868; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3108283. DOI:10.2147/CCID.S13499
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakajima M, Kobayashi M. Clinical application of real-time tissue elastography on skin lesions. Tokyo: MEDIX SUPPL. 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Botar-Jid CM, Cosgarea R, Bolboaca SD, et al. Assessment of cutaneous melanoma by use of very- high-frequency ultrasound and real-time elastography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. [ Epub 2016 Feb 13]. 2016;206(4):699–704. doi:10.2214/ajr.15.15182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botar Jid C, Bolboaca SD, Cosgarea R, et al. Doppler ultrasound and strain elastography in the assessment of cutaneous melanoma: preliminary results. Med Ultrason. [ Epub 2015 Dec 10]. 2015;17(4):509–514. doi:10.11152/mu.2013.2066.174.dus
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgeb B, Morris MA, Mehregan D, et al. Quantified ultrasound elastography in the assessment of cutaneous carcinoma. Br J Radiol. 2015;88(1054):20150344. PubMed PMID: 26268142; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4730976. DOI:10.1259/bjr.20150344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magarelli N, Carducci C, Bucalo C, et al. Sonoelastography for qualitative and quantitative evaluation of superficial soft tissue lesions: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol. 2014;24(3):566–573. PubMed PMID: 24272225. DOI:10.1007/s00330-013-3069-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakajima M, Kiyohara Y, Shimizu M, et al. Clinical Application of Real-time Tissue Elastography on Skin Lesions. MEDIX Suppl. 2007;19:36–39.
   Google Scholar
• Righetti R, Garra BS, Mobbs LM, et al. The feasibility of using poroelastographic techniques for distinguishing between normal and lymphedematous tissues in vivo. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52(21):6525–6541. Epub 2007 Oct 24. PubMed PMID: 17951860. DOI:10.1088/0031-9155/52/21/013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adriaenssens N, Belsack D, Buyl R, et al. Ultrasound elastography as an objective diagnostic measurement tool for lymphoedema of the treated breast in breast cancer patients following breast conserving surgery and radiotherapy. Radiol Oncol. [ Epub 2013 Feb 16]. 2012;46(4):284–295. doi:10.2478/v10019-012-0033-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng J, Dietrich MS, Ridner SH, et al. Preliminary evaluation of reliability and validity of head and neck external lymphedema and fibrosis assessment criteria. Eur Oncol Nurs Soc. 2016;22:63–70. Epub 2016 May 18. PubMed PMID: 27179894. DOI:10.1016/j.ejon.2016.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Zordo T, Fink C, Feuchtner GM, et al. Real-time sonoelastography findings in healthy achilles tendons. AJR Am J Roentgenol. [ Epub 2009 Jul 22]. 2009;193(2):W134–8. doi:10.2214/ajr.08.1843
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson RJ, O’Connor PJ, Grainger AJ. Tendon and ligament imaging. Br J Radiol. 2012;85(1016):1157–1172. PubMed PMID: 22553301; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3495576. DOI:10.1259/bjr/34786470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Zordo T, Chhem R, Smekal V, et al. Real-time sonoelastography: findings in patients with symptomatic achilles tendons and comparison to healthy volunteers. Ultraschall Med. [ Epub 2009 Dec 01]. 2010;31(4):394–400. doi:10.1055/s-0028-1109809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sconfienza LM, Silvestri E, Cimmino MA. Sonoelastography in the evaluation of painful achilles tendon in amateur athletes. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2010;28(3):373–378. PubMed PMID: 20525445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yerli H, Eski E, Korucuk E, et al. Sonoelastographic qualitative analysis for management of salivary gland masses. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31(7):1083–1089. Epub 2012 Jun 27. PubMed PMID: 22733857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatar IG, Ergun O, Kurt A, et al. The role of elastosonography in the differentiation of parotid gland lesions: report of three cases and review of the literature. Pol J Radiol. 2014;79:398–401. PubMed PMID: 25386225; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4226314. DOI:10.12659/PJR.891019
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhatia KS, Rasalkar DD, Lee YP, et al. Evaluation of real-time qualitative sonoelastography of focal lesions in the parotid and submandibular glands: applications and limitations. Eur Radiol. [ Epub 2010 Apr 22]. 2010;20(8):1958–1964. doi:10.1007/s00330-010-1756-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar