Computer assisted surgery in preoperative planning of acetabular fracture surgery: state of the art

References

• Judet R, Judet J, Letournel E. Fractures of the acetabulum: classification and surgical approaches for open reduction. Preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1964;46:1615–1646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudissa M, Francony F, Kerschbaumer G, et al. Epidemiology and treatment of acetabular fractures in a level-1 trauma centre: retrospective study of 414 patients over 10 years. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103:335–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudissa M, Ruatti S, Kerschbaumer G, et al. Part 2: outcome of acetabular fractures and associated prognostic factors - a ten-year retrospective study of one hundred and fifty six operated cases with open reduction and internal fixation. Int Orthop. 2015;40:2151–2156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudissa M, Orfeuvre B, Chabanas M, et al. Does semi-automatic bone-fragment segmentation improve the reproducibility of the Letournel acetabular fracture classification? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103:633–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gellrich NC, Schramm A, Hammer B, et al. Computer assisted secondary reconstruction of unilateral posttraumatic orbital deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110:1417–1429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handels H, Ehrhardt J, Plötz W, et al. Three-dimensional planning and simulation of hip operations and computer-assisted construction of endoprostheses in bone tumor surgery. Comput Aided Surg. 2001;6:65–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Götze C, Rosenbaum D, Hoedemaker J, et al. Is there a need of custom-made prostheses for total hip arthroplasty? Gait analysis, clinical and radiographic analysis of customized femoral components. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009;129:267–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari V, Carbone M, Cappelli C, et al. Value of multidetector computed tomography image segmentation for preoperative planning in general surgery. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:616–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Davuluri P, Ward KR, et al. Fracture detection in traumatic pelvic CT images. Int J Biomed Imaging. 2012;327198. doi: 10.1155/2012/327198
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fornaro J, Székely G, Harders M. Semi-automatic segmentation of fractured pelvic bones for surgical planning. In: Bello F, Cotin S, editors. ISBMS. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2010. p. 82–89.
   Google Scholar
• Vasilache S, Najarian K. Automated bone segmentation from pelvic CT images. In: Bioinformatics and Biomedicine Workshops (BIBMW). Philadelphia, PA: IEEE International Conference. 2008. doi: 10.1109/BIBMW.2008.4686207
   Google Scholar
• Letournel E, Judet R. Fractures of the acetabulum. 2nd ed. Elson RAT, editor, translator. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald J, Orlick T, Letts M. Mental readiness in surgeons and its links to performance excellence in surgery. J Pediatr Orthop. 1995;15:691–697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahuta MA, Schemitsch EH, Backstein D, et al. Virtual fracture carving improves understanding of a complex fracture: a randomized controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:e182.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Citak M, Gardner MJ, Kendoff D, et al. Virtual 3D planning of acetabular fracture reduction. J Orthop Res. 2008;26:547–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cimerman M, Kristan A. Preoperative planning in pelvic and acetabular surgery: the value of advanced computerised planning modules. Injury. 2007;38:442–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornaro J, Keel M, Harders M, et al. An interactive surgical planning tool for acetabular fractures: initial results. J Orthop Surg Res. 2010;5(4):50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hu Y, Li H, Qiao G, et al. Computer-assisted virtual surgical procedure for acetabular fractures based on real CT data. Injury. 2011;42:1121–1124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.Y Lee, J.Y. Lai, Hu Y.S, et al. Virtual 3D planning of pelvic fracture reduction and implant placement. Biomed Eng Appl Basis Commun. 2012;24:245–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Wang F, Newman S, et al. Application of an innovative computerized virtual planning system in acetabular fracture surgery: a feasibility study. Injury. 2015;47:1698–1701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang G-Y, Huang W-J, Song Q, et al. Computer-assisted virtual preoperative planning in orthopedic surgery for acetabular fractures based on actual computed tomography data. Comput Assist Surg. 2016;21:160–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovler I, Joskowicz L, Weil YA, et al. Haptic computer-assisted patient-specific preoperative planning for orthopedic fractures surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2015;10:1535–1546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen F, Chen B, Guo Q, et al. Augmented reality patient-specific reconstruction plate design for pelvic and acetabular fracture surgery. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2012;8:169–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu M, Zhang LH, Zhang YZ, et al. Custom-made locked plating for acetabular fracture: a pilot study in 24 consecutive cases. Orthopedics. 2014;7:660–667.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Zhang K, Zhuang Y, et al. A morphological study of anatomical plates for acetabular posterior column. Int J CARS. 2014;9:725–731.
   Google Scholar
• Chana-Rodríguez F, Mañanes RP, Rojo-Manaute J, et al. 3D surgical printing and pre contoured plates for acetabular fractures. Injury. 2016;47:2507–2511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng C, Xing W, Wu Z, et al. A combination of three-dimensional printing and computer-assisted virtual surgical procedure for preoperative planning of acetabular fracture reduction. Injury. 2016;47:2223–2227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maini L, Sharma A, Jha S, et al. Three-dimensional printing and patient-specific pre-contoured plate: future of acetabulum fracture fixation? Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boudissa M, Chabanas M, Oliveri H, et al. Virtual fracture reduction of the acetabulum using a rigid body biomechanical model. Chambery: SURGETICA; 2014 Dec. hal-01233925.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveri H, Boudissa M, Tonetti J, et al. Planning acetabular fracture reduction using patient-specific multibody simulation of the hip. In: SPIE medical imaging 2017: image-guided procedures, robotic interventions, and modeling. Orlando (FL): SPIE Medical Imaging; 2017 Feb. p. 10135. hal-01490266. DOI:10.1117/12.2250380
   Google Scholar
• Boudissa M, Oliveri H, Chabanas M, et al. Pre-operative planning in acetabular surgery: the first patient-specific biomechanical model. Orthoapedic proceedings. 2017; 99-B(SUPP 20)18.
   Google Scholar
• Brown GA, Milner B, Firoozbakhsh K. Application of computer-generated stereolithography and interpositionning template in acetabular fractures: a report of eight cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16:347–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letournel E. Acetabulum fractures: classification and management. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;12:81–106.
   Google Scholar
• Hoppenfeld S, Deboer P. Surgical exposures in orthopaedics: the anatomic approach. Philadelphia (PA): J.B. Lippincott; 1984. p. 327–343.
   Google Scholar
• Keel MJ, Ecker TM, Cullmann JL, et al. The Pararectus approach for anterior intrapelvic management of acetabular fractures: an anatomical study and clinical evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg. 2012;94:405–411.
   Google Scholar
• Ponsen KJ, Joosse P, Schigt A, et al. Internal fracture fixation using the Stoppa approach in pelvic ring and acetabular fractures: technical aspects and operative results. J Trauma. 2006;61:662–667.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boyoud-Garnier L, Boudissa M, Ruatti S, et al. Chronic low back pain after lumbosacral fracture due to sagittal and frontal vertebral imbalance. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103:523–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochman A, Goral A, Martin T, et al. Application of navigated ultrasound for assessment of the anterior pelvic plane in patients with degenerative hip diseases. J Ultrasound Med. 2017;36:1373–1380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar