Review of long-term outcomes of disc arthroplasty for symptomatic single level cervical degenerative disc disease

References

• Bohlman HH, Emery SE, Goodfellow DB, et al. Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy. Long-term follow-up of 122 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75(9):1298–1307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH, et al. Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27:2431–2434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsunaga S, Kabayama S, Yamamoto T, et al. Strain on intervertebral discs after anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24(7):670–675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, et al. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81(4):519–528.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heller JG, Sasso RC, Papadopoulos SM, et al. Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Spine (Phila PA 1976). 2009;34(2):101–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upadhyaya CD, Wu JC, Trost G, et al. Analysis of the three United States Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical arthroplasty trials. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012;16(3):216–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiAngelo DJ, Roberston JT, Metcalf NH, et al. Biomechanical testing of an artificial cervical joint and an anterior cervical plate. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003;16(4):314–323.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dmitriev AE, Cunningham BW, Hu N, et al. Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(10):1165–1172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandhi AA, Kode S, DeVries NA, et al. Biomechanical analysis of cervical disc replacement and fusion using single level, two level and hybrid constructs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(20):1578–1585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JH, Kim JS, Lee JH, et al. Comparison of cervical kinematics between patients with cervical artificial disc replacement and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical disc herniation. Spine J. 2014;14(7):1199–1204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anakwenze OA, Auerbach JD, Milby AH, et al. Sagittal cervical alignment after cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(19):2001–2007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkus JK, Traynelis VC, Haid RW, et al. Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the Prestige disc: results from a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21(4):516–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zigler JE, Delamarter R, Murrey D, et al. ProDisc-C and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion as surgical treatment for single-level cervical symptomatic degenerative disc disease: five-year results of a Food and Drug Administration study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(3):203–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrido BJ, Taha TA, Sasso RC. Clinical outcomes of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty a prospective, randomized, controlled, single site trial with 48-month follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010;23(6):367–371.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coric D, Kim PK, Clemente JD, et al. Prospective randomized study of cervical arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with long-term follow-up: results in 74 patients from a single site. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;18(1):36–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis RJ, Nunley PD, Kim KD, et al. Two-level total disc replacement with Mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial with 4-year follow-up results. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;22(1):15–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hisey MS, Bae HW, Davis RJ, et al. Prospective, randomized comparison of cervical disc replacement versus anterior cervical fusion: results at 48 months follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015;28(4):E237–243.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Phillips FM, Geisler FH, Gilder KM, et al. Long-term outcomes of the US FDA IDE prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(10):674–683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasso RC, Anderson PA, Riew KD, et al. Results of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four-year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(18):1684–1692.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang HX, Shao YD, Chen Y, et al. A prospective, randomised, controlled multicentre study comparing cervical disc replacement with anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Int Orthop. 2014;38(12):2533–2541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen ME, Zigler JE, Spivak JM, et al. ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for single-level symptomatic cervical disc disease: seven-year follow-up of the prospective randomized U.S. Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(21):1738–1747.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bartels RH, Donk R, Verbeek AL. No justification for cervical disk prostheses in clinical practice: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Neurosurgery. 2010;66(6):1153–1160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zechmeister I, Winkler R, Mad P. Artificial total disc replacement versus fusion for the cervical spine: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(2):177–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Wang X, Bai W, et al. Prevalence of heterotopic ossification after cervical total disc arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(4):674–680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cepoiu-Martin M, Faris P, Lorenzetti D, et al. Artificial cervical disc arthroplasty: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(25):E1623–1633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang H, Zhu Z, Qiu Y, et al. Cervical disc arthroplasty versus fusion for single-level symptomatic cervical disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Orthop and Trauma Surg. 2012;132(2):141–151.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McAfee PC, Reah C, Gilder K, et al. A meta-analysis of comparative outcomes following cervical arthroplasty or anterior cervical fusion: results from 4 prospective multicenter randomized clinical trials and up to 1226 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012;37(11):943–952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu L, Song Y, Yang X, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials: comparison of total disk replacement with anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Orthopedics. 2011;34(10):e651–658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boselie TF, Willems PC, Van Mameren H, et al. Arthroplasty versus fusion in single-level cervical degenerative disc disease: a Cochrane review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(17):E1096–1107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren C, Song Y, Xue Y, et al. Mid- to long-term outcomes after disc arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Spine J Spine J. 2014;23(5):1115–1123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Lv G, Ren S, et al. Mid- to long-term outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of eight prospective randomized controlled trials. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0149312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dejaegher J, Walraevens J, Van Loon J, et al. 10-year follow-up after implantation of the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. Eur Spine J. 2017;26(4):1191–1198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Sun Y, et al. Application of cervical arthroplasty with Bryan cervical arthroplasty with Bryan cervical disc: 10-year follow-up results in China. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(2):111–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Tian Z, Zhu B, et al. Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for treatment of cervical disc diseases: A meta-analysis of prospective, randomized controlled trials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(12):E733–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957;16(4):494–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walraevens J, Demaerel P, Suetens P, et al. Longitudinal prospective long-term radiographic follow-up after treatment of single-level cervical disk disease with the Bryan cervical disc. Neurosurgery. 2010;67(3):679–687. discussion 687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunley PD, Jawahar A, Cavanaugh DA, et al. Symptomatic adjacent segment disease after cervical total disc replacement: re-examining the clinical and radiological evidence with established criteria. Spine J. 2013;13(1):5–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Zhang B, Liu H, et al. Cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for incidence of symptomatic adjacent segment disease: A meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41(19):1493–1502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quan GM, Vital JM, Hansen S, et al. Eight-year clinical and radiological follow-up of the Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36(8):639–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hisey MS, Zigler JE, Jackson R, et al. Prospective, randomized comparison of one-level Mobi-C cervical total disc replacement vs. anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results at 5-year follow-up. Int J Spine Surg. 2016;10:10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi S, Shin DA, Kim KN, et al. The predisposing factors for the heterotopic ossification after cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine J. 2013;13(9):1048–1054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson RJ, Davis RJ, Hoffman GA, et al. Subsequent surgery rates after cervical total disc replacement using a Mobi-C cervical disc prosthesis versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective randomized clinical trial with 5-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;24(5):734–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie L, Lui M, Ding F, et al. Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in a symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDDs): an updated meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Springerplus. 2016;5(1):1188.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hacker FM, Babcock RM, Hacker RJ. Very late complications of cervical arthroplasty: results of 2 controlled randomized prospective studies from a single investigator site. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(26):2223–2226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu WH, Kowalczyk I, Duggal N. Long-term kinematic analysis of cervical spine after single-level implantation of Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. Spine J. 2013;13(6):628–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qureshi SA, McAnany S, Goz V, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis: comparing single-level cervical disc replacement and single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;19(5):546–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radcliff K, Lerner J, Yang C, et al. Seven-year cost-effectiveness of ProDisc-C total disc replacement: results from investigational device exemption and post-approval studies. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;24(5):760–768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhadra AK, Raman AS, Casey AT, et al. Single-level cervical radiculopathy: clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness of four techniques of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and disc arthroplasty. Eur Spine J. 2009;18(2):232–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radcliff K, Zigler J, Zigler J. Costs of cervical disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for treatment of single-level cervical disc disease: an analysis of the Blue Health Intelligence database for acute and long-term costs and complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015;40(8):521–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jd A, Yang Z, Nunley P, et al. Cost utility analysis of the cervical artificial disc vs fusion for the treatment of 2-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease: 5-year follow-up. Neurosurgery. 2016;79(1):135–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen R. Reader bias. Jama. 1982;247(18):2533–2534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radcliff K, Siburn S, Murphy H, et al. Bias in cervical total disc replacement trials. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017;10(2):170–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rihn JA, Radcliff K, Hipp J, et al. Radiographic variables that may predict clinical outcomes in cervical disk replacement surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015;28(3):106–113.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim SW, Paik SH, Oh JK, et al. The impact of coronal alignment of device on radiographic degeneration in the case of total disc replacement. Spine J. 2016;16(4):470–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar