Optimal site selection and image fusion guidance technology to facilitate cardiac resynchronization therapy

References

• Petersen S, Rayner M, Wolstenholme J. Coronary heart disease statistics: heart failure supplement. Br Hear Found. 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Cleland JGF, Daubert JC, Erdmann E, et al. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1539–1549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu CM, Bleeker GB, Fung JW-H, et al. Left ventricular reverse remodeling but not clinical improvement predicts long-term survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation. 2005;112:1580–1586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullens W, Grimm RA, Verga T, et al. Insights from a cardiac resynchronization optimization clinic as part of a heart failure disease management program. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:765–773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronborg MB, Johansen JB, Riahi S, et al. An anterior left ventricular lead position is associated with increased mortality and non-response in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Int J Cardiol. 2016;222:157–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butter C, Auricchio A, Stellbrink C, et al. Effect of resynchronization therapy stimulation site on the systolic function of heart failure patients. Circulation. 2001;104:3026–3029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auricchio A, Stellbrink C, Block M, et al. Effect of pacing chamber and atrioventricular delay on acute systolic function of paced patients with congestive heart failure. Circulation. 1999;99:2993–3001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leyva F, Foley PW, Chalil S, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy guided by late gadolinium-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2011;13:29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummel JP, Lindner JR, Belcik JT, et al. Extent of myocardial viability predicts response to biventricular pacing in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Hear. Rhythm. 2005;2:1211–1217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ypenburg C, Schalij MJ, Bleeker GB, et al. Impact of viability and scar tissue on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in ischaemic heart failure patients. Eur Heart J. 2006;28:33–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huntjens PR, Walmsley J, Ploux S, et al. Influence of left ventricular lead position relative to scar location on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a model study. Europace. 2014;16(Suppl 4):iv62–iv68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ypenburg C, Van Bommel RJ, Delgado V, et al. Optimal left ventricular lead position predicts reverse remodeling and survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:1402–1409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan FZ, Virdee MS, Palmer CR, et al. Targeted left ventricular lead placement to guide cardiac resynchronization therapy: the TARGET study: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:1509–1518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döring M, Braunschweig F, Eitel C, et al. Individually tailored left ventricular lead placement: lessons from multimodality integration between three-dimensional echocardiography and coronary sinus angiogram. Europace. 2013;15:718–727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansalone G, Giannantoni P, Ricci R, et al. Doppler myocardial imaging to evaluate the effectiveness of pacing sites in patients receiving biventricular pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:489–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saba S, Marek J, Schwartzman D, et al. Echocardiography-guided left ventricular lead placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy results of the speckle tracking assisted resynchronization therapy for electrode region trial. Circ Hear Fail. 2013;6:427–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soliman OII, Geleijnse ML. Theuns D MJ, et al. Usefulness of left ventricular systolic dyssynchrony by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography to predict long-term response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am. J. Cardiol. 2009;103:1586–1591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohal M, Duckett SG, Zhuang X, et al. A prospective evaluation of cardiovascular magnetic resonance measures of dyssynchrony in the prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014;16:58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold MR, Birgersdotter-Green U, Singh JP, et al. The relationship between ventricular electrical delay and left ventricular remodelling with cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:2516–2524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh JP, Fan D, Heist EK, et al. Left ventricular lead electrical delay predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Hear. Rhythm. 2006;3:1285–1292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanon F, Baracca E, Pastore G, et al. Determination of the longest intrapatient left ventricular electrical delay may predict acute hemodynamic improvement in patients after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2014;7:377–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang Y, Yu H, Zhou W, et al. Left ventricular lead placement targeted at the latest activated site guided by electrophysiological mapping in coronary sinus branches improves response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26:1333–1339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rad MM, Blaauw Y, Dinh T, et al. Left ventricular lead placement in the latest activated region guided by coronary venous electroanatomic mapping. Europace. 2014;17:84–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster AH, Gold MR, Mclaughlin JS. Acute hemodynamic effects of atrio-biventricular pacing in humans. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;59:294–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley PWX, Leyva F, Frenneaux MP. What is treatment success in cardiac resynchronization therapy?. Europace. 2009;11:v58–v65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White HD, Norris RM, Brown MA, et al. Left ventricular end-systolic volume as the major determinant of survival after recovery from myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1987;76:44–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picard MH, Young Park M, Altman RK, et al. Clinical Investigations Characteristics of Responders to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The Impact of Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Volume.
   Google Scholar
• Spragg DD, Dong J, Fetics BJ, et al. Optimal left ventricular endocardial pacing sites for cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:774–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derval N, Steendijk P, Gula LJ, et al. Optimizing hemodynamics in heart failure patients by systematic screening of left ventricular pacing sites lateral left ventricular wall coronary sinus are rarely best sites. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:566–575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gelder BM, Bracke FA, Meijer A, et al. The hemodynamic effect of intrinsic conduction during left ventricular pacing as compared to biventricular pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:2305–2310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gelder BM, Bracke FA, Meijer A, et al. Effect of optimizing the VV interval on left ventricular contractility in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93:1500–1503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steendijk P, Tulner SA, Bax JJ, et al. Hemodynamic effects of long-term cardiac resynchronization therapy: analysis by pressure-volume loops. Circulation. 2006;113:1295–1304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanc -J-J, Etienne Y, Gilard M, et al. Evaluation of different ventricular pacing sites in patients with severe heart failure: results of an acute hemodynamic study. Circulation. 1997;96:3273–3277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckett SG, Ginks M, Shetty A, et al. Invasive acute hemodynamic response to guide left ventricular lead implantation predicts chronic remodeling in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:1128–1136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochitte CE, Tassi EM, Shiozaki AA. The emerging role of MRI in the diagnosis and management of cardiomyopathies. Curr Cardiol Rep Current Medicine Group. 2006;44–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• White JA, Patel MR. The role of cardiovascular MRI in heart failure and the cardiomyopathies. Cardiol Clin. 2007;25:71–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shehata ML, Turkbey EB, Vogel-Claussen J, et al. Role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of nonischemic cardiomyopathies. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;19:43–57.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanderson JE, Olsen EGJ, Gatei D. Dilated cardiomyopathy and myocarditis in Kenya: an endomyocardial biopsy study. Int J Cardiol. 1993;41:157–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson WJW, Clarke SA, Quinn TA, et al. Physiological implications of myocardial scar structure. Compr Physiol. 2015;5:1877–1909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogen DK, Rabinowitz SA, Needleman A, et al. An analysis of the mechanical disadvantage of myocardial infarction in the canine left ventricle. Circ Res. 1980;47:728–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adelstein EC, Saba S. Scar burden by myocardial perfusion imaging predicts echocardiographic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Am Heart J. 2007;153:105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adelstein EC, Saba S. Baseline scintigraphic abnormalities by myocardial perfusion imaging predict echocardiographic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Clin Cardiol. 2008;31:217–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ypenburg C, Roes SD, Bleeker GB, et al. Effect of total scar burden on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99:657–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ypenburg C, Schalij MJ, Bleeker GB, et al. Extent of viability to predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in ischemic heart failure patients. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1565–1570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalil S, Foley PWX, Muyhaldeen SA, et al. Late gadolinium enhancement-cardiovascular magnetic resonance as a predictor of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Europace. 2007;9:1031–1037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White JA, Yee R, Yuan X, et al. Delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with intraventricular dyssynchrony. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1953–1960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon DH, Halley CM, Carrigan TP, et al. Extent of left ventricular scar predicts outcomes in ischemic cardiomyopathy patients with significantly reduced systolic function. A delayed hyperenhancement cardiac magnetic resonance study. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging. 2009;2:34–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleeker GB, Kaandorp TAM, Lamb HJ, et al. Effect of posterolateral scar tissue on clinical and echocardiographic improvement after cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation. 2006;113:969–976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner PI, Ursell PC, Fenoglio JJ, et al. Electrophysiologic and anatomic basis for fractionated electrograms recorded from healed myocardial infarcts. Circulation. 1985;72:596–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dun W, Baba S, Yagi T, et al. Dynamic remodeling of K+ and Ca2+ currents in cells that survived in the epicardial border zone of canine healed infarcted heart. Am J Physiol Hear Circ Physiol. 2004;287:H1046–H1054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Severs NJ, Bruce AF, Dupont E, et al. Remodelling of gap junctions and connexin expression in diseased myocardium. Cardiovasc Res. 2008;80:9–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambiase PD, Rinaldi CA, Hauck J, et al. Non-contact left ventricular endocardial mapping in cardiac resynchronisation therapy. Heart. 2004;90:44–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayak HM, Verdino RJ, Russo AM, et al. Ventricular tachycardia storm after initiation of biventricular pacing: incidence, clinical characteristics, management, and outcome. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008;19:708–715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shukla G, Chaudhry GM, Orlov M, et al. Potential proarrhythmic effect of biventricular pacing: fact or myth? Hear. Rhythm. 2005;2:951–956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalil S, Stegemann B, Muhyaldeen S, et al. Effect of posterolateral left ventricular scar on mortality and morbidity following cardiac resynchronization therapy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007;30:1201–1209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong JA, Yee R, Stirrat J, et al. Influence of pacing site characteristics on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:542–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB, et al. Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. circulation. 1999;100:1992–2002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen S, Corya BC, Feigenbaum H, et al. Detection of myocardial scar tissue by M-mode echocardiography. Circulation. 1978;57:230–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaandorp TA, Bax JJ, Schuijf JD, et al. Head-to-head comparison between contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and dobutamine magnetic resonance imaging in men with ischemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2004;93:1461–1464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakos Z, Ostenfeld E, Markstad H, et al. A comparison between radial strain evaluation by speckle-tracking echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, for assessment of suitable segments for left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
   Google Scholar
• Mele D, Nardozza M, Malagù M, et al. Left ventricular lead position guided by parametric strain echocardiography improves response to cardiac resynchronization Therapy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017;30:1001–1011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montant P, Chenot F, Goffinet C, et al. Detection and quantification of myocardial scars by contrast-enhanced 3D echocardiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:415–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaibazzi N, Bianconcini M, Marziliano N, et al. Scar detection by pulse-cancellation echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:1239–1251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winer-Muram HT, Tann M, Aisen AM, et al. Computed tomography demonstration of lipomatous metaplasia of the left ventricle following myocardial infarction. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2004;28:455–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wichmann JL, Bauer RW, Doss M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of late iodine-enhancement dual-energy computed tomography for the detection of chronic myocardial infarction compared with late gadolinium-enhancement 3-T magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol. 2013;48:851–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crean A, Khan SN, Davies LC, et al. Assessment of myocardial scar; comparison between Tc-sestamibi. Clin Med Cardiol. 2009;3:69–763.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peters NS, Wit AL. Myocardial architecture and ventricular arrhythmogenesis. Circulation. 1998;97:1746–1754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornowski R, Hong MK, Leon MB. Comparison between left ventricular electromechanical mapping and radionuclide perfusion imaging for detection of myocardial viability. Circulation. 1998;98:1837–1841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch KC. vom Dahl J, Wenderdel M, et al. Myocardial viability assessment by endocardial electroanatomic mapping: comparison with metabolic imaging and functional recovery after coronary revascularization. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2001;38:91–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perin EC, Silva GV, Sarmento-Leite R, et al. Assessing myocardial viability and infarct transmurality with left ventricular electromechanical mapping in patients with stable coronary artery disease: Validation by delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2002;106:957–961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Codreanu A, Odille F, Aliot E, et al. Electroanatomic characterization of post-infarct scars comparison with 3-Dimensional myocardial scar reconstruction based on magnetic resonance imaging. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008;52:839–842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijnmaalen AP. Van Der Geest RJ, Van Huls Van Taxis CFB, et al. Head-to-head comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and electroanatomical voltage mapping to assess post-infarct scar characteristics in patients with ventricular tachycardias: real-time image integration and reversed registration. Eur. Heart J. 2011;32:104–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desjardins B, Crawford T, Good E, et al. Infarct architecture and characteristics on delayed enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and electroanatomic mapping in patients with postinfarction ventricular arrhythmia. Hear. Rhythm. 2009;6:644–651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gornick CC, Adler SW, Pederson B, et al. Validation of a new noncontact catheter system for electroanatomic mapping of left ventricular endocardium. Circulation. 1999;99:829–835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhakta D, Miller JM. Principles of electroanatomic mapping. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2008;8:32–50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oster HS, Taccardi B, Lux RL, et al. Noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging: reconstruction of epicardial potentials, electrograms, and isochrones and localization of single and multiple electrocardiac events. Circulation. 1997;96:1012–1024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jmt DB, Janse MJ, Fjl VC, et al. Endocardial mapping by simultaneous recording of endocardial electrograms during cardiac surgery for ventricular aneurysm. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983;2:947–953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz LN, Harken AH, Kastor JA, et al. Ventricular resection guided by epicardial and endocardial mapping for treatment of recurrent ventricular tachycardia. NEJM. 1980;302:589–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein H, Karp RB, Kouchoukos NT, et al. Intraoperative electrophysiologic mapping of the ventricles during sinus rhythm in patients with a previous myocardial infarction. Identification Electrophysiologic Substrate Ventricular Arrhythmias Circulation. 1982;66:847–853.
   Google Scholar
• Sieniewicz BJ, Panayiotou M, Rashed K, et al. Predicting the optimal site for LV lead deployment using epicardial non-invasive mapping. EP Eur. 2017;19:iii209–iii209.
   Google Scholar
• Cuculich PS, Zhang J, Wang Y, et al. The electrophysiological cardiac ventricular substrate in patients after myocardial infarction: noninvasive characterization with electrocardiographic imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:1893–1902.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu J, Adelstein E, Saba S. Targeting left ventricular lead placement to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2013;15:390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu C-M, Fung W-H, Lin H, et al. Predictors of left ventricular reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure secondary to idiopathic dilated or ischemic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2003;91:684–688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bax JJ, Bleeker GB, Marwick TH, et al. Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts response and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:1834–1840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suffoletto MS, Dohi K, Cannesson M, et al. Novel speckle-tracking radial strain from routine black-and-white echocardiographic images to quantify dyssynchrony and predict response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation. 2006;113:960–968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruschitzka F, Abraham WT, Singh JP, et al. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy in heart failure with a narrow QRS complex. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1395–1405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung ES, Leon A, Tavazzi L, et al. Results of the predictors of response to crt (prospect) trial. Circulation. 2008;117:2608–2616.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mele D, Toselli T, Capasso F, et al. Comparison of myocardial deformation and velocity dyssynchrony for identification of responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur J Heart Fail. 2009;11:391–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapetanakis S, Bhan A, Murgatroyd F, et al. Real-time 3D echo in patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:16–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy RT, Sigurdsson G, Mulamalla S, et al. Tissue synchronization imaging and optimal left ventricular pacing site in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97:1615–1621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker M, Hoffmann R, Schmitz F, et al. Relation of optimal lead positioning as defined by three-dimensional echocardiography to long-term benefit of cardiac resynchronization. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100:1671–1676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker M, Franke A, Breithardt OA, et al. Impact of left ventricular lead position on the efficacy of cardiac resynchronisation therapy: a two-dimensional strain echocardiography study. Heart. 2007;93:1197–1203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kočková R, Sedláček K, Wichterle D, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy guided by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective, single-centre randomized study (CMR-CRT). Int J Cardiol. 2018;7:1040–1047.
   Google Scholar
• Bilchick KC, Dimaano V, Wu KC, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance assessment of dyssynchrony and myocardial scar predicts function class improvement following cardiac resynchronization therapy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;1:561–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panayiotou M, Mountney P, Brost A, et al. Dynamic mapping of ventricular function from cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. 2016 38th Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. IEEE; 2016. p. 4137–4140.
   Google Scholar
• Daubert JC, Saxon L, Adamson PB, et al. EHRA/HRS expert consensus statement on cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure: implant and follow-up recommendations and management: a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), and the Heart Rhythm Society; and in col. Europace. 2012;2012(14):1236–1286.
   Google Scholar
• Pourmorteza A, Schuleri KH, Herzka DA, et al. A new method for cardiac computed tomography regional function assessment: stretch quantifier for endocardial engraved zones (SQUEEZ). Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:243–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behar JM, Rajani R, Pourmorteza A, et al. Comprehensive use of cardiac computed tomography to guide left ventricular lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Hear. Rhythm.. 2017;14:1364–1372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auricchio A, Fantoni C, Regoli F, et al. Characterization of left ventricular activation in patients with heart failure and left bundle-branch block. Circulation. 2004;109:1133–1139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behar JM, Jackson T, Hyde ER, et al. Optimized left ventricular endocardial stimulation is superior to optimized epicardial stimulation in ischemic patients with poor response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2016;2:799–809.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ellenbogen KA, Gold MR, Meyer TE, et al. Primary results from the smartdelay determined AV optimization: A comparison to other AV delay methods used in cardiac resynchronization therapy (SMART-AV) trial: A randomized trial comparing empirical, echocardiography- guided, and algorithmic atrioventr. Circulation. 2010;122:2660–2668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gelder BM, Nathoe R, Bracke FA. Haemodynamic evaluation of alternative left ventricular endocardial pacing sites in clinical non-responders to cardiac resynchronisation therapy. Netherlands Hear. J. 2016;24:85–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iler MA, Hu T, Ayyagari S, et al. Prognostic Value of Electrocardiographic Measurements Before and After Cardiac Resynchronization Device Implantation in Patients With Heart Failure due to Ischemic or Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:359–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsing JM, Selzman KA, Leclercq C, et al. Paced left ventricular QRS width and ECG parameters predict outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy PROSPECT-ECG substudy. Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2011;4:851–857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonakdar HR, Jorat MV, Fazelifar AF, et al. Prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy using simple electrocardiographic and echocardiographic tools. Europace. 2009;11:1330–1337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecoq G, Leclercq C, Leray E, et al. Clinical and electrocardiographic predictors of a positive response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in advanced heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:1094–1100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollema SA, Bleeker GB, Van Der Wall EE, et al. Usefulness of QRS Duration to Predict Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With End-Stage Heart Failure. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100:1665–1670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Silva JNA, Canham RM, et al. Electrophysiologic substrate and intraventricular left ventricular dyssynchrony in nonischemic heart failure patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:692–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva JNAA, Ghosh S, Bowman TM, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy in pediatric congenital heart disease: insights from noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging. Heart Rhythm. 2009;6:1178–1185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez L-M, Timmermans C, Nabar A, et al. Variable patterns of septal activation in patients with left bundle branch block and heart failure. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003;14:135–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suever JD, Hartlage GR, Magrath RP, et al. Relationship between mechanical dyssynchrony and intra-operative electrical delay times in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014;16:4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujiwara R, Yoshida A, Fukuzawa K, et al. Discrepancy between electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with heart failure and an electrical disturbance. PACE Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014;37:576–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eschalier R, Ploux S, Lumens J, et al. Detailed analysis of ventricular activation sequences during right ventricular apical pacing and left bundle branch block and the potential implications for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Hear. Rhythm.. 2015;12:137–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkoff BL, Cook JR, Epstein AE, et al. Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: the Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial. JAMA. 2002;288:3115–3123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma AD, Rizo-Patron C, Hallstrom AP, et al. Percent right ventricular pacing predicts outcomes in the DAVID trial. Hear. Rhythm.. 2005;2:830–834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cock CC, Giudici MC, Twisk JW. Comparison of the haemodynamic effects of right ventricular outflow-tract pacing with right ventricular apex pacing: A quantitative review. Europace. 2003;5:275–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fz KHAN, Salahshouri P, Duehmke R, et al. The Impact of the Right Ventricular Lead Position on Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011;34:467–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutyifa V, Bloch Thomsen PE, Huang DT, et al. Impact of the right ventricular lead position on clinical outcome and on the incidence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with CRT-D. Hear. Rhythm.. 2013;10:1770–1777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leclercq C, Sadoul N, Mont L, et al. Comparison of right ventricular septal pacing and right ventricular apical pacing in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators: the SEPTAL CRT Study. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:473–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derval N, Steendijk P, Gula LJ, et al. Optimizing hemodynamics in heart failure patients by systematic screening of left ventricular pacing sites. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:566–575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar P, Upadhyay GA, Cavaliere-Ogus C, et al. Right ventricular lead adjustment in cardiac resynchronization therapy and acute hemodynamic response: a pilot study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2013;36:223–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassone B, Gabrieli L, Saccà S, et al. Value of right ventricular-left ventricular interlead electrical delay to predict reverse remodelling in cardiac resynchronization therapy: the INTER-V pilot study. Europace. 2010;12:78–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda RI, Nault M, Johri A, et al. Maximal electric separation–guided placement of right ventricular lead improves responders in cardiac resynchronization defibrillator therapy. Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2012;5:927–932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasparini M, Bocchiardo M, Lunati M, et al. Comparison of 1-year effects of left ventricular and biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure who have ventricular arrhythmias and left bundle-branch block: the Bi vs Left Ventricular Pacing: an International Pilot Evaluation on Heart Failure P. Am Heart J. 2006;152:155.e1–155.e7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boriani G, Kranig W, Donal E, et al. A randomized double-blind comparison of biventricular versus left ventricular stimulation for cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Biventricular versus Left Univentricular Pacing with ICD Back-up in Heart Failure Patients (B-LEFT HF) trial. Am Heart J. 2010;159:1052–1058.e1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibault B, Ducharme A, Harel FFF, et al. Left ventricular versus simultaneous biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and a QRS complex ≥120 milliseconds. Circulation. 2011;124:2874–2881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao RK, Kumar UN, Schafer J, et al. Reduced ventricular volumes and improved systolic function with cardiac resynchronization therapy: a randomized trial comparing simultaneous biventricular pacing, sequential biventricular pacing, and left ventricular pacing. Circulation. 2007;115:2136–2144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns KV, Gage RM, Curtin AE, et al. Left ventricular-only pacing in heart failure patients with normal atrioventricular conduction improves global function and left ventricular regional mechanics compared with biventricular pacing: an adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy sub-study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2017;19:1335–1343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde ER, Behar JM, Claridge S, et al. Beneficial effect on cardiac resynchronization from left ventricular endocardial pacing is mediated by early access to high conduction velocity tissue: electrophysiological simulation study. Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2015;8:1164–1172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohal M, Shetty A, Niederer S, et al. Delayed trans-septal activation results in comparable hemodynamic effect of left ventricular and biventricular endocardial pacing insights from electroanatomical mapping. Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2014;7:251–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sodi-Pallares D, Rodriguez MI, Chait LO, et al. The activation of the interventricular septum. Am Heart J. 1951;41:569–608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durrer D, Van Dam RT, Freud GE, et al. Total excitation of the isolated human heart. Circulation. 1970;41:899–912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanagh KM, Belenkie I, Duff HJ. Transmural temporospatial left ventricular activation during pacing from different sites: potential implications for optimal pacing. Cardiovasc Res. 2007;77:81–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mafi Rad M, Luermans JGLM, Blaauw Y, et al. Feasibility and acute hemodynamic effect of left ventricular septal pacing by transvenous approach through the interventricular septum. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016;9:e003344.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rademakers LM, Van HA, Kuiper M, et al. A possible role for pacing the left ventricular septum in cardiac resynchronization therapy. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2016;2:413–422.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bertini M, Mele D, Malagù M, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy guided by multimodality cardiac imaging. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18:1375–1382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laksman Z, Yee R, Stirrat J, et al. Model-based navigation of left and right ventricular leads to optimal targets for cardiac resynchronization therapy: a single-center feasibility study. Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2014;7:1040–1047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer A, Kronborg MB, Norgaard BL, et al. Left and right ventricular lead positions are imprecisely determined by fluoroscopy in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a comparison with cardiac computed tomography. Europace. 2014;16:1334–1341.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Behar JM, Mountney P, Toth D, et al. Real-time X-MRI-guided left ventricular lead implantation for targeted delivery of cardiac resynchronization therapy. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;3:803–814.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Friehling M, Chen J, Saba S, et al. A prospective pilot study to evaluate the relationship between acute change in left ventricular synchrony after cardiac resynchronization therapy and patient outcome using a single-injection gated SPECT protocol. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:532–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou W, Hou X, Piccinelli M, et al. 3D Fusion of LV venous anatomy on fluoroscopy venograms with epicardial surface on SPECT myocardial perfusion images for guiding CRT LV lead placement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:1239–1248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Younger JF, Plein S, Crean A, et al. Visualization of coronary venous anatomy by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2009;11:1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun C, Pan Y, Wang H, et al. Assessment of the coronary venous system using 256-slice computed tomography. Hodgson-Zingman D, Editor. PLoS One. 2014;9:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Zollei L, Grimson E, Norbash A, et al. 2D-3D rigid registration of X-ray fluoroscopy and CT images using mutual information and sparsely sampled histogram estimators. Proc. 2001 IEEE Comput. Soc. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001. IEEE Comput. Soc; p. II-696-II-703.
   Google Scholar
• Gould J, Behar JM, Rajani R, et al. P333Dual energy cardiac computed tomography to guide cardiac resynchronisation therapy: a feasibility study using coronary venous anatomy, scar and strain to guide optimal left ventricular lead placement. EP Eur. 2018;20:i53–i54.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan JM, Biffi M, Gellér L, et al. ALternate Site Cardiac ResYNChronization (ALSYNC): a prospective and multicentre study of left ventricular endocardial pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2118–2127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyde ER, Behar JM, Crozier A, et al. Improvement of right ventricular hemodynamics with left ventricular endocardial pacing during cardiac resynchronization therapy. PACE Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016;39:531–541.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sharma PS, Dandamudi G, Herweg B, et al.Permanent His-bundle pacing as an alternative to biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: A multicenter experience. Hear. Rhythm.. 2018;15:413–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee A, Crozier A, Hyde ER, et al. Biophysical modeling to determine the optimization of left ventricular pacing site and AV/VV delays in the acute and chronic phase of cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017;28:208–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy VY, Miller MA, Neuzil P, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy with wireless left ventricular endocardial pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69:2119–2129.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sieniewicz BJ, Gould J, Rimington HMHM, et al. Transseptal delivery of a leadless left ventricular endocardial pacing electrode. JACC: Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;3:1333–1335.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prothmann M, Von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Töpper A, et al. High spatial resolution cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 7.0 tesla in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy - First experiences: Lesson learned from 7.0 tesla. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0148066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niendorf T, Schulz-Menger J, Paul K, et al. High field cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a case for ultrahigh field cardiac magnetic resonance. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10:e005460.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ben JW, Vatterott PJ, Peterson MA, et al. Body surface mapping using an ECG belt to characterize electrical heterogeneity for different left ventricular pacing sites during cardiac resynchronization: relationship with acute hemodynamic improvement. Hear. Rhythm. 2017;14:385–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruckheimer E, Rotschild C, Dagan T, et al. Computer-generated real-time digital holography: first time use in clinical medical imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17:845–849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar