Laryngoscopes for difficult airway scenarios: a comparison of the available devices

References

• Frerk C, Mitchell VS, McNarry AF, et al. Difficult Airway Society intubation guidelines working group. Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115(6):827–848.
   Google Scholar
• Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, et al. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 2013;118(2):251–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar HV, Schroeder JW, Gang Z, et al. Mallampati score and pediatric obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2014;10(9):985–990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cormack RS, Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia. 1984;39(11):1105–1111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivilaithon W, Muengtaweepongsa S, Sittichanbuncha Y, et al. Predicting difficult intubation in emergency department by intubation assessment score. J Clin Med Res. 2018;10(3):247–253.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murphy MF, Walls RM. The difficult and failed airway. Manual of emergency airway management. Chicago: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Mackay CA, Terris J, Coats TJ. Prehospital rapid sequence induction by emergency physicians: is it safe? Emerg Med J. 2001;18:20–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunde GA, Kottmann A, Heltne JK, et al. Standardised data reporting from pre-hospital advanced airway management – a nominal group technique update of the Utstein-style airway template. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018;26(1):46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Truszewski Z, Krajewski P, Fudalej M, et al. A comparison of a traditional endotracheal tube versus ETView SL in endotracheal intubation during different emergency conditions: a randomized, crossover cadaver trial. Medicine. 2016;95(44):e5170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xanthos T, Stroumpoulis K, Bassiakou E, et al. Glidescope(®) videolaryngoscope improves intubation success rate in cardiac arrest scenarios without chest compressions interruption: a randomized cross-over manikin study. Resuscitation. 2011;82(4):464–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okada D, Komasawa N, Fujiwara S, et al. Comparison of tube-guided and guideless videolaryngoscope for tracheal intubation during chest compression in a manikin: a randomized crossover trial. J Anesth. 2015;29(3):331–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawel W, Kaminska H, Wieczorek W. UEScope as a method of endotracheal intubation of trauma patient. Disaster Emerg Med J. 2017;2(4):175–176.
   Google Scholar
• van Zundert A, Maassen R, Lee R, et al. A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(3):825–831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle DJ. A brief history of clinical airway management. Rev Mex Anest. 2009;32(1):S164–S167.
   Google Scholar
• Vlatten A, Aucoin S, Litz S, et al. A comparison of the STORZ video laryngoscope and standard direct laryngoscopy for intubation in the pediatric airway – a randomized clinical trial. Paediatr Anaesth. 2009;19(11):1102–1107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojewodzka-Zelezniakowicz M, Madziala A, Madziala M. Comparison of the Miller and Macintosh laryngoscopes in simulated pediatric trauma patient: a pilot study. Disaster Emerg Med J. 2017;2(1):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Achen B, Terblanche OC, Finucane BT. View of the larynx obtained using the Miller blade and paraglossal approach, compared to that with the Macintosh blade. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2008;36(5):717–721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varghese E, Kundu R. Does the Miller blade truly provide a better laryngoscopic view and intubating conditions than the Macintosh blade in small children? Paediatr Anaesth. 2014;24(8):825–829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klosiewicz T, Sip M, Zalewski R, et al. Alternative of endotracheal intubation for paramedics to provide direct laryngoscopy randomized manikin trial. Disaster Emerg Med J. 2017;2(3):142–144.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson JJ. The use of paraglossal straight blade laryngoscopy in difficult tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia. 1997;52(6):552–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alter SM, Haim ED, Sullivan AH, et al. Intubation of prehospital patients with curved laryngoscope blade is more successful than with straight blade. Am J Emerg Med. 2018;pii. S0735–6757(18)30114-1.
   Google Scholar
• Das B, Samanta A, Mitra S, et al. Comparative evaluation of Airtraq™ optical laryngoscope and Miller’s blade in paediatric patients undergoing elective surgery requiring tracheal intubation: a randomized, controlled trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2017;61(4):326–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madziala A, Evrin T, Wieczorek W, et al. Can the face-to-face intubation technique be used during cardiopulmonary resuscitation? A prospective, randomized, crossover manikin trial. Disaster Emerg Med J. 2017;2(4):145–149.
   Google Scholar
• Abdullah HR, Li-Ming T, Marriott A, et al. A comparison between the Bonfils Intubation Fiberscope and McCoy laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients with a simulated difficult airway. Anesth Analg. 2013;117(5):1217–1220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali QE, Das B, Amir SH, et al. Comparison of the Airtraq and McCoy laryngoscopes using a rigid neck collar in patients with simulated difficult laryngoscopy. J Clin Anesth. 2014;26(3):199–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogdański Ł, Truszewski Z, Kurowski A, et al. Simulated endotracheal intubation of a patient with cervical spine immobilization during resuscitation: a randomized comparison of the Pentax AWS, the Airtraq, and the McCoy laryngoscopes. Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33(12):1814–1817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truszewski Z, Szarpak Ł, Smereka J, et al. Comparison of the VivaSight single lumen endotracheal tube and the Macintosh laryngoscope for emergency intubation by experienced paramedics in a standardized airway manikin with restricted access: a randomized, crossover trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34(5):929–930.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karczewska K, Szarpak L, Smereka J, et al. ET-View compared to direct laryngoscopy in patients with immobilized cervical spine by unexperienced physicians: a randomized crossover manikin trial. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2017;49(4):274–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawlowski P, Smereka J, Madziala M, et al. Comparison of the ETView Single Lumen and Macintosh laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation in an airway manikin with immobilized cervical spine by novice paramedics: a randomized crossover manikin trial. Medicine. 2017;96(16):1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umutoglu T, Bakan M, Topuz U, et al. Use of ETView Tracheoscopic Ventilation Tube® in airway management of a patient with tracheal injury. Minerva Anestesiol. 2014;80(3):398–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurowski A, Szarpak L, Truszewski Z, et al. Can the ETView VivaSight SL rival conventional intubation using the Macintosh laryngoscope during adult resuscitation by novice physicians? A randomized crossover manikin study. Medicine. 2015;94(21):1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madziala A, Majer J, Madziała M. Comparison of ETView SL, Airtraq, and Macintosh laryngoscopes for face-to-face tracheal intubation: a randomized crossover manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34(9):1893–1894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truszewski Z, Szarpak L, Czyzewski L, et al. A comparison of the ETView VivaSight SL against a fiberoptic bronchoscope for nasotracheal intubation of multitrauma patients during resuscitation randomized, crossover, manikin study. Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33(8):1097–1099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorelli AF, Ferraro FF, Milione RM, et al. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy using a tracheoscopic ventilation tube in an experimental ex vivo animal model. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2016;44(3):371–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moritz A, Schreiner W, Schmidt J. One-lung ventilation after rapid-sequence intubation: a novel approach using an ETView tracheoscopic ventilation tube for placement of an EZ-Blocker without bronchoscopy. J Clin Anesth. 2016;29:48–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu H, Zuo MZ. Use of the ETView tracheoscopic ventilation tube in airway management of a patient with unanticipated difficult bag-mask ventilation. J Anesth. 2016;30(4):699–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagannathan N, Hajduk J, Sohn L, et al. Randomized equivalence trial of the King Vision aBlade videolaryngoscope with the Miller direct laryngoscope for routine tracheal intubation in children <2 yr of age. Br J Anaesth. 2017;118(6):932–937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eismann H, Sieg L, Etti N, et al. Improved success rates using videolaryngoscopy in unexperienced users: a randomized crossover study in airway manikins. Eur J Med Res. 2017;22(1):27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gaszyński T. Comparison of the glottic view during video-intubation in super obese patients: a series of cases. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2016;12:1677–1682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smereka J, Ladny JR, Naylor A, et al. C-MAC compared with direct laryngoscopy for intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization: a manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;35(8):1142–1146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoshijima H, Mihara T, Maruyama K, et al. C-MAC videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2018;49:53–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendonca C, Ungureanu N, Nowicka A, et al. A randomised clinical trial comparing the ‘sniffing’ and neutral position using channelled (KingVision®) and non-channelled (C-MAC®) videolaryngoscopes. Anaesthesia. 2018;73(7):847–855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frass M, Robak O, Truszewski Z, et al. Comparison of endotracheal intubation with the Airtraq Avant® and the Macintosh laryngoscope during intermittent or continous chest compression: a randomized, crossover, study in manikins. Disaster Emerg Med J. 2016;1(1):7–13.
   Google Scholar
• Maharaj CH, Higgins BD, Harte BH, et al. Evaluation of intubation using the Airtraq or Macintosh laryngoscope by anaesthetists in easy and simulated difficult laryngoscopy–a manikin study. Anaesthesia. 2006;61(5):469–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueshima H, Kitamura A. Use of the new Airtraq “Airtraq AVANT” in clinical settings. J Clin Anesth. 2015;27(5):441–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maharaj CH, O’Croinin D, Curley G, et al. A comparison of tracheal intubation using the Airtraq or the Macintosh laryngoscope in routine airway management: a randomised, controlled clinical trial. Anaesthesia. 2006;61(11):1093–1099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maharaj CH, Costello JF, Higgins BD, et al. Learning and performance of tracheal intubation by novice personnel: a comparison of the Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscope. Anaesthesia. 2006;61(7):671–677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Xu T, Song Y, et al. Airtraq laryngoscope: a solution for difficult laryngeal exposure in phonomicrosurgery. Acta Otolaryngol. 2017;137(6):635–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rendeki S, Keresztes D, Woth G, et al. Comparison of VividTrac®, Airtraq®, King Vision®, Macintosh laryngoscope and a custom-made videolaryngoscope for difficult and normal airways in mannequins by novices. BMC Anesthesiol. 2017;17(1):68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoshijima H, Maruyama K, Mihara T, et al. Airtraq® reduces the hemodynamic response to tracheal intubation using single-lumen tubes in adults compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. J Clin Anesth. 2018;47:86–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orozco JA, Rojas JL, Medina-Vera AJ. Haemodynamic response and effectiveness of tracheal intubation with Airtraq® versus Macintosh laryngoscope in paediatric patient undergoing elective surgery: prospective, randomised and blind clinical trial. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2018;65(1):24–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• El-Tahan MR, Khidr AM, Gaarour IS, et al. A comparison of 3 videolaryngoscopes for double-lumen tube intubation in humans by users with mixed experience: a randomized controlled study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018;32(1):277–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belze O, Lepage E, Bazin Y, et al. Glidescope versus Airtraq DL for double-lumen tracheal tube insertion in patients with a predicted or known difficult airway: a randomised study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017;34(7):456–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szarpak Ł, Karczewska K, Czyżewski Ł, et al. Airtraq laryngoscope versus the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope during pediatric intubation performed by nurses: a randomized crossover manikin study with three airway scenarios. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2017;33(11):735–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetsch WA, Carlitscheck M, Spelten O, et al. Success rates and endotracheal tube insertion times of experienced emergency physicians using five video laryngoscopes: a randomised trial in a simulated trapped car accident victim. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011;28(12):849–858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szarpak L, Karczewska K, Evrin T, et al. Comparison of intubation through the McGrath MAC, GlideScope, AirTraq, and Miller Laryngoscope by paramedics during child CPR: a randomized crossover manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33(7):946–950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee YC, Lee J, Son JD, et al. Stylet angulation of 70 degrees reduces the time to intubation with the GlideScope®: a prospective randomised trial. J Int Med Res. 2018;46(4):1428–1438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aqil M, Khan MU, Mansoor S, et al. Incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat: a randomized comparison of Glidescope with Macintosh laryngoscope. BMC Anesthesiol. 2017;17(1):127.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jafra A, Gombar S, Kapoor D, et al. A prospective randomized controlled study to evaluate and compare GlideScope with Macintosh laryngoscope for ease of endotracheal intubation in adult patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. Saudi J Anaesth. 2018;12(2):272–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang GZ, Xue FS, Liu YY, et al. Assessing usefulness of GlideScope® video laryngoscope in children with difficult direct laryngoscopy. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2017;pii. S2352-5568(17)30318-1.
   Google Scholar
• Sola C, Saour AC, Macq C, et al. Children with challenging airways: what about GlideScope® video-laryngoscopy? Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2017;36(5):267–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park R, Peyton JM, Fiadjoe JE, et al. The efficacy of GlideScope® videolaryngoscopy compared with direct laryngoscopy in children who are difficult to intubate: an analysis from the paediatric difficult intubation registry. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119(5):984–992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vadi MG, Roddy KJ, Ghazal EA, et al. Comparison of the GlideScope Cobalt® and Storz DCI® video laryngoscopes in children younger than 2 years of age during manual in-line stabilization: a randomized trainee evaluation study. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2017;33(7):467–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace MC, Britton ST, Meek R, et al. Comparison of five video-assisted intubation devices by novice and expert laryngoscopists for use in the aeromedical evacuation environment. Mil Med Res. 2017;4:20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kill C, Risse J, Wallot P, et al. Videolaryngoscopy with glidescope reduces cervical spine movement in patients with unsecured cervical spine. J Emerg Med. 2013;44(4):750–756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbarzadeh SR, Taghavi Gillani M, Tabari M, et al. Comparative analysis of the usefulness of the GlideScope®, Macintosh, and McCoy laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation in patients with obesity: a randomized, clinical trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2017;7(6):e57913.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Szarpak L, Czyżewski L, Kurowski A. Can GlideScope® videolaryngoscope be an alternative to direct laryngoscopy for child and infant tracheal intubation during chest compression? Eur J Pediatr. 2015;174(7):981–982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin DH, Choi PC, Han SK. Tracheal intubation during chest compressions using Pentax-AWS®, GlideScope®, and Macintosh laryngoscope: a randomized crossover trial using a mannequin. Can J Anaesth. 2011;58(8):733–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue FS, Yuan YJ, Liao X, et al. Is Glidescope® videolaryngoscope more effective than Macintosh laryngoscope for emergent intubation during chest compression? Resuscitation. 2011;82(7):956. author reply 957–958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma D. Is GlideScope the best way to intubate? Anesthesiology. 2010 Jul;113(1):258–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko JI, Ha SO, Koo MS, et al. Comparison of intubation times using a manikin with an immobilized cervical spine: macintosh laryngoscope vs GlideScope vs. Fiberoptic bronchoscope. Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2015;2(4):244–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui XL, Xue FS, Cheng Y, et al. Comparative performance of GlideScope video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in children with immobilized cervical spine. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013;29(5):690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buljan D, Rosiczuk J, Stawicka I. Evaluation of the effectiveness of selected techniques for endotracheal intubation in conditions of simulated resuscitation performer by nurses. Disaster Emerg Med J. 2016;1(1):57–58.
   Google Scholar
• Mutlak H, Rolle U, Rosskopf W, et al. Comparison of the TruView infant EVO2 PCD™ and C-MAC video laryngoscopes with direct Macintosh laryngoscopy for routine tracheal intubation in infants with normal airways. Clinics. 2014;69(1):23–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh R, Singh P, Vajifdar H. A comparison of Truview infant EVO2 laryngoscope with the Miller blade in neonates and infants. Paediatr Anaesth. 2009;19(4):338–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stawicka I, Czyzewski L, Smereka J, et al. Comparison of four laryngoscopes for ortotracheal intubation by nurses during resuscitation with and without chest compressions: a randomized crossover manikin trial. Disaster Emerg Med J. 2016;1(1):14–23.
   Google Scholar
• Shrestha S, Arora S, Jain D, et al. Truview EVO2 laryngoscope reduces intubation difficulty in maxillofacial surgeries. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73(10):1919.e1–e8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora S, Sayeed H, Bhardwaj N. A comparison of Truview EVO2 laryngoscope with Macintosh laryngoscope in routine airway management: a randomized crossover clinical trial. Saudi J Anaesth. 2013;7(3):244–248.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bharadwaj A, Khurana G, Jindal P. Cervical spine movement and ease of intubation using Truview or McCoy laryngoscope in difficult intubation. Spine. 2016;41(12):987–993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxena A, Madan M, Shrivastava U, et al. Role of the Truview EVO2 laryngoscope in the airway management of elective surgical patients: a comparison with the Macintosh laryngoscope. Indian J Anaesth. 2013;57(3):276–281.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matsumoto S, Asai T, Shingu K. TruViewEVO2 videolaryngoscope. Masui. 2007;56(2):213–217.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patil AR, Kulkarni KR, Patil RS, et al. Truview PCD-video laryngoscope aided nasotracheal intubation in case series of orofacial malignancy with limited mouth opening. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015;31(2):256–258.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhola R, Bhalla S, Gupta R, et al. Tracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization: a comparison of McGrath® video laryngoscope and Truview EVO2® laryngoscope. Indian J Anaesth. 2014;58(3):269–274.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Szarpak Ł, Czyżewski Ł, Kurowski A, et al. Comparison of the TruView PCD video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope for pediatric tracheal intubation by novice paramedics: a randomized crossover simulation trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2015;174(10):1325–1332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumoto S, Asai T, Shingu K. Truview video laryngoscope in patients with difficult airways. Anesth Analg. 2006;103(2):492–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang PK, Huang CC, Lee Y, et al. Comparison of 3 video laryngoscopes with the Macintosh in a manikin with easy and difficult simulated airways. Am J Emerg Med. 2013;31(2):330–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker L, Brampton W, Halai M, et al. Randomized controlled trial of intubation with the McGrath Series 5 videolaryngoscope by inexperienced anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103(3):440–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marciniak B, Fayoux P, Laffargue A, et al. Use of the McGrath® Series 5 portable video laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in children. Anesthesiology. 2008;109:A785.
   Google Scholar
• Madziala M, Smereka J, Dabrowski M, et al. A comparison of McGrath MAC® and standard direct laryngoscopy in simulated immobilized cervical spine pediatric intubation: a manikin study. Eur J Pediatr. 2017;176(6):779–786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szarpak L, Truszewski Z, Czyzewski L, et al. A comparison of the McGrath-MAC and Macintosh laryngoscopes for child tracheal intubation during resuscitation by paramedics randomized, crossover, manikin study. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34(8):1338–1341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Ríos MÁ, Pinegger S, de Carrillo Mantilla M, et al. A randomised crossover trial comparing the Airtraq® NT, McGrath® MAC and Macintosh laryngoscopes for nasotracheal intubation of simulated easy and difficult airways in a manikin. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2016;66(3):289–297.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kwak HJ, Lee SY, Lee SY, et al. Intubation without use of stylet for McGrath videolaryngoscopy in patients with expected normal airway: a randomized noninferiority trial. Medicine. 2016;95(48):e5498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim EH, Lee JH, Song IK, et al. Effect of head position on laryngeal visualisation with the McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope in paediatric patients: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016;33(7):528–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foulds LT, McGuire BE, Shippey BJ. A randomised cross-over trial comparing the McGrath® Series 5 videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with cervical spine immobilisation. Anaesthesia. 2016;71(4):437–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvis BD, Hester D, Watson D, et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing the McGrath MAC video laryngoscope with the King Vision video laryngoscope in adult patients. Minerva Anestesiol. 2016;82(1):30–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kido H, Komasawa N, Matsunami S, et al. Comparison of McGRATH MAC and Macintosh laryngoscopes for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation by anesthesia residents: a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Clin Anesth. 2015;27(6):476–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asai T, Liu EH, Matsumoto S, et al. Use of the Pentax-AWS in 293 patients with difficult airways. Anesthesiology. 2009;110(4):898–904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim KN, Jeong MA, Oh YN, et al. Efficacy of Pentax airway scope versus Macintosh laryngoscope when used by novice personnel: a prospective randomized controlled study. J Int Med Res. 2018;46(1):258–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawlowski P, Iskrzycki L. Comparison of Macintosh and AWS Pentax laryngoscope for intubation in cervical immobilization scenario. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;35(5):791–792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szarpak Ł, Czyżewski Ł, Truszewski Z, et al. Pentax Airway Scope AWS-S200 video laryngoscope for child tracheal intubation in a manikin study with 3 airway scenarios. Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33(9):1171–1174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komasawa N, Ueki R, Kaminoh Y, et al. Comparison of the Miller laryngoscope and videolaryngoscope for tracheal intubation by novice doctors during neonatal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized crossover simulation trial. Am J Perinatol. 2015;32(9):809–814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimada M, Hirabayashi Y, Ehara T. Tracheal intubation using the Pentax-AWS during chest compression: a meta-analysis. Masui. 2015;64(8):873–878.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mendonca C, Mesbah A, Velayudhan A, et al. A randomised clinical trial comparing the flexible fibrescope and the Pentax Airway Scope (AWS)® for awake oral tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia. 2016;71(8):908–914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirabayashi Y, Hoshijima H, Kuratani N. Efficacy of Pentax-AWS in difficult airways: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Masui. 2013;62(6):737–744.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goto T, Koyama Y, Kondo T, et al. A comparison of the force applied on oral structures during intubation attempts between the Pentax-AWS airwayscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope: a high-fidelity simulator-based study. BMJ Open. 2014;4(10):e006416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung OR, Pytka S, Morris I, et al. Clinical trial of a new lightwand device (Trachlight) to intubate the trachea. Anesthesiology. 1995;83(3):509–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen TH, Tsai SK, Lin CJ, et al. Does the suggested lightwand bent length fit every patient? The relation between bent length and patient’s thyroid prominence-to-mandibular angle distance. Anesthesiology. 2003;98(5):1070–1076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue FS, Yang QY, Liao X, et al. Lightwand guided intubation in paediatric patients with a known difficult airway: a report of four cases. Anaesthesia. 2008;63(5):520–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher QA, Tunkel DE. Lightwand intubation of infants and children. J Clin Anesth. 1997;9(4):275–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung OR, Pytka S, Morris I, et al. Lightwand intubation: II – clinical trial of a new lightwand for tracheal intubation in patients with difficult airways. Can J Anaesth. 1995;42:826–830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pott LM, Murray WB. Review of video laryngoscopy and rigid fiberoptic laryngoscopy. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2008;21(6):750–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoue Y, Koga K, Shigematsu A. A comparison of two tracheal intubation techniques with Trachlight and Fastrach in patients with cervical spine disorders. Anesth Analg. 2002;94(3):667–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahrous RSS, Ahmed AMM. The Shikani optical stylet as an alternative to awake fiberoptic intubation in patients at risk of secondary cervical spine injury: a randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2017 Aug;14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xu M, Li XX, Guo XY, et al. Shikani optical stylet versus Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation in patients undergoing surgery for cervical spondylosis: a randomized controlled trial. Chin Med J. 2017;130:297–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phua DS, Mah CL, Wang CF. The Shikani optical stylet as an alternative to the GlideScope® videolaryngoscope in simulated difficult intubations – a randomised controlled trial. Anaesthesia. 2012;67(4):402–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legrand MA, Steinmann D, Priebe HJ, et al. Comparison of Bullard and Airtraq laryngoscopes with conventional laryngoscopy in a manikin study of simulated difficult intubation. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2012;29(7):343–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamora JE, Nolan RL, Sharan S, et al. Evaluation of the Bullard, GlideScope, Viewmax, and Macintosh laryngoscopes using a cadaver model to simulate the difficult airway. J Clin Anesth. 2011;23(1):27–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman GB, Connelly NR. A comparison of the Bullard laryngoscope versus the flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope during intubation in patients afforded inline stabilization. J Clin Anesth. 2001;13(3):182–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borland LM, Casselbrant M. The Bullard laryngoscope. A new indirect oral laryngoscope (pediatric version). Anesth Analg. 1990;70(1):105–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis SR, Butler AR, Parker J, et al. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11:CD011136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buis ML, Maissan IM, Hoeks SE, et al. Defining the learning curve for endotracheal intubation using direct laryngoscopy: a systematic review. Resuscitation. 2016;99:63–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakles JC, Mosier J, Patanwala AE, et al. Learning curves for direct laryngoscopy and GlideScope® video laryngoscopy in an emergency medicine residency. West J Emerg Med. 2014;15(7):930–937.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerritse BM, Draaisma JM, Schalkwijk A, et al. Should EMS-paramedics perform paediatric tracheal intubation in the field? Resuscitation. 2008;79(2):225–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baciarello M, Zasa M, Manferdini ME, et al. The learning curve for laryngoscopy: Airtraq versus Macintosh laryngoscopes. J Anesth. 2012;26(4):516–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latif RK, Akca O. Simulation based training of airway management with Macintosh blade and Glidescope video laryngoscope. Minerva Anestesiol. 2011;77(1):1–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szarpak Ł, Kurowski A, Czyżewski Ł, et al. Comparison of infant intubation through the TruView EVO2, TruView PCD, and Miller laryngoscope by paramedics during simulated infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized crossover manikin study. Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33(7):872–875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szarpak Ł, Truszewski Z, Gałązkowski R, et al. A randomized crossover trial comparing the C-MAC and Macintosh laryngoscopes for face-to-face intubation in a manikin. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34(5):920–922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang JQ, Xue FS, Meng FM. Comparing face-to-face intubation with different devices. J Anesth. 2016;30(4):735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arslan Zİ, Turna C, Gümüş NE, et al. Intubation of a paediatric manikin in tongue oedema and face-to-face simulations by novice personnel: a comparison of Glidescope, Airtraq and direct laryngoscopy. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2016;44(2):71–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodnick R, Zitek T, Galster K, et al. A comparison of paramedic first pass endotracheal intubation success rate of the VividTrac VT-A 100, GlideScope Ranger, and direct laryngoscopy under simulated prehospital cervical spinal immobilization conditions in a cadaveric model. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017;32(6):621–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar