Catheter-based closure of aortic and mitral paravalvular leaks: existing techniques and new frontiers

References

• Sponga S, Perron J, Dagenais F, et al. Impact of residual regurgitation after aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg. 2012;42:486–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Movsowitz HD, Shah SI, Ioli A, et al... Long-term follow-up of mitral paraprosthetic regurgitation by transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1994;7:488–492.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davila-Roman VG, Waggoner AD, Kennard ED, et al. Prevalence and severity of paravalvular regurgitation in the Artificial Valve Endocarditis Reduction Trial (AVERT) echocardiography study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:1467–1472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen YT, Kan MN, Chen JS, et al. Detection of prosthetic mitral valve leak: a comparative study using transesophageal echocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography, and auscultation. J Clin Ultrasound. 1990;18:557–561.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia E, Sandoval J, Unzue L, et al. Paravalvular leaks: mechanisms, diagnosis and management. EuroIntervention. 2012;8(Suppl):Q:Q41-52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim MS, Casserly IP, Garcia JA, et al. Percutaneous transcatheter closure of prosthetic mitral paravalvular leaks: are we there yet? JACC Cardiovasc Intervention. 2009;2:81–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herr R, Starr A, McCord CW, et al. Special problems following valve replacement: embolus, leak, infection, red cell damage. Ann Thorac Surg. 1965;1:403–415.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hein R, Wunderlich N, Robertson G, et al. Catheter closure of paravalvular leak. EuroIntervention. 2006;2:318–325.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cortes M, Garcia E, Garcia-Fernandez MA, et al. Usefulness of transesophageal echocardiography in percutaneous transcatheter repairs of paravalvular mitral regurgitation. Am J Cardiol. 2008;101:382–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Borbolla Fernández R, Sancho Jaldón M, Calle Pérez G, et al.. Percutaneous treatment of mitral valve periprosthetic leakage. An alternative to high-risk surgery? Revista espanola de cardiologia. 2009;62:438–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nietlispach F, Johnson M, Moss RR, et al. Transcatheter closure of paravalvular defects using a purpose-specific occluder. JACC Cardiovasc Intervention. 2010;3:759–765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz CE, Jelnin V, Kronzon I, et al. Clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous closure of periprosthetic paravalvular leaks. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:2210–2217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorajja P, Cabalka AK, Hagler DJ, et al. Long-term follow-up of percutaneous repair of paravalvular prosthetic regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:2218–2224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaans MJ, Post MC, van der Ven HA, et al. Transapical treatment of paravalvular leaks in patients with a logistic EuroSCORE of more than 15%: acute and 3-month outcomes of a “proof of concept” study. Catheterization Cardiovasc Interventions. 2012;79:741–747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble S, Jolicoeur EM, Basmadjian A, et al. Percutaneous paravalvular leak reduction: procedural and long-term clinical outcomes. Can J Cardiol. 2013;29:1422–1428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolka G, Pysz P, Wojakowski W, et al. Clinical manifestations of heart failure abate with transcatheter aortic paravalvular leak closure using Amplatzer vascular plug II and III devices. J Invasive Cardiol. 2013;25:226–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolka G, Pysz P, Jasinski M, et al. Transapical closure of mitral paravalvular leaks with use of amplatzer vascular plug III. J Invasive Cardiol. 2013;25:497–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz-Gonzalez I, Rama-Merchan JC, Arribas-Jimenez A, et al. Paravalvular leak closure with the Amplatzer Vascular Plug III device: immediate and short-term results. Revista espanola de cardiologia. 2014;67:608–614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccuzzi G, De Rosa C, Scrocca I, et al. Percutaneous closure of periprosthetic paravalvular leak: single center experience. J Clin Exp Cardiolog S. 2013;3:2.
   Google Scholar
• Millán X, Skaf S, Joseph L, et al.. Transcatheter reduction of paravalvular leaks: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Cardiol. 2015;31:260–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElhinney DB. Will there ever be a food and drug administration–approved device for transcatheter paravalvular leak closure? Circulation. 2014;7:2–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammermeister K, Sethi GK, Henderson WG, et al. Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the veterans affairs randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:1152–1158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cicco G, Lorusso R, Colli A, et al. Aortic valve periprosthetic leakage: anatomic observations and surgical results. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:1480–1485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cicco G, Russo C, Moreo A, et al. Mitral valve periprosthetic leakage: anatomical observations in 135 patients from a multicentre study. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg. 2006;30:887–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condado JF, Corrigan FE, Lerakis S, et al. Anatomical risk models for paravalvular leak and landing zone complications for balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Catheterization Cardiovasc Interventions. 2017;90:690–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englberger L, Schaff HV, Jamieson WRE, et al. Importance of implant technique on risk of major paravalvular leak (PVL) after St. Jude mechanical heart valve replacement: a report from the Artificial Valve Endocarditis Reduction Trial (AVERT). Eur J Cardio Thoracic Surg. 2005;28:838–843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kliger C, Eiros R, Isasti G, et al. Review of surgical prosthetic paravalvular leaks: diagnosis and catheter-based closure. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:638–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rallidis LS, Moyssakis IE, Ikonomidis I, et al. Natural history of early aortic paraprosthetic regurgitation: a five-year follow-up. Am Heart J. 1999;138:351–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rihal CS, Sorajja P, Booker JD, et al. Principles of percutaneous paravalvular leak closure. JACC Cardiovasc Intervention. 2012;5:121–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ionescu A. Fraser AG and Butchart EG. Prevalence and clinical significance of incidental paraprosthetic valvar regurgitation: a prospective study using transoesophageal echocardiography. Heart. 2003;89:1316–1321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoghbi WA, Chambers JB, Dumesnil JG, et al.. Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and doppler ultrasound: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Cardiovascular Imaging Committee, Cardiac Imaging Committee of the American Heart Association, the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography, endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, American Heart Association, European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, the Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Canadian Society of Echocardiography.. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22:975–1014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes V, Olmos L, Nagueh SF, et al.. Peak early diastolic velocity rather than pressure half-time is the best index of mechanical prosthetic mitral valve function. Am J Cardiol. 2002;89:704–710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blauwet LA, Malouf JF, Connolly HM, et al.. Comprehensive hemodynamic assessment of 368 normal St. Jude medical mechanical mitral valve prostheses based on early postimplantation echocardiographic studies. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;26:381–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148:e1–e132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupferwasser IRI, Mohr-Kahaly S, Erbel R, et al. Improved assessment of pathological regurgitation in patients with prosthetic heart valves by multiplane transesophageal echocardiography. Echocardiography. 1997;14:363–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkhouli M, Sarraf M, Maor E, et al. Techniques and outcomes of percutaneous aortic paravalvular leak closure. JACC: Cardiovasc Interventions. 2016;9:2416–2426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib G, Lancellotti P, Antunes MJ, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis the Task Force for the Management of Infective Endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) endorsed by: European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM). Eur Heart J. 2015;36:3075–3128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkhouli M, Rihal CS, Zack CJ, et al.. Transcatheter and surgical management of mitral paravalvular leak. Long-Term Outcomes. 2017;10:1946–1956.
   Google Scholar
• Exposito V, Garcia-Camarero T, Bernal JM, et al. Repeat mitral valve replacement: 30-years’ experience. Revista espanola de cardiologia. 2009;62:929–932.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echevarria J, Bernal J, Rabasa J, et al.. Reoperation for bioprosthetic valve dysfunction. A decade of clinical experience. Eur j cardio-thoracic surg. 1991;5:523–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elhmidi Y, Gunzinger R, Deutsch MA, et al. Outcomes of patients undergoing third-time aortic or mitral valve replacement. J Card Surg. 2014;29:8–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi JW, Hwang HY, Kim KH, et al. Long-term results of surgical correction for mitral paravalvular leak: repair versus re-replacement. J Heart Valve Dis. 2013;22:682–687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davierwala PM, Borger MA, David TE, et al. Reoperation is not an independent predictor of mortality during aortic valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131:329–335.e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taramasso M, Maisano F, Denti P, et al. Surgical treatment of paravalvular leak: long-term results in a single-center experience (up to 14 years). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149:1270–1275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Hijji MA, Alkhouli M, Sarraf M, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of re-do percutaneous paravalvular leak closure. Catheterization Cardiovasc Interventions. 2017;90:680–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvert PA, Northridge DB, Malik IS, et al. Percutaneous device closure of paravalvular leak: combined experience from the United Kingdom and Ireland. Circulation. 2016;134:934–944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkhouli M, Zack CJ, Sarraf M, et al.. Successful percutaneous mitral paravalvular leak closure is associated with improved midterm survival. In: Circulation Cardiovascular interventions. 2017;10:e005730.
   Google Scholar
• Maor E, Raphael CE, Panaich SS, et al. Left atrial pressure and predictors of survival after percutaneous mitral paravalvular leak closure. Catheterization Cardiovasc Interventions. 2017;90:861–869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho IJ, Moon J, Shim CY, et al.. Different clinical outcome of paravalvular leakage after aortic or mitral valve replacement. Am J Cardiol. 2011;107:280–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz CE, Kliger C, Perk G, et al. Transcatheter therapies for the treatment of valvular and paravalvular regurgitation in acquired and congenital valvular heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:169–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pate GE, Al Zubaidi A, Chandavimol M, et al. Percutaneous closure of prosthetic paravalvular leaks: case series and review. Catheterization Cardiovasc Interventions. 2006;68:528–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hourihan M, Perry SB, Mandell VS, et al. Transcatheter umbrella closure of valvular and paravalvular leaks. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:1371–1377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapira Y, Hirsch R, Kornowski R, et al. Percutaneous closure of perivalvular leaks with Amplatzer occluders: feasibility, safety, and shortterm results. J Heart Valve Dis. 2007;16:305–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolka G, Pysz P, Kozlowski M, et al.. Transcatheter closure of paravalvular leaks using a paravalvular leak device – a prospective Polish registry. Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Adv interventional cardiol. 2016;12:128–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goktekin O, Vatankulu MA, Ozhan H, et al.. Early experience of percutaneous paravalvular leak closure using a novel Occlutech occluder. EuroIntervention. 2016;11:1195–1200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugeng L, Shernan SK, Salgo IS, et al. Live 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography: initial experience using the fully-sampled matrix array probe. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:446–449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder RK, Webb JG. Percutaneous mitral and aortic paravalvular leak repair: indications, current application, and future directions. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2013;15:342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorajja P, Cabalka AK, Hagler DJ, et al. Percutaneous repair of paravalvular prosthetic regurgitation. Acute and 30-day outcomes in 115 patients. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:314–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goktekin O, Vatankulu MA, Tasal A, et al. Transcatheter trans-apical closure of paravalvular mitral and aortic leaks using a new device: first in man experience. Catheterization Cardiovasc Interventions. 2014;83:308–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cubeddu RJ, Crespo HJ, Novaro GM. Retrograde transmitral paravalvular leak closure through an antegrade transseptal approach: a novel technique. Catheterization Cardiovasc Interventions. 2018:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Kaneko H, Hoelschermann F, Tambor G, et al. Predictors of paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis using new-generation balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3. Am J Cardiol. 2017;119:618–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eleid MF, Foley TA, Said SM, et al. Severe mitral annular calcification: multimodality imaging for therapeutic strategies and interventions. JACC: Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:1318–1337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Sabbagh A, Eleid MF, Matsumoto JM, et al.. Three-dimensional prototyping for procedural simulation of transcatheter mitral valve replacement in patients with mitral annular calcification. Catheterization Cardiovasc Interventions. 2018:1–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qian Z, Wang K, Liu S, et al. Quantitative prediction of paravalvular leak in transcatheter aortic valve replacement based on tissue-mimicking 3D printing. JACC: Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10:719–731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anwar S, Rockefeller T, Raptis DA, et al. 3D printing provides a precise approach in the treatment of tetralogy of fallot, pulmonary atresia with major aortopulmonary collateral arteries. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2018;20:5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hockaday LA, Kang KH, Colangelo NW, et al. Rapid 3D printing of anatomically accurate and mechanically heterogeneous aortic valve hydrogel scaffolds. Biofabrication. 2012;4:035005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar