Advanced search
Publication Cover
Expert Review of Medical Devices Volume 15, 2018 - Issue 9
Submit an article Journal homepage
119
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Key Paper Evaluation

TIGR matrix for implant-based breast reconstruction – a long-term resorbable mesh

Giulio CuffoloFrimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Wexham Park Hospital, Slough, UKCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
,
Nicholas C HolfordFrimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Wexham Park Hospital, Slough, UKView further author information
,
Kaiyumars ContractorFrimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Wexham Park Hospital, Slough, UKView further author information
&
Alexandra TenoviciFrimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Wexham Park Hospital, Slough, UKView further author information
Pages 689-691 | Received 30 Jun 2018, Accepted 21 Aug 2018, Published online: 10 Sep 2018

References

  • Pompei S, Evangelidou D, Arelli F, et al. The use of TIGR matrix in breast aesthetic and reconstructive surgery, is a resorbable synthetic mesh a viable alternative to acellular dermal matrices. Clin Plast Surg. 2018;45(1):65–73.
  • Martin L, O’Donoghue JM, Horgan K, et al. Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) assisted breast reconstruction procedures: joint guidelines from the association of breast surgery and the British association of plastic, reconstructive and aesthetic surgeons. EJSO. 2013;39(5):425–429.
  • Colwell AS. Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. Gland Surg. 2012;1(3):139–141.
  • Salzberg CA, Ashikari A, Berry C. Acellular dermal matrix-assisted direct-to-implant breast reconstruction and capsular contraction: a 13 year experience. Plast Reconst Surg. 2016;138(2):329–337.
  • Lee KT, Mun GH. Updated evidence of acellular dermal matrix use for implant-based breast reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(2):600–610.
  • The Breast Reconstruction Research Collaborative. Exploring variations in the provision and practice of implant based breast reconstruction in the UK: initial results from the iBRA national practice questionnaire. EJSO. 2015;42(6):S22.
  • Tessler O, Reish RG, Maman DY, et al. Beyond biologics: absorbable mesh as a low-cost, low-complication sling for implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(2):90e–9e.
  • Haynes DF, Kreithen JC. Vicryl mesh in expander/implant breast reconstruction: long-term follow-up in 38 patients. Plast Reconst Surg. 2014;134(5):892–899.
  • Becker H, Lind JGII. The use of synthetic mesh in reconstructive, revision and cosmetic breast surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013;37(5):914–921.
  • Dieterich M, Paepke S, Zwiefel K, et al. Implant-based breast reconstruction using a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TiLOOP Bra): a multicenter study of 231 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(1):8e–19e.
  • Kim JY, Davila AA, Persing S, et al. A meta-analysis of human acellular dermis and submuscular tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(1):28–41.
  • Spear SL, Parikh PM, Reisin E, et al. Acellular dermis-assisted breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008;32(3):418–425.
  • Valdatta L, Cattaneo AG, Pellegatta I, et al. Acellular dermal matrices and radiotherapy in breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Plast Surg Int. 2014;472604. DOI:10.1155/2014/472604
  • Brooke S, Mesa J, Uluer M, et al. Complications in tissue expander breast reconstruction: a comparison of AlloDerm, DermaMatrix, and FlexHD acellular inferior pole dermal slings. Ann Plast Surg. 2012;69:347–349.
  • Sheckter CC, Matros E, Momeni A. Assessing value in breast reconstruction: a systematic review of cost-effectiveness studies. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018;71(3):353–365.
  • Yan C, Fischer JP, Wes AM, et al. The cost of major complications associated with immediate two-stage expander/implant-based breast reconstruction. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2015;49:166–171.
  • Pukancsik D, Kelemen P, Gulyása G, et al. Clinical experiences with the use of ULTRAPRO® mesh in single-stage direct-to-implant immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction in 102 patients: a retrospective cohort study. EJSO. 2017;43(7):1244–1251.
  • Apte A, Walsh M, Chandrasekharan S, et al. Single-stage immediate breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: experience gained and lessons learnt from patient reported outcome measure. EJSO. 2016;41(1):39–44.
  • Vardanian AJ, Clayton JL, Roostaeian J, et al. Comparison of implant-based immediate breast reconstruction with and without acellular dermal matrix. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(5):403e–10e.
  • Lanier ST, Wang ED, Chen CJ, et al. The effect of acellular dermal matrix use on complication rates in tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;64(5):674–678.
  • Gschwantler-Kaulich D, Schrenk P, Bjelic-Radisic V, et al. Mesh versus acellular dermal matrix in immediate implant-based breast reconstruction – a prospective randomized trial. EJSO. 2016;42(5):665–671.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.