Comparison of stents used for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms

References

• UCAS JI, Morita A, Kirino T, et al. The natural course of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in a Japanese cohort. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(26):2474–2482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guglielmi G, Vinuela F, Dion J, et al. Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach. Part 2: preliminary clinical experience. J Neurosurg. 1991;75(1):8–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;360(9342):1267–1274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiebers DO. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms–risk of rupture and risks of surgical intervention. International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(24):1725–1733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston J, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet. 2003;362(9378):103–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloft HJ, Joseph GJ, Tong FC, et al. Use of three-dimensional Guglielmi detachable coils in the treatment of wide-necked cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21(7):1312–1314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moret J, Cognard C, Weill A, et al. The “remodelling technique” in the treatment of wide neck intracranial aneurysms. angiographic results and clinical follow-up in 56 cases. Interv Neuroradiol. 1997;3(1):21–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lubicz B, Leclerc X, Gauvrit JY, et al. HyperForm remodeling-balloon for endovascular treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;25(8):1381–1383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubicz B, Lefranc F, Bruneau M, et al. Balloon-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms is not associated with a higher complication rate. Neuroradiology. 2008;50(9):769–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sluzewski M, van Rooij WJ, Beute GN, et al. Balloon-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms: incidence, complications, and angiography results. J Neurosurg. 2006;105(3):396–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turjman F, Massoud TF, Ji C, et al. Combined stent implantation and endosaccular coil placement for treatment of experimental wide-necked aneurysms: a feasibility study in swine. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1994;15(6):1087–1090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szikora I, Guterman LR, Wells KM, et al. Combined use of stents and coils to treat experimental wide-necked carotid aneurysms: preliminary results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1994;15(6):1091–1102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massoud TF, Turjman F, Ji C, et al. Endovascular treatment of fusiform aneurysms with stents and coils: technical feasibility in a swine model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1995;16(10):1953–1963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higashida RT, Smith W, Gress D, et al. Intravascular stent and endovascular coil placement for a ruptured fusiform aneurysm of the basilar artery. Case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg. 1997;87(6):944–949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han PP, Albuquerque FC, Ponce FA, et al. Percutaneous intracranial stent placement for aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2003;99(1):23–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardi S, Poncet P Metallurgical principles of nitinol and its use in interventional devices. 2004
   Google Scholar
• Henkes H, Bose A, Felber S, et al. Endovascular coil occlusion of intracranial aneurysms assisted by a novel self-expandable nitinol microstent (neuroform). Interv Neuroradiol. 2002;8(2):107–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanke I, Doerfler A, Schoch B, et al. Treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms with a self-expanding stent system: initial clinical experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24(6):1192–1199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higashida RT, Halbach VV, Dowd CF, et al. Initial clinical experience with a new self-expanding nitinol stent for the treatment of intracranial cerebral aneurysms: the Cordis Enterprise stent. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26(7):1751–1756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubicz B, Leclerc X, Levivier M, et al. Retractable self-expandable stent for endovascular treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms: preliminary experience. Neurosurgery. 2006;58(3):451–457; discussion 451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebig T, Henkes H, Reinartz J, et al. A novel self-expanding fully retrievable intracranial stent (SOLO): experience in nine procedures of stent-assisted aneurysm coil occlusion. Neuroradiology. 2006;48(7):471–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turk AS, Niemann DB, Ahmed A, et al. Use of self-expanding stents in distal small cerebral vessels. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28(3):533–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pumar JM, Blanco M, Vázquez F, et al. Preliminary experience with Leo self-expanding stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26(10):2573–2577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kis B, Weber W, Berlit P, et al. Elective treatment of saccular and broad-necked intracranial aneurysms using a closed-cell nitinol stent (Leo). Neurosurgery. 2006;58(3):443–450; discussion 443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behme D, Weber A, Kowoll A, et al. Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support device (LVIS Jr) as a novel tool in the treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms: initial experience in 32 cases. J Neurointerv Surg. 2015;7(4):281–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santillan A, Boddu S, Schwarz J, et al. LVIS Jr. stent for treatment of intracranial aneurysms with parent vessel diameter of 2.5 mm or less. Interv Neuroradiol. 2018. DOI:10.1177/1591019918759307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang CC, Li W, Feng ZZ, et al. Preliminary experience with stent-assisted coiling of aneurysms arising from small (<2.5 mm) cerebral vessels using the low-profile visualized intraluminal support device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017;38(6):1163–1168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydin K, Arat A, Sencer S, et al. Stent-assisted coiling of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms using low-profile Leo baby stents: initial and midterm results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(10):1934–1941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bock S, Iannaccone F, De Santis G, et al. Our capricious vessels: the influence of stent design and vessel geometry on the mechanics of intracranial aneurysm stent deployment. J Biomech. 2012;45(8):1353–1359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadkhodayan Y, Rhodes N, Blackburn S, et al. Comparison of enterprise with neuroform stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200(4):872–878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuramoto Y, Mikami K, Bando T, et al. Intentional herniation technique with the Neuroform EZ stent system for preservation of aneurysmal neck branch: a case report. Turk Neurosurg. 2017. [Epub ahead of print].
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Darflinger RJ, Chao K. Using the barrel technique with the LVIS Jr (low-profile visualized intraluminal support) stent to treat a wide neck MCA bifurcation aneurysm. J Vasc Interv Neurol. 2015;8(3):25–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benndorf G, Claus B, Strother CM, et al. Increased cell opening and prolapse of struts of a neuroform stent in curved vasculature: value of angiographic computed tomography: technical case report. Oper Neurosurg. 2006;58:ONS–E380.
   Google Scholar
• Cay F, Peker A, Arat A. Stent-assisted coiling of cerebral aneurysms with the Neuroform Atlas stent. Interv Neuroradiol. 2018. DOI:10.1177/1591019917753710
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biondi A, Janardhan V, Katz JM, et al. Neuroform stent-assisted coil embolization of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms: strategies in stent deployment and midterm follow-up. Neurosurgery. 2007;61(3):460–468; discussion 468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentric JC, Biondi A, Piotin M, et al. Safety and efficacy of neuroform for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective, consecutive, French multicentric study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013;34(6):1203–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulcsár Z, Göricke SL, Gizewski ER, et al. Neuroform stent-assisted treatment of intracranial aneurysms: long-term follow-up study of aneurysm recurrence and in-stent stenosis rates. Neuroradiology. 2013;55(4):459–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santillan A, Greenberg E, Patsalides A, et al. Long-term clinical and angiographic results of neuroform stent-assisted coil embolization in wide-necked intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2012;70(5):1232–1237; discussion 1237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahimi N, Claus B, Lee CY, et al. Stent conformity in curved vascular models with simulated aneurysm necks using flat-panel CT: an in vitro study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28(5):823–829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller RS, Malek AM. Delivery technique plays an important role in determining vessel wall apposition of the Enterprise self-expanding intracranial stent. J Neurointerv Surg. 2011;3(4):340–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li TF, Shui SF, Han XW, et al. The use of solitaire AB stents in coil embolization of wide-necked cerebral aneurysms. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0139714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dippel DW, Majoie CB, Roos YB, et al. Influence of device choice on the effect of intra-arterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke in MR CLEAN (multicenter randomized clinical trial of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke in the Netherlands). Stroke. 2016;47(10):2574–2581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo XB, Yan BJ, Guan S. Waffle-cone technique using solitaire AB stent for endovascular treatment of complex and wide-necked bifurcation cerebral aneurysms. J Neuroimaging. 2014;24(6):599–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sychra V, Klisch J, Werner M, et al. Waffle-cone technique with Solitaire™ AB remodeling device: endovascular treatment of highly selected complex cerebral aneurysms. Neuroradiology. 2011;53(12):961–972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clajus C, Sychra V, Strasilla C, et al. Stent-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms using the solitaire™ AB neurovascular remodeling device: initial and midterm follow-up results. Neuroradiology. 2013;55(5):629–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gory B, Klisch J, Bonafé A, et al. Solitaire AB stent-assisted coiling of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms: short-term results from a prospective, consecutive, European multicentric study. Neuroradiology. 2013;55(11):1373–1378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gory B, Klisch J, Bonafé A, et al. Solitaire AB stent-assisted coiling of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms: mid-term results from the SOLARE study. Neurosurgery. 2014;75(3):215–219; discussion 219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kono K, Terada T. In vitro experiments of vessel wall apposition between the Enterprise and Enterprise 2 stents for treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016;158(2):241–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho SH, Jo WI, Jo YE, et al. Bench-top comparison of physical properties of 4 commercially-available self-expanding intracranial stents. Neurointervention. 2017;12(1):31–39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mocco J, Snyder KV, Albuquerque FC, et al. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the enterprise stent: a multicenter registry. J Neurosurg. 2009;110(1):35–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mocco J, Fargen KM, Albuquerque FC, et al. Delayed thrombosis or stenosis following enterprise-assisted stent-coiling: is it safe? Midterm results of the interstate collaboration of enterprise stent coiling. Neurosurgery. 2011;69(4):908–913; discussion 913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia J, Lv X, Liu A, et al. Enterprise stent-assisted coiling of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms: clinical and angiographic follow-up. Interv Neuroradiol. 2012;18(4):426–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fargen KM, Hoh BL, Welch BG, et al. Long-term results of enterprise stent-assisted coiling of cerebral aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 2012;71(2):239–244; discussion 244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv X, Li Y, Xinjian Y, et al. Results of endovascular treatment for intracranial wide-necked saccular and dissecting aneurysms using the enterprise stent: a single center experience. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(6):1179–1183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herweh C, Nagel S, Pfaff J, et al. First experiences with the new enterprise2® stent. Clin Neuroradiol. 2016;28(2):201-207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabbasch C, Liebig T, Faymonville A, et al. Initial clinical experience with a new self-expanding nitinol microstent for the treatment of wide-neck intracranial cerebral aneurysms: the Acandis Acclino stent. J Vasc Interv Neurol. 2015;8(3):1–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tureli D, Sabet S, Senol S, et al. Stent-assisted coil embolization of challenging intracranial aneurysms: initial and mid-term results with low-profile ACCLINO devices. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016;158(8):1545–1553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brassel F, Grieb D, Meila D, et al. Endovascular treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms using Acandis Acclino stents. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9(9):854–859.
   Google Scholar
• Juszkat R, Nowak S, Smól S, et al. Leo stent for endovascular treatment of broad-necked and fusiform intracranial aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol. 2007;13(3):255–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdivia Y, Alvarado M, Ebrahimi N, et al. Study of conformability of the new leo plus stent to a curved vascular model using flat-panel detector computed tomography (DynaCT). Neurosurgery. 2009;64(3Suppl):130–134; discussion 134.
   Google Scholar
• Lubicz B, Kadou A, Morais R, et al. Leo stent for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: very long-term results in 50 patients with 52 aneurysms and literature review. Neuroradiology. 2017;59(3):271–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv X, Li Y, Jiang C, et al. Potential advantages and limitations of the Leo stent in endovascular treatment of complex cerebral aneurysms. Eur J Radiol. 2011;79(2):317–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machi P, Costalat V, Lobotesis K, et al. LEO baby stent use following balloon-assisted coiling: single- and dual-stent technique–immediate and midterm results of 29 consecutive patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(11):2096–2103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardo MI, Pumar JM, Blanco M, et al. Medium-term results using the leo self-expanding stent in the treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms. Neuroradiol J. 2008;21(5):704–711.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sedat J, Chau Y, Gaudart J, et al. Stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms using LEO stents: long-term follow-up in 153 patients. Neuroradiology. 2018;60(2):211–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voigt P, Schob S, Jantschke R, et al. Stent-assisted coiling of ruptured and incidental aneurysms of the intracranial circulation using moderately flow-redirecting, braided leo stents-initial experience in 39 patients. Front Neurol. 2017;14(8):602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung J, Matsuda Y, Nelson J, et al. A new low-profile visualized intraluminal support (LVIS) device, LVIS Blue: laboratory comparison between old and new LVIS. Neurol Res. 2018;40(1):78–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch MJ, Stapleton CJ, Raymond SB, et al. LVIS Blue as a low porosity stent and coil adjuvant. J Neurointerv Surg. 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Zhong J, Gao H, et al. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the LVIS device: a systematic review. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9(6):553–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho YD, Sohn CH, Kang HS, et al. Coil embolization of intracranial saccular aneurysms using the Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS™) device. Neuroradiology. 2014;56(7):543–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng X, Qian Z, Liu P, et al. Comparison of recanalization and in-stent stenosis between the low-profile visualized intraluminal support stent and enterprise stent-assisted coiling for 254 intracranial aneurysms. World Neurosurg. 2018;109:e99–e104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Z, Li Q, Zhao R, et al. Endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysm with the LVIS Junior stent. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24(6):1357–1362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Z, Zhang L, Li Q, et al. Endovascular treatment of wide-neck anterior communicating artery aneurysms using the LVIS Junior stent. J Clin Neurosci. 2015;22(8):1288–1291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorella D, Arthur A, Boulos A, et al. Final results of the US humanitarian device exemption study of the low-profile visualized intraluminal support (LVIS) device. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8(9):894–897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alghamdi F, Mine B, Morais R, et al. Stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms located on small vessels: midterm results with the LVIS Junior stent in 40 patients with 43 aneurysms. Neuroradiology. 2016;58(7):665–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möhlenbruch M, Herweh C, Behrens L, et al. The LVIS Jr. microstent to assist coil embolization of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms: clinical study to assess safety and efficacy. Neuroradiology. 2014;56(5):389–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poncyljusz W, Biliński P, Safranow K, et al. The LVIS/LVIS Jr. stents in the treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms: multicentre registry. J Neurointerv Surg.. 2015;7(7):524–529.
   Google Scholar
• Shankar JJS, Quateen A, Weill A, et al. Canadian registry of LVIS Jr for treatment of intracranial aneurysms (CaRLA). J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9(9):849–853.
   Google Scholar
• Yoo DH, Cho YD, Moon J, et al. Long-term outcomes of Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support device usage in stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysm. J Clin Neurosci. 2018;50:287–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta M, Cheung VJ, Abraham P, et al. Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support junior device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Cureus. 2017;9(2):e1037.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iosif C, Piotin M, Saleme S, et al. Safety and effectiveness of the Low Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS and LVIS Jr) devices in the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: results of the TRAIL multicenter observational study. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;10(7):675-681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossberg JA, Hanel RA, Dabus G, et al. Treatment of wide-necked aneurysms with the Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS Jr) device: a multicenter experience. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9(11):1098–1102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouillot P, Brina O, Ouared R, et al. Computational fluid dynamics with stents: quantitative comparison with particle image velocimetry for three commercial off the shelf intracranial stents. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8(3):309–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dholakia RJ, Kappel AD, Pagano A, et al. In vitro angiographic comparison of the flow-diversion performance of five neurovascular stents. Interv Neuroradiol. 2018;24(2):150–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durst CR, Khan P, Gaughen J, et al. Direct comparison of Neuroform and Enterprise stents in the treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms. Clin Radiol. 2014;69(12):e471–e476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izar B, Rai A, Raghuram K, et al. Comparison of devices used for stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms. PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24875.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SW, Sung SO, Chae KS, et al. Clinical and angiographic outcomes of aneurysms treated with two self-expanding stent-assisted coiling systems: a comparison of solitaire AB and enterprise VRD stents. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2015;17(3):149–156.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krischek O, Miloslavski E, Fischer S, et al. A comparison of functional and physical properties of self-expanding intracranial stents [Neuroform3, Wingspan, Solitaire, Leo+, Enterprise]. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2011;54(1):21–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roszelle BN, Nair P, Gonzalez LF, et al. Comparison among different high porosity stent configurations: hemodynamic effects of treatment in a large cerebral aneurysm. J Biomech Eng. 2014;136(2):021013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Tian Z, Liu J, et al. Flow diverter effect of LVIS stent on cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics: a comparison with Enterprise stents and the Pipeline device. J Transl Med. 2016;14(1):199.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wanke I, Forsting M. Stents for intracranial wide-necked aneurysms: more than mechanical protection. Neuroradiology. 2008;50(12):991–998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tateshima S, Tanishita K, Hakata Y, et al. Alteration of intraaneurysmal hemodynamics by placement of a self-expandable stent. Laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg. 2009;111(1):22–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremmel M, Xiang J, Natarajan SK, et al. Alteration of intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics for flow diversion using enterprise and vision stents. World Neurosurg. 2010;74(2–3):306–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubicz B, Bandeira A, Bruneau M, et al. Stenting is improving and stabilizing anatomical results of coiled intracranial aneurysms. Neuroradiology. 2009;51(6):419–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanninen R, Manninen H, Ronkainen A. Broad-based intracranial aneurysms: thrombosis induced by stent placement. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24(2):263–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartolini B, Blanc R, Pistocchi S, et al. Y” and “X” stent-assisted coiling of complex and wide-neck intracranial bifurcation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35(11):2153–2158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierot L, Biondi A. Endovascular techniques for the management of wide-neck intracranial bifurcation aneurysms: a critical review of the literature. J Neuroradiol. 2016;43(3):167–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briganti F, Leone G, Ugga L, et al. Mid-term and long-term follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated by the p64 flow modulation device: a multicenter experience. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9(1):70–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinjikji W, Murad MH, Lanzino G, et al. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2013;44(2):442–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griessenauer CJ, Piske RL, Baccin CE, et al. Flow diverters for treatment of 160 ophthalmic segment aneurysms: evaluation of safety and efficacy in a multicenter cohort. Neurosurgery. 2017;80(5):726–732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzardi G, Stanca C, Cerini P, et al. Long-term follow-up in the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow-diverter stents: update of a single-centre experience. Radiol med. 2018;123(6):449–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rong-Bo Q, Hua J, Kai W, et al. Stent-jail technique in endovascular treatment of wide-necked aneurysm. Turk Neurosurg. 2013;23(2):179–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briganti F, Delehaye L, Leone G, et al. Flow diverter device for the treatment of small middle cerebral artery aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8(3):287–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caroff J, Neki H, Mihalea C, et al. Flow-diverter stents for the treatment of saccular middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37(2):279–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arat A, Daglioglu E, Akmangit I, et al. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in interventional neuroradiology. Clin Neuroradiol. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne RA, Kastrati A. Disappearing scaffolds, dissolving expectations. Lancet. 2016;388(10059):2451–2452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serruys PW, Chevalier B, Sotomi Y, et al. Comparison of an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffold with an everolimus-eluting metallic stent for the treatment of coronary artery stenosis (ABSORB II): a 3 year, randomised, controlled, single-blind, multicentre clinical trial. Lancet. 2016;388(10059):2479–2491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacchi G, Ortega-Paz L, Brugaletta S, et al. Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds technology: current use and future developments. Med Devices (Auckl). 2016;9:185–198.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schellhammer F, Walter M, Berlis A, et al. Polyethylene terephthalate and polyurethane coatings for endovascular stents: preliminary results in canine experimental arteriovenous fistulas. Radiology. 1999;211(1):169–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang JB, Zhou B, Gu XL, et al. Treatment of a canine carotid artery aneurysm model with a biodegradable nanofiber-covered stent: a prospective pilot study. Neurol India. 2013;61(3):282–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, An Q, Li D, et al. Heparin and vascular endothelial growth factor loaded poly(L-lactide-co-caprolactone) nanofiber covered stent-graft for aneurysm treatment. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2015;11:1947–1960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang K, Yuan S, Zhang X, et al. Biodegradable flow-diverting device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysm: short-term results of a rabbit experiment. Neuroradiology. 2013;55(5):621–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar