An update on research and outcomes in surgical management of vaginal mesh complications

References

• Petros PE, Ulmsten UI. An integral theory and its method for the diagnosis and management of female urinary incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1993;153:1–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Delorme E. Transobturator urethral suspension: mini-invasive procedure in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women]. Prog Urol. 2001 Dec;11(6):1306–1313. French
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washington JL. Commercial products for pelvic repair. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2011 Sep;17(5):218–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee D, Bacsu C, Zimmern PE. Meshology: a fast-growing field involving mesh and/or tape removal procedures and their outcomes. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2015 Mar;12(2):201–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng D, Rutman M, Raz S, et al. Presentation and management of midurethral slings: are complications under-reported? Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26:46–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FDA Public Health Notification: Serious Complications Associated with Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh in Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Stress Urinary Incontinence. Issued 2008 Oct 2.
   Google Scholar
• FDA Public Health Notification: Serious Complications Associated with Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh in Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Stress Urinary Incontinence. Issued 2011 Jul 13.
   Google Scholar
• FDA Public Health Notification: Serious Complications Associated with Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh in Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Stress Urinary Incontinence. Issued 2014 May 1.
   Google Scholar
• FDA Public Health Notification: Serious Complications Associated with Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh in Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Stress Urinary Incontinence. Issued 2016 Jan 5.
   Google Scholar
• Haylen BT, Freeman RM, Swift SE, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) & grafts in female pelvic floor surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Jan;22(1):3–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesh Medical Device News Desk. [cited 2018 April 11]. Available from: https://www.meshmedicaldevicenewsdesk.com/breaking-judge-goodwin-to-dismiss-thousands-of-non-revision-ethicon-mesh-cases/
   Google Scholar
• BMJ. 2017;358. doi:10.1136/bmj.j3603.
   Google Scholar
• [cited 2018 Jul 10]. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2018/jul/09/government-halts-vaginal-mesh-surgery-in-nhs-hospitals?
   Google Scholar
• Keltie K, Elneil S, Monga A, et al. Complications following vaginal mesh procedures for stress urinary incontinence: an 8 year study of 92,246 women. Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 20;7(1):12015.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• [cited 2018 Mar 29]. Available from: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-03-29/further-legal-action-considered-after-pelvic-mesh-report/9600286
   Google Scholar
• [cited 2019 Apr 16]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm636114.html
   Google Scholar
• Ou R, Xie XJ, Zimmern PE. Prolapse follow-up at 5 years or more: myth or reality? Urology. 2011 Aug;78(2):295–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr;30(4):CD004014.
   Google Scholar
• Chughtai B, Barber MD, Mao J, et al. Association between the amount of vaginal mesh used with mesh erosions and repeated surgery after repairing pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):257–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee D, Dillon B, Lemack G, et al. Transvaginal mesh kits–how “serious” are the complications and are they reversible? Urology. 2013 Jan;81(1):43–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Society for Female Urology and Urodynamics Response. FDA safety communication: UPDATE on serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. July, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Bacsu C, Zimmern PE. Complications of treatment of urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. RevMédClín Las Condes. 2013 March;24(2):229–237.
   Google Scholar
• Kim KY, Cheng JW, Shen JK, et al. Translabial ultrasound evaluation of pelvic floor structures and mesh in the urology office and intraoperative setting. Urology. 2018 Jul 20:S0090–4295(18):30722.
   Google Scholar
• Khatri G, Carmel ME, Bailey AA, et al. Postoperative imaging after surgical repair for pelvic floor dysfunction. Radiographics. 2016 Jul-Aug;36(4):1233–1256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee D, Dillon BE, Zimmern PE. Martius labial fat pad procedure: technique and long-term outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Sep;26(9):1395–1396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon B, Gurbuz C, Zimmern P. Long term results after complication of “prophylactic” suburethral tape placement. Can J Urol. 2012;19:6424–6430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coskun B, Lavelle RS, Alhalabi F, et al. Mini-slings can cause complications. Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Apr;26(4):557-562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firoozi F, Ingber MS, Moore CK, et al. Purely transvaginal/perineal management of complications from commercial prolapse kits using a new prostheses/grafts complication classification system. J Urol. 2012 May;187(5):1674-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.12.066.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson CG, Palva K, Aarnio R, et al. Seventeen years’ follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for female stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2013 Aug;24(8):1265–1269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee D, Bacsu C, Dillon B, et al. Complications following the insertion of two synthetic mid-urethral slings and subsequent removal. Low Urin Tract Symptoms. 2018 Sep;10(3):259–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klutke C, Siegel S, Carlin B, et al. Urinary retention after tension-free vaginal tape procedure: incidence and treatment. Urology. 2001;58:697–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurikainen E, Kiilholma P. A nationwide analysis of transvaginal tape release for urinary retention after tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006 Feb;17(2):111–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamé X, Soulié M, Malavaud B, et al. [Treatment of bladder outlet obstruction secondary to suburethral tape by section of the tape]. Prog Urol. 2006 Feb;16(1):67–71. Article in French
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ordorica R, Rodriguez AR, Coste-Delvecchio F, et al. Disabling complications with slings for managing female stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int. 2008 Aug;102(3):333–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price N, Slack A, Khong SY, et al. The benefit of early mobilisation of tension-free vaginal tape in the treatment of post-operative voiding dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 Jul;20(7):855–858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• South MM, Wu JM, Webster GD, et al. Early vs late midline sling lysis results in greater improvement in lower urinary tract symptoms. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May;200(5):564.e1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misrai V, Roupret M, Xylinas E, et al. Surgical resection for suburethral sling complications after treatment for stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2009;181(5):2198–2202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasturi S, Hale DS. “J” cut of sling for postoperative voiding dysfunction following synthetic midurethral slings. Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Aug;22(8):933–936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnew G, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, et al. Functional outcomes for surgical revision of synthetic slings performed for voiding dysfunction: a retrospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Jul;163(1):113–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou JC, Alhalabi F1, Lemack GE1, et al. Outcome of transvaginal mesh and tape removed for pain only. J Urol. 2014 Sep;192(3):856–860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnew G, Dwyer PL, Rosamilia A, et al. Functional outcomes following surgical management of pain, exposure or extrusion following a suburethral tape insertion for urinary stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Feb;25(2):235–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammett J, Peters A, Trowbridge E, et al. Short-term surgical outcomes and characteristics of patients with mesh complications from pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Apr;25(4):465–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinthakanan O, Miklos JR, Moore RD, et al. The indication and surgical treatment of 286 midurethral synthetic sling complications: a multicenter study. Surg Technol Int. 2016 Oct 26;29:167–171.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shakir NA, Wang C, Singla N, et al. Challenges of multidimensional outcome reporting after suburethral mid urethral sling removal. J Urol. 2018 Jun;199(6):1577–1583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Available from: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-07-04/class-action-vaginal-mesh-implants-johnson-and-johnson/8674106
   Google Scholar
• Hurtado EA, Appell RA. Management of complications arising from transvaginal mesh kit procedures: a tertiary referral center’s experience. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20:11–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgeway B, Walters MD, Paraiso MF, et al. Early experience with mesh excision for adverse outcomes after transvaginal mesh placement using prolapse kits. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Dec;199(6):703.e1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skala CE, Renezeder K, Albrich S, et al. Mesh-complications following prolapse surgery: management and outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011;159:453–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tijdink MM, Vierhout ME, Heesakkers JP, et al. Surgical management of mesh-related complications after prior pelvic floor reconstructive surgery with mesh. Int Urogynecol J. 2011 Nov;22(11):1395–1404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby E, Abernethy M, Berger M, et al. Symptom resolution after operative management of complications from transvaginal mesh. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jan;123(1):134–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danford JM, Osborn DJ, Reynolds WS, et al. Postoperative pain outcomes after transvaginal mesh revision. Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Jan;26(1):65–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miklos JR, Chinthakanan O, Moore RD, et al. Indications and complications associated with the removal of 506 pieces of vaginal mesh used in pelvic floor reconstruction: amulticenter study. Surg Technol Int. 2016 Oct 26;29:185–189.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Javadian P, Shobeiri SA. The disability impact and associated cost per disability in women who underwent surgical revision of transvaginal mesh kits for prolapse repair. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018;24(5):375-379. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyang AN, Feranec JB, Patel RC, et al. Managing chronic pelvic pain following reconstructive pelvic surgery with transvaginal mesh. Int Urogynecol J. 2014 Mar;25(3):313–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargas-Schaffer G. Is the WHO analgesic ladder still valid? Twenty-four years of experience. Can Fam Physician. 2010;56(6):514–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibner M, Desai N, Robertson LJ, et al. Pudendal neuralgia. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17(2):148–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert R, Prat-Pradal D, Labat JJ, et al. Anatomic basis of chronic perineal pain: role of the pudendal nerve. Surg Radiol Anat. 1998;20(2):93–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar