388
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 555-567 | Received 24 Apr 2019, Accepted 31 May 2019, Published online: 10 Jun 2019

References

  • Chang MJ, So S, Park CD, et al. Long-term follow-up and survivorship of single-radius, posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci. 2018;23(1):92–96.
  • Nakamura S, Ito H, Nakamura K, et al. Long-term durability of ceramic tri-condylar knee implants: a minimum 15 year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(6):1874–1879.
  • Mont MA, Pivec R, Issa K, et al. Long-term implant survivorship of cementless total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. J Knee Surg. 2014;27(5):369–376.
  • Ng VY, DeClaire JH, Berend KR, et al. Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(1):99–107.
  • Issa K, Rifai A, McGrath MS, et al. Reliability of templating with patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2013;26(6):429–433.
  • Sharkey PF, Lichstein PM, Shen C, et al. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today-has anything changed after 10 years? J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(9):1774–1778.
  • Anon. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register Annual Report; 2018.
  • Anon. National Joint Registry for England and Wales Annual Report; 2018.
  • Berend ME, Ritter MA, Meding JB, et al. Tibial component failure mechanisms in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:26–34.
  • Fang D, Ritter MA. Malalignment: forewarned is forearmed. Orthopedics. 2009;32(9). DOI:10.3928/01477447-20090728-29
  • Fang DM, Ritter MA, Davis KE. Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: just how important is it? J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(6Suppl):39–43.
  • Ritter MA, Davis KE, Meding JB, et al. The effect of alignment and BMI on failure of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(17):1588–1596.
  • Jeffery RS, Morris RW, Denham RA. Coronal alignment after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73(5):709–714.
  • Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, et al. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(12):2143–2149.
  • Abdel MP, Oussedik S, Parratte S, et al. Coronal alignment in total knee replacement: historical review, contemporary analysis, and future direction. Bone Joint J. 2014;96–B(7):857–862.
  • Bonner TJ, Eardley WG, Patterson P, et al. The effect of post-operative mechanical axis alignment on the survival of primary total knee replacements after a follow-up of 15 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(9):1217–1222.
  • Argenson JN, Boisgard S, Parratte S, et al. Survival analysis of total knee arthroplasty at a minimum 10 years’ follow-up: a multicenter French nationwide study including 846 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99(4):385–390.
  • Abdel MP, Ollivier M, Parratte S, et al. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on survival and functional outcomes of modern total knee arthroplasties with cement: a concise follow-up at 20 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100(6):472–478.
  • Nishida K, Matsumoto T, Takayama K, et al. Remaining mild varus limb alignment leads to better clinical outcome in total knee arthroplasty for varus osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(11):3488–3494.
  • Vanlommel L, Vanlommel J, Claes S, et al. Slight undercorrection following total knee arthroplasty results in superior clinical outcomes in varus knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(10):2325–2330.
  • Matziolis G, Adam J, Perka C. Varus malalignment has no influence on clinical outcome in midterm follow-up after total knee replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130(12):1487–1491.
  • Thienpont E, Bellemans J, Victor J, et al. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty, still more questions than answers …. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(10):2191–2193.
  • Becker R, Tandogan R, Violante B. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(8):2393–2394.
  • Hirschmann MT, Behrend H. Functional knee phenotypes: a call for a more personalised and individualised approach to total knee arthroplasty? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(10):2873–2874.
  • Larrainzar-Garijo R, Murillo-Vizuete D, Garcia-Bogalo R, et al. Dynamic alignment analysis in the osteoarthritic knee using computer navigation. J Knee Surg. 2017;30(9):909–915.
  • Deep K, Picard F, Baines J. Dynamic knee behaviour: does the knee deformity change as it is flexed-an assessment and classification with computer navigation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(11):3575–3583.
  • Bankes MJ, Back DL, Cannon SR, et al. The effect of component malalignment on the clinical and radiological outcome of the kinemax total knee replacement. Knee. 2003;10(1):55–60.
  • Arbab D, Reimann P, Brucker M, et al. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty – a comparison of patient-specific implants with the conventional technique. Knee. 2018;25(5):882–887.
  • Mihalko WM, Boyle J, Clark LD, et al. The variability of intramedullary alignment of the femoral component during total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(1):25–28.
  • Siston RA, Patel JJ, Goodman SB, et al. The variability of femoral rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(10):2276–2280.
  • Mason JB, Fehring TK, Estok R, et al. Meta-analysis of alignment outcomes in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22(8):1097–1106.
  • Hetaimish BM, Khan MM, Simunovic N, et al. Meta-analysis of navigation vs conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(6):1177–1182.
  • Anderson KC, Buehler KC, Markel DC. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20(7 Suppl 3):132–138.
  • Mullaji A, Shetty GM, Computer-Assisted TKA. greater precision, doubtful clinical efficacy: opposes. Orthopedics. 2009;32(9):679–682.
  • Catani F, Biasca N, Ensini A, et al. Alignment deviation between bone resection and final implant positioning in computer navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(4):765–771.
  • Bae DK, Song SJ. Computer assisted navigation in knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg. 2011;3(4):259–267.
  • Fu Y, Wang M, Liu Y, et al. Alignment outcomes in navigated total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20(6):1075–1082.
  • Panjwani TR, Mullaji A, Doshi K, et al. Comparison of functional outcomes of computer-assisted vs conventional total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of high-quality, prospective studies. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34(3):586–593.
  • Ollivier M, Parratte S, Lino L, et al. No benefit of computer-assisted TKA: 10 year results of a prospective randomized study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476(1):126–134.
  • Ast MP, Nam D, Haas SB. Patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a review. Orthop Clin North Am. 2012;43(5):e17–22.
  • Camarda L, D’Arienzo A, Morello S, et al. Patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a literature review. Musculoskelet Surg. 2015;99(1):11–18.
  • Jauregui JJ, Cherian JJ, Kapadia BH, et al. Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2014;27(3):177–183.
  • Nam D, McArthur BA, Cross MB, et al. Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a review. J Knee Surg. 2012;25(3):213–219.
  • Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, et al. The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(1):45–53.
  • Bellemans J. Neutral mechanical alignment: a requirement for successful TKA: opposes. Orthopedics. 2011;34(9):e507–9.
  • Alcelik I, Blomfield M, Öztürk SA, et al. A comparison of short term radiological alignment outcomes of the patient specific and standard instrumentation for primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2017;51(3):215–222.
  • Cavaignac E, Pailhé R, Laumond G, et al. Evaluation of the accuracy of patient-specific cutting blocks for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop. 2015;39(8):1541–1552.
  • Fu H, Wang J, Zhou S, et al. No difference in mechanical alignment and femoral component placement between patient-specific instrumentation and conventional instrumentation in TKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(11):3288–3295.
  • Gong S, Xu W, Wang R, et al. Patient-specific instrumentation improved axial alignment of the femoral component, operative time and perioperative blood loss after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27(4):1083–1095.
  • Huijbregts HJ, Khan RJ, Sorensen E, et al. Patient-specific instrumentation does not improve radiographic alignment or clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2016;87(4):386–394.
  • Mannan A, Smith TO, Sagar C, et al. No demonstrable benefit for coronal alignment outcomes in PSI knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015;101(4):461–468.
  • Mannan A, Smith TO. Favourable rotational alignment outcomes in PSI knee arthroplasty: a Level 1 systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee. 2016;23(2):186–190.
  • Russell R, Brown T, Huo M, et al. Patient-specific instrumentation does not improve alignment in total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2014;27(6):501–504.
  • Schotanus MGM, Thijs E, Heijmans M, et al. Favourable alignment outcomes with MRI-based patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(9):2659–2668.
  • Sharareh B, Schwarzkopf R. Review article: patient-specific versus standard instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2015;23(1):100–106.
  • Shen C, Tang ZH, Hu JZ, et al. Patient-specific instrumentation does not improve accuracy in total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2015;38(3):e178–88.
  • Thienpont E, Schwab PE, Fennema P. A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-specific instrumentation for improving alignment of the components in total knee replacement. Bone Joint J. 2014;96–B(8):1052–1061.
  • Thienpont E, Schwab PE, Fennema P. Efficacy of patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(6):521–530.
  • Voleti PB, Hamula MJ, Baldwin KD, et al. Current data do not support routine use of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(9):1709–1712.
  • Klatt BA, Goyal N, Austin MS, et al. Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty (OtisKnee) results in malalignment. J Arthroplasty. 2008;23(1):26–29.
  • Boonen B, Schotanus MG, Kerens B, et al. Intra-operative results and radiological outcome of conventional and patient-specific surgery in total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(10):2206–2212.
  • Boonen B, Schotanus MG, Kerens B, et al. No difference in clinical outcome between patient-matched positioning guides and conventional instrumented total knee arthroplasty two years post-operatively: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J. 2016;98–B(7):939–944.
  • Chareancholvanich K, Narkbunnam R, Pornrattanamaneewong C. A prospective randomised controlled study of patient-specific cutting guides compared with conventional instrumentation in total knee replacement. Bone Joint J. 2013;95–B(3):354–359.
  • Hamilton WG, Parks NL, Saxena A. Patient-specific instrumentation does not shorten surgical time: a prospective, randomized trial. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(8 Suppl):96–100.
  • Parratte S, Blanc G, Boussemart T, et al. Rotation in total knee arthroplasty: no difference between patient-specific and conventional instrumentation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(10):2213–2219.
  • Roh YW, Kim TW, Lee S, et al. Is TKA using patient-specific instruments comparable to conventional TKA? A randomized controlled study of one system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(12):3988–3995.
  • Vundelinckx BJ, Bruckers L, De Mulder K, et al. Functional and radiographic short-term outcome evaluation of the visionaire system, a patient-matched instrumentation system for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(6):964–970.
  • Kotela A, Kotela I. Patient-specific computed tomography based instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled study. Int Orthop. 2014;38(10):2099–2107.
  • Kotela A, Lorkowski J, Kucharzewski M, et al. Patient-specific CT-based instrumentation versus conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled study on clinical outcomes and in-hospital data. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:165908.
  • Silva A, Sampaio R, Pinto E. Patient-specific instrumentation improves tibial component rotation in TKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(3):636–642.
  • Victor J, Dujardin J, Vandenneucker H, et al. Patient-specific guides do not improve accuracy in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(1):263–271..
  • Woolson ST, Harris AH, Wagner DW, et al. Component alignment during total knee arthroplasty with use of standard or custom instrumentation: a randomized clinical trial using computed tomography for postoperative alignment measurement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(5):366–372.
  • Abane L, Anract P, Boisgard S, et al. A comparison of patient-specific and conventional instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J. 2015;97–B(1):56–63.
  • Gan Y, Ding J, Xu Y, et al. Accuracy and efficacy of osteotomy in total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific navigational template. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(8):12192–12201.
  • Yan CH, Chiu KY, Ng FY, et al. Comparison between patient-specific instruments and conventional instruments and computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(12):3637–3645.
  • Huijbregts HJ, Khan RJ, Fick DP, et al. Component alignment and clinical outcome following total knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled trial comparing an intramedullary alignment system with patient-specific instrumentation. Bone Joint J. 2016;98–B(8):1043–1049.
  • De Vloo R, Pellikaan P, Dhollander A, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of accuracy of component positioning in total knee arthroplasty with patient specific and conventional instruments: a randomized controlled trial. Knee. 2017;24(6):1469–1477.
  • Vide J, Freitas TP, Ramos A, et al. Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: simpler, faster and more accurate than standard instrumentation-a randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(8):2616–2621.
  • Kosse NM, Heesterbeek PJC, Schimmel JJP, et al. Stability and alignment do not improve by using patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(6):1792–1799.
  • Maus U, Marques CJ, Scheunemann D, et al. No improvement in reducing outliers in coronal axis alignment with patient-specific instrumentation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26(9):2788–2796.
  • Van Leeuwen JAMJ, Snorrason F, Röhrl SM. No radiological and clinical advantages with patient-specific positioning guides in total knee replacement. Acta Orthop. 2018;89(1):89–94.
  • An VV, Sivakumar BS, Phan K, et al. Accuracy of MRI-based vs. CT-based patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Sci. 2017;22(1):116–120.
  • White D, Chelule KL, Seedhom BB. Accuracy of MRI vs CT imaging with particular reference to patient specific templates for total knee replacement surgery. Int J Med Robot. 2008;4(3):224–231.
  • Asada S, Mori S, Matsushita T, et al. Comparison of MRI- and CT-based patient-specific guides for total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2014;21(6):1238–1243.
  • Pfitzner T, Abdel MP, von Roth P, et al. Small improvements in mechanical axis alignment achieved with MRI versus CT-based patient-specific instruments in TKA: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(10):2913–2922.
  • Schotanus MG, Sollie R, van Haaren EH, et al. A radiological analysis of the difference between MRI- and CT-based patient-specific matched guides for total knee arthroplasty from the same manufacturer: a randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J. 2016;98–B(6):786–792.
  • Silva A, Pinto E, Sampaio R. Rotational alignment in patient-specific instrumentation in TKA: MRI or CT? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(11):3648–3652.
  • Wu XD, Xiang BY, Schotanus MGM, et al. CT- versus MRI-based patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgeon. 2017;15(6):336–348.
  • Koch PP, Müller D, Pisan M, et al. Radiographic accuracy in TKA with a CT-based patient-specific cutting block technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(10):2200–2205.
  • Anderl W, Pauzenberger L, Kölblinger R, et al. Patient-specific instrumentation improved mechanical alignment, while early clinical outcome was comparable to conventional instrumentation in TKA. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24(1):102–111.
  • Helmy N, Dao Trong ML, Kühnel SP. Accuracy of patient specific cutting blocks in total knee arthroplasty. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:1–10562919.
  • Goyal T, Tripathy SK. Does patient-specific instrumentations improve short-term functional outcomes after total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(10):2173–2180.
  • Mannan A, Akinyooye D, Hossain F. A meta-analysis of functional outcomes in patient-specific instrumented knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2017;30(7):668–674.
  • Woon JTK, Zeng ISL, Calliess T, et al. Outcome of kinematic alignment using patient-specific instrumentation versus mechanical alignment in TKA: a meta-analysis and subgroup analysis of randomised trials. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018;138(9):1293–1303.
  • Pietsch M, Djahani O, Zweiger C, et al. Custom-fit minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty: effect on blood loss and early clinical outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(10):2234–2240.
  • Dossett HG, Estrada NA, Swartz GJ, et al. A randomised controlled trial of kinematically and mechanically aligned total knee replacements: two-year clinical results. Bone Joint J. 2014;96–B(7):907.
  • Abdel MP, Parratte S, Blanc G, et al. No benefit of patient-specific instrumentation in TKA on functional and gait outcomes: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(8):2468–2476.
  • Yaffe M, Luo M, Goyal N, et al. Clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes following total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific instrumentation, computer-assisted surgery, and manual instrumentation: a short-term follow-up study. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2014;9(5):837–844.
  • Chen JY, Chin PL, Tay DK, et al. Functional outcome and quality of life after patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(10):1724–1728.
  • Calliess T, Bauer K, Stukenborg-Colsman C, et al. PSI kinematic versus non-PSI mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(6):1743–1748.
  • Young SW, Walker ML, Bayan A, et al. The Chitranjan S. Ranawat Award: no difference in 2 year functional outcomes using kinematic versus mechanical alignment in TKA: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(1):9–20.
  • Waterson HB, Clement ND, Eyres KS, et al. The early outcome of kinematic versus mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised control trial. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(10):1360–1368.
  • Zhu M, Chen JY, Chong HC, et al. Outcomes following total knee arthroplasty with CT-based patient-specific instrumentation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(8):2567–2572.
  • Stone AH, Sibia US, MacDonald JH. Functional outcomes and accuracy of patient-specific instruments for total knee arthroplasty. Surg Innov. 2018;25(5):470–475.
  • Nam D, Park A, Stambough JB, et al. The mark coventry award: custom cutting guides do not improve total knee arthroplasty clinical outcomes at 2 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(1):40–46.
  • Chotanaphuti T, Wangwittayakul V, Khuangsirikul S, et al. The accuracy of component alignment in custom cutting blocks compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty instrumentation: prospective control trial. Knee. 2014;21(1):185–188.
  • Ng VY1, Arnott L, Li J, et al. Comparison of custom to standard TKA instrumentation with computed tomography. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(8):1833–1842.
  • Noble JW Jr, Moore CA, Liu N. The value of patient-matched instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(1):153–155.
  • Boonen B, Schotanus MG, Kort NP. Preliminary experience with the patient-specific templating total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2012;83(4):387–393.
  • Daniilidis K, Tibesku CO. A comparison of conventional and patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2014;38(3):503–508.
  • Nunley RM, Ellison BS, Ruh EL, et al. Are patient-specific cutting blocks cost-effective for total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470(3):889–894.
  • Barke S, Musanhu E, Busch C, et al. Patient-matched total knee arthroplasty: does it offer any clinical advantages? Acta Orthop Belg. 2013;79(3):307–311.
  • Chen JY, Yeo SJ, Yew AK, et al. The radiological outcomes of patient-specific instrumentation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(3):630–635.
  • Barrett W, Hoeffel D, Dalury D, et al. In-vivo alignment comparing patient specific instrumentation with both conventional and computer assisted surgery (CAS) instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(2):343–347.
  • Marimuthu K, Chen DB, Harris IA, et al. A multi-planar CT-based comparative analysis of patient-specific cutting guides with conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(6):1138–1142.
  • Ferrara F, Cipriani A, Magarelli N, et al. Implant positioning in TKA: comparison between conventional and patient-specific instrumentation. Orthopedics. 2015;38(4):e271–80.
  • Bali K, Walker P, Bruce W. Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty: our initial experience in 32 knees. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(6):1149–1154.
  • Renson L, Poilvache P. Van den Wyngaert H. Improved alignment and operating room efficiency with patient-specific instrumentation for TKA. Knee. 2014;21(6):1216–1220.
  • MacDessi SJ, Jang B, Harris IA, et al. A comparison of alignment using patient specific guides, computer navigation and conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2014;21(2):406–409.
  • DeHaan AM, Adams JR, DeHart ML, et al. Patient-specific versus conventional instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: peri-operative and cost differences. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(11):2065–2069.
  • Nankivell M, West G, Pourgiezis N. Operative efficiency and accuracy of patient-specific cutting guides in total knee replacement. ANZ J Surg. 2015;85(6):452–455.
  • Thienpont E, Grosu I, Paternostre F, et al. The use of patient-specific instruments does not reduce blood loss during minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(7):2055–2060.
  • Kassab S, Pietrzak WS. Patient-specific positioning guides versus manual instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: an intraoperative comparison. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2014;23(3):140–146.
  • Stronach BM, Pelt CE, Erickson JA, et al. Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty provides no improvement in component alignment. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(9):1705–1708.
  • León VJ, Lengua MA, Calvo V, et al. Use of patient-specific cutting blocks reduces blood loss after total knee arthroplasty. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017;27(2):273–277.
  • Nabavi A, Olwill CM. Early outcome after total knee replacement using computed tomography-based patient-specific cutting blocks versus standard instrumentation. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2015;23(2):182–184.
  • Schwarzkopf R1, Brodsky M1, Garcia GA1, et al. Surgical and functional outcomes in patients undergoing total knee replacement with patient-specific implants compared with “off-the-shelf” implants. Orthop J Sports Med. 2015;3(7):2325967115590379.
  • Barrack RL, Ruh EL, Williams BM, et al. Patient specific cutting blocks are currently of no proven value. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(11 Suppl A):95–99.
  • Klasan A, Dworschak P, Heyse TJ, et al. Patient-specific instruments’ routine use over conventional total knee arthroplasty remains inconclusive: analysis of 961 cases. Technol Health Care. 2018;26(3):523–528.
  • Duffy GP. Maximizing surgeon and hospital total knee arthroplasty volume using customized patient instrumentation and swing operating rooms. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2011;40(11 Suppl):5–8.
  • Lionberger DR, Crocker CL, Chen V. Patient specific instrumentation. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(9):1699–1704.
  • Watters TS, Mather RC 3rd, Browne JA, et al. Analysis of procedure-related costs and proposed benefits of using patient-specific approach in total knee arthroplasty. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2011;20(2):112–116.
  • Tibesku CO, Hofer P, Portegies W, et al. Benefits of using customized instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: results from an activity-based costing model. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013;133(3):405–411.
  • Slover JD, Rubash HE, Malchau H, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of custom total knee cutting blocks. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(2):180–185. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.023.
  • Cenni F, Timoncini A, Ensini A, et al. Three-dimensional implant position and orientation after total knee replacement performed with patient-specific instrumentation systems. J Orthop Res. 2014;32(2):331–337.
  • Ensini A, Timoncini A, Cenni F, et al. Intra- and post-operative accuracy assessments of two different patient-specific instrumentation systems for total knee replacement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(3):621–629.
  • Frye BM, Najim AA, Adams JB, et al. MRI is more accurate than CT for patient-specific total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2015;22(6):609–612.
  • Fritschy D, Messerli G. Patient-specific cutting block in TKR: comparison between CT and MRI 3D planning. Arthroscopy. 2011;27(10):70e1.
  • Molicnik A, Naranda J, Dolinar D. Patient-matched instruments versus standard instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2015;127(Suppl 5):S235–40.
  • Abane L, Zaoui A, Anract P, et al. Can a single-use and patient-specific instrumentation be reliably used in primary total knee arthroplasty? A multicenter controlled study. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(7):2111–2118.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.