Flow rate accuracy of ambulatory elastomeric and electronic infusion pumps when exposed to height and back pressures experienced during home infusion therapy

References

• Sriskandarajah S, Hobbs J, Roughead E, et al. Safety and effectiveness of ‘hospital in the home’ and ‘outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy’ in different age groups: a systematic review of observational studies. Int J Clin Pract. 2018;72(8):e13216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skryabina EA, Dunn TS. Disposable infusion pumps. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2006;63(13):1260–1268. PubMed PMID: 16790578; eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subedi S, Looke DF, McDougall DA, et al. Supervised self-administration of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy: a report from a large tertiary hospital in Australia. Inter J Infect Dis. 2015;30:161–165. PubMed PMID: 25603999; eng. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs JG, Ryan MK, Ritchie B, et al. Protocol for a randomised crossover trial to evaluate patient and nurse satisfaction with electronic and elastomeric portable infusion pumps for the continuous administration of antibiotic therapy in the home: the Comparing Home Infusion Devices (CHID) study. BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 31;7(7):e016763. PubMed PMID: 28760798; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc5642663. eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeRiger M, Bhalla T, Martin D, et al. Comparison of flow rate accuracy and consistency between the on-Q, baxter, and amby pain infusion devices. World J Anesthesiology. 2014;3(1):119–123.
   Google Scholar
• Mohseni M, Ebneshahidi A. The flow rate accuracy of elastomeric infusion pumps after repeated filling. Anesth Pain Med. 2014 May;4(2):e14989. PubMed PMID: 24829882; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc4013505. eng. .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burnett T, Bhalla T, Sawardekar A, et al. Performance of the On-Q pain infusion device during changes in environmental temperature. Paediatr Anaesth. 2011 Dec;21(12):1231–1233. PubMed PMID: 21707833; eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobias JD, Johnson GA, Patel M. Performance of the On-Q pain infusion device during hyperbaric therapy. Anesth Analg. 2011 Aug;113(2):275–277. PubMed PMID: 21519047; eng. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris TS, von Maltzahn WW. Infusion line model for the detection of infiltration, extravasation, and other fluid flow faults. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1993 Feb;40(2):154–162. PubMed PMID: 8319966; eng. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health Technology Safety Research Team. Improving the safety of ambulatory intravenous chemotherapy in Canada. Canada2011; [cited 2019 Mar 01].  Available from: http://www.capca.ca/wp-content/uploads/IV-Ambulatory-Study-Final-Report-ENGLISH-Jan-14-2011_small.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Remerand F, Vuitton AS, Palud M, et al. Elastomeric pump reliability in postoperative regional anesthesia: a survey of 430 consecutive devices. Anesth Analg. 2008 Dec;107(6):2079–2084. PubMed PMID: 19020162; eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilfeld BM, Morey TE, Enneking FK. The delivery rate accuracy of portable infusion pumps used for continuous regional analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2002 Nov;95(5):1331–6, table of contents. PubMed PMID: 12401621; eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandya KH, Eaton V, Kowalski S, et al. Safety of continuous antibiotic infusions administered through an Australian hospital in the home service: a pilot study. J Pharm Pract Res. 2017;47(5):333–339.
   Google Scholar
• Irish Medicines Board. Disposable infusion devices. IMB Safety Notice: SN2008(06). Dublin. 2008; [cited 2019 Mar 01]. Available from: https://www.hpra.ie/docs/default-source/Safety-Notices/sn200806_disposableinfusiondevices_v1723_100608.pdf?sfvrsn=0
   Google Scholar
• Grant CR, Fredrickson MJ. Regional anaesthesia elastomeric pump performance after a single use and subsequent refill: a laboratory study. Anaesthesia. 2009 Jul;64(7):770–775. PubMed PMID: 19624633; eng. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilfeld BM, Morey TE, Enneking FK. New portable infusion pumps: real advantages or just more of the same in a different package? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2004;29(4):371–376. PubMed PMID: 15305260; eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ackermann M, Maier S, Ing H, et al. Evaluation of the design and reliability of three elastomeric and one mechanical infusers. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2007 Jun;13(2):77–84. PubMed PMID: 17873107; eng.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ilfeld BM, Morey TE, Enneking FK. Delivery rate accuracy of portable, bolus-capable infusion pumps used for patient-controlled continuous regional analgesia. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003;28(1):17–23. PubMed PMID: 12567338; eng. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilfeld BM, Morey TE, Enneking FK. Portable infusion pumps used for continuous regional analgesia: delivery rate accuracy and consistency. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003;28(5):424–432. PubMed PMID: 14556133; eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philip JH. Intravenous access and delivery principles. In: Rogers MC, Tinker JH, Covino BG. editors Principles and practice of anesthesiology. St. Louis. Mosby Year Book. 1992;2:1183–1196.
   Google Scholar
• Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. Infusion systems London: MHRA; 2013. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/403420/Infusion_systems.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mizuuchi M, Yamakage M, Iwasaki S, et al. The infusion rate of most disposable, non-electric infusion pumps decreases under hypobaric conditions. Can J Anaesth. 2003;50(7):657–662. PubMed PMID: 12944439; eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Moeller A, Ding YS. Effects of atmospheric pressure conditions on flow rate of an elastomeric infusion pump. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2012;69(7):587–591. PubMed PMID: 22441790; eng. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasai T, Hirose M, Yaegashi K, et al. Influence of microcatheter length on flow rates of disposable infusion kits. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004 Nov;21(11):858–860. PubMed PMID: 15717700; eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiveaud D, Demazieres V, Lafont J. Comparison of the performance of four elastomeric devices. Eur J Hosp Pharm Pract. 2005;2:54–56.
   Google Scholar
• Tam YC. Automated performance checking of infusion equipment. Clin Phys Physiol Meas. 1989;10(4):311–318.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tugrul M, Camci E, Pembeci K, et al. Relationship between peripheral and central venous pressures in different patient positions, catheter sizes, and insertion sites. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004 Aug;18(4):446–450. PubMed PMID: 15365925; eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisman RS, Missair A, Pham P, et al. Accuracy and consistency of modern elastomeric pumps. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014;39(5):423–428. PubMed PMID: 25140510; eng. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente M, Aldrete JA. Comparison of accuracy and cost of disposable, nonmechanical pumps used for epidural infusions. Reg Anesthesia. 1997;22(3):260–266. PubMed PMID: 9168219; eng.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferrari R, Beech DR. Infusion pumps: guidelines and pitfalls. Aust Prescr. 1995;18(2):49–51. .
   Google Scholar
• Sluggett J, Sharley N, Reynolds K, et al. Temperature variation in the home setting: implications for continuous ambulatory infusions. J Pharm Pract Res. 2016;47(6):431–437.
   Google Scholar
• van Marken Lichtenbelt WD, Daanen HA, Wouters L, et al. Evaluation of wireless determination of skin temperature using iButtons. Physiol Behav. 2006 Jul 30;88(4–5):489–497. PubMed PMID: 16797616; eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cebeiro J, Musacchio A, Fernandez Sarda E. Low flow measurement for infusion pumps: implementation and uncertainty determination of the normalized method. J Phys. Conf Series. 2011;332:012005.
   Google Scholar
• Capes DF, Asiimwe D. Performance of selected flow-restricting infusion devices. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1998;55(4):351–359. PubMed PMID: 9504194; eng.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar