Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of cervical active range of movement in young asymptomatic adults using inertial sensors

References

• Hurwitz EL, Randhawa K, Yu H, et al. The global spine care initiative: a summary of the global burden of low back and neck pain studies. Eur Spine J. 2018;27:796–801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palacios-Ceña D, Alonso-Blanco C, Hernández-Barrera V, et al. Prevalence of neck and low back pain in community-dwelling adults in Spain: an updated population-based national study (2009/10–2011/12). Eur Spine J. 2015;24:482–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenneberg MS, Rood M, de Bie R, et al. To what degree does active cervical range of motion differ between patients with neck pain, patients with whiplash, and those without neck pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98:1407–1434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunketorp L, Stener-Victorin E, Carlsson J. Neck pain and disability following motor vehicle accidents–a cohort study. Eur Spine J. 2005;14:84–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanpied PR, Gross AR, Elliott JM, et al. Neck pain: revision 2017. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2017;47:A1–A83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grondin F, Hall T, Laurentjoye M, et al. Upper cervical range of motion is impaired in patients with temporomandibular disorders. Cranio. 2015;33:91–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grondin F, Hall T. Changes in cervical movement impairment and pain following orofacial treatment in patients with chronic arthralgic temporomandibular disorder with pain: A prospective case series. Physiother Theory Pract. 2017;33:52–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childs JD, Cleland JA, Elliott JM, et al. Neck pain: clinical practice guidelines linked to the international classification of functioning, disability, and health from the orthopedic section of the American physical therapy association. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008;38:A1–A34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannion AF, Klein GN, Dvorak J, et al. Range of global motion of the cervical spine: intraindividual reliability and the influence of measurement device. Eur Spine J. 2000;9:379–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan K, Haywood KL, Dziedzic K, et al. Assessment of the 3-dimensional Fastrak measurement system in measuring range of motion in ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 2004;31:2207–2215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assink N, Bergman GJD, Knoester B, et al. Interobserver reliability of neck-mobility measurement by means of the flock-of-birds electromagnetic tracking system. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005;28:408–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morphett AL, Crawford CM, Lee D. The use of electromagnetic tracking technology for measurement of passive cervical range of motion: a pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2003;26:152–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tousignant M, Duclos E, Laflèche S, et al. Validity study for the cervical range of motion device used for lateral flexion in patients with neck pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) (Phila. Pa. 1976). 2002;27:812–817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal S, Allison GT, Singer KP. Reliability of the spin-T cervical goniometer in measuring cervical range of motion in an asymptomatic Indian population. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005;28:487–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima LAO, Gomes S, Goulart F, et al. Estudo da confiabilidade de um instrumento de medida de flexibilidade em adultos e idosos. Fisioter E Pesqui. 2004;11:83–89.
   Google Scholar
• De CHP, Ae K, Van Den Heuvel SP, et al. Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:905–921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cagnie B, Cools A, De Loose V, et al. Reliability and normative database of the Zebris cervical range-of-motion system in healthy controls with preliminary validation in a group of patients with neck pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007;30:450–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehan Youssef A, Gumaa M. Validity and reliability of smartphone applications for clinical assessment of the neuromusculoskeletal system. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2017;14:481–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellmon RH, Gulick DT, Paterson ML, et al. Validity and reliability of 2 goniometric mobile apps: device, application, and examiner factors. J Sport Rehabil. 2016;25:371–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vohralik SL, Bowen AR, Burns J, et al. Reliability and validity of a smartphone app to measure joint range. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;94:325–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milani P, Coccetta CA, Rabini A, et al. Mobile smartphone applications for body position measurement in rehabilitation: a review of goniometric tools. PM&R. 2014;6:1038–1043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira L, Rwakabayiza S, Lécureux E, et al. Reliability of the knee smartphone-application goniometer in the acute orthopedic setting. J Knee Surg. 2016;30:223–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourahmadi MR, Ebrahimi Takamjani I, Sarrafzadeh J, et al. Reliability and concurrent validity of a new iPhone ® goniometric application for measuring active wrist range of motion: a cross-sectional study in asymptomatic subjects. J Anat. 2017;230:484–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park K, Kwon O, Kim S, et al. An immediate effect of axial neck rotation training with real time visual feedback using a smartphone inclinometer on improvement in axial neck rotation function. Physiother Theory Pract. 2017;33:218–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quek J, Brauer SG, Treleaven J, et al. Validity and intra-rater reliability of an Android phone application to measure cervical range-of-motion. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11:65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strimpakos N, Sakellari V, Gioftsos G, et al. Cervical spine ROM measurements: optimizing the testing protocol by using a 3D ultrasound-based motion analysis system. Cephalalgia. 2005;25:1133–1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solinger AB, Chen J, Lantz CA. Standardized initial head position in cervical range-of-motion assessment: reliability and error analysis. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000;23:20–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assink N, Bergman GJD, Knoester B, et al. Assessment of the cervical range of motion over time, differences between results of the Flock of Birds and the EDI-320: a comparison between an electromagnetic tracking system and an electronic inclinometer. Man Ther. 2008;13:450–455.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Capuano-Pucci D, Rheault W, Aukai J, et al. Intratester and intertester reliability of the cervical range of motion device. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991;72:338–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiefer C, Kraus T, Ellegast RP, et al. A technical support tool for joint range of motion determination in functional diagnostics - an inter-rater study. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2015;10:16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theobald PS, Jones MD, Williams JM. Do inertial sensors represent a viable method to reliably measure cervical spine range of motion? Man Ther. 2012;17:92–96.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andrade Ortega JA, Delgado Martínez AD, Almécija Ruiz R. Validation of the Spanish version of the neck disability index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) (Phila. Pa. 1976). 2010;35:E114–E118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernon H, Mior S. The neck disability index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991;14:409–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernon H. The neck disability index: state-of-the-art, 1991–2008. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008;31:491–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raya R, Garcia-Carmona R, Sanchez C, et al. An inexpensive and easy to use cervical range of motion measurement solution using inertial sensors. Sensors (Basel). 2018;18:2582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher JP, Bandy WD. Intrarater reliability of CROM measurement of cervical spine active range of motion in persons with and without neck pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008;38:640–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter SD, Eliasziw M, Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med. 1998;17:101–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donner A, Eliasziw M. Sample size requirements for reliability studies. Stat Med. 1987;6:441–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoukri M, Asyali M, Donner A. Sample size requirements for the design of reliability study: review and new results. Stat Methods Med Res. 2004;13:1–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adam Bujang M, Baharum N. A simplified guide to determination of sample size requirements for estimating the value of intraclass correlation coefficient: a review. Arch Orofac Sci. 2017;12:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19:231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunce C. Correlation, agreement, and Bland–Altman analysis: statistical analysis of method comparison studies. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148:4–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet. 1995;346:1085–1087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley SM, Fragala-Pinkham MA. Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy. Phys Ther. 2006;86:735–743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyrwich KW. Minimal important difference thresholds and the standard error of measurement: is there a connection? J Biopharm Stat. 2004;14:97–110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Serrao G, et al. Active range of motion of the head and cervical spine: a three-dimensional investigation in healthy young adults. J Orthop Res. 2002;20:122–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George D, Mallery P. SPSS/PC+ step by step : a simple guide and reference. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Pub. Co; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Audette I, Dumas J-P, Côté JN, et al. Validity and between-day reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40:318–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beltran-Alacreu H, Navarro-Fernandez G, San Juan-Burgueño J, et al. Fiabilidad intra e interevaluador de un sensor inercial para el rango de movimiento de la rodilla en sujetos asintomáticos. Fisioterapia. 2019;41:123–130.
   Google Scholar
• Farooq MN, Bandpei MAM, Ali M, et al. Reliability of the universal goniometer for assessing active cervical range of motion in asymptomatic healthy persons. Pakistan J Med Sci. 1969;32:457–461.
   Google Scholar
• Yankai A, Manosan P. Reliability of the universal and invented gravity goniometers in measuring active cervical range of motion in normal healthy subjects. Int J Appl Biomed Eng. 2009;2:49–53.
   Google Scholar
• Chaves T, Nagamine H, Belli J, et al. Confiabilidade da fleximetria e goniometria na avaliação da amplitude de movimento cervical em crianças. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2008;12:283–289.
   Google Scholar
• Milanese S, Gordon S, Buettner P, et al. Reliability and concurrent validity of knee angle measurement: smart phone app versus universal goniometer used by experienced and novice clinicians. Man Ther. 2014;19:569–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tousignant-Laflamme Y, Boutin N, Dion AM, et al. Reliability and criterion validity of two applications of the iPhoneTM to measure cervical range of motion in healthy participants. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013;10:69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swinkels RAHM, Swinkels-Meewisse IEJCM. Normal values for cervical range of motion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39:362–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iosa M, Picerno P, Paolucci S, et al. Wearable inertial sensors for human movement analysis. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2016;13:641–659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu X, Chen KB, Lin J-H, et al. The accuracy of the Oculus Rift virtual reality head-mounted display during cervical spine mobility measurement. J Biomech. 2015;48:721–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarig Bahat H, Sprecher E, Sela I, et al. Neck motion kinematics: an inter-tester reliability study using an interactive neck VR assessment in asymptomatic individuals. Eur Spine J. 2016;25:2139–2148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar