Robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting: current status and future prospects

References

• Loulmet D, Carpentier A, d’Attellis N, et al. Endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting with the aid of robotic assisted instruments. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;118:4–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd WD, Rayman R, Desai ND, et al. Closed-chest coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart with the use of a computer-enhanced surgical robotic system. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;120:807–809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Cannière D, Wimmer-Greinecker G, Cichon R, et al. Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting: multicenter European experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;134:710–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonaros N, Schachner T, Lehr E, et al. Five hundred cases of robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting: predictors of success and safety. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95:803–812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava S, Barrera R, Quismundo S. One hundred sixty-four consecutive beating heart totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass cases without intraoperative conversion. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94:1463–1468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonatti J, Lee JD, Bonaros N, et al. Robotic totally endoscopic multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting – procedure development, challenges, results. Innovations (Phila). 2012;7:3–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Srivastava S, Gadasalli S, Agusala M, et al. Beating heart totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89(6):1873–1879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonatti J, Zimrin D, Lehr EJ, et al. Hybrid coronary revascularization using robotic totally endoscopic surgery: perioperative outcomes and 5-year results. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;94:1920–1926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettinari M, Navarra E, Noirhomme P, et al. The state of robotic cardiac surgery in Europe. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;6:1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehman B, Lehr E, Lahiji K, et al. Patient anatomy predicts operative time in robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014;19:572–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitahara H, Patel B, McCrorey M, et al. is robotic beating heart totally endoscopic coronary bypass feasible for BMI > 35 morbidly obese patients? Int J Med Robot. 2018;14:e1911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonatti J, Schachner T, Bernecker O, et al. Robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass: program development and learning curve issues. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127(2):504–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonatti J, Wehmann B, DeBiasi A, et al. Totally endoscopic quadruple coronary artery bypass grafting is feasible using robotic technology. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;144:1061–1066.
   Google Scholar
• [cited 2019 Oct 15]. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6DiBz2JUnY&t=108s
   Google Scholar
• Balkhy HH, Wann LS, Krienbring D, et al. Integrating coronary anastomotic connectors and robotics toward a totally endoscopic beating heart approach: review of 120 cases. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92:821–827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitzman B, McCrorey M, Patel B, et al. Anastomotic techniques for robotic beating-heart totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass (TECAB). Video on ctsnet.org. 2018 March. doi:10.25373/ctsnet.5959594.
   Google Scholar
• Goeboeloes L, Ramahi J, Obeso A, et al. Robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting: systematic review of clinical outcomes from the past two decades. Innovations. 2019;14:5–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dhawan R, Roberts JD, Wroblewski K, et al. Multivessel beating heart robotic myocardial revascularization increases morbidity and mortality. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143:1056–1061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaouter C, Imbault J, Labrousse L, et al. Association of robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass graft surgery associated with a preliminary cardiac enhanced recovery after surgery program: a retrospective analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015 December;29(6):1489–1497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonaros N, Schachner T, Wiedemann D, et al. Quality of life improvement after robotically assisted coronary artery bypass grafting. Cardiology. 2009;114:59–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serruys P, Ong A, Van Herwerden L, et al. Five-year outcomes after coronary stenting versus bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel disease: the final analysis of the Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study (ARTS) randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:575–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohr F, Morice M, Kappetein P, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5 year follow-up of the randomized, clinical SYNTAX trial. Lancet. 2013;381:629–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kofler M, Stastny L, Reinstadler S, et al. Robotic versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. Direct comparison of long-term clinical outcome. Innovations. 2017;12:239–246.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stastny L, Kofler M, Dumfarth J, et al. Long-term clinical and computed tomography angiographic follow-up after totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. Innovations. 2018;13:5–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Currie ME, Romsa J, Fox SA, et al. Long-term angiographic follow-up of robotic-assisted coronary artery revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:1426–1431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whellan D, McCarey M, Taylor B, et al. Trends in robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafts: a study of the society of thoracic surgeons adult cardiac surgery database, 2006-2012. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102:140–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez E, Nifong L, Bonatti J, et al. Pathway for surgeons and programs to establish and maintain a successful robot-assisted adult cardiac surgery program. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;152:9–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavallaro P, Rhee A, Chiang Y, et al. In-Hospital mortality and morbidity after robotic coronary artery surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015 February;29(1):27–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasrija C, Kon Z, Ghoreishi M, et al. Cost and outcome of minimally invasive techniques for coronary surgery using robotic technology. Innovations. 2018;13:282–286.
   Google Scholar
• cited 2019 Oct 15]. Available from: https://www.ssinnovations.org
   Google Scholar
• Shin DH, Dalag L, Azhar R, et al. A novel interface for the telementoring of robotic surgery. BJU. 2015;116:302–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Oh PJ, Cheng N, et al. Use of automated performance metrics to measure surgeon performance during robotic vesicourethral anastomosis and methodical development of a training tutorial. J Urol. 2018;200:895–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fard M, Pandya A, Chinnam R, et al. Distance-based time series classification approach for task recognition with application in surgical robot autonomy. Int J Med Robot. 2017;13:e1766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar