Innovative tools for atrial fibrillation ablation

References

• Feinberg WM , Blackshear JL , Laupacis A , et al. Prevalence, age distribution, and gender of patients with atrial fibrillation. Analysis and implications. Arch Int Med. 1995;155(5):469–473.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kirchhof P , Benussi S , Kotecha D , et al. ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Europace. 2016;18(11):1609–1678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saraswat MK , Carter L , Berrigan P , et al. Integrated management approach to atrial fibrillation care: a cost utility analysis. Can J Cardiol. 2019;35(9):1142–1148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chugh SS , Havmoeller R , Narayanan K , et al. Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: a global burden of disease 2010 study. Circulation. 2014;129(8):837–847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel NJ , Deshmukh A , Pant S , et al. Contemporary trends of hospitalization for atrial fibrillation in the United States, 2000 through 2010: implications for healthcare planning. Circulation. 2014;129(23):2371–2379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haissaguerre M , Jais P , Shah DC , et al. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(10):659–666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuck KH , Brugada J , Furnkranz A , et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(23):2235–2245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang F , Bansch D , Ernst S , et al. Complete isolation of left atrium surrounding the pulmonary veins: new insights from the double-Lasso technique in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2004;110(15):2090–2096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemes C , Wer E , Lin T , et al. One-year clinical outcome after pulmonary vein isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation using the second-generation 28 mm cryoballoon: a retrospective analysis. Europace. 2016;18(2):201–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks S , Metzner A , Wohlmuth P , et al. Insights into ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: lessons from 6-year clinical outcomes. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018;29(2):257–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roselli C , Chaffin MD , Weng LC , et al. Multi-ethnic genome-wide association study for atrial fibrillation. Nat Genet. 2018;50(9):1225–1233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnussen C , Niiranen TJ , Ojeda FM , et al. Sex differences and similarities in atrial fibrillation epidemiology, risk factors, and mortality in community cohorts: results from the BiomarCaRE consortium (Biomarker for cardiovascular risk assessment in Europe). Circulation. 2017;136(17):1588–1597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabritz L , Guasch E , Antoniades C , et al. Expert consensus document: defining the major health modifiers causing atrial fibrillation: a roadmap to underpin personalized prevention and treatment. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016;13(4):230–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappato R , Calkins H , Chen SA , et al. Updated worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010;3(1):32–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang F , Ernst S , Chun J , et al. Electrophysiological findings during ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation with electroanatomic mapping and double Lasso catheter technique. Circulation. 2005;112(20):3038–3048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell BD , Packer DL. Does image integration improve atrial fibrillation ablation outcomes, or are other aspects of the ablation the key to success? Europace. 2009;11(8):973–974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kistler PM , Rajappan K , Harris S , et al. The impact of image integration on catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using electroanatomic mapping: a prospective randomized study. Eur Heart J. 2008;29(24):3029–3036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy VY , Shah D , Kautzner J , et al. The relationship between contact force and clinical outcome during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the TOCCATA study. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9(11):1789–1795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kautzner J , Neuzil P , Lambert H , et al. EFFICAS II: optimization of catheter contact force improves outcome of pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2015;17(8):1229–1235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarman JWE , Panikker S , Das M , et al. Relationship between contact force sensing technology and medium-term outcome of atrial fibrillation ablation: a multicenter study of 600 patients. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26(4):378–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy VY , Dukkipati SR , Neuzil P , et al. Randomized, controlled trial of the safety and effectiveness of a contact force-sensing irrigated catheter for ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results of the TactiCath contact force ablation catheter study for atrial fibrillation (TOCCASTAR) Study. Circulation. 2015;132(10):907–915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itoh T , Kimura M , Tomita H , et al. Reduced residual conduction gaps and favourable outcome in contact force-guided circumferential pulmonary vein isolation. Europace. 2016;18(4):531–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer T , Rottner L , Makimoto H , et al. The best of two worlds? Pulmonary vein isolation using a novel radiofrequency ablation catheter incorporating contact force sensing technology and 56-hole porous tip irrigation. Clin Res Cardiol. 2018;107(11):1003–1012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rordorf R , Sanzo A , Gionti V. Contact force technology integrated with 3D navigation system for atrial fibrillation ablation: improving results? Expert Rev Med Devices. 2017;14(6):461–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knopp H , Halm U , Lamberts R , et al. Incidental and ablation-induced findings during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients after ablation of atrial fibrillation: a retrospective study of 425 patients. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(4):574–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black-Maier E , Pokorney SD , Barnett AS , et al. Risk of atrioesophageal fistula formation with contact force-sensing catheters. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(9):1328–1333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das M , Loveday JJ , Wynn GJ , et al. Ablation index, a novel marker of ablation lesion quality: prediction of pulmonary vein reconnection at repeat electrophysiology study and regional differences in target values. Europace. 2017;19(5):775–783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussein A , Das M , Riva S , et al. Use of ablation index-guided ablation results in high rates of durable pulmonary vein isolation and freedom from arrhythmia in persistent atrial fibrillation patients. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018;11(9):e006576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phlips T , Taghji P , El Haddad M , et al. Improving procedural and one-year outcome after contact force-guided pulmonary vein isolation: the role of interlesion distance, ablation index, and contact force variability in the ‘CLOSE’-protocol. Europace. 2018;20(FI_3):f419–f27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaskaran A , Chik W , Pouliopoulos J , et al. Five seconds of 50–60 W radio frequency atrial ablations were transmural and safe: an in vitro mechanistic assessment and force-controlled in vivo validation. Europace. 2017;19(5):874–880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leshem E , Zilberman I , Tschabrunn CM , et al. High-power and short-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: biophysical characterization. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;4(4):467–479.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winkle RA , Moskovitz R , Hardwin Mead R , et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation using very short duration 50 W ablations and contact force sensing catheters. J Interven Card Electrophysiol. 2018;52(1):1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassallo F , Cunha C , Serpa E , et al. Comparison of high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation of atrial fibrillation using a contact force-sensing catheter and conventional technique: initial results. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;30(10):1877–1883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy VY , Grimaldi M , De Potter T , et al. Pulmonary vein isolation with very high power, short duration, temperature-controlled lesions: the QDOT-FAST trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019;5(7):778–786.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heeger CH , Wer E , Wohlmuth P , et al. Bonus-freeze: benefit or risk? Two-year outcome and procedural comparison of a “bonus-freeze” and “no bonus-freeze” protocol using the second-generation cryoballoon for pulmonary vein isolation. Clin Res Cardiol. 2016;105(9):774–782.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzner A , Heeger CH , Wohlmuth P , et al. Two-year outcome after pulmonary vein isolation using the second-generation 28-mm cryoballoon: lessons from the bonus freeze protocol. Clin Res Cardiol. 2016;105(1):72–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boveda S , Metzner A , Nguyen DQ , et al. Single-procedure outcomes and quality-of-life improvement 12 months post-cryoballoon ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation results from the multicenter CRYO4PERSISTENT AF trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;4(11):1440–1447.
   Google Scholar
• Straube F , Dorwarth U , Pongratz J , et al. The fourth cryoballoon generation with a shorter tip to facilitate real-time pulmonary vein potential recording: feasibility and safety results. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;30(6):918–925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moltrasio M , Sicuso R , Fassini GM , et al. Acute outcome after a single cryoballoon ablation: comparison between Arctic Front Advance and Arctic Front Advance PRO. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019;42(7):890–896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reissmann B , Budelmann T , Wer E , et al. Five-year clinical outcomes of visually guided laser balloon pulmonary vein isolation for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Clin Res Cardiol. 2018;107(5):405–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wer E , Deiss S , Kuck KH . Balloon-based pulmonary vein isolation for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (cryoballoon and laserballoon). Future Cardiol. 2015;11(6):663–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzner A , Wer E , Schmidt B , et al. Acute and long-term clinical outcome after endoscopic pulmonary vein isolation: results from the first prospective, multicenter study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24(1):7–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dukkipati SR , Cuoco F , Kutinsky I , et al. Pulmonary vein isolation using the visually guided laser balloon: a prospective, multicenter, and randomized comparison to standard radiofrequency ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(12):1350–1360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt B , Neuzil P , Luik A , et al. Laser balloon or wide-area circumferential irrigated radiofrequency ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: a multicenter prospective randomized study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017;10(12):12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kottkamp H , Moser F , Rieger A , et al. Global multielectrode contact mapping plus ablation with a single catheter: preclinical and preliminary experience in humans with atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017;28(11):1247–1256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beukema RP , Beukema WP , Smit JJ , et al. Efficacy of multi-electrode duty-cycled radiofrequency ablation for pulmonary vein disconnection in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2010;12(4):502–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade JG , Dubuc M , Rivard L , et al. Efficacy and safety of atrial fibrillation ablation with phased radiofrequency energy and multielectrode catheters. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9(2):289–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaita F , Leclercq JF , Schumacher B , et al. Incidence of silent cerebral thromboembolic lesions after atrial fibrillation ablation may change according to technology used: comparison of irrigated radiofrequency, multipolar nonirrigated catheter and cryoballoon. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011;22(9):961–968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Greef Y , Dekker L , Boersma L , et al. Low rate of asymptomatic cerebral embolism and improved procedural efficiency with the novel pulmonary vein ablation catheter GOLD: results of the PRECISION GOLD trial. Europace. 2016;18(5):687–695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kece F , Bruggemans EF , de Riva M , et al. Incidence and clinical significance of cerebral embolism during atrial fibrillation ablation with duty-cycled phased-radiofrequency versus cooled-radiofrequency: a randomized controlled trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019;5(3):318–326.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burkhardt JD , Natale A . New technologies in atrial fibrillation ablation. Circulation. 2009;120(15):1533–1541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy VY , Neuzil P , Malchano ZJ , et al. View-synchronized robotic image-guided therapy for atrial fibrillation ablation: experimental validation and clinical feasibility. Circulation. 2007;115(21):2705–2714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradfield J , Tung R , Mandapati R , et al. Catheter ablation utilizing remote magnetic navigation: a review of applications and outcomes. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol PACE. 2012;35(8):1021–1034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurer T , Sohns C , Deiss S , et al. Significant reduction in procedure duration in remote magnetic-guided catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using the third-generation magnetic navigation system. J Interven Card Electrophysiol. 2017;49(3):219–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chun KR , Wer E , Koektuerk B , et al. Remote-controlled magnetic pulmonary vein isolation using a new irrigated-tip catheter in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010;3(5):458–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rillig A , Schmidt B , Di Biase L , et al. Manual versus robotic catheter ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: the man and machine trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;3(8):875–883.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rillig A , Lin T , Schmidt B , et al. Experience matters: long-term results of pulmonary vein isolation using a robotic navigation system for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Clin Res Cardiol. 2016;105(2):106–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rillig A , Meyerfeldt U , Kunze M , et al. Persistent iatrogenic atrial septal defect after a single-puncture, double-transseptal approach for pulmonary vein isolation using a remote robotic navigation system: results from a prospective study. Europace. 2010;12(3):331–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittkampf FH , van Driel VJ , van Wessel H , et al. Feasibility of electroporation for the creation of pulmonary vein ostial lesions. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011;22(3):302–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittkampf FH , van Driel VJ , van Wessel H , et al. Myocardial lesion depth with circular electroporation ablation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012;5(3):581–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittkampf FHM , van Es R , Neven K . Electroporation and its relevance for cardiac catheter ablation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;4(8):977–986.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neven K , van Es R , van Driel V , et al. Acute and long-term effects of full-power electroporation ablation directly on the Porcine Esophagus. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017;10(5). DOI:10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappone C , Oreto G , Lamberti F , et al. Catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using a 3D mapping system. Circulation. 1999;100(11):1203–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earley MJ , Showkathali R , Alzetani M , et al. Radiofrequency ablation of arrhythmias guided by non-fluoroscopic catheter location: a prospective randomized trial. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(10):1223–1229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohns C , Saguner AM , Lemes C , et al. First clinical experience using a novel high-resolution electroanatomical mapping system for left atrial ablation procedures. Clin Res Cardiol. 2016;105(12):992–1002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin C , Pehrson S , Jacobsen PK , et al. Initial experience of a novel mapping system combined with remote magnetic navigation in the catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017;28(12):1387–1392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borlich M , Iden L , Kuhnhardt K , et al. 3D mapping for PVI- geometry, image integration and incorporation of contact force into work flow. J Atr Fibrillation. 2018;10(6):1795.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bun SS , Delassi T , Latcu DG , et al. A comparison between multipolar mapping and conventional mapping of atrial tachycardias in the context of atrial fibrillation ablation. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2018;111(1):33–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh KA , Galvin J , Keaney J , et al. First experience with zero-fluoroscopic ablation for supraventricular tachycardias using a novel impedance and magnetic-field-based mapping system. Clin Res Cardiol. 2018;107(7):578–585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ptaszek LM , Chalhoub F , Perna F , et al. Rapid acquisition of high-resolution electroanatomical maps using a novel multielectrode mapping system. J Interventional Card Electrophysiol. 2013;36(3):233–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rottner L , Metzner A , Ouyang F , et al. Direct comparison of point-by-point and rapid ultra-high-resolution electroanatomical mapping in patients scheduled for ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017;28(3):289–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anter E , McElderry TH , Contreras-Valdes FM , et al. Evaluation of a novel high-resolution mapping technology for ablation of recurrent scar-related atrial tachycardias. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13(10):2048–2055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks AG , Wilson L , Kuklik P , et al. Image integration using NavX Fusion: initial experience and validation. Heart Rhythm. 2008;5(4):526–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu SX , Zhang Y , Zhang XW . Impact of image integration on catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation using three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping: a meta-analysis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012;35(10):1242–1247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romanov A , Dichterman E , Schwartz Y , et al. High-resolution, real-time, and nonfluoroscopic 3-dimensional cardiac imaging and catheter navigation in humans using a novel dielectric-based system. Heart Rhythm. 2019;16(12):1883–1889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellmann B , Lin T , Ruppersberg P , et al. Identification of active atrial fibrillation sources and their discrimination from passive rotors using electrographical flow mapping. Clin Res Cardiol. 2018;107(11):1021–1032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellmann B , Zettwitz M , Lin T , et al. Velocity characteristics of atrial fibrillation sources determined by electrographic flow mapping before and after catheter ablation. Int J Cardiol. 2019;286:56–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willems S , Verma A , Betts T , et al. Targeting nonpulmonary vein sources in persistent atrial fibrillation identified by noncontact charge density mapping (UNCOVER-AF Trial). Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019;12:e007233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung LW , Gallagher MM , Santangeli P , et al. Esophageal cooling for protection during left-atrial ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2019. DOI:10.1007/s10840-019-00661-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Oliveira BD , Oyama H , Hardy CA , et al. Comparative study of strategies to prevent esophageal and periesophageal injury during atrial fibrillation ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020. DOI:10.1111/jce.14417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox JL , Schuessler RB , D’Agostino HJ , et al. The surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation.III. Development of a definitive surgical procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991;101(4):569–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vroomen M , La Meir M , Maesen B , et al. Hybrid thoracoscopic surgical and transvenous catheter ablation versus transvenous catheter ablation in persistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation (HATDCAP-AF): study protocol for a randomized trial. Trials. 2019;20(1). DOI:10.1186/s13063-019-3365-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Driver K , Mangrum JM . Hybrid approaches in atrial fibrillation ablation: why, where and who? J Thorac Dis. 2015;7(2):159–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar