Robotic assistance for people with dementia: a viable option for the future?

References

• [cited 2019 Sep 1 ]. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Population_structure_and_ageing
   Google Scholar
• https://ec.europa.eu/health/indicators/echi/list_en [cited 2019 Sep 1 ]
   Google Scholar
• [cited 2019 Sep 1 ]. Available at https://population.un.org/wpp/Publications/Files/WPP2017_Volume-I_Comprehensive-Tables.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dogangil G , Davies BL , Rodriguez Y Baena F. A review of medical robotics for minimally invasive soft tissue surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2010;224(5):653–679.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosiek A , Leksowski K . Technology advances in hospital practices: robotics in treatment of patients. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Jun;14(3):270–276. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [cited 2019 Sep 1 ]. Available at https://ifr.org/downloads/press2018/Executive_Summary_WR_Service_Robots_2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Abdi J , Al-Hindawi A , Ng T , et al. Scoping review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care. BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 12;8(2):e018815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim GH , Jeon S , Im K , et al. Structural brain changes after traditional and robot-assisted multi-domain cognitive training in community-dwelling healthy elderly. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(4):e0123251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takayanagi K , Kirita T , Shibata T . Comparison of verbal and emotional responses of elderly people with mild/moderate dementia and those with severe dementia in responses to seal robot, PARO. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014;6:257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka M , Ishii A , Yamano E , et al. Effect of a human-type communication robot on cognitive function in elderly women living alone. Med Sci Monit. 2012;18(9):CR550–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyle W . The promise of technology in the future of dementia care. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019;15(6):353–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogan AA , Alnajjar F , Gochoo M , et al. Robots, AI, and cognitive training in an era of mass age-related cognitive decline: a systematic review. IEEE Access. 2020;8:18284–18304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savela N , Turja T , Oksanen A . Social acceptance of robots in different occupational fields: a systematic literature review. Int J Soc Robot. 2018;10(4):493–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Maris A , Zook N , Caleb-Solly P , et al. Designing ethical social robots—a longitudinal field study with older adults. 2020;AI 7:1. Front Robot.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ENRICHME Project Consortium: European Union H2020 Programme (2018). [cited 2019 Sep 1]. Available at https://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/194090/results/en
   Google Scholar
• Vandemeulebroucke T , Dierckx de Casterlé B , Gastmans C . The use of care robots in aged care: A systematic review of argument-based ethics literature. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018;74:15–25. ISSN 0167-4943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frennert S , Östlund B . Review: seven matters of concern of social robots and older people. Int J of Soc Robotics. 2014;6(2):299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wachsmuth I . Robots like me: challenges and ethical issues in aged care. Front Psychol. 2018;9:432. ISSN=1664-1078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun W , Wilson MG , Schreiber D , et al. Ethical challenges related to assistive product access for older adults and adults living with a disability: a scoping review protocol. Syst Rev. 2017 Sun;6(1):24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reed S . Building bridges between AI and cognitive psychology. AI Mag. 2019 Jun;40(2):17–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torresen J . A review of future and ethical perspectives of robotics and AI. Front Rob AI. 2018 Jan;4. DOI:10.3389/frobt.2017.00075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO/TR 23482-2-2:20 . Robotics—application of ISO 13482—part 2: application guideline. International Organization for Standardization ISO Geneva, Switzerland. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• IEEE Ethically Aligned Design . A vision for prioritizing human well-being with autonomous and intelligent systems (A/IS). IEEE. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Goodrich MA , Schultz AC . Human–Robot Interaction: A Survey. Found Trends Hum-Comput Interact. 2007;1(3):203–275.
   Google Scholar
• Everitt T , Hutter M , Universal Artificial Intelligence . Practical agents and fundamental challenges. In: Abbass HA , Scholz J , Reid DJ editors, Foundations of trusted autonomy studies in systems, decision and control. 117. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64816-3.
   Google Scholar
• Special Eurobarometer 382 public attitudes towards robots. [cited 2019 Sep 1 ]. Avilable at http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/archives/ebs/ebs_382_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association . Neurocognitive disorders. In: American Psychiatric Association editor, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th. Arlington, VA, USA: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013. p. 299-320.
   Google Scholar
• ICD 11 . [cited 2019 Sep 1]. Available at https://icd.who.int/
   Google Scholar
• Korchut A , Szklener S , Abdelnour C , et al. Challenges for service robots—requirements of elderly adults with cognitive impairments. Front Neurol. 2017;8:228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlowska J , Skrobas U , Grabowska-Aleksandrowicz K , et al. Assessment of perceived attractiveness, usability, and societal impact of a multimodal robotic assistant for aging patients with memory impairments. Front Neurol. 2018;9:392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smarr CA , Mitzner TL , Beer JM , et al. Domestic robots for older adults: attitudes, preferences, and potential. Int J Soc Robot. 2014 Apr 1;6(2):229–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turja T , Taipale S , Kaakinen M , et al. Care workers’ readiness for robotization: identifying psychological and socio-demographic determinants. Int J Soc Robot. 2020;12(1):79–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fosch-Villaronga E , Lutz C , Tamò-Larrieux A . Gathering expert opinions for social robots’ ethical, legal, and societal concerns: findings from four international workshops. International Journal of Social Robotics. 2019. DOI:10.1007/s12369-019-00605-z.
   Google Scholar
• Winkle K , Caleb-Solly P , Turton A , et al. Mutual shaping in the design of socially assistive robots: a case study on social robots for therapy. Int J Soc Robot. 2019. DOI:10.1007/s12369-019-00536-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johansson-Pajala R-M , Thommes K , Hoppe JA , et al. Care robot orientation: what, who and how? Potential users’ perceptions. Int J Soc Robot. 2020. DOI:10.1007/s12369-020-00619-y
   Google Scholar
• Beuscher LM , Fan J , Sarkar N , et al. Socially assistive robots: measuring older adults’ perceptions. J Gerontol Nurs. 2017 Dec 1;43(12):35–43. Epub 2017 Jul 13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitley E , Deary IJ , Ritchie SJ , et al. Variations in cognitive abilities across the life course: cross-sectional evidence from understanding society: the UK household longitudinal study. DOI:10.1016/j.intell.2016.07.001.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie SJ , Dickie DA , Cox SR , et al. Brain structural differences between 73- and 92-year olds matched for childhood intelligence, social background, and intracranial volume. Intelligence. 2016;59:39–50. DOI:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.10.005.
   Google Scholar
• [cited 2019 Sep 1 ]. Available at https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/publications/Files/WPP2015_Volume-I_Comprehensive-Tables.pdf
   Google Scholar
• [cited 2019 Sep 1 ]. Available at https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/publications/Files/WPP2017_Volume-I_Comprehensive-Tables.pdf
   Google Scholar
• WHO disability [cited 2019 Sep 1 ]. Available at http://www.who.int/disabilities/technology/en/
   Google Scholar
• [accessdate 2019 Sep 1 ]. Available at https://ramcip-project.eu/
   Google Scholar
• Chatila R , Renaudo E , Andries M , et al. Toward self-aware robots. Front Rob AI. 2018;5:88. ISSN 2296-9144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brose SW , Weber DJ , Salatin BA , et al. The role of assistive robotics in the lives of persons with disability. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Jun;89(6):509–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedaf S , Gelderblom GJ , De Witte L . Overview and categorization of robots supporting independent living of elderly people: what activities do they support and how far have they developed. Assist Technol. 2015 Summer;27(2):88–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandemeulebroucke T , de Casterlé BD , Gastmans C . How do older adults experience and perceive socially assistive robots in aged care: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Aging Ment Health. 2018 Feb;22(2):149–167. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Y-H , Wrobel J , Cornuet M , et al. Acceptance of an assistive robot in older adults: a mixed-method study of human–robot interaction over a 1-month period in the living lab setting. Clin Interv Aging. 2014 May 8;9:801–811. eCollection 2014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louie WY , McColl D , Nejat G . Acceptance and attitudes toward a human-like socially assistive robot by older adults. Assist Technol. 2014 Fall;26(3):140–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glas D , Satake S , Kanda T , et al. An interaction design framework for social robots. Conference: Robotics: Science and Systems VII, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA, June 27-30, 2011. DOI:10.15607/RSS.2011.VII.014.
   Google Scholar
• Shishehgar M , Kerr D , Blake J . A systematic review of research into how robotic technology can help older people. Smart Health, 2018, 7-8, 1–18, ISSN 2352-6483
   Google Scholar
• [ cited Sep 1 2019]. Available at http://www.riken.jp/en/pr/press/2015/20150223_2/
   Google Scholar
• [cited 2019 Sep 1 ]. Available at http://www.parorobots.com/
   Google Scholar
• LEA . [cited 2019 Sep 1 ]. Available at https://www.robotcaresystems.com/
   Google Scholar
• Pripfl J , Körtner T , Batko-Klein D , et al. Social service robots to support independent living: experiences from a field trial. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2016 Jun;49(4):282–287. Epub 2016 May 25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [cited 2019 Sep 1 ]. Available at http://hobbit.acin.tuwien.ac.at/
   Google Scholar
• [cited 2019 Sep 1 ]. Available at https://www.care-o-bot.de/en/care-o-bot-4.html
   Google Scholar
• Peleka G , Kostavelis I , Giakoumis D , et al., RAMCIP: a service robot for MCI patients at home. In 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2018), Madrid, Spain, October 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Filippeschi A , Peppoloni L , Kostavelis I , et al., Towards skills evaluation of elderly for human robot interaction. In 27th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE RO-MAN 2018), Nanjing, China, August 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Kostavelis I , Vasileiadis M , Skartados E , et al. Understanding of human behavior with a robotic agent through daily activity analysis. Int J Soc Robot, Springer. 2019;11(3):437–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn JH , Freier P , Kanda N , et al. Design patterns for sociality in human-robot interaction. In HRI 2008 - Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction: Living with Robots. 97–104. Amsterdam. The Netherlands. DOI:10.1145/1349822.1349836.
   Google Scholar
• Glas D , Kanda T , Ishiguro H . Human-robot interaction design using interaction composer - eight years of lessons learned. HRI '16: The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction. 2016. p. 303-310. DOI:10.1109/HRI.2016.7451766.
   Google Scholar
• Zlotowski J , Yogeeswaran K , Bartneck C . Can we control it? Autonomous robots threaten human identity, uniqueness, safety, and resources. Inter J Human Comp Stud. 2017;100:48–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich-Stiebert N , Eyssel F , Hohnemann C . Involve the user! Changing attitudes toward robots by user participation in a robot prototyping process. Comput Hum Behav. 2019;91:290–296. ISSN 0747-5632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eftring H , Frennert S . Designing a social and assistive robot for seniors. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2016 Jun;49(4):274–281. Epub 2016 May 25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang RH , Sudhama A , Begum M , et al. Robots to assist daily activities: views of older adults with Alzheimer’s disease and their caregivers. Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 Jan;29(1):67–79. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Soler Á , Facal D , Díaz-Orueta U , et al. Inclusion of service robots in the daily lives of frail older users: a step-by-step definition procedure on users‘ requirements. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018;74:191–196. ISSN 0167-4943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberta MS , DeKosky ST , Dickson D , et al. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):270–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperlinga RA , Aisen PS , Beckett LA , et al. Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):280–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKhann GM , Knopman DS , Chertkow H , et al. Prevalence and incidence of clinically diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease dementia from 1994 to 2012 in a population study. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):263–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajan KB , Weuve J , Barnes LL , et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2019;15(1):1–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sweeney MD , Montagne A , Sagara AP , et al. Vascular dysfunction—the disregarded partner of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2019;15(1):158–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang Y , Lutz MW , Xing Y . A systems-based model of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2019;15(1):168–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaiad A , Zhou L . The determinants of home healthcare robots adoption: an empirical investigation. Int J Med Inform. 2014;83(11):825–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden RJ , Karsh B-T . The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Inform. 2010;43(1):159–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V , Morris MG , Davis GB , et al. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003. 425–478. Available online at http://www.jstor.org/stable/30036540?origin=JSTOR-pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damholdt M , Nørskov M , Yamazaki R , et al. Attitudinal change in elderly citizens toward social robots: the role of personality traits and beliefs about robot functionality. Front Psychol. 2015;6. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuten A , van Dam M , Naber M . Pupillary responses to robotic and human emotions: the Uncanny Valley and media equation confirmed. Front Psychol. 2018;9:774. ISSN=1664-1078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zlotowski J , Sumioka H , Nishio S , et al. Persistence of the uncanny valley: the influence of repeated interactions and a robot’s attitude on its perception. Front Psychol. 2015;6:883. ISSN=1664-1078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pino M , Boulay M , Jouen F , et al. “Are we ready for robots that care for us?” Attitudes and opinions of older adults toward socially assistive robots. Front Aging Neurosci. 2015 Jul 23;7:141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goher KM , Mansouri N , Fadlallah SO . Assessment of personal care and medical robots from older adults’ perspective. Robot Biomim. 2017;4(1):5. Epub 2017 Sep 20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vitale J , Tonkin M , Herse S , et al. Be more transparent and users will like you: a robot privacy and user experience design experiment, 2018: DOI: 10.1145/3171221.3171269.
   Google Scholar
• Loe M . Comfort and medical ambivalence in old age. Technol Forecasting Social Change. 2015;93:141–146. ISSN 0040-1625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkle K , Caleb-Solly P , Turton A , et al. Social robots for engagement in rehabilitative therapies: design implications from a study with therapists. 2018;289–297. DOI:10.1145/3171221.3171273.
   Google Scholar
• Neven L . By any means? Questioning the link between gerontechnological innovation and older people’s wish to live at home. Technol Forecasting Social Change. 2014;93. DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.04.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheetham M , Wu L , Pauli P , et al. Arousal, valence, and the uncanny valley: psychophysiological and self-report findings. Front Psychol. 2015;6:981. ISSN=1664-1078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouaix N , Retru-Chavastel L , Rigaud A-S , et al. Affective and engagement issues in the conception and assessment of a robot-assisted psychomotor therapy for persons with dementia. Front Psychol. 2017;8:950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teipel S , Babiloni C , Hoey J , et al. Information and communication technology solutions for outdoor navigation in dementia. Alzheimers Dement. 2016 Jun;12(6):695–707. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo F , Ullberg J , Stimec A , et al. Sensor network infrastructure for a home care monitoring system. Sensors (Basel). 2014 Feb 25;14(3):3833–3860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortellessa G , Fracasso F , Sorrentino A , et al. ROBIN, a telepresence robot to support older users monitoring and social inclusion: development and evaluation. Telemed J E Health. 2018 Feb;24(2):145–154. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koceski S , Koceska N . Evaluation of an assistive telepresence robot for elderly healthcare. J Med Syst. 2016 May;40(5):121. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyle W , Arnautovska U , Ownsworth T , et al. Potential of telepresence robots to enhance social connectedness in older adults with dementia: an integrative review of feasibility. Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 Dec;29(12):1951–1964. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers L , Mortenson WB , Fuhrer MJ , et al. Effect of a tailored assistive technology intervention on older adults and their family caregiver: a pragmatic study protocol. BMC Geriatr. 2016 May 13;16(1):103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mortenson BW , Demers L , Fuhrer MJ , et al. Effects of a caregiver-inclusive assistive technology intervention: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Geriatr. 2018 Apr 18;18(1):97.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alvira MC , Risco E , Cabrera E , et al. The association between positive-negative reactions of informal caregivers of people with dementia and health outcomes in eight European countries: a cross-sectional study. J Adv Nurs. 2015 Jun;71(6):1417–1434. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lethin C , Renom-Guiteras A , Zwakhalen S , et al. Psychological well-being over time among informal caregivers caring for persons with dementia living at home. Aging Ment Health. 2017 Nov;21(11):1138–1146. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrieu S , Coley N , Rolland Y , et al. Assessing Alzheimer’s disease patients’ quality of life: discrepancies between patient and caregiver perspectives. Alzheimers Dement. 2016 Apr;12(4):427–437. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tangcharoensathien V , Witthayapipopsakul W , Viriyathorn S , et al. Improving access to assistive technologies: challenges and solutions in low- and middle-income countries. WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2018 Sep;7(2):84–89.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nitto H , Taniyama D Social acceptance and impact of robots and artificial intelligence – findings of survey in Japan, the US and Germany- 221, Inagaki H NRI Papers, February 1, 2017
   Google Scholar
• Mansouri N , Goher K , Hosseini SE . Ethical framework of assistive devices: review and reflection. Robot Biomim. 2017;4(1):19. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Villaronga FE , Roig A . European regulatory framework for person carrier robots. Comput Law Secur Rev. 2017;33(4):502–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riek DL , Howard D . A code of ethics for the human-robot interaction profession we robot. Conference on Legal and Policy Issues Relating to Robotics. 2014 April4-5, Coral Gables Florida, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Holder C , Khurana V , Harrison F , et al. Robotics and law: key legal and regulatory implications of the robotics age (Part I of II). Comput Law Secur Rev. 2016;32. DOI:10.1016/j.clsr.2016.03.001.
   Google Scholar
• Holder C , Khurana V , Hook J , et al. Robotics and law: key legal and regulatory implications of the robotics age (part II of II). Comput Law Secur Rev. 2016;32. DOI:10.1016/j.clsr.2016.05.011.
   Google Scholar
• Chlopecki A . Artificial intelligence - legal and futurological sketches, Beck, Warsaw. Warsaw Poland, Wydawnictwo C.H. Beck. 2018. p. 4,6.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the commission on civil law rules on robotics 2015/2103(INL).  [cited 2019 Sep 1]. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52017IP0051
   Google Scholar
• Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on Artificial Intelligence for Europe of 25 April 2018 COM/2018/237. [cited 2019 Sep 1 ]. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52018DC0237
   Google Scholar