Ocular biometric repeatability using a new high-resolution swept-source optical coherence tomographer

References

• Gaurisankar ZS , van Rijn GA , Lima JEE , et al. Correlations between ocular biometrics and refractive error: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019;97(8):735–743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montés-Micó R , Carones F , Buttacchio A , et al. Madrid-costa D comparison of immersion ultrasound, partial coherence interferometry, and low coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry in cataract patients. J Refract Surg. 2011;27:665–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miglior S , Albe E , Guareschi M , et al. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of ultrasonic pachymetry measurements of central corneal thickness. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88(2):174–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dada T , Sihota R , Gadia R , et al. Comparison of anterior segment optical coherence tomography and ultrasound biomicroscopy for assessment of the anterior segment. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(5):837–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen P , Chopra V. Applications of optical coherence tomography in cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2013;24(1):47–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivannaboon S , Chirapapaisan C , Chonpimai P , et al. Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(10):2224–2232. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurian M , Negalur N , Das S , et al. Biometry with a new swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer: repeatability and agreement with an optical low-coherence reflectometry device. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(4):577–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunert KS , Peter M , Blum M , et al. Repeatability and agreement in optical biometry of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer versus partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(1):76–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffer KJ , Hoffmann PC , Savini G. Comparison of a new optical biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a biometer using optical low-coherence reflectometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42(8):1165–1172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W , Miao Y , Savini G , et al. Precision of a new ocular biometer in eyes with cataract using swept source optical coherence tomography combined with Placido-disk corneal topography. Sci Rep. 2017 23;7(1):13736. .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang J , Savini G , Hoffer K , et al. Repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of a new optical biometer based on swept-source optical coherence tomography and comparison with IOLMaster. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101(4):493–498. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteve-Taboada JJ , Ferrer-Blasco T , Aloy MA , et al. Ocular anatomic changes for different accommodative demands using swept-source optical coherence tomography: a pilot study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017;255(12):2399–2406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer-Blasco T , Domínguez-Vicent A , Esteve-Taboada JJ , et al. Evaluation of the repeatability of a swept-source ocular biometer for measuring ocular biometric parameters. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017;255(2):343–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J , Chen H , Li Y , et al. Comprehensive comparison of axial length measurement with three Swept-Source OCT-based biometers and partial coherence interferometry. J Refract Surg. 2019 1;35(2):115–120. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Albert N , Esteve-Taboada JJ , Montés-Micó R , et al. Repeatability assessment of biometric measurements with different refractive states and age using a swept-source biometer. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019;16(1):63–69. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer-Blasco T , Esteve-Taboada JJ , Monsálvez-Romín D , et al. Ocular biometric changes with different accommodative stimuli using swept-source optical coherence tomography. Int Ophthalmol. 2019;39(2):303–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlinden C , Khadka J , Pesudovs K. Statistical methods for conducting agreement (comparison of clinical tests) and precision (repeatability or reproducibility) studies in optometry and ophthalmology. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011;31(4):330–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM , Altman DG . Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8(2):135–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM , Altman DG . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen T . Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85:472–485.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rozema J , Wouters K , Mathysen D , et al. Overview of the repeatability, reproducibility, and agreement of the biometry values provided by various ophthalmic devices. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158:1111–1120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller R , Buttner P . A critical discussion of intraclass correlation coefficients. Stat Med. 1994;13:2465–2476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar