Current utilization and future directions of robotic-assisted endovascular surgery

References

• Tang QH, Chen J, Hu CF, et al. Comparison between endovascular and open surgery for the treatment of peripheral artery diseases: a meta-analysis. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020;62:484–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanagaratnam P, Koa-Wing M, Wallace DT, et al. Experience of robotic catheter ablation in humans using a novel remotely steerable catheter sheath. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2008;21(1):19–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riga C, Bicknell C, Cheshire N, et al. Initial clinical application of a robotically steerable catheter system in endovascular aneurysm repair. J Endovasc Ther. 2009;16(2):149–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisz G, Metzger DC, Caputo RP, et al. Safety and feasibility of robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: PRECISE (percutaneous robotically-enhanced coronary intervention) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(15):1596–1600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown KR, Rzucidlo E. Acute and chronic radiation injury. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53(1 SUPPL):15S–21S.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reeves RR, Ang L, Bahadorani J, et al. Invasive cardiologists are exposed to greater left sided cranial radiation: the BRAIN study (brain radiation exposure and attenuation during invasive cardiology procedures). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(9):1197–1206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roguin A, Goldstein J, Bar O, et al. Brain and neck tumors among physicians performing interventional procedures. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;111(9):1368–1372.
   Google Scholar
• National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Implementation of the principle of as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) for medical and dental personnel: recommendations of the national council on radiation protection and measurements. Bethesda, MD: The Council; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Hertault A, Maurel B, Midulla M, et al. Editor’s choice–minimizing radiation exposure during endovascular procedures: basic knowledge, literature review, and reporting standards. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;50(1):21–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karatasakis A, Brilakis ES. Shields and garb for decreasing radiation exposure in the cath lab. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2018;15(9):683–688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastracci TM. Radiation safety: a call to arms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;50(1):1–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein JA, Balter S, Cowley M, et al. Occupational hazards of interventional cardiologists: prevalence of orthopedic health problems in contemporary practice. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004;63(4):407–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orme NM, Rihal CS, Gulati R, et al. Occupational health hazards of working in the interventional laboratory: a multisite case control study of physicians and allied staff. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(8):820–826. 12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schanzer A, Steppacher R, Eslami M, et al. Vascular surgery training trends from 2001-2007: a substantial increase in total procedure volume is driven by escalating endovascular procedure volume and stable open procedure volume. J Vasc Surg. 2009;49(5):1339–1344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai AT, Crivera C, Kalsekar I, et al. Endovascular stroke therapy trends from 2011 to 2017 show significant improvement in clinical and economic outcomes. Stroke. 2019;50(7):1902–1906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granada JF, Delgado JA, Uribe MP, et al. First-in-human evaluation of a novel robotic-assisted coronary angioplasty system. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4(4):460–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordoli SJ, Carsten CG, Cull DL, et al. Radiation safety education in vascular surgery training. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59(3):860–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Challa K, Warren SG, Danak S, et al. Redundant protective barriers: minimizing operator occupational risk. J Interv Cardiol. 2009;22(3):299–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel TM, Shah SC, Soni YY, et al. Comparison of robotic percutaneous coronary intervention with traditional percutaneous coronary intervention: a propensity score-matched analysis of a large cohort. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(5):e008888.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell PT, Kruse KR, Kroll CR, et al. The impact of precise robotic lesion length measurement on stent length selection: ramifications for stent savings. Cardiovasc Revascularization Med. 2015;16(6):348–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Nooryani A, Aboushokka W. Rotate-on-retract procedural automation for robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: first clinical experience. Case Rep Cardiol. 2018;2018:1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madder R, Lombardi W, Parikh M, et al. TCT-539 impact of a novel advanced robotic wiring algorithm on time to wire a coronary artery bifurcation in a porcine model. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(18):B223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairns E $ 1bn corindus deal gets healthineers off the acquisition blocks. Evaluate [Internet]. 2019 Aug 8 [cited 2020 Aug 20]. Available from: https://www.evaluate.com/vantage/articles/news/deals/1bn-corindus-deal-gets-healthineers-acquisition-blocks#:~:text=Corindus’s%20flagship%20system%20is%20the,which%20sells%20for%20around%20%24480%2C000.
   Google Scholar
• Beck DL. Cover story the robot will see you now … robotics in the cath lab have staff breathing a sigh of relief. Am Coll Cardiol Interv [Internet]. 2017 Aug 3 [cited 2020 Aug 20]. Available from: https://www.acc.org/latest-in-cardiology/articles/2017/08/01/18/42/the-robot-will-see-you-now-robotics-in-the-cath-lab-have-staff-breathing-a-sigh-of-relief
   Google Scholar
• Mahmud E, Naghi J, Ang L, et al. Demonstration of the safety and feasibility of robotically assisted percutaneous coronary intervention in complex coronary lesions: results of the CORA-PCI study (complex robotically assisted percutaneous coronary intervention). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(13):1320–1327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis SG, Vandormael MG, Cowley MJ, et al. Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease. Implications for patient selection. Multivessel angioplasty prognosis study group. Circulation. 1990;82(4):1193–1202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters D, Reeves RR, Patel M, et al. Complex robotic compared to manual coronary interventions: 6- and 12-month outcomes. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Off J Soc Card Angiogr Interv. 2019;93(4):613–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmud E, Schmid F, Kalmar P, et al. Feasibility and safety of robotic peripheral vascular interventions: results of the RAPID trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(19):2058–2064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majewska N, Blaszak MA, Juszkat R, et al. Patients radiation doses during the implantation of stents in carotid, renal, iliac, femoral and popliteal arteries. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011;41(3):372–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigterman TA, Bolt LJJ, Snoeijs MG, et al. Radiation exposure during percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. Ann Vasc Surg. 2016;33:167–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal E, Weinberg I, Leichter I, et al. Patient radiation exposure during percutaneous endovascular revascularization of the lower extremity. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58(6):1556–1562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmud E, Hafner F, Rief P, et al. Robotic percutaneous vascular intervention with drug coated balloons is feasible and reduces operator radiation exposure: results of the robotic-assisted intervention for peripheral artery disease (RAPID) study II. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;8(2 Supplement):S35–S36.
   Google Scholar
• Behnamfar O, Pourdjabbar A, Yalvac E, et al. First case of robotic percutaneous vascular intervention for below-The-knee peripheral arterial disease. J Invasive Cardiol. 2016;28(11):E128–E131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips JA. Robotic-assisted revascularization of the posterior tibial artery in the treatment of peripheral vascular disease. Vasc Dis Manag. 2019;16(9):E118–E121.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caputo R, Lesser A, Simons A. Feasibility of robotic percutaneous renal artery revascularization. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;8(2 Supplement):S35–S36.
   Google Scholar
• George JC, Tabaza L, Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous JS. Peripheral vascular intervention for bilateral renal artery stenosis. Vasc Dis Manag. 2019;16(4):E52–E54.
   Google Scholar
• Britz GW, Panesar SS, Falb P, et al. Neuroendovascular-specific engineering modifications to the CorPath GRX robotic system. J Neurosurg. 2019;1–7. DOI: 10.3171/2019.9.JNS192113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira VM, Cancelliere NM, Nicholson P, et al. First-in- human, robotic-assisted neuroendovascular intervention. J Neurointervent Surg. 2020;12):338–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britz GW, Tomas J, Lumsden A. Feasibility of robotic-assisted neurovascular interventions: initial experience in flow model and porcine model. Neurosurgery. 2020;86(2):309–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sajja KC, Sweid A, Al Saiegh F, et al. Endovascular robotic: feasibility and proof of principle for diagnostic cerebral angiography and carotid artery stenting. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020;12(4):345–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsafrir Z, Janosek-Albright K, Aoun J, et al. The impact of a wireless audio system on communication in robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery: a prospective controlled trial. PLoS One. 2020;15(1):1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madder RD, VanOosterhout S, Mulder A, et al. Impact of robotics and a suspended lead suit on physician radiation exposure during percutaneous coronary intervention. Cardiovasc Revascularization Med. 2017;18(3):190–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madder RD, VanOosterhout S, Mulder A, et al. Feasibility of robotic telestenting over long geographic distances: a pre-clinical ex vivo and in vivo study. EuroIntervention. 2019;15(6):e510–e512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madder RD, VanOosterhout S, Mulder A, et al. Network latency and long‐distance robotic telestenting: exploring the potential impact of network delays on telestenting performance. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;95:914–919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel TM, Shah SC, Pancholy SB. Long distance tele-robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of first-in-human experience. EClinicalMedicine. 2019;14:53–58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pourdjabbar A, Ang L, Reeves RR, et al. The development of robotic technology in cardiac and vascular interventions. Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2017;8(3):e0030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolls A, Riga C. Endovascular robotics. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018;100:14–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bismuth J, Duran C, Stankovic M, et al. A first-in-man study of the role of flexible robotics in overcoming navigation challenges in the iliofemoral arteries. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57:14S–19S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochennec F, Kobeiter H, Gohel M, et al. Feasibility and safety of renal and visceral target vessel cannulation using robotically steerable catheters during complex endovascular aortic procedures. J Endovasc Ther. 2015;22(2):187–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C V R, Bicknell CD, Hamady MS, et al. Evaluation of robotic endovascular catheters for arch vessel cannulation. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54(3):799–809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perera AH, Riga CV, Monzon L, et al. Robotic arch catheter placement reduces cerebral embolization during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;53(3):362–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panesar SS, Volpi JJ, Lumsden A, et al. Telerobotic stroke intervention: a novel solution to the care dissemination dilemma. J Neurosurg. 2019;1:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Swerdlow NJ, Jones DW, Pothof AB, et al. Three-dimensional image fusion is associated with lower radiation exposure and shorter time to carotid cannulation during carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69(4):1111–1120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwein A, Chinnadurai P, Behler G, et al. Computed tomography angiography-fluoroscopy image fusion allows visceral vessel cannulation without angiography during fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2018;68(1):2–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwein A, Kramer B, Chinnadurai P, et al. Electromagnetic tracking of flexible robotic catheters enables “assisted navigation” and brings automation to endovascular navigation in an in vitro study. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67(4):1274–1281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurel B, Martin-Gonzalez T, Chong D, et al. A prospective observational trial of fusion imaging in infrarenal aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2018;68(6):1706–1713.e1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar