Virtual reality in neurorehabilitation: a review of its effects on multiple cognitive domains

References

• Chin JH, Vora N. The global burden of neurologic diseases. Neurology. 2014;83(4):349–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Europea C. The 2015 ageing report: economic and budgetary projections for the 28 EU member states (2013–2060). Eur Econ Ser. 2015:396.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll WM. The global burden of neurological disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(5):418–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massetti T, da Silva TD, Crocetta TB, et al. The clinical utility of virtual reality in neurorehabilitation: a systematic review. J Cent Nerv Syst Dis. 2018;10:1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallett M. Neuroplasticity and rehabilitation. Adv Struct Eng. 2005;42(2):R17.
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy JM, Cramer SC. Spontaneous and therapeutic-induced mechanisms of functional recovery after stroke. Transl Stroke Res. 2017;8(1):33–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahncke HW, Bronstone A, Merzenich MM. Brain plasticity and functional losses in the aged: scientific bases for a novel intervention. Prog Brain Res. 2006;157:81–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naismith SL, Glozier N, Burke D, et al. Early intervention for cognitive decline: is there a role for multiple medical or behavioural interventions? Early Interv Psychiatry. 2009;3(1):19–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowszowski L, Batchelor J, Naismith SL. Early intervention for cognitive decline : can cognitive training be used as a selective prevention technique ? Int Psychogeriatrics. 2010;22(4):537–548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallio EL, Öhman H, Kautiainen H, et al. Cognitive training interventions for patients with alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review. J Alzheimer’s Dis. 2017;56(4):1349–1372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitzer DI, Twamley EW, Jeste DV. Cognitive training in alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis of the literature. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2006;114(2):75–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons TD. Ecological validity in virtual reality-based neuropsychological assessment. In: Encyclopedia of information science and technology. 3rd Edition ed. IGI GLOBAL. 2014. p. 1006–1015.
   Google Scholar
• Bellucci DM, Glaberman K, Haslam N. Computer-assisted cognitive rehabilitation reduces negative symptoms in the severely mentally ill. Schizophr Res. 2003;59(2–3):1006–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semprini M, Laffranchi M, Sanguineti V, et al. Technological approaches for neurorehabilitation: from robotic devices to brain stimulation and beyond. Front Neurol. 2018;9:212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tieri G, Morone G, Paolucci S, et al. Virtual reality in cognitive and motor rehabilitation: facts, fiction and fallacies. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2018;15(2):107–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Tan W, Chen C, et al. A review of the application of virtual reality technology in the diagnosis and treatment of cognitive impairment. Front Aging Neurosci. 2019;11:280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montana JI, Tuena C, Serino S, et al. Neurorehabilitation of spatial memory using virtual environments : a systematic review. J Clin Med. 2019;8(10):7–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riva G, Baños RM, Botella C, et al. Transforming experience: the potential of augmented reality and virtual reality for enhancing personal and clinical change. Front Psychiatry. 2016;7:164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthes C, García-Hernández RJ, Wiedemann M, et al. State of the art of virtual reality technology. In: IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings; Big Sky, MT, USA. 2016. p. 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Castronovo F, Nikolic D, Liu Y, et al. An evaluation of immersive virtual reality systems for design reviews. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Construction Applications of Virtual Reality; London UK. 2013. p. 30–31.
   Google Scholar
• Slater M, Wilbur S. A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence. 1997;6(6):603–616.
   Google Scholar
• Slater M. A note on presence. Presence Connect. 2003;3(3):1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Cipresso P, Giglioli IAC, Raya MA, et al. The past, present, and future of virtual and augmented reality research: a network and cluster analysis of the literature. Front Psychol. 2018;9:2086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chirico A, Cipresso P, Yaden DB, et al. Effectiveness of immersive videos in inducing awe : an experimental study. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventura S, Brivio E, Riva G, et al. Immersive versus non-immersive experience: exploring the feasibility of memory assessment through 360° technology. Front Psychol. 2019;10(11):2509.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cavalera C, Pepe A, Zurloni V, Diana B, Realdon O. A short version of the state shame and guilt scale (SSGS-8). TPM - Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology. 2017;24(1):99–106
   Google Scholar
• Ijsselsteijn W, Riva G. Being there: the experience of presence in mediated environments. In Riva G, Davide F, & IJsselsteijn WA, Editors. Studies in new technologies and practices in communication. Being there: concepts, effects and measurement of user presence in synthetic environments. IOS press; 2003. p. 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Riva G, Wiederhold BK, Mantovani F. Neuroscience of virtual reality: from virtual exposure to embodied medicine. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Net. 2019;22(1):82–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston K. The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010;11(2):127–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friston K. Embodied inference and spatial cognition. Cogn Process. 2012;13(1):171–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark A. Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behav Brain Sci. 2013;36(3):181–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogeley K, May M, Ritzl A, et al. Neural correlates of first-person perspective as one constituent of human self-consciousness. J Cogn Neurosci. 2004;16(5):817–827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burin D, Yamaya N, Ogitsu R, et al. Virtual training leads to real acute physical, cognitive, and neural benefits on healthy adults. Neuroimage. 2020;222:117297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burin D, Kilteni K, Rabuffetti M, et al. Body ownership increases the interference between observed and executed movements. PLoS One. 2019;14(1):e0209899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banakou D, Kishore S, Slater M. Virtually being Einstein results in an improvement in cognitive task performance and a decrease in age bias. Front Psychol. 2018;9:917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matamala-Gomez M, Maisto M, Montana JI, Mavrodiev PA, Baglio F, Rossetto F, et al. The Role of Engagement in Teleneurorehabilitation: A Systematic Review. Front Neurol. 2020;11:354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallese V, Sinigaglia C. What is so special about embodied simulation? Trends Cogn Sci. 2011;15(11):512–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riva G. From virtual to real body: virtual reality as embodied technology. J Cyber Ther Rehabil. 2008;1(1):7–22.
   Google Scholar
• Riva G, Wiederhold BK, Chirico A, et al. Brain and virtual reality: what do they have in common and how to exploit their potential. Annu Rev Cybertherapy Telemed 2018;3:6.
   Google Scholar
• Pugnetti L, Mendozzi L, Attree EA, et al. Probing memory and executive functions with virtual reality: past and present studies. CyberPsychol Behav. 1998;1(2):151–161.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzo A, Reger G, Perlman K, et al. Virtual reality posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) exposure therapy results with active duty OIF/OEF service members. Int J Disabil Hum Dev. 2011;10(4):301–308.
   Google Scholar
• Matamala-gomez M, Donegan T, Bottiroli S, et al. Immersive virtual reality and virtual embodiment for pain relief. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019;13(8):1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishkind MC, Norr AM, Katz AC, et al. Review of virtual reality treatment in psychiatry : evidence versus current diffusion and use. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2017;19(11):80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng N, Pope Z, Lee JE, et al. Virtual reality exercise for anxiety and depression : a preliminary review of current research in an emerging field. J Clin Med. 2018;7(3):1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riva G, Gutiérrez-maldonado J, Dakanalis A, et al. Virtual reality in the assessment and treatment of weight-related disorders. In: In Virtual reality for psychological and neurocognitive interventions. New York (NY): Springer; 2019. p. 163–93.
   Google Scholar
• Merians AS, Jack D, Boian R, et al. Virtual reality–augmented rehabilitation for patients following stroke. Phys Ther. 2002;82(9):898–915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Van Peppen R, Wagenaar RC, et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2004;35(11):1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Realdon O, Serino S, Savazzi F, Rossetto F, Cipresso P, Parsons TD, et al. An ecological measure to screen executive functioning in MS: the Picture Interpretation Test (PIT) 360°. Sci Rep-Uk. 2019;9(1):5690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demain S, Burridge J, Ellis-Hill C, et al. Assistive technologies after stroke: self-management or fending for yourself? A focus group study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13(1):334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohil CJ, Alicea B, Biocca FA, Virtual reality in neuroscience research and therapy. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12(12). Available from. DOI:10.1038/nrn3122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultheis MT, Rizzo AA. The application of virtual reality technology in rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol. 2001;46(3):296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson EB, Feigon M, Gagliardo P, et al. Virtual reality and cognitive rehabilitation: a review of current outcome research. NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;34(4):759–772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard MC. A meta-analysis and systematic literature review of virtual reality rehabilitation programs. Comput Human Behav. 2017;70:317–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherniack EP. Not just fun and games: applications of virtual reality in the identification and rehabilitation of cognitive disorders of the elderly. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2011;6(4):283–289.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bouchard S, Rizzo A. Applications of virtual reality in clinical psychology and clinical cognitive neuroscience–an introduction. In: Virtual reality for psychological and neurocognitive interventions. New York (NY): Springer; 2019. p. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Słyk S, Zarzycki MZ, Kocwa-Karnaś A, et al. Virtual reality in the diagnostics and therapy of neurological diseases. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019;16(12):1035–1040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uwajeh PC, Iyendo TO, Polay M. Therapeutic gardens as a design approach for optimising the healing environment of patients with alzheimer’s disease and other dementias: a narrative review. Explore. 2019;15(5):352–362.
   Google Scholar
• Levin MF What is the potential of virtual reality for post-stroke sensorimotor rehabilitation? Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Chi B, Chau B, Yeo E, et al. Virtual reality for spinal cord injury-associated neuropathic pain: systematic review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2019;62(1):49–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dockx K, Bekkers EMJ, Van den Bergh V, et al. Virtual reality for rehabilitation in parkinson’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;12(12).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massetti T, Trevizan IL, Arab C, et al. Virtual reality in multiple sclerosis - a systematic review. Multi Sclerosis Relat Disord. 2016;8:107–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dredge S Facebook closes its $2bn oculus rift acquisition. What next? Technology The Guardian. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Proffitt R, Lange B. Considerations in the efficacy and effectiveness of virtual reality interventions for stroke rehabilitation: moving the field forward. Phys Ther. 2015;95(3):441–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter RC. Visual search with color. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1982;8(1):127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mrakic-Sposta S, Di Santo SG, Franchini F, et al. Effects of combined physical and cognitive virtual reality-based training on cognitive impairment and oxidative stress in MCI patients: a pilot study. Front Aging Neurosci. 2018;10(10):282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faria AL, Andrade A, Soares L, et al. Benefits of virtual reality based cognitive rehabilitation through simulated activities of daily living : a randomized controlled trial with stroke patients. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016;13(1):96–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall K, Stark J, Schillaci A, et al. The enhanced Interactive Physical and Cognitive Exercise System (iPACESTM v2.0): pilot clinical trial of an in-home ipad-based neuro-exergame for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). J Clin Med. 2018;7(9):249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggio MG, De Cola MC, Latella D, et al. What about the role of virtual reality in parkinson disease’s cognitive rehabilitation? preliminary findings from a randomized clinical trial. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2018;31(6):312–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Luca R, Russo M, Naro A, et al. Effects of virtual reality-based training with BTs-Nirvana on functional recovery in stroke patients: preliminary considerations. Int J Neurosci. 2017;128(9):791–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faria AL, Cameirão MS, Couras JF, et al. Combined cognitive-motor rehabilitation in virtual reality improves motor outcomes in chronic stroke - a pilot study. Front Psychol. 2018;9:854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faria AL, Pinho MS, Bermúdez I Badia S. A comparison of two personalization and adaptive cognitive rehabilitation approaches: a randomized controlled trial with chronic stroke patients. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020;17(1):1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho DR, Lee SH. Effects of virtual reality immersive training with computerized cognitive training on cognitive function and activities of daily living performance in patients with acute stage stroke: a preliminary randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(11):e14752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ettenhofer ML, Guise B, Brandler B, et al. Neurocognitive Driving Rehabilitation in Virtual Environments (NeuroDRIVE): a pilot clinical trial for chronic traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation. 2019;44(4):531–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao YY, Tseng HY, Lin YJ, et al. Using virtual reality-based training to improve cognitive function, instrumental activities of daily living and neural efficiency in older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020;56(1):47–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo M, De Luca R, Naro A, et al. Does body shadow improve the efficacy of virtual reality-based training with BTS NIRVANA? A pilot study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(38):e8096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park E, Yun BJ, Min YS, et al. Effects of a mixed reality-based cognitive training system compared to a conventional computer-assisted cognitive training system on mild cognitive impairment: a pilot study. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2019;32(3):172–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand N, Jolles J. Learning and retrieval rate of words presented auditorily and visually. J Gen Psychol. 1985. DOI:10.1080/00221309.1985.9711004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. WMS-III Wechsler memory Scale. Psychological Corporation. San Antonio (TX): Psychological corporation. 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Rey A L’examen clinique en psychologie. [The clinical examination in psychology.]. L’examen clinique en psychologie. 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Kwon JS, Lyoo IK, Hong KS, et al. Development and standardization of the computerized attention assessment for korean adults. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 2002;41(2):347–358.
   Google Scholar
• Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitas S, Simões MR, Alves L, et al. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): normative study for the Portuguese population. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2011;33(9):989–996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magni E, Binetti G, Bianchetti A, et al. Mini-mental state examination: a normative study in Italian elderly population. Eur J Neurol. 1996;3(3):198–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magni E, Binetti G, Padovani A, et al. Mini-mental state examination in Alzheimer’s disease and multi-infarct dementia. Int Psychogeriatrics. 1996;8(1):127–134.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mioshi E, Dawson K, Mitchell J, et al. The Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination revised (ACE-R): a brief cognitive test battery for dementia screening. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006;21(11):1078–1085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirra SS, Heyman A, McKeel D, et al. The consortium to establish a registry for alzheimer’s disease (CERAD). Part II. Standardization of the neuropathologic assessment of alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 1991. DOI:10.1212/WNL.41.4.479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delis DC, Kramer JH, Kaplan E, et al. California verbal learning test. 2nd ed. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• De Luca R, Maggio MG, Maresca G, et al. Improving cognitive function after traumatic brain injury: a clinical trial on the potential use of the semi-immersive virtual reality. Behav Neurol. 2019;2019(7):9268179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggio MG, Torrisi M, Buda A, et al. Effects of robotic neurorehabilitation through lokomat plus virtual reality on cognitive function in patients with traumatic brain injury: a retrospective case-control study. Int J Neurosci. 2019;130(2):117–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao Y, Chen I, Lin Y, et al. Effects of virtual reality-based physical and cognitive training on executive function and dual-task gait performance in older adults with mild cognitive impairment : a randomized control trial. Front Aging Neurosci. 2019;11(7):162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang CC, Kramer JH, Lin KN, et al. Validating the Chinese version of the verbal learning test for screening alzheimers disease. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2010. DOI:10.1017/S1355617709991184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlesimo GA, Marfia GA, Loasses A, et al. Perceptual and conceptual components in implicit and explicit stem completion. Neuropsychologia. 1996;34(8):785–792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison JE. Measuring cognitive change in alzheimer’s disease clinical drug trials. J Nutr Heal Aging. 2007;11:327–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podhorna J, Krahnke T, Shear M, et al. Alzheimer’s disease assessment scale-cognitive subscale variants in mild cognitive impairment and mild alzheimer’s disease: change over time and the effect of enrichment strategies. Alzheimer’s Res Ther. 2016;8(1):1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois B, Slachevsky A, Litvan I, et al. The FAB: a frontal assessment battery at bedside. Neurology. 2000;55(11):1621–1626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appollonio I, Leone M, Isella V, et al. The Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB): normative values in an Italian population sample. Neurol Sci. 2005;26(2):108–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss E, Sherman EMS, Spreen O. Acheivement tests. A compendium of neuropsychological tests: administration, norms and commentary. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Wang RY, Zhou JH, Huang YC, et al. Reliability of the Chinese version of the trail making test and stroop color and word test among older adults. Int J Gerontol. 2018;12(4):336–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavaco S, Gonçalves A, Pinto C, et al. Trail making test: regression-based norms for the portuguese population. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2013;28(2):189–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell GB, Whyte EM, Sereika SM, et al. Reliability and validity of the executive interview (exit) and quick exit among community dwelling older adults. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014;22(12):1444–1451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manera V, Chapoulie E, Bourgeois J, et al. A feasibility study with image-based rendered virtual reality in patients with mild cognitive impairment and dementia. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giovagnoli AR, Del Pesce M, Mascheroni S, et al. Trail making test: normative values from287 normal adult controls. Ital J Neurol Sci. 1996;17:305–309.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reitan RM. Validity of the trail making test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Percept Mot Skills. 1958;8(3):271–276.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-3R). San Antonio (TX): Psychological corporation. 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson P, Meara J, Taylor C. The weigl colour-form sorting test: a quick and easily administered bedside screen for dementia and executive dysfunction. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007. DOI:10.1002/gps.1765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royall DR, Mahurin RK, Gray KF. Bedside assessment of executive cognitive impairment: the executive interview. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40:1221–1226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grechuta K, Rubio Ballester B, Espín Munne R, et al. Augmented dyadic therapy boosts recovery of language function in patients with nonfluent aphasia: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2019;50(5):1270–1274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier L, Dehaut F, Joanette Y. The bells test: a quantitative and qualitative test for visual neglect. Int J Clin Neuropsychol. 1989;11:49–54.
   Google Scholar
• Mohs RC, Knopman D, Petersen RC, et al. Development of cognitive instruments for use in clinical trials of antidementia drugs: additions to the alzheimer’s disease assessment scale that broaden its scope. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1997;11:13–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan E, Goodglas H, Weintraub S. The boston naming test. 2da ed. Lea Febinger; Pro-Ed, 8700 Shoal Creek Blvd, Austin, TX. 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Benton LA, Hamsher KD, Sivan AB. Controlled oral word association test, multilingual aphasia examination. AJA Associate. New York (NY): Springer. 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Yasuda K, Muroi D, Ohira M, et al. Topics in stroke rehabilitation validation of an immersive virtual reality system for training near and far space neglect in individuals with stroke : a pilot study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2017;9357(7):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Fordell H, Bodin K, Eklund A, et al. RehAtt–scanning training for neglect enhanced by multi-sensory stimulation in virtual reality. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016;23(3):191–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson B, Cockburn J, Halligan P. Development of a behavioral test of visuospatial neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987;68:98–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halligan P, Wilson B, Cockburn J. A short screening test for visual neglect in stroke patients. Disabil Rehabil. 1990;12(3):95–99.
   Google Scholar
• Spinnler H, Tognoni G. Standardizzazione e taratura italiana di test neuropsicologici. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio Neuropsicologico dell’Invecchiamento. Ital J Neurol Sci. 1987;8:1–120.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rorden C, Karnath HO. A simple measure of neglect severity. Neuropsychologia. 2010;48(9):2758–2763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novelli G, Papagno C, Capitani E, et al. Tre test clinici di ricerca e produzione lessicale. Taratura su sogetti normali. Arch Psicol Neurol Psichiatr. 1986;47(4):477–506.
   Google Scholar
• Borod JC, Goodglass H, Kaplan E. Normative data on the boston diagnostic aphasia examination, parietal lobe battery, and the boston naming test. J Clin Neuropsychol. 1980. DOI:10.1080/01688638008403793
   Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller F, Neininger B, Elbert T, et al. Constraint-induced therapy of chronic aphasia after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32:1621–1626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tham K, Tegnér R. The baking tray task: a test of spatial neglect. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1996;6(1):19–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geeraerts S, Lafosse C, Vandenbussche E, et al. Asynchronous stimulus presentation in visual extinction: a psychophysical study. J Neuropsychol. 2010;4(2):167–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azouvi P, Olivier S, De Montety G, et al. Behavioral assessment of unilateral neglect: study of the psychometric properties of the catherine bergego scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(1):51–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azouvi P, Samuel C, Louis-Dreyfus A, et al. Sensitivity of clinical and behavioural tests of spatial neglect after right hemisphere stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;73(2):160–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenkenberg T, Bradford DC, Ajax ET. Line bisection and unilateral visual neglect in patients with neurologic impairment. Neurology. 1980;30(5):509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rengachary J, D’Avossa G, Sapir A, et al. Is the posner reaction time test more accurate than clinical tests in detecting left neglect in acute and chronic stroke? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(12):2081–2088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caffarra P, Vezzadini G, Dieci F, et al. Rey-osterrieth complex figure: normative values in an Italian population sample. Neurol Sci. 2002;22(6):443–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diller L, Ben Yishay Y, Gerstman LJ. Studies in cognition and rehabilitation in hemiplegia. In: Proceedings of the studies in cognition and rehabilitation in hemiplegia. Behavioral Science, Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, New York University Medical Center, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Grazia M, Russo M, Foti M, et al. Virtual reality in multiple sclerosis rehabilitation : a review on cognitive and motor outcomes. J Clin Neurosci. 2019;65:106–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggio MG, Maresca G, De Luca R, et al. The growing use of virtual reality in cognitive rehabilitation: fact, fake or vision? A scoping review. J Natl Med Assoc. 2019;111(4):457–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker MW, Pelleymounter MA, Gallagher M. Effects of training on a spatial memory task on high affinity choline uptake in hippocampus and cortex in young adult and aged rats. J Neurosci. 1988;8(1):90–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry E, Walker M, Grace J, et al. Acetylcholine in mind: a neurotransmitter correlate of consciousness? Trends Neurosci. 1999;22(6):273–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flannery RB. Treating learned helplessness in the elderly dementia patient: preliminary inquiry. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2002;17(6):345–349.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buccino G, Solodkin A, Small SL. Functions of the mirror neuron system: implications for neurorehabilitation. Cogn Behav Neurol. 2006;19(1):55–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainley V, Tajadura-Jiménez A, Fotopoulou A, et al. Looking into myself: changes in interoceptive sensitivity during mirror self-observation. Psychophysiology. 2012;49(11):1504–1508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouhnana M, Kingdom FAA. Objects versus shadows as influences on perceived object motion. Iperception. 2016;7:6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert PH, Mulin E, Malléa P, et al. Apathy diagnosis, assessment, and treatment in alzheimer’s disease. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2010;16(5):263–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dvorkin AY, Ramaiya M, Larson EB, et al. A “virtually minimal” visuo-haptic training of attention in severe traumatic brain injury. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013;10(1):92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riva G, Castelnuovo G, Mantovani F. Transformation of flow in rehabilitation: the role of advanced communication technologies. Behav Res Methods. 2006;38(2):237–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riva G. The neuroscience of body memory: from the self through the space to the others. Cortex. 2018;104:241–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riva G, Wiederhold BK, Mantovani F. Neuroscience of virtual reality: from virtual exposure to embodied medicine. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Net. 2019;22(1):82–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark A. Embodied prediction. Open MIND. 2015;7:1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Moseley GL, Gallace A, Spence C. Bodily illusions in health and disease: physiological and clinical perspectives and the concept of a cortical “body matrix.”. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012;36(1):34–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallace A, Spence C. In touch with the future: the sense of touch from cognitive neuroscience to virtual reality. In: Presence. Oxford: OUP; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Finotti G, Migliorati D, Costantini M. Multisensory integration, bodily self-consciousness and disorders of the immune system. Brain Behav Immun. 2015;49:e31.
   Google Scholar
• Finotti G, Costantini M. Multisensory body representation in autoimmune diseases. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):21074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawato M. Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999;9(6):718–7127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z. Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nat Neurosci. 2000;3(11):1212–1217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulus MP, Feinstein JS, Khalsa SS. An active inference approach to interoceptive psychopathology. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2019;15:97–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apps MAJ, Tsakiris M. The free-energy self: a predictive coding account of self-recognition. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014;41:85–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvert GA, Thesen T. Multisensory integration: methodological approaches and emerging principles in the human brain. J Physiol Paris. 2004. DOI:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2004.03.018
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sutter C, Drewing K, Müsseler J. Multisensory integration in action control. Front Psychol. 2014;5:544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho JT, Preller KH, Lenggenhager B. Neuropharmacological modulation of the aberrant bodily self through psychedelics. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020;108:526–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serino S, Pedroli E, Tuena C, et al. A novel virtual reality-based training protocol for the enhancement of the “ mental frame syncing ” in individuals with alzheimer ’ s disease : a development-of-concept trial. Front Aging Neurosci. 2017;9(7):240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serino S, Morganti F, Di Stefano F, et al. Detecting early egocentric and allocentric impairments deficits in alzheimer’s disease: an experimental study with virtual reality. Front Aging Neurosci. 2015;7:88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo D, Serino S, Tuena C, et al. Egocentric and allocentric spatial reference frames in aging: a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017;80(7):605–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lithfous S, Dufour A, Després O. Spatial navigation in normal aging and the prodromal stage of alzheimer’s disease: insights from imaging and behavioral studies. Ageing Res Rev. 2013;12(1):201–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riva G, Di Lernia D, Serino A, et al. The role of reference frames in memory recollection. Behav Brain Sci. 2019;42:e296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki K, Garfinkel SN, Critchley HD, et al. Multisensory integration across exteroceptive and interoceptive domains modulates self-experience in the rubber-hand illusion. Neuropsychologia. 2013;51(13):2909–20917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo RT, Bennett N, Bilicki A, et al. The calming effect of a new wearable device during the anticipation of public speech. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serino S, Pedroli E, Keizer A, et al. Virtual reality body swapping : a tool for modifying the allocentric. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2016;19(2):127–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riva G, Serino S, Di Lernia D, et al. Embodied medicine: mens sana in corpore virtuale sano. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017;11:120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tieri G, Morone G, Paolucci S, et al. Virtual reality in cognitive and motor rehabilitation: facts, fiction and fallacies. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2018;15(2):107–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petkova VI, Ehrsson HH. If I were you: perceptual illusion of body swapping. PLoS One. 2008;3(12):e3832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li BJ, Bailenson JN, Pines A, et al. A public database of immersive VR videos with corresponding ratings of arousal, valence, and correlations between head movements and self report measures. Front Psychol. 2017;8:2116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nason EE, Trahan M, Smith S, et al. Virtual treatment for veteran social anxiety disorder: a comparison of 360° video and 3D virtual reality. J Technol Hum Serv. 2020;38(3):288–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar