Device profile of the Bonebridge bone conduction implant system in hearing loss: an overview of its safety and efficacy

References

• den Besten CA, Monksfield P, Bosman A, et al. Audiological and clinical outcomes of a transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant: six-month results from a multicentre study. Clin Otolaryngol. 2019;44(2):144–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurz A, Flynn M, Caversaccio M, et al. Speech understanding with a new implant technology: a comparative study with a new nonskin penetrating Baha system. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:416205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen SY, Mancuso D, Lalwani AK. Skin necrosis after implantation with the BAHA attract: a case report and review of the literature. Otol Neurotol. 2017;38(3):364–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnevale C, Tomás-Barberán M, Til-Pérez G, et al. The Bonebridge active bone conduction system: a fast and safe technique for a middle fossa approach. J Laryngol Otol. 2019;133(4):344–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You P, Siegel LH, Kassam Z, et al. The middle fossa approach with self-drilling screws: a novel technique for BONEBRIDGE implantation. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;48(1):35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plontke SK, Radetzki F, Seiwerth I, et al. Individual computer-assisted 3D planning for surgical placement of a new bone conduction hearing device. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35(7):1251–1257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, et al. 3D slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;30(9):1323–1341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinmetz C, Mader I, Arndt S, et al. MRI artefacts after Bonebridge implantation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;271(7):2079–2082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprinzl G, Lenarz T, Ernst A, et al. First European multicenter results with a new transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant system: short-term safety and efficacy. Otol Neurotol. 2013;34:1076–1083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbara M, Perotti M, Gioia B, et al. Transcutaneous bone-conduction hearing device: audiological and surgical aspects in a first series of patients with mixed hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol. 2013;133:1058–1064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manrique M, Sanhueza I, Manrique R, et al. A new bone conduction implant: surgical technique and results. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35(2):216–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riss D, Arnoldner C, Baumgartner WD, et al. Indication criteria and outcomes with the Bonebridge transcutaneous bone-conduction implant. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(12):2802–2806.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihler F, Volbers L, Blum J, et al. Preliminary functional results and quality of life after implantation of a new bone conduction hearing device in patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35:211–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchin G, Bonali M, Russo M, et al. Active bone conduction system: outcomes with the Bonebridge transcutaneous device. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2015;77(1):17–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahne T, Seiwerth I, Götze G, et al. Functional results after Bonebridge implantation in adults and children with conductive and mixed hearing loss. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;272(11):3263–3269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laske RD, Röösli C, Pfiffner F, et al. Functional results and subjective benefit of a transcutaneous bone conduction device in patients with single-sided deafness. Otol Neurotol. 2015;36:1151–1156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner WD, Hamzavi JS, Böheim K, et al. A new transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant: short-term safety and efficacy in children. Otol Neurotol. 2016;37(6):713–720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zernotti ME, Di Gregorio MF, Galeazzi P, et al. Comparative outcomes of active and passive hearing devices by transcutaneous bone conduction. Acta Otolaryngol. 2016;136:556–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihler F, Blum J, Berger MU, et al. The prediction of speech recognition in noise with a semi-implantable bone conduction hearing system by external bone conduction stimulation with headband: a prospective study. Trends Hear. 2016;20:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salcher R, Zimmermann D, Giere T, et al. Audiological results in SSD with an active transcutaneous bone conduction implant at a retrosigmoidal position. Otol Neurotol. 2017;38(5):642–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vyskocil E, Riss D, Arnoldner C, et al. Dura and sinus compression with a transcutaneous bone conduction device - hearing outcomes and safety in 38 patients. Clin Otolaryngol. 2017;42(5):1033–1038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rader T, Stöver T, Lenarz T, et al. Retrospective analysis of hearing-impaired adult patients treated with an active transcutaneous bone conduction implant. Otol Neurotol. 2018;39(7):874–881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zernotti ME, Chiaraviglio MM, Mauricio SB, et al. Audiological outcomes in patients with congenital aural atresia implanted with transcutaneous active bone conduction hearing implant. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;119:54–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnevale C, Til-Pérez G, Arancibia-Tagle DJ, et al. Hearing outcomes of the active bone conduction system Bonebridge® in conductive or mixed hearing loss. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2019;70(2):80–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan X, Yang T, Niu X, et al. Long-term outcomes of bone conduction hearing implants in patients with bilateral microtia-atresia. Otol Neurotol. 2019;40(8):998–1005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brkic FF, Riss D, Scheuba K, et al. Medical, technical and audiological outcomes of hearing rehabilitation with the Bonebridge transcutaneous bone-conduction implant: a single-center experience. J Clin Med. 2019;8(10):1614–1623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimmer W, von Werdt M, Mantokoudis G, et al. Outcome prediction for Bonebridge candidates based on audiological indication criteria. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2019;46(5):681–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koro E, Werner M. Outcomes after application of active bone conducting implants. Audiol Neurootol. 2019;24(4):197–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skarżyński PH, Ratuszniak A, Król B, et al. The Bonebridge in adults with mixed and conductive hearing loss: audiological and quality of life outcomes. Audiol Neurootol. 2019;24(2):90–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Chen P, Zhao C, et al. Audiological and subjective outcomes of 100 implanted transcutaneous bone conduction devices and preoperative bone conduction hearing aids in patients with bilateral microtia-atresia. Acta Otolaryngol. 2020;140(8):667-673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratuszniak A, Skarzynski PH, Gos E, et al. The Bonebridge implant in older children and adolescents with mixed or conductive hearing loss: audiological outcomes. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;118:97–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss R, Leinung M, Baumann U, et al. Improvement of speech perception in quiet and in noise without decreasing localization abilities with the bone conduction device Bonebridge. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;274(5):2107–2115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Wang Z, Huang M, et al., BoneBridge implantation in patients with single-sided deafness resulting from vestibular schwannoma resection: objective and subjective benefit evaluations. Acta Otolaryngol. 2018;138(10):877–885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmerber S, Deguine O, Marx M, et al. Safety and effectiveness of the Bonebridge transcutaneous active direct-drive bone-conduction hearing implant at 1-year device use. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017;274(4):1835–1851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung J, Kim HJ, Lee YH, et al. Extended-duration deafness is correlated with better subjective satisfaction in CROS-tBAHI recipients. Clin Otolaryngol. 2019;44(4):688–692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt K, Frenzel H, Ausili SA, et al. Improved directional hearing of children with congenital unilateral conductive hearing loss implanted with an active bone-conduction implant or an active middle ear implant. Hear Res. 2018;370:238–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerdes T, Salcher RB, Schwab B, et al. Comparison of audiological results between a transcutaneous and a percutaneous bone conduction instrument in conductive hearing loss. Otol Neurotol. 2016;37:685–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monini S, Bianchi A, Talamonti R, et al. Patient satisfaction after auditory implant surgery: ten-year experience from a single implanting unit center. Acta Otolaryngol. 2017;137(4):389–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbara M, Covelli E, Filippi C, et al. Transitions in auditory rehabilitation with bone conduction implants (BCI). Acta Otolaryngol. 2019;139(4):379–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han JJ, Park HR, Song JJ, et al. A comparison study of audiological outcome and compliance of bone conduction implantable hearing implants. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020. DOI:10.1007/s00405-020-06025-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren R, Zhao S, Wang D, et al. Audiological effectiveness of Bonebridge implantation for bilateral congenital malformation of the external and middle ear. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;276(10):2755–2762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audiological benefit and improved quality of life with two bone conduction systems: Adhear vs. Bonebridge in experienced users. [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 11]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03766152?cond=bonebridge&draw=2&rank=3
   Google Scholar
• Bonebridge Bone Conduction Implant in Adults. [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 20]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03859648?cond=bonebridge&draw=2&rank=1
   Google Scholar
• Tsang WSS, Yu JKY, Bhatia KSS, et al. The Bonebridge semi-implantable bone conduction hearing device: experience in an Asian patient. J Laryngol Otol. 2013;127:1214–1221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulasegarah J, Burgess H, Neeff M, et al. Comparing audiological outcomes between the Bonebridge and bone conduction hearing aid on a hard test band: our experience in children with atresia and microtia. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;107:176–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan X, Ping L, Yang T, et al. Comparative effects of unilateral and bilateral bone conduction hearing devices on functional hearing and sound localization abilities in patients with bilateral microtia-atresia. Acta Otolaryngol. 2020;140(7):1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab B, Wimmer W, Severens JL, et al., Adverse events associated with bone-conduction and middle-ear implants: a systematic review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;277(2):423–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar