References
- American College of Radiology. Revised 2020. ACR practice parameters for the performance of stereotactic/tomosynthesis-guided breast interventional procedures. [cited 2020 Sep 20]. Available from: https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Practice-Parameters/stereo-breast.pdf
- Bruening W, Fontanarosa J, Tipton K, et al. Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of core-needle and open surgical biopsy to diagnose breast lesions. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:238–246.
- cited 2020 January 10. Cancer.org.www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/breast-cancer-facts-and-figures/breast-cancer-facts-and-figures-2019-2020.pdf
- Radiology Info. cited 2020 May 10. https://www.radiologyinfo.org/en/info.cfm?pg=breastbius.
- Schrading S, Distelmaier M, Dirrichs T, et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial experiences and comparison with prone stereotactic vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology. 2015 March;274:654–662. Number 3.
- Paixão L, Chevalier M, Hurtado-Romero AE, et al. Mean glandular dose to patients from stereotactic breast biopsy procedures. Phys Med Biol. 2018;63:14.
- Mayo R, Kalambo M, Parikh J. Preoperative localization of breast lesions: current techniques. Clin Imaging. 2019;56:1–8.
- Ma K, Kornecki A, Bax J, et al. Development and validation of a new guidance device for lateral approach stereotactic breast biopsy. Med Phys. 2009 June;36(6):2118–2129.
- Nakamura Y, Urashima M, Matsuura A, et al. Stereotactic directional vacuum-assisted breast biopsy using lateral approach. Breast Cancer. 2010;17:286–289.
- Grimm L. Clinical benefits of tomosynthesis guided breast biopsy. Marlborough, MA: Hologic; 2018. p. 1–6.
- Verkooijen HM, Peeters PH, Borel Rinkes IH, et al. Risk factors for cancellation of stereotactic large core needle biopsy on a prone biopsy table. BrJ Radiol. 2001 Nov;74(887):1007–1012. .
- Department of health and human services – food and drug administration. [cited 2020 Sep 15]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/premarket-submissions/premarket-notification-510k.
- Traditional. 510(k) Summary for FDA approval of the lateral arm device. June. 2016;6.
- Tejerina A. Clinical experience implementing the hologic affirm prone biopsy system. Hologic. 2018.
- Madhukar Kapoor M, Mahesh Patel M, Scoggins ME. The wire and beyond: recent advances in breast imaging preoperative needle localization. Radiographics. 2019;39:1886–1906.
- Patel B, Covington M, Pizzitola V, et al. Initial experience of tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted biopsies of tomosynthesis-detected (2D mammography and ultrasound occult) architectural distortions. AJR. 2018;210:1395–1400.
- Shin K, Teichgraeber D, Martaindale S, et al. Tomosynthesis-guided core biopsy of the breast: why and how to use it. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2018;8:28.
- Wakdherr C, Berchlaz G, Altermatt HJ, et al. Tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: afeasibility study. Eur Radiol. 2016;26:1582–1589.
- Imschweiler T, Haueisen H, Kampmann G, et al. MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: comparison with stereotactically guided and ultrasound-guided techniques. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:128–135.
- Bahl M, Maunglay M, D’Alessandro LC. Comparison of upright digital breast tomosynthesis-guided versus prone stereotactic vacuum-assistedbreast biopsy. Radiology. 2019;290:298–304.
- Ma K, Fenster A, Kornecki A, et al. A new lateral guidance device for stereotactic breast biopsy using an add-on unit to an upright mammography system. 30th Annual International IEEE EMBS Conference. August 20-24, 2008.
- Welle GJ, Clark M, Loos S, et al. Stereotactic breast biopsy: recumbent biopsy using add-on upright equipment. AJR. 2019;175:59–63.
- Myong JH, Kang BJ, Soo Kyung MD, et al. The clinical utility of adding lateral approach to conventional vertical approach forprone stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Korean J Radiol. 2013;14(4):568–575. .
- Horvat J, Keating D, Rodrigues-Duarte H, et al. Calcifications at digital breast tomosynthesis: imaging features and biopsy techniques. Radiographics. 2019;39:307–318.