Contact force sensors in minimally invasive catheters: current and future applications

References

• Weiss VJ, Lumsden AB. Minimally invasive vascular surgery: review of current modalities. World J Surg. 1999 Apr;23(4):406–414. PubMed PMID: 10030865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catheter SK. Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. N Engl J Med. 2019 Apr 18;380(16):1555–1564. PubMed PMID: 30995375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanc R, Escalard S, Baharvadhat H, et al. Recent advances in devices for mechanical thrombectomy. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2020 Jul;17(7):697–706. PubMed PMID: 32552093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao PS. Balloon pulmonary valvuloplasty: a review. Clin Cardiol. 1989 Feb;12(2):55–74. PubMed PMID: 2653678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oesterle SN, Reifart N, Hayase M, et al. Catheter-based coronary bypass: a development update. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003 Feb;58(2):212–218. PubMed PMID: 12552547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng W, Law PK. Feedforward Coordinate Control of a Robotic Cell Injection Catheter. Cell Transplant. Cell Transplantation. 2017 Aug;26(8):1319–1330. PubMed PMID: 28901195; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5680975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haider H, Lei Y, Ashraf M. MyoCell, a cell-based, autologous skeletal myoblast therapy for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Curr Opin Mol Ther. 2008 Dec;10(6):611–621. PubMed PMID: 19051139; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2668534.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zheng Y, Sampaio LC, Li K, et al. Safety and feasibility of mapping and stem cell delivery in the presence of an implanted left ventricular assist device: a preclinical investigation in sheep. Tex Heart Inst J. 2013;40(3):229–234. PubMed PMID: 23914010; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3709201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moya-Angeler J, Gianakos AL, Villa JC, et al. Current concepts on osteonecrosis of the femoral head. World J Orthop. 2015 Sep 18;6(8):590–601. PubMed PMID: 26396935; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4573503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein LW, Miller DL, Balter S, et al. Occupational health hazards in the interventional laboratory: time for a safer environment. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009 Jul;20(7Suppl):S278–83. PubMed PMID: 19560009.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rafii-Tari H, Payne CJ, Yang GZ. Current and emerging robot-assisted endovascular catheterization technologies: a review. Ann Biomed Eng. 2014 Apr;42(4):697–715. PubMed PMID: 24281653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu Y, Liu H, Huang W, et al. Steerable catheters in minimally invasive vascular surgery. Int J Med Robot. 2009 Dec 5;5(4):381–391. PubMed PMID: 19795440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng W, Law PK. Conceptual Design and Procedure for an Autonomous Intramyocardial Injection Catheter. Cell Transplant. 2017 May 9;26(5):735–751. PubMed PMID: 27938487; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5657718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters BS, Armijo PR, Krause C, et al. Review of emerging surgical robotic technology. Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1636–1655. PubMed PMID: 29442240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller L, Saeed M, Wilson MW, et al. Remote control catheter navigation: options for guidance under MRI. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012 Jun 1;14(33):33. PubMed PMID: 22655535; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3461467.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bell JA, Saikus CE, Ratnayaka K, et al. A deflectable guiding catheter for real-time MRI-guided interventions. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Apr;35(4):908–915. PubMed PMID: 22128071; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3292659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taffoni F, Formica D, Saccomandi P, et al. Optical fiber-based MR-compatible sensors for medical applications: an overview. Sensors (Basel). 2013 Oct 18;13(10):14105–14120. PubMed PMID: 24145918; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3859111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabri N, Aljunid SA, Salim MS. Fiber Optic Sensors: short Review and Applications. G F, S K, A J. et al. editors. Recent Trends in Physics of Material Science and Technology. Vol. 204. Singapore: Springer: Springer Series in Materials Science; 2015:299-311.
   Google Scholar
• Roriz P, Frazao O, Lobo-Ribeiro AB, et al. Review of fiber-optic pressure sensors for biomedical and biomechanical applications. J Biomed Opt. 2013 May;18(5):50903. PubMed PMID: 23722494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu L, Miller MI, Ge J, et al. Temperature-Insensitive Fiber-Optic Contact Force Sensor for Steerable Catheters. IEEE Sens J. 2016;16(12):4771–4775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokoyama K, Nakagawa H, Shah DC, et al. Novel contact force sensor incorporated in irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter predicts lesion size and incidence of steam pop and thrombus. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2008 Dec 1;1(5):354–362. PubMed PMID: 19808430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho SC, Razavi M, Nazeri A, et al. FBG sensor for contact level monitoring and prediction of perforation in cardiac ablation. Sensors (Basel). 2012;12(1):1002–1013. PubMed PMID: 22368507; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3279251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polygerinos P, Schaeffter T, Seneviratne L, et al. A fibre-optic catheter-tip force sensor with MRI compatibility: a feasibility study. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2009; Minneapolis, US 2009:1501–1554. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5334163 PubMed PMID: 19964534.
   Google Scholar
• Polygerinos P, Ataollahi A, Schaeffter T, et al. MRI-compatible intensity-modulated force sensor for cardiac catheterization procedures. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2011 Mar;58(3):721–726. PubMed PMID: 21118758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polygerinos P, Seneviratne LD, Razavi R, et al. Triaxial Catheter-Tip Force Sensor for MRI-Guided Cardiac Procedures. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron. 2013;18(1):386–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polygerinos P, Puangmali P, Seneviratne LD, et al. Novel Miniature MRI-Compatible Fiber-Optic Force Sensor for Cardiac Catherisation Procedures. 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; May 3–8; Anchorage, Alaska,USA: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; 2010. p. 2598–2603.
   Google Scholar
• Roriz P, Ramos A, Santos JL, et al. Fiber Optic Intensity-Modulated Sensors: a Review in Biomechanics. Photonic Sens. 2012;2(4):315–330.
   Google Scholar
• Islam MR, Ali MM, Lai MH, et al. Chronology of Fabry-Perot interferometer fiber-optic sensors and their applications: a review. Sensors (Basel). 2014 Apr 24;14(4):7451–7488. PubMed PMID: 24763250; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4029708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su H, Zervas M, Furlong C, et al. A Miniature MRI-Compatible Fiber-optic Force Sensor Utilizing Fabry-Perot Interferometer. In: P T, editor. MEMS and Nanotechnology, 4. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. New York, NY: Springer; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Abushagur AA, Arsad N, Reaz MI, et al. Advances in bio-tactile sensors for minimally invasive surgery using the fibre Bragg grating force sensor technique: a survey. Sensors (Basel). 2014 Apr 9;14(4):6633–6665. PubMed PMID: 24721774; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4029712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werneck MM, Allil RC, Ribeiro BA, et al. A Guide to Fiber Bragg Grating Sensors. In: Cuadrado-Laborde C, editor. Current Trends in Short- and Long-period Fiber Gratings: Intech Open; 2013. Available from: https://www.intechopen.com/books/current-trends-in-short-and-long-period-fiber-gratings/a-guide-to-fiber-bragg-grating-sensors
   Google Scholar
• Chatzipirpiridis G, Erne P, Ergeneman O, et al. A magnetic force sensor on a catheter tip for minimally invasive surgery. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Aug; Milano, Italy 2015:7970–7973. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7320241. PubMed PMID: 26738141.
   Google Scholar
• Jang AK, Changmin K, Kihong P, et al. Development of an integrated optical contact force monitoring sensor for cardiac ablation catheters. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Aug; Milan, Italy 2015:4363–4366. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2015.7319361. PubMed PMID: 26737261.
   Google Scholar
• Bourier F, Gianni C, Dare M, et al. Fiberoptic Contact-Force Sensing Electrophysiological Catheters: how Precise Is the Technology? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017 Jan;28(1):109-114. PubMed PMID: 27653802.
   Google Scholar
• Bourier F, Hessling G, Ammar-Busch S, et al. Electromagnetic Contact-Force Sensing Electrophysiological Catheters: how Accurate is the Technology? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016 Mar;27(3):347-50. PubMed PMID: 26643010.
   Google Scholar
• Gerstenfeld EP. Contact force-sensing catheters: evolution or revolution in catheter ablation technology? Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014 Feb 7;7(1):5–6. PubMed PMID: 24550405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stabile G, Simone A, Solimene F, et al. Radiation Dose is Significantly Reduced by Use of Contact Force Sensing Catheter During Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation. J Atr Fibrillation. 2015 Apr-May;7(6):1229. PubMed PMID: 27957166; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4956365.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee G, Hunter RJ, Lovell MJ, et al. Use of a contact force-sensing ablation catheter with advanced catheter location significantly reduces fluoroscopy time and radiation dose in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2016 Feb;18(2):211–218. PubMed PMID: 26318548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natale A, Monir G, Patel AM, et al. Long-term safety and effectiveness of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation using a porous tip contact force-sensing catheter from the SMART SF trial. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2020 May 27. DOI: 10.1007/s10840-020-00780-4 PubMed PMID: 32462550. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32462550/
   Google Scholar
• Shurrab M, Di Biase L, Briceno DF, et al. Impact of Contact Force Technology on Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: a Meta-Analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Sep 21;4(9):e002476. PubMed PMID: 26391136; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4599513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Biase L, Natale A, Barrett C, et al. Relationship between catheter forces, lesion characteristics, “popping,” and char formation: experience with robotic navigation system. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009;20(4):436–440. PubMed PMID: 19017335.
   Google Scholar
• Ganapathy AV, Nazeri A, Ashton J, et al. Contact-force recovery predicts the absence of cardiac perforation during steam pops. [ J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2020 Jun 13. doi: 10.1007/s10840-020-00794-y. PubMed PMID: 32533277. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32533277/
   Google Scholar
• Nazeri A, Ganapathy A, Massumi A, et al. Contact-force recovery can predict cardiac perforation during radiofrequency ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014 Sep;37(9):1129–1132. PubMed PMID: 24797921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah D, Lambert H, Langenkamp A, et al. Catheter tip force required for mechanical perforation of porcine cardiac chambers. Europace. 2011 Feb;13(2):277–283. PubMed PMID: 21084361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perna F, Heist EK, Danik SB, et al. Assessment of catheter tip contact force resulting in cardiac perforation in swine atria using force sensing technology. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011 Apr 4;4(2):218–224. PubMed PMID: 21248244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsokkari I, Sapp JL, Doucette S, et al. Role of contact force in ischemic scar-related ventricular tachycardia ablation; optimal force required and impact of left ventricular access route. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018;53(3):323–331. PubMed PMID: 29946899.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy VY, Shah D, Kautzner J, et al. The relationship between contact force and clinical outcome during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the TOCCATA study. Heart Rhythm. 2012 Nov;9(11):1789–1795. DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.07.016. PubMed PMID: 22820056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuzil P, Reddy VY, Kautzner J, et al. Electrical reconnection after pulmonary vein isolation is contingent on contact force during initial treatment: results from the EFFICAS I study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Apr 6;6(2):327–333. PubMed PMID: 23515263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kautzner J, Neuzil P, Lambert H, et al. EFFICAS II: optimization of catheter contact force improves outcome of pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2015 Aug;17(8):1229–1235. PubMed PMID: 26041872; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4535556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullah W, Hunter RJ, Baker V, et al. Target indices for clinical ablation in atrial fibrillation: insights from contact force, electrogram, and biophysical parameter analysis. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014 Feb 7;1:63–68. DOI:10.1161/CIRCEP.113.001137. PubMed PMID: 24443504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makimoto H, Metzner A, Tilz RR, et al. Higher contact force, energy setting, and impedance rise during radiofrequency ablation predicts charring: new insights from contact force-guided in vivo ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018;29(2):227–235. PubMed PMID: 29116663.
   Google Scholar
• Ravi V, Poudyal A, Abid QU, et al. High-power short duration vs. conventional radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace. 2021 Feb 1 PubMed PMID: 33523184. DOI:10.1093/europace/euaa327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson B, Chen X, Pehrson S, et al. The effectiveness of a high output/short duration radiofrequency current application technique in segmental pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2006 Nov 8;8(11):962–965. PubMed PMID: 17043070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leshem E, Zilberman I, Tschabrunn CM, et al. High-Power and Short-Duration Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation: biophysical Characterization. JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology. 2018 Apr 4;4(4):467–479. PubMed PMID: 30067486.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhaskaran A, Chik W, Pouliopoulos J, et al. Five seconds of 50–60 W radio frequency atrial ablations were transmural and safe: an in vitro mechanistic assessment and force-controlled in vivo validation. Europace. 2017 May 1;19(5):874–880. PubMed PMID: 27207815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkagan M, Contreras-Valdes FM, Leshem E, et al. High-power and short-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: safety, efficacy, and long-term durability. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018;Sep;29(9):1287–1296. PubMed PMID: 29846987.
   Google Scholar
• Kottmaier M, Popa M, Bourier F, et al. Safety and outcome of very high-power short-duration ablation using 70W for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2020;22(3):388–393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassallo F, Meigre LL, Serpa E, et al. Changes and impacts in early recurrences after atrial fibrillation ablation in contact force era: comparison of high-power short-duration with conventional technique-FIRST experience data. J Interv Card Electrophysiol.. 2020 Nov 5. DOI: 10.1007/s10840-020-00911-x PubMed PMID: 33151444.
   Google Scholar
• Vassallo F, Cunha C, Serpa E, et al. Comparison of high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation of atrial fibrillation using a contact force-sensing catheter and conventional technique: initial results. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;Oct;30(10):1877–1883. PubMed PMID: 31397522.
   Google Scholar
• Black-Maier E, Pokorney SD, Barnett AS, et al. Risk of atrioesophageal fistula formation with contact force-sensing catheters. Heart Rhythm. 2017 Sep;14(9):1328–1333. PubMed PMID: 28416466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das M, Tomlinson DR, Gupta D To the Editor- Contact force-sensing catheters and increased risk of atrioesophageal fistula: is the tool to blame or the workmen?: Is the Tool to Blame or the Workmen? Heart Rhythm. 2018 Jan;15(1): e1. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.09.020. PubMed PMID: 28917568.
   Google Scholar
• Black-Maier E, Piccini JP. Reply to the Editor—Contact force-sensing catheters and increased risk of atrioesophageal fistula: is the tool to blame or the workmen? Heart Rhythm. 2018 Jan;15(1):e1–e2. PubMed PMID: 28917565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou X, Lv W, Zhang W, et al. Impact of contact force technology on reducing the recurrence and major complications of atrial fibrillation ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anatol J Cardiol. 2017 Feb;17(2):82–91. PubMed PMID: 28209944; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5336771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansour M, Lakkireddy D, Packer D, et al. Safety of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using fiber optic–based contact force sensing. Heart Rhythm. 2017 Nov;14(11):1631–1636. PubMed PMID: 28734985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu N, Zhao Q, Li L, et al. Association between the use of contact force-sensing catheters and cardiac tamponade in atrial fibrillation ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2019;55(2):137–143. PubMed PMID: 30712075; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6660577.
   Google Scholar
• Haegeli LM, Stutz L, Mohsen M, et al. Feasibility of zero or near zero fluoroscopy during catheter ablation procedures. Cardiol J. 2019;26(3):226–232. PubMed PMID: 29611170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf T, Gepstein L, Dror U, et al. Detailed endocardial mapping accurately predicts the transmural extent of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 May;37(6):1590–1597. PubMed PMID: 11345370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson JT, Hutchinson MD, Cooper JM, et al. Tissue-specific variability in human epicardial impedance. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011;22(4):436–439. PubMed PMID: 20946231.
   Google Scholar
• Mizuno H, Vergara P, Maccabelli G, et al. Contact force monitoring for cardiac mapping in patients with ventricular tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24(5):519–524. PubMed PMID: 23373693.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasi C, Dal Monte A, Argnani MS, et al. Impedance mapping with constant contact force on 3D electroanatomic map to characterize tissues at pulmonary veno-atrial junction. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2020 Aug 4. DOI: 10.1007/s10840-020-00845-4 PubMed PMID: 32749567.
   Google Scholar
• Sciarra L, Palama Z, Nesti M, et al. Contact-force monitoring increases accuracy of right ventricular voltage mapping avoiding “false scar” detection in patients with no evidence of structural heart disease. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2020 Aug 6;20(6):243–249. PubMed PMID: 32768620.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teijeira-Fernandez E, Cochet H, Bourier F, et al. Influence of contact force on voltage mapping: a combined magnetic resonance imaging and electroanatomic mapping study in patients with tetralogy of Fallot. Heart Rhythm. 2018 Aug;15(8):1198–1205. PubMed PMID: 29572086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schecter S, Lin W, Gopal A, et al. Haptics and the heart: force and tactile feedback system for cardiovascular interventions. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Sep;19(6):36–40. PubMed PMID: 30017728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omisore OM, Han SP, Ren LX, et al. Towards Characterization and Adaptive Compensation of Backlash in a Novel Robotic Catheter System for Cardiovascular Interventions. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst. 2018 Aug;12(4):824–838. PubMed PMID: 29994773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aranda-Michel E, Yi J, Wirekoh J, et al. Miniaturized Robotic End-Effector with Piezoelectric Actuation and Fiber Optic Sensing for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Procedures. IEEE Sens J. 2018 Jun 15;18(12):4961–4968. PubMed PMID: 30555284; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6289201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman D, Skanes AC, Tavallaei MA, et al. Design and Evaluation of a Catheter Contact-Force Controller for Cardiac Ablation Therapy. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2016 Nov;63(11):2301–2307. PubMed PMID: 26863646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman D, Skanes AC, Jones DL, et al. Eliminating the effects of motion during radiofrequency lesion delivery using a novel contact-force controller. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol.2019;30(9):1652–1662. PubMed PMID: 31353683.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar N, Wirekoh J, Saba S, et al. Soft Miniaturized Actuation and Sensing Units for Dynamic Force Control of Cardiac Ablation Catheters. Soft robotics. 2021 May 11;8(1):59–70. PubMed PMID: 32392453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar