Subcutaneous cardiac rhythm monitors: state of the art review

References

• Bisignani A, De Bonis S, Mancuso L, et al. Implantable loop recorder in clinical practice. J Arrhythm. 2019 (1880-4276 (Print));35:25–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee R, Mittal S. Utility and limitations of long-term monitoring of atrial fibrillation using an implantable loop recorder. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15(2):287–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afzal MR, Mease J, Koppert T, et al. Incidence of false-positive transmissions during remote rhythm monitoring with implantable loop recorders. Heart Rhythm. 2020;17(1):75–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afzal MR, Nadkarni A, Niemet L, et al. Resource use and economic implications of remote monitoring with subcutaneous cardiac rhythm monitors. Clin Electrophysiol. 2021. DOI:10.1016/j.jacep.2020.10.014.
   Google Scholar
• Afzal MR, Casmer A, Buck B, et al. Incidence and risk factors for early explantation of subcutaneous cardiac rhythm monitors. Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;6(14):1858–1860.
   Google Scholar
• Brignole M, Moya A, de Lange FJ, et al. 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(21):1883–1948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drak-Hernández Y, Toquero-Ramos J, Fernández JM, et al. Effectiveness and safety of remote monitoring of patients with an implantable loop recorder. Revista Española De Cardiología (English Edition). 2013;66(12):943–948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giada F, Gulizia M, Francese M, et al. Recurrent unexplained palpitations (RUP) study: comparison of implantable loop recorder versus conventional diagnostic strategy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(19):1951–1956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanna T, Diener H-C, Passman RS, et al. Cryptogenic stroke and underlying atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(26):2478–2486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oudeman M, Tjon A, Huijgen J, et al. A new approach to determine the results of minimally invasive pulmonary vein isolation using a continuous loop monitor: preliminary results. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;48(6):855–860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker LR, Pokushalov E, Sanders P, et al. Continuous cardiac monitoring around atrial fibrillation ablation: insights on clinical classifications and end points. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016;39(8):805–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg JS, Shah Y, Bhatt A, et al. Focal impulse and rotor modulation: acute procedural observations and extended clinical follow-up. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(2):192–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapa S, Epstein AE, Callans DJ, et al. Assessing arrhythmia burden after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using an implantable loop recorder: the ABACUS study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24(8):875–881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korada SKC, Buck B, Koppert T, et al. Implantable loop recorder insertion angle is not associated with sensed R-wave amplitude. Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;6(9):1185–1186.
   Google Scholar
• Lauschke J, Busch M, Haverkamp W, et al. New implantable cardiac monitor with three-lead ECG and active noise detection. Herz. 2017;42(6):585–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffel J, Wright DJ, Schäfer H, et al. Insertion of miniaturized cardiac monitors outside the catheter operating room: experience and practical advice. Ep Europace. 2017;19(10):1624–1629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Ep Europace. 2018;20(1):e1–e160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pürerfellner H, Sanders P, Pokushalov E, et al. Miniaturized Reveal LINQ insertable cardiac monitoring system: first-in-human experience. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(6):1113–1119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pürerfellner H, Sanders P, Sarkar S, et al. Adapting detection sensitivity based on evidence of irregular sinus arrhythmia to improve atrial fibrillation detection in insertable cardiac monitors. EP Europace. 2018;20(FI_3):f321–f8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Verma A, Champagne J, Sapp J, et al. Discerning the incidence of symptomatic and asymptomatic episodes of atrial fibrillation before and after catheter ablation (DISCERN AF): a prospective, multicenter study. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(2):149–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindricks G, Pokushalov E, Urban L, et al. Performance of a new leadless implantable cardiac monitor in detecting and quantifying atrial fibrillation results of the XPECT trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010;3(2):141–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon JG, Fares M, Hoyt W, et al. Diagnostic accuracy and safety of confirm Rx™ insertable cardiac monitor in pediatric patients. Pediatr Cardiol. 2021 Jan;42(1):142-147.
   Google Scholar
• Ciconte G, Saviano M, Giannelli L, et al. Atrial fibrillation detection using a novel three-vector cardiac implantable monitor: the atrial fibrillation detect study. EP Europace. 2017;19(7):1101–1108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders P, Pürerfellner H, Pokushalov E, et al. Performance of a new atrial fibrillation detection algorithm in a miniaturized insertable cardiac monitor: results from the Reveal LINQ Usability Study. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13(7):1425–1430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariani J, Lovibond S, Gould P, et al. The BIO|CONCEPT.BIOMONITOR III study: sensing performance and Home Monitoring transmission success of a new miniaturized implantable cardiac monitor. Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society Scientific Session Bangkok; Thailand; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Richards M, Perschbacher D, Saha S. A novel algorithm improves detection of arrythmias with regular R-R intervals. San Francisco, CA: Heart Rhythm Society; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Maines M, Zorzi A, Tomasi G, et al. Clinical impact, safety, and accuracy of the remotely monitored implantable loop recorder Medtronic Reveal LINQTM. Ep Europace. 2018;20(6):1050–1057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solbiati M, Costantino G, Casazza G, et al. Implantable loop recorder versus conventional diagnostic workup for unexplained recurrent syncope. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(4). DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD011637.pub2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podoleanu C, DaCosta A, Defaye P, et al. Early use of an implantable loop recorder in syncope evaluation: a randomized study in the context of the French healthcare system (FRESH study). Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2014;107(10):546–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farwell DJ, Freemantle N, Sulke N. The clinical impact of implantable loop recorders in patients with syncope. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(3):351–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Providência R, Candeias R, Morais C, et al. Financial impact of adopting implantable loop recorder diagnostic for unexplained syncope compared with conventional diagnostic pathway in Portugal. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2014;14(1):1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis S, Westby M, Pitcher D, et al. Implantable loop recorders are cost-effective when used to investigate transient loss of consciousness which is either suspected to be arrhythmic or remains unexplained. Europace. 2012;14(3):402–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Implantable loop recorder for unexplained syncope—Assessment Report. In: Medical Services Advisory Committee DoHaA, editor. Australia: Australian Government; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Zimetbaum PJ, Kim KY, Josephson ME, et al. Diagnostic yield and optimal duration of continuous-loop event monitoring for the diagnosis of palpitations: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128(11):890–895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(1):104–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen W-K, Sheldon RS, Benditt DG, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline for the evaluation and management of patients with syncope: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(5):e39–e110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brignole M, Vardas P, Hoffman E, et al. Indications for the use of diagnostic implantable and external ECG loop recorders. Europace. 2009;11(5):671–687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez MV, Mahaffey KW, Hedlin H, et al. Large-scale assessment of a smartwatch to identify atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(20):1909–1917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar