176
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Agreement of predicted intraocular lens power using swept-source optical coherence tomography and partial coherence interferometry

, , , , &
Pages 1219-1234 | Received 14 Jun 2021, Accepted 16 Nov 2021, Published online: 26 Nov 2021

References

  • Koch DD, Hill W, Abulafia A, et al. Pursuing perfection in intraocular lens calculations: i. Logical approach for classifying IOL calculation formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43:717–718.
  • Hill WE, Abulafia A, Wang L, et al. Pursuing perfection in IOL calculations. II. Measurement foibles: measurement errors, validation criteria, IOL constants, and lane length. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43:869–870.
  • Hui S, Yi L. Comparison of two optical biometers in intraocular lens power calculation. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014;62:931–934.
  • Srivannaboon S, Chirapapaisan C, Chonpimai P, et al. Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:2224–2232.
  • Kurian M, Negalur N, Das S, et al. Biometry with a new swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer: repeatability and agreement with an optical low-coherence reflectometry device. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:577–581.
  • Hoffer KJ, Hoffmann PC, Savini G. Comparison of a new optical biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a biometer using optical low-coherence reflectometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:1165–1172.
  • Arriola-Villalobos P, Almendral-Gómez J, Garzón N, et al. Agreement and clinical comparison between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer. Eye (Lond). 2017;31:437–442.
  • Jung S, Chin HS, Kim NR, et al. Comparison of repeatability and agreement between swept-source optical biometry and dual-Scheimpflug topography. J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:1516395.
  • Ventura BV, Ventura MC, Wang L, et al. Comparison of biometry and intraocular lens power calculation performed by a new optical biometry device and a reference biometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43:74–79.
  • Lee HK, Kim MK. Comparison of a new swept-source optical biometer with a partial coherence interferometry. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018;18:269.
  • Pereira JMM, Neves A, Alfaiate P, et al. Lenstar® LS 900 vs pentacam®-AXL: comparative study of ocular biometric measurements and intraocular lens power calculation. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2018;28:645–651.
  • Whang WJ, Yoo YS, Kang MJ, et al. Predictive accuracy of partial coherence interferometry and swept-source optical coherence tomography for intraocular lens power calculation. Sci Rep. 2018;8:13732.
  • El Chehab H, Agard E, Dot C. Comparison of two biometers: a swept-source optical coherence tomography and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2019;29:547–554.
  • Muzyka-Woźniak M, Oleszko A. Comparison of anterior segment parameters and axial length measurements performed on a Scheimpflug device with biometry function and a reference optical biometer. Int Ophthalmol. 2019;39:1115–1122.
  • Tamaoki A, Kojima T, Hasegawa A, et al. Clinical evaluation of a new swept-source optical coherence biometer that uses individual refractive indices to measure axial length in cataract patients. Ophthalmic Res. 2019;62:11–23.
  • Omoto MK, Torii H, Masui S, et al. Ocular biometry and refractive outcomes using two swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometers with segmental or equivalent refractive indices. Sci Rep. 2019;9:6557.
  • Cheng H, Li J, Cheng B, et al. Refractive predictability using two optical biometers and refraction types for intraocular lens power calculation in cataract surgery. Int Ophthalmol. 2020;40:1849–1856.
  • Chan TCY, Wan KH, Tang FY, et al. Repeatability and agreement of a swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer IOLMaster 700 versus a Scheimpflug imaging-based biometer AL-scan in cataract patients. Eye Contact Lens. 2020;46:35–45.
  • Liao X, Peng Y, Liu B, et al. Agreement of ocular biometric measurements in young healthy eyes between IOLMaster 700 and OA-2000. Sci Rep. 2020;10:3134.
  • Yang CM, Lim DH, Kim HJ, et al. Comparison of two swept-source optical coherence tomography biometers and a partial coherence interferometer. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0223114.
  • McAlinden C, Khadka J, Pesudovs K. Statistical methods for conducting agreement (comparison of clinical tests) and precision (repeatability or reproducibility) studies in optometry and ophthalmology. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011;31:330–338.
  • Tañá-Rivero P, Aguilar-Córcoles S, and Tello-Elordi C, et al. Agreement between 2 swept-source OCT biometers and a Scheimpflug partial coherence interferometer. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 ;47(4):488–495.
  • Hoffer K, Giacomo G. IOL power calculation in short and long eyes. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2017;6:330–331.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.