Value of colposcopy with dynamic spectral imaging in the detection and evolution of high-grade cervical lesions

References

• Ferris DG, Litaker M, Group ALTS. Interobserver agreement for colposcopy quality control using digitized colposcopic images during the ALTS trial. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2005;9:29–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duggan MA, Nation J. An audit of the cervical cancer screening histories of 246 women with carcinoma. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2012;16:263–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soutter WP, Diakomanolis E, Lyons D, et al. Dynamic spectral imaging: improving colposcopy. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(5):1814–1820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coronado PJ, Fasero M. Colposcopy combined with dynamic spectral imaging. A prospective clinical study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;196:11–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louwers J, Zaal A, Kocken M, et al. Dynamic spectral imaging colposcopy: higher sensitivity for detection of premalignant cervical lesions. BJOG. 2011;118(3):309–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louwers JA, Zaal A, Kocken M, et al. The performance of dynamic spectral imaging colposcopy depends on indication for referrals. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;139(3):452–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeNardis SA, Lavin PT, Livingston J, et al. Increased detection of precancerous cervical lesions with adjunctive dynamic spectral imaging. Int J Womens Health. 2017;9:717–725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cholkeri-Singh A, Lavin PT, Olson CG, et al., Digital colposcopy with dynamic spectral imaging for detection of cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 2 in low-grade referrals: the IMPROVE-COLPO study. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2018 ;22(1):21–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budithi S, Peevor R, Pugh D, et al. Evaluating colposcopy with dynamic spectral imaging during routine practice at five colposcopy clinics in Wales: clinical performance. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2018;83(3):234–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu D, Hu W. Combined dynamic spectral imaging and routine colposcopy strategy for the diagnosis of pre-cancerous cervical lesions. Exp Ther Med. 2019;18:1521–1526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coronado PJ, Fasero M. Correlating the accuracy of colposcopy to practitioner experience using the Dynamic Spectral Imaging System (DySIS). Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2014;78:224–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASCUS LSIL Triage Study Group: Walker JL, Wang SS, Schiffman M, et al. Predicting absolute risk of CIN3 during post-colposcopic follow-up: results from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:341–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeronimo J, Massad LS, Schiffman M. Visual appearance of the uterine cervix: correlation with human papillomavirus detection and type. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(1):47–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Marel J, van Baars R, Quint WG, et al. The impact of human papillomavirus genotype on colposcopic appearance: a cross-sectional analysis. BJOG. 2014;121(9):1117–1126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AEPCC-Guía: Prevención del cáncer de cuello de útero. Publicaciones AEPCC, Noviembre 2015/Oncoguía SEGO: prevención del cáncer de cuello de útero. Guías de práctica clínica en cáncer ginecológico y mamario. Publicaciones SEGO; 2014 Oct. [cited 2021 Oct 25]. Available from: https://www.aepcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/AEPCC_revista02_EN_PREVENTION-CC-2014_26032018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• CLART ® HPV2. [cited 2020 Nov 12]. Available from: http://www.genomica.es/en/in_vitro_diagnostics_products_clart_hpv2.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein J, Bentley J, Bosze P, et al. 2011 colposcopic terminology of the International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(1):166–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaal A, Louwers JA, Berkhof J, et al. Agreement between colposcopic impression and histological diagnosis among human papillomavirus type 16-positive women: a clinical trial using dynamic spectral imaging colposcopy. BJOG. 2012;119(5):537–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker B, Garcia F, Lozevski J, et al. The correlation between colposcopically directed cervical biopsy and loop electrosurgical excision procedure pathology and the effect of time on that agreement. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;82:22–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duesing N, Schwarz J, Choschzick M, et al. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;286(6):1549–1554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth BB, Petersen LK, Blaakaer J, et al. Accuracy of colposcopy-directed biopsy vs dynamic spectral imaging directed biopsy in correctly identifying the grade of cervical dysplasia in women undergoing conization: a methodological study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Feb 27;99:1064–1070. Epub ahead of print
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannella L, Mfuta K, Gardini G, et al. High-grade CIN on cervical biopsy and predictors of the subsequent cone histology results in women undergoing immediate conization. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Mar;186:68–74. Epub 2015 Jan 23. PMID: 25656975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Founta C, Papagiannakis E, Ratnavelu N, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of colposcopy with dynamic spectral imaging for cytology-negative/high-risk HPV positive (failed test of cure) after large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) of the cervix: results of the DySIS colposcopy 1 study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(1):e9560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huh WK, Sideri M, Stoler M, et al. Relevance of random biopsy at the transformation zone when colposcopy is negative. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(4):670–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomsen LT, Frederiksen K, Munk C, et al. Long-term risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse according to high-risk human papillomavirus genotype and semi-quantitative viral load among 33,288 women with normal cervical cytology. Int J Cancer. 2015;137(1):193–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Baars R, Griffin H, Wu Z, et al. Investigating diagnostic problems of CIN1 and CIN2 associated with high-risk HPV by combining the novel molecular biomarker PanHPVE4 With P16INK4a. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015;39(11):1518–1528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar